2
   

scary little changes

 
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 12:12 am
Momma Angel wrote:
My point is this, man is trying to usurp God's laws. Man is trying to make God's laws to be what man wants and not what God wants.

I gather from quite a few different posters they feel God is being unfair to them. I gather they think they know better than God because they think God should change according to the changes in society. I believe that is just backwards. It is society that should be changing to follow God's laws. He said things were wrong, sinful, immoral, etc., for a reason. And IMO the reason becomes clearer and clearer everyday (not to all, unfortunately) but the more society makes things acceptable or legal that are against God's laws, the more the decline of mankind. Now, all this is what I believe. I believe these things because that is what the Bible teaches me and I believe the Bible is the Word of God.

I understand how hard that is for some to understand and yet, others understand it perfectly. Different views, different people, different world.
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1680571#1680571



Quote:

Do I think it should be a Christian Homeland? Hmmm, well I won't lie. I believe if it was we would be better off. However, I realize this is an unrealistic expectation. If I didn't believe it should be a Christian homeland (actually Christian world is what I'd like) then my convictions would mean nothing.

The laws abolished by the New Testament were the ritual laws. The hygiene and food laws were the laws abolished, not the Ten Commandments nor the basic laws of Chrisitianity.

Like I said, I will work WITHIN THE LAW to lobby for the laws I would like to have, just as I would expect EVERYONE to work WITHIN THE LAW to lobby for the laws they would like to have.

I cannot go along with any law that I believe is in direct conflict with God's law. Abortion is legal so that just means it's legal in man's world. I would never have one so I can stick to my beliefs.

In the end, everyone has to deal with God on their own. But, that doesn't mean I would be a responsible Christian if I stopped lobbying for the laws as I think they should be.
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1682531#1682531


You have no idea how these words and the potential of them becoming reality haunt me. As I said about in reference to Afghanistan, I would dedicate my life to overthrowing a theocracy that was established in America.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 12:13 am
Setanta,

I am in no way embarrassed by what I believe, how I believe, or how much I know. I am happy to share what I believe. What I stated is what I believe as a Christian.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 12:20 am
This is why people get so disgusted with you--you make asssertions about what something is, and when you get shot down, you retreat into that "this is what i believe" crapola . . . stop making bald assertions about the truth when you don't know what the hell you're talking about, and you won't have these problems.

I know you're not embarrassed--you're obviously too ignorant of the diversity of christian belief and the history of christianity to be embarrassed by what you clearly do not know.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 12:21 am
J_B,

There is a big difference in what I think you might be referring to here. I do not subscribe to the Christianity at all costs doctrine.

I said what I would like according to my beliefs. I know it will never happen. All I can do is lobby within the law for the laws I feel we should have. This is every person's individual right.

Just as I would like there not to be same sex marriages there are probably just as many or more that are lobbying for them. What is the difference? To me, there is none. We all have the right. I will live by the laws of the land. That's the way it is.

I am sorry that my views haunt you. No need to. I don't know how many times I have to say that I do not agree with those like Pat Robertson, yet, it seems I am viewed that way no matter what. Well, so be it. I know what I believe. I don't condemn anyone for their choice of religion or lack of it.

It doesn't seem to matter that I work within the law and try my best to not personally attack anyone because I don't agree with them.

Don't you think that perhaps I am bothered by the fact that abortion is legal? That homosexuality seems to be so widely accepted? Of course I am, but that doesn't give me the right to hurt anyone because of it. I only assert my rights as an American citizen and lobby for what I believe is right.

Setanta,

I've about had my fill of you. What you think is absolutely of no consequence to me. I don't care what you think I know or don't know. If you don't like it, don't read it.
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 12:31 am
Momma Angel wrote:
Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:
Certain things? How about sharing the banner space amongst different Dieties on different bill and coin denominations, and for us atheists and agnostics we could have "We Trust No Gods".


How often do you even recognize this is on money? Do you at all? Like I said before, I do not believe there are any other deities. There is one True Living God, so why would I want to allow in Buddha We Trust, etc.? If you don't trust God, then don't. No one is forcing you to. Come up with a compromise I can live with like the Pledge of Allegiance and I will accept it. Until then, I don't want it changed.


Well since you don't want to share the banner space then the only reasonable compromise is to return the currency to it's original secular form, the same as we agreed to with the pledge.

Momma Angel wrote:
Mesquite Wrote:
Quote:
I'll give you this. With the current loonies in charge, things are headed that direction.


To be honest with you, Mesquite. I'm not sure it's the ones in charge right now that will be involved in the one world government. That is something I just don't know. I just know it's going to happen.

My reference was in respect to the speed with which the current administration is depleting our military readiness, our financial resources and our international standing.

Momma Angel wrote:
Mesquite, you are going to get what you want. God will be taken off money. He will be taken off buildings. You are going to get what you want. Mine and others efforts won't stop it. Hopefully, they may slow the process down, but it will happen.

Said like a true rapture fan.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 12:35 am
I was talking about the one world government and you were talking about something else.

Yep, a true rapture fan indeed.
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 12:58 am
Holy crap, momma...
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 01:02 am
Rapture people. Oh dear.
0 Replies
 
Wolf ODonnell
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 06:47 am
Sheesh. It's only taking some words off a piece of money. It's not as if money was the Bible or money was holy in some way.

Three-quarters of people in the UK regard themselves as Christians, yet not one of them would think twice if "In God We Trust" was taken off their money.

