92
   

Atheists... Your life is pointless

 
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Wed 14 Dec, 2005 06:23 pm
Quote:

Are you more like an agnostic then? It is one thing to believe and is quite another to have seen. To know...is a whole other story entirely.

The word 'know' gets used far too flippantly sometimes.
For instance. The 'heavens gate' cult knew they would be whisked away on a spaceship shortly after drinking their poisoned kool-aide. Scientologists know that the spirits of dead aliens called 'thetans' live in our bodys and cause all of our unhappy feelings.
Just what is the value of this kind of knowledge anyway?
And what is it precisely that separates the above two examples from any other form of 'spiritual knowledge' from any other religion? (let's use christianity and 'knowing jesus' as an example)
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Wed 14 Dec, 2005 06:33 pm
Doktor S,

I am curious know how your self-description as "Satanist" fits into this discussion.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Wed 14 Dec, 2005 06:59 pm
As far as I can tell, it doesn't.
Other than the fact my position is afiliate to that philosophy.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Wed 14 Dec, 2005 07:48 pm
Doktor S wrote:
timberlandko wrote:
My point of contenton with both the religionist/deist and areligious/atheist belief set is the exclusionary absolutism inherent to embracing either proposition; both are purely, and equally, assumptive constructs.

What exactly is it you think 'the atheist belief' is?
Sounds like you've talk to one too many apologists to me.

In fact, there is no atheist belief, and when you look closely you can see how ludicrous the idea of an a-theist belief is.
Simply, an atheist is someone that lacks a belief in god. The lack of belief can not itself BE a belief, as per the law of non contradiction.
Atheism and theism are not oposite sides of the same polemic fence, that is just something christians like to forward to advance their argument.
A theist is making a claim that something exists.
An atheist is not making a claim at all, an atheist is simply 'everyone else' that doesn't accept claims of spiritual boogeymen.

Poppycock; mere sophistic word gamery. A deist believes in a deity concept, an atheist believes any affirmative deity concept is founded in error - such is the nature of the two paradigms; indeed they are opposite sides of the same coin, both are belief sets, by definition. They are neither more nor less than what their respective proponents believe.

Quote:
And pre-emptively, please do not go gather a bunch of dictionary references from christianized dictionaries that define atheist the wrong way.

Trust me, partner, that's something you'll not likely see me do.

Quote:
Simply more misinformation.

Precisely.


Quote:
The OED is the only one worth anything.

For your edification, and to refute your assertion via the source to which you yourself ascribe ultimate authority in such issue, here is the OED* definition of atheism:

* OED (Second Edition), Vols I-XX: Simpson, J. A. and Weiner, E. S. (Eds)
(1989) Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
ISBN: 0198611862


Quote:
atheism
ay
' thee-iz'm

Disbelief in, or denial of, the existence of a god or gods.
(emphasis added by timber, just in case anyone might for some reason otherwise miss or skip over the first word of the defintion).

Whether to the affirmative or to the negative, to believe in or to not believe in a thing, state, or condition involves the excersize of that aspect or atribute of intellectual activity defined as belief. One believes the way one does, regardless how one cares to characterize one's beliefs, and regardless as well whether or not that which is believed is consistent with fact. A disbelief is itself every bit as much an expression or endorsement of belief in its own particular foundational proposition as is any other belief in its own paricular foundational proposition.

Here is what the online Oxford has to say:
Quote:
ATHEISM

/ay'/thi-iz'm/

• noun the belief that God does not exist.


Quote:
And for the record, I am not an atheist.

Neither am I. I am, however, areligious.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Wed 14 Dec, 2005 08:04 pm
Asking timber, Bartikus wrote:

Are you more like an agnostic then?

Fervently so. I see that as the only logical, intellectually honest, academically valid, forensically sound appraisal of and position with regard to the issue. I BELIEVE neither one way nor the other; I simply do not know and I would not presume to assert otherwise.

Quote:
It is one thing to believe and is quite another to have seen.

