Herald
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Oct, 2013 02:52 pm
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
Where will the water go?

This is not interesting. Much more interesting is when and how, for example.
And you didn't answer my question: Do you have the math?
Romeo Fabulini
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Oct, 2013 02:56 pm
@cicerone imposter,
"Of course there are missing links in the Theory of Evolution" wrote Dawkins to me during a brief snail-mail debate i had with him some years ago.
So until he and his mates can fill in the missing links, gaps and holes, it remains just a Theory..Smile
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Oct, 2013 03:08 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
The Prof was on In Confidence on Sky Arts today being probed by Laurie Taylor who is an atheist and retired professor.

I only saw a bit of it but Sky Arts usually repeats it's output. What was very noticeable was a fast tic under RD's eyes whenever he was talking.
Romeo Fabulini
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Oct, 2013 03:29 pm
@spendius,
Yeah Dawks has always struck me as a typical sweaty red-faced pouting neurotic, jumpy, irritable uptight atheist..Smile
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Oct, 2013 03:49 pm
@Herald,
You didn't ask me a question, you just sneered at me. The question presumes that you "have the math." I have no reason to believe that is true, especially as you seem determined to continue to claim that "the water" will go away--somewhere, somehow.

But i asked you two questions, and asked them before you started your present incoherent rant. I won't be answering any of your questions until you have answered mine.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Oct, 2013 03:52 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
You are incredibly stupid, perhaps even more incredibly stupid than Herald. Steam is just water in a gaseous form. It becomes a solid when it freezes--but it's still here, on earth, it hasn't gone anywhere. So the question remains, where will it go?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Oct, 2013 03:53 pm
@cicerone imposter,
You're wasting your time, because he doesn't understand what theory means in a scientific context.
0 Replies
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Oct, 2013 04:40 pm
Setanta said:
Quote:
@Romeo: You are incredibly stupid,

You sound incredibly angry mate, there's an old saying-"Whoever makes you angry controls you", so I guess that makes me your boss..Smile
"And don't you ever forget it boy!"
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/bouncerzia34.png~original
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Oct, 2013 04:44 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
Just because someone on a2k is called 'stupid' doesn't come from anger. It's an unemotional factual statement. Stupid is an adjective, but can also be used as a noun. A noun is a description of places, persons, or things, and no emotion is involved.
Romeo Fabulini
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Oct, 2013 04:55 pm
@cicerone imposter,

"Take a hike Jack!"
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/bouncerzia34.png~original
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Oct, 2013 05:23 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
Quote:
Yeah Dawks has always struck me as a typical sweaty red-faced pouting neurotic, jumpy, irritable uptight atheist..


That might be the reason he's on his third wife which is bound to cause him to disagree with what the Bible says about adultery. A common manifestation I do believe.
0 Replies
 
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Oct, 2013 05:24 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I suspect the proper term for mr Fab is troll.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Oct, 2013 05:25 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
Enjoy your delusions--it's all you've got going for you.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Oct, 2013 05:28 pm
@Cyracuz,
Quote:
I suspect the proper term for mr Fab is troll.


I suspect that you needed a needle to scrape that out of the bottom of the barrel Cyr.
0 Replies
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Oct, 2013 08:02 pm
Spendius said:
Quote:
[Dawkins] is on his third wife

Wow I never knew that..Smile
No wonder the first two got fed up, I bet it went like this-

WIFE (during their lovemaking)- "Oh Dickie darling, do you love me? Please whisper the things I want to hear!"

DAWKINS- "Alright sweety, a uniflagellar sperm cell that is motile is referred to as a spermatozoon, whereas a non-motile sperm cell is referred to as a spermatium. Sperm cells cannot divide and have a limited life span, but after fusion with egg cells during fertilization, a new organism begins developing, starting as a totipotent zygote. The human sperm cell is haploid, so that its 23 chromosomes can join the 23 chromosomes of the female egg to form a diploid cell. In mammals, sperm develops in the testicles and is released from the penis. It is also possible to extract sperm through TESE. Some sperm banks hold up to 170 litres of sperm......"

WIFE- "Oh shut the **** up!"

0 Replies
 
Herald
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Oct, 2013 09:18 pm
@Setanta,
Let's start from the very beginning - how did the water leave Venus, for example?
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Oct, 2013 04:54 am
@Herald,
No, let's answer the question. Where would the water go?
Romeo Fabulini
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Oct, 2013 11:02 am
It's not rocket science, the water boils off into space when the sun turns into a red giant, followed soon after by the planet itself breaking up as the sun sucks it in-
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/earth-red-g_zps9426ec7f.jpg~original

0 Replies
 
Herald
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Oct, 2013 11:14 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
No, let's answer the question. Where would the water go?

At 2200 deg. C it will start dissociating into hydrogen and oxygen, but at much lower temperature the water cycle might go high, ... and at much much lower temperature the surface of the Earth will become uninhebitable ... or at least extremely unbearable ... something like the swamp planet of Dagobah. This is a whole system of gases in equilibrium - a model should be made.
So, would you tell us now how much is the average annual concentration of CO2 in the air ... and where it is going? ... and what does that mean? ... and what is the function of approximation of the data?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Oct, 2013 12:14 pm
@Herald,
Nice physics; now apply that to our planet. Can you even guess when that might happen? I think not.
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Define God
  3. » Page 84
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 03/04/2025 at 08:04:34