No one would care. If they're Christian, so be it. Does their money have to be Christian too?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 08:14 am
I thought it was the root of...well, you know.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 08:39 am
I assume that after the rapture, seeing as all of the Christians will be gone, it would be OK if we take God off of our money?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 08:47 am
Why the insistence on conducting this debate at the lowest possible level of understanding.

As Willian Jennings Bryan once said so wisely-

"The people of Nebraska are for free silver and I am for free silver.I will look up the arguments later."

If there's a forgiving God we are all going to heaven and if there's a vengeful God you lot are all going to hell:the believers for the arrogance of second guessing His intentions and the non believers for insubordination.

It's all about money and power and rhetoric and general all round trouble-making and,it must be admitted,simple fun.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 08:50 am
Wolf_ODonnell wrote:
Sheesh. It's only taking some words off a piece of money. It's not as if money was the Bible or money was holy in some way.

Three-quarters of people in the UK regard themselves as Christians, yet not one of them would think twice if "In God We Trust" was taken off their money.

No one would care. If they're Christian, so be it. Does their money have to be Christian too?


In Canada, even the Queen of England was taken off most of our money. Razz

I, personally, do not see a need for God to be involved in the evil and greed associated with the almighty dollar.
0 Replies
 
LionTamerX
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 08:58 am
Wow,
Spendius and MoAn are neck and neck in the sense-making department...
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 09:03 am
LT-

Self abnegation doesn't suit you.You are at least level surely and after the salad fork job I would say edging ahead a little.
0 Replies
 
yitwail
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 09:30 am
ebrown_p wrote:
I assume that after the rapture, seeing as all of the Christians will be gone, it would be OK if we take God off of our money?


nope, unless there are only 144,000 Christians in the world at the Rapture.
0 Replies
 
username
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 09:47 am
yitwail, yeah, you're right, 144,000 is probably high.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 10:13 am
LionTamer X-

I have,on second thoughts,decided to take your earlier remark more seriously than I did.

Would you mind explaining what you meant when you commented on 1704690.
0 Replies
 
LionTamerX
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 10:24 am
spendius wrote:
LionTamer X-

I have,on second thoughts,decided to take your earlier remark more seriously than I did.

Would you mind explaining what you meant when you commented on 1704690.


I would be glad to explain my comments re your earlier post, but I'll need to get a couple of pints of the table waters under my cummerbund first.

(Much like the salad fork thingy, I was just having a bit of fun.)

p.s. the lowest possible level of understanding insistence is necessary to keep some of the B-leaguers in the game.
0 Replies
 
Chai
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2005 11:35 am
sozobe wrote:
Momma, with all due respect, your repetitions of the fact that you believe something do not further a discussion. I can say that I believe that all cats are emissaries of the devil, and point to a website to support my assertion. If people point out the flaws in that website and ask me to provide other support for my position, either with reputable cites or a logical construct of my own, and I just repeatedly state that I believe that cats are emissaries of the devil, that you can believe what you want, we can agree to disagree, but I still firmly believe they are Satanic and that's that... there just isn't much room for rational discussion.

Do you see that?


Thanks sozobe! Been reading this thread with interest, and thinking other other threads where MA just "shuts down" like this, which is, well, all the time. You said it very well.

Totally off the topic of the thread for a moment, but.....

MA - You know how some people use their hand a lot when speaking? If you ask them to sit on their hands and tell a story, they just can't do it.

There are a few phrases you use frequently that just grates on my nerves, for the simple reason that when you use them, it just totally negates what someone else is saying, for no good reason.

I'll bet if you took these phrases out of your writing, you would be incapable of carrying on a conversation, as these expressions are the hands you are sitting on.

How many times do we have to hear.....

I'm sorry but.......translation: I'm not sorry, you're wrong, but saying the word sorry allows me to continue with my 'but' which is just going to rehash what I just said.

That's just what I believe......translation: My mind is closed to even considering anything else. Others words are so many raindrops bouncing off my force field.

Sidenote: I hate the word 'just' and try to avoid using it....have you ever noticed that many times when someone says 'just', they mean the opposite?
For Instance:
I was JUST kinding - No you weren't, you're using the excuse of humor to insult/redicule
I JUST wanted to know - No you don't, you want to know something about me that's none of your business.
I JUST don't see why you don't/can't - Yes you do, but you're going to ignore it, hoping that causes things to go your way.

OK - to continue.

I believe what I believe, and you believe what you believe......translation: You are wrong.

I respect what.......translation: no you don't, it's another way of throwing a 'just' in there, so you can rehash what you just said.

I'm a Christian, and......yeah MA, I think you could totally never say that again here and we would all know you're a Christian. OK, message received, you're a Christian, can we get past that?

now, if you respond to any of the above, it'll be in the vein of.....well, that's JUST how I express myself.

You know what I believe in my heart? You don't want a discussion at all. A discussion implies that one person may actually say something that will make someone else think, Hey, I never thought of that, good point, actually, maybe that will even change my mind about this aspect of what we're talking about.

I believe you JUST want to keep going over and over the same points.

I learn new stuff from so many other posters here, every day I think "wow, I didn't know that" or "jeez, that's interesting, I'll have to think about that"
Frankly, I never get that from you.

I have a friend that I play this informal game of "what if" with.
We have some similar beliefs, some disimilar.
One of us will ponder "what if......" something really different from how we have been raised to believe.

We have such a great time, and from taking down these artifical walls we put up of how things are, sometimes we get these incredibly complex ideas and epiphanies.
We both come away with our basic ideas intact, but with a better appreciation as to why.
Neither one of us believes we're going to be struck by lightning, we're excerising our brains.

Why are you so afraid of doing that? (please, that's a rhetorical question, I absolutely know what your answer would be.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 07:21:59