Indeed. Don't believe all you "see".
Quote:
To know...is a whole other story entirely.

Precisely the point - what is known is that the thesis remains unresolved, despite belief to the contrary on the part of those who assume whichever answer they find convenient and comforting to be THE Answer. No matter how dearly held, nor whether to the affirmative or the negative of any thesis, a belief remains neither more nor less than a belief. Facts and knowledge are alltogether different things, empirical, objective, concrete, dispassionate, not ephemeral, transcendant, convenient, comforting, and self-aggrandizing.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Wed 14 Dec, 2005 08:45 pm
Timberlandko,
I think you are setting up a false dichotomy. There is no dualism at play here. We have one group making a claim as to a positive, and another not accepting that claim.
I really wonder how you equate not accepting a claim as being the same as making a contrary claim.
I define the word atheist via direct translation from the greek.
"a" = no/not/without
"theism" = god-belief
therefore:
"atheism" = without god-belief.

Quote:

Neither am I. I am, however, areligious.

Well, I suppose we share some common ground..though I prefer the term unreligious
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Wed 14 Dec, 2005 09:04 pm
I submit, Doktor S, that it is you who fails to recognize the dichotomy; one who believes there to be a god or gods is a theist, one who believes there to be no god or gods is an atheist. Being without belief in a thing, state, or condition while possesed of the knowledge of the existance of belief in said thing state or condition perforce entails that one believes that thing, state, or condition at question does not pertain.

Now, if one without knowledge that there be a contrary position were to assert or aver that there be no god or gods, that perhaps could serve to in some wise validate your proposition. However, in real life an irresolvable contradiction arises in that without knowledge of the thing, state, or condition disputed or denied there could be no such dispute or denial; the requisite concept would be inoperative for the simple fact it would not exist.

You present not an argument, but an absurdity.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Wed 14 Dec, 2005 10:20 pm
I just see no reason to create a dichotomy. How you assert I am creating one is beyond me.. A dichotomy involves two distinct but opposite positions, what I am asserting is a position and a non-position.
Yes, even people that haven't heard of omnipotent invisible friends can be atheists, by definition. One does not have to assert 'there is no god' to be an atheist. Not if you go by the direct translated definition of the word.
As I already stated, the lack of belief cannot itself be a belief, because that violates the law of non contradiction. This isn't difficult.
Yes, a good deal of atheists assert 'there cannot be a god!' but a rather large percentage are not asserting anything other than 'show me the evidence'
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Wed 14 Dec, 2005 10:26 pm
I agree with Doktor S's interpretation of atheist. Not all cultures believe in religions based on christianity, but we can find people that do not follow the religion of their culture for whatever reason. They do not consider themselves "atheist." They in no way appose the religion of their culture; they just don't believe in the religion(s) and live their life accordingly. Confucianism, Taosim, and Buddhism are good examples.
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Thu 15 Dec, 2005 02:34 am
Doktor S wrote:
Quote:

Are you more like an agnostic then? It is one thing to believe and is quite another to have seen. To know...is a whole other story entirely.

The word 'know' gets used far too flippantly sometimes.
For instance. The 'heavens gate' cult knew they would be whisked away on a spaceship shortly after drinking their poisoned kool-aide. Scientologists know that the spirits of dead aliens called 'thetans' live in our bodys and cause all of our unhappy feelings.
Just what is the value of this kind of knowledge anyway?
And what is it precisely that separates the above two examples from any other form of 'spiritual knowledge' from any other religion? (let's use christianity and 'knowing jesus' as an example)[/quote[/b]

Your right i think...How does one know the 'heavens gate cult' were not whisked away on a spaceship? By what they see alone?Faith?

Why would the question of knowing be limited to spiritual knowledge? Does anyone know how many planets are in our solar system? The most any man could say is, "as far as we know....10"! Based on what? What we have observed thusfar. We who? Mankind...

