neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 10:45 pm
kevnmoon wrote:
SORRY IT IS LONG..
Absolutely not! It is not burdensome; it rather affords a luminosity and joy producing a lightness, ease, and spirit, and ensuring confidence and security. Because if man does not believe in Divine Determining, he is compelled to bear a burden as heavy as the world on the shoulders of his spirit within a constricted space, which allows him only an insignificant independence and temporary freedom. For man is connected with the whole universe. He has infinite aims and desires. But since his power, will, and freedom are insufficient to meet a millionth of these, it may be understood how awesome is the burden of the distress he bears. Thus, belief in Divine Determining throws that burden in its entirety onto the ship of Divine Determining, allowing him to roam free within its perfections with perfect ease and perfect freedom of spirit and heart. It only negates the petty freedom of the evil-commanding soul and smashes its Pharaoh-like tyranny and lordship, and its acting as it wishes.
very complex
0 Replies
 
kevnmoon
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 05:26 am
bcs question is more complex than answer.. A lots questions in the world r waitng for answer for centuries
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 06:40 am
Kev, do you believe the nature of God may be understood only by the intellectual or academic elite?
0 Replies
 
kevnmoon
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 09:54 am
No Neologist.. most of the us are ordinary people. So Paradise is not only for elite people... ooo all the you r right. O.K. you r right again.. I accept. ic what u told
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 12:52 pm
wil y sp pkn lik that ps
0 Replies
 
queen annie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 05:17 pm
Paradise is for everyone. [/i]

Smart, dumb, rich, poor--fat, thin, blonde or bald.

One condition: one must die in this plane.
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 05:55 pm
queen annie wrote:
One condition: one must die in this plane.


What other "plane" would we die in?
0 Replies
 
queen annie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 06:22 pm
Good point!
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 07:52 pm
Well, yeah. That's one thing I always disliked about heavenly rewards.

You had to die first! Bummer!

The angels were willing to defy God in order to live on earth. What could possibly be wrong with where we are right now?
0 Replies
 
kevnmoon
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 07:59 pm
Neologist..
Now I am translating what you r saying.. You r afraid of death... lol..
0 Replies
 
kevnmoon
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 08:02 pm
Neologist.. believe best Angel takes souls.. Be calm..lol
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 08:10 pm
kevnmoon wrote:
Neologist.. believe best Angel takes souls.. Be calm..lol
If we were created to live in heaven, why were Adam and Eve not told so?

Kev, you will be hard pressed to show that the bible supports the concept of an immortal soul.

Would you like to try?
0 Replies
 
kevnmoon
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 08:27 pm
Some thoughts..

''if anyone studies his own life and self, he perceives an immortal spirit. Indeed, in the course of occupying its body for a number of years the spirit causes the body to change considerably, yet the spirit self-evidently remains constant. In which case, although the body is ephemeral, it does not affect the spirit's permanence, nor spoil its nature, even though the spirit is completely naked at death. However, in the course of life, the spirit gradually changes its body-clothes, and at the time of death, it is suddenly undressed. It has been established through certain conjecture, indeed, through observation, that the body subsists though the spirit; in which case, the spirit does not subsist through the body. Rather, since the spirit subsists and is dominant of itself, the body may be dispersed and gathered together again as it wishes; it will not infringe the spirit's independence.

In fact, the body is the spirit's house, it is its home; it is not its clothes. What clothes the spirit is a subtle, fine sheath, something which may be likened to a body, which is to some extent constant, and is ethereal and appropriate for the spirit. At the time of death, then, the spirit is not completely naked, it leaves its home dressed in its body-like sheath.'' BSN
0 Replies
 
kevnmoon
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 08:33 pm
and also Neologist...
''Can it be said of an All-Wise One of Glory, an Imperishable Preserver, Who includes and preserves in the tiny dot-like seed of a mighty tree the programme and law of its formation, which to some degree resembles a spirit, "How can He preserve the spirits of the dead?"
BSN
0 Replies
 
kevnmoon
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 08:41 pm
and also
''For example, should a fig-tree die and be dispersed, the law of its formation, which is like its spirit, will continue in its tiny seeds; it will not die. And so, since even the most commonplace and weak commanding laws are thus connected to permanence and continuance, the human spirit must be connected not only with permanence and immortality, but with all eternity.'' BSN
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 08:44 pm
Neologist, One time I said; "God is truth" A very short response in another thread. You responded. I did not respond back but I read what you said.

God is truth and everything there is to know. God is the knowledge of right and wrong. God is the travel through infinity and time all at once at will.
0 Replies
 
kevnmoon
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 08:45 pm
''For example, the day, year, lifetime of man, and revolution of God's great clock known as the earth resemble the dials of a weekly clock of ours that tell the seconds, minutes, hours and days; each the forerunner of the following, they give news of one another; they turn and function. Like they show morning after night, and spring after winter, they intimate that after death the morning of the resurrection will appear from that instrument, that vast clock.'' BSN
0 Replies
 
queen annie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Mar, 2006 12:13 am
Amigo wrote:
One time I said; "God is truth"

God is truth and everything there is to know.


Exclamation

I think there is a base, a root perhaps--something which remains when all the rest (illusion) is stripped away. This 'thing' has an utterly pure nature that is understood/experienced on several levels: Light, love, truth, mind, thought, energy...

These things are part of every human. But I feel they are 'God.' These are that which 'will not be moved.'
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Mar, 2006 12:16 am
Amigo wrote:
Neologist, One time I said; "God is truth" A very short response in another thread. You responded. I did not respond back but I read what you said.

God is truth and everything there is to know. God is the knowledge of right and wrong. God is the travel through infinity and time all at once at will.
OK; but I can't find your post in search.

I believe it is impossible for God to lie. And I believe he has made his purpose and intentions understandable to even the least sophisticated among us.

That is why I constantly ask those who are intellectual among us to prune their posts for clarity.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Mar, 2006 12:19 am
kevnmoon wrote:
''For example, the day, year, lifetime of man, and revolution of God's great clock known as the earth resemble the dials of a weekly clock of ours that tell the seconds, minutes, hours and days; each the forerunner of the following, they give news of one another; they turn and function. Like they show morning after night, and spring after winter, they intimate that after death the morning of the resurrection will appear from that instrument, that vast clock.'' BSN
This is what Solomon had to say in Ecclesiastes 9:5,6:

"For the living are conscious that they will die; but as for the dead, they are conscious of nothing at all, neither do they anymore have wages, because the remembrance of them has been forgotten. 6 Also, their love and their hate and their jealousy have already perished, and they have no portion anymore to time indefinite in anything that has to be done under the sun."

How does this fit with your understanding?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Define God
  3. » Page 17
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 02/01/2025 at 07:03:05