@neologist,
neologist wrote:Please provide chapter and verse for your citations.
What difference does it make who is the prophet ... if everything in the Bible is claimed to be the Word of God.
neologist wrote:God is neither omnipresent nor omniscient.
You may go and explain this to the faculty of theology at the local university.
http://www.cogwriter.com/god-omnipotent-omniscient-omnipresent.htm
neologist wrote:His holy spirit may be omnipresent, for it is by His spirit that He is aware.
If His holy spirit is omnipresent it should be able to be detected somehow (by the alpha and thetha frequencies of the 'Mind of God' or something of the kind).
neologist wrote:While He is capable of knowing our moral outcome in advance ...
Where do you know this from (that He is capable of knowing, that the outcome of the events is knowable at all, that our moral is predicable, and why should somebody know something in advance at all ... is He a fortune teller or what)?
neologist wrote: ... he is under no more obligation to peer into our future
You are talking as if you know what are 'the obligations' of God (if any) towards us?
neologist wrote:If we do not have free will, he could not offer us choice.
1. You don't have evidences that we have free will (even if it is not constrained by the Will of God, our will is constrained by the 'free will' of all the people around us, and by the limited resources of the Earth, and by the money that we may have and by the money of the people around us that they may have and that constrain our free will by forcing us to work for them and to provide goods and services ... for pennies, etc.)
2. The 'choice' is restrained by all of the above said constraints and the constraints may provide no choice, or some choice that we don't like.
3. '... He could not offer'
- Why should He offer something at all?
- Who are we to have offers by God ... or whomever?
- ... and you are not even sure whether it is 'could' or 'would' ... etc.
Most of your claims are stochastic with more or less probability component and you are presenting them as being absolute and indisputable truth.