Suppose an alien race came forward to men to show them 'proof' of the sort (physical proof) in which men rely on today in the fields of science, that there was in fact 11 planets in this solar system? Would we still know?

No. Could the alien race be wrong sure...could they simply be misleading man for their own purposes......absolutely. Unless we believe/know that such a race (either ourselves or another) are infallible in their judgements and their sight.

There could be more than meets mankinds eyes. There could be more than meets the eyes/and perceptions of any intelligence.

Unless the intelligence be all-knowing, all-seeing, all-perceiving etc.
God

Man does not know enough about the physical world let alone a spiritual one to be conclusive on such matters.

"And what is it precisely that separates the above two examples from any other form of 'spiritual knowledge' from any other religion? (let's use christianity and 'knowing jesus' as an example"

I don't know....do you? As such I can neither measure the true value of such knowledge?

Who can?
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Thu 15 Dec, 2005 03:08 am
Doktor S wrote:
I just see no reason to create a dichotomy. How you assert I am creating one is beyond me.. A dichotomy involves two distinct but opposite positions, what I am asserting is a position and a non-position.
Yes, even people that haven't heard of omnipotent invisible friends can be atheists, by definition. One does not have to assert 'there is no god' to be an atheist. Not if you go by the direct translated definition of the word.
As I already stated, the lack of belief cannot itself be a belief, because that violates the law of non contradiction. This isn't difficult.

Then why are you having such difficulty with it? A theist believes there is a god or gods, and an atheist believes there not to be. It is not a matter of asserting or creating a dichotomy, it is in the case of your proposition as stated a matter of failing or refusing to see the dichotomy which exists. To assert that disbelief equates to a non-position is absurd - disbelief is the state or condition of believing some other belief is unfounded. It is not a non-position, it is the position that the opposite position is unfounded. Obverse or reverse, they are the 2 faces of the same coin -

Quote:
Yes, a good deal of atheists assert 'there cannot be a god!' but a rather large percentage are not asserting anything other than 'show me the evidence'

I submit that those who say "Show me the proof" are not atheists so much as they are skeptical agnostics (the proposition to which personally I happen to subscribe, BTW); they acknowledge - or at the very least assert - that they are open to the possibility of proof, whether or not they stipulate to any level of probability that proof ever might be forthcoming. Such a position unambiguously equates to believing there most likely to be no god or gods, while permitting the possibilty, however remote, that same might exist. "I believe that "X" is not so" is every bit as much an expression of belief as is "I believe that "X" is so".
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Thu 15 Dec, 2005 05:38 am
Timber.....you cannot base what is truth on what a man sees.

How many planets are there for sure? You don't know

Based on what we saw...there was 9.

Based on what we see today....10

Based on what we see tomorrow.....?God is the final authority

Truth can only be seen by faith in Jesus Christ.

God said that his children operate by faith.

Jesus said "He was the way the truth and the life...No one comes to the father but by me!"

Your logic is correct concerning the position of an atheist.

timber....the enemy of God will soon try to show himself(proving) who is God and who is a saviour.

The enemy of God can only have authority over man by convincing man(proving) who he is.

the enemy of God can only have authority over man.....by convincing you of a lie as was with Adam And Eve.

My God revealed to me by Jesus Christ...has authority whether any man is convinced of it or not.

Determine by your own logic where each derives there authority and know the truth!

Does the true God need to prove his authority to anyone or anything?

NO!

The Bible gives testimony that "confusion does not come from God, but from the evil one"!

This....man is trying to confuse you !

God does not derive his authority or power from our belief in him...it is the other way around.

In Jesus name I pray...God's will be done on earth as it is in heaven.
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Thu 15 Dec, 2005 06:25 am
Sin to God...is nothing more than an error on our part.

It occurs when we believe a lie.

If we commit an error God still loves us and will forgive us through Christ!

God made his plan simple.....not complex.

Those who seek complex answers are only searching to make an appeal to their own LOFTY INTELLIGENCE! PRAISING themselves.

How intelligent or lofty can one be in the presence of the all knowing all powerful God?

God made it simple...for those who see themselves as such in his presence.

"He has revealed the truth unto babes"

Your logic is simple and sweet
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Thu 15 Dec, 2005 06:31 am
Read what Jesus has done and Know God's Love for man.

God.....is our father.

He has both authority and wisdom to tell us right from wrong........but..and most importantly above all things.

He loves us like we know a father should.....even above our expectations.

That love is demonstrated in Jesus.
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Thu 15 Dec, 2005 06:35 am
Read what Jesus has done and Know God's Love for man.

God.....is our father.

He has both authority and wisdom to tell us right from wrong........but..and most importantly above all things.

He loves us like we know a father should.....even above our expectations.

That love is demonstrated in Jesus.

The word of God testifies that Jesus name is above every name.....meaning adam and eve never needed to run and Hide.

When we run from God and look for a complicated answer or seek to justify ourselves...we are in the company of evil and confusion.

We only have to realize our errors and say we are sorry....he loves us!

Then we come be in the company of God.....even forever.

The truth will set men free. In Jesus name....amen
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Thu 15 Dec, 2005 06:39 am
You're leaning pretty heavily on Doctor S there, Big Bird, on the basis of what he accurately has pointed out are the definitions of christian dictionaries. I exactly match your description of someone who has no reason to believe in god, but does not assert that there is no god. On the same basis which Doctor S has elucidated, that i am, therefore, "without god," in the definition of theists, i am atheist--without god.

Seems to me that you've been counting dancing angels on the heads of pins in your exercise . . .
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Thu 15 Dec, 2005 06:56 am
Setanta wrote:
You're leaning pretty heavily on Doctor S there, Big Bird, on the basis of what he accurately has pointed out are the definitions of christian dictionaries. I exactly match your description of someone who has no reason to believe in god, but does not assert that there is no god. On the same basis which Doctor S has elucidated, that i am, therefore, "without god," in the definition of theists, i am atheist--without god.

Seems to me that you've been counting dancing angels on the heads of pins in your exercise . . .


An atheist believes that there is no God.....They assert a truth.

Agnostics...do not believe or know.....if there is or isn't

One truth....no man is God
all should realize that.

What God needs to prove his authority over man?

Only one who derives his authority from a spectacle (show)

"wicked is the generation that asks for a sign"

The enemy of us all will provide it

Not the God who is and always will be.

His authority remains.....even if not one of man believes.

His authority is HIS

Devils authority comes from our belief in his lies alone.

He will demonstrate to the world his authority over man by killing the Christians.

Why his demonstrations?.....it's his last and only way to prove to others his......assumed authority.

Read the word of God

seek the truth before it is too late

May God's will be done in Jesus name.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Thu 15 Dec, 2005 06:57 am
Save your unfounded statements from authority for those who are stupid enough to play your witless games with you, Barfikus--among whose number you needn't include me.
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Thu 15 Dec, 2005 06:58 am
Setanta wrote:
Save your witless statements from authority for those who are stupid enough to play your witless games with you, Barfikus--among whose number you needn't include me.


It is not for me to determine.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Thu 15 Dec, 2005 06:58 am
God rest ye merry Christians, put a sock in your mouth
Remember Christ is the reason the world is headed south
Well not just Jesus but Buddha and Mohammed too
Oh tiny is your brain filled with faithful goo
Faith and goo Oh tiny when filled with faith and goo
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Atheism - Discussion by littlek
American Atheists Barred from holding Office - Discussion by edgarblythe
Richard Dawkins doesn't exist! - Question by Jay2know
The New State Religion: Atheism - Question by Expert2
Is Atheism the New Age Religion? - Question by Expert2
Critical thinking on the existence of God - Discussion by Susmariosep
Are evolution and the big bang true? - Discussion by Johnjohnjohn
To the people .. - Question by Johnjohnjohn
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 06/30/2025 at 09:35:07