92
   

Atheists... Your life is pointless

 
 
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Sun 6 Jan, 2013 05:27 pm
@Arella Mae,
Quote:
Actually, it's because of what you just posted. I see your real feelings have now come out. I ignored you but yes, was curious about what you'd have to say. I'm glad I looked. It only proved to me my assessment of you was right. Don't bother responding because I won't be reading it again.


Why did you say that I was on your permanent ignore list just to turn around and tell me that you do not like me again? Do you see why I have a problem with some Christian's sincerity?
0 Replies
 
Zardoz
 
  1  
Wed 9 Jan, 2013 07:15 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM good Christians cut the baby out of one of the blacks they lynched in the old south and used their heels to crush the fetus’s head and that was less than a 100 years ago. If Mosses ordered the slaughter of children he is no different than Charles Manson. A murdered child is a murdered child. Murdering children is either right or wrong but it can’t be both. Because one is held up as a role model and moral example doesn’t alter the facts. You can’t abhor Mansion and hold Mosses up as a moral example for your children. One is no better than the other.
0 Replies
 
Zardoz
 
  1  
Wed 9 Jan, 2013 07:36 pm
@Val Killmore,
Val Killmore the fact is both Mosses ordering the slaughter of innocent children and Adam Lanza slaughter in Newtown have a lot in common they both involve the senseless slaughter of innocent children who had done nothing to deserve it. If Lanza had been a Buddhist he would not have been bought to worship and admire a mass child killer. Why some people can ignore all of the savage behavior of primitive tribal society and hold it up as an example of morality is beyond me. Then they claim that worship of these child murders is responsible for morality in our society.

Of course it involves speculation but people with mental problems are drawn to religious cults. Do you believe if the investigators found Adam Lanza’ bible open to the passage where Mosses orders the killing of the innocent children and underlined that they would make it public? Would Christians question the bible morality if they did?
0 Replies
 
Zardoz
 
  1  
Wed 9 Jan, 2013 08:12 pm
@izzythepush,
Izzythepush I located Psalms 137.9 in a King Version of a bible I was given in 1960.
“Happy shall he be, that dasheth thy little ones against the stones.”
I guess it was very important during biblical times that you enjoy your work. I suspect Adam Lanza would agree whole heartedly. You can tell both Adam Lanza and the writer of Psalm really enjoyed killing children.

The facts were as previously stated the writer of Psalm enjoyed killing children.
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Wed 9 Jan, 2013 08:35 pm
@Zardoz,
Quote:
I guess it was very important during biblical times that you enjoy your work. I suspect Adam Lanza would agree whole heartedly.


I have a many Christians that dislike me and recently I have had a lady Christian that dislikes me because I share provocative reality with people at times even though it may be reality but anyways would you take a little more time in considering that scripture because I myself walk away with a different understanding. I find that scripture to be one of a moral understanding.


I read it as "just as one society will rejoice in victory of being able to conquer another society so will the next when they take over the conqueror.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 02:24 am
@Zardoz,
That's the Rivers of Babylon bit. It's talking about killing the Babylonian's children, not your own children.

Are you now going to admit you got something wrong?
DavJohanis
 
  0  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 07:18 am
Would it not be truly something, if people knew that true feelings about issues involving existence to the bitter end, could never be classed as true, barely in a moment.. Let alone existence in total?.

It breaks your order, so you break the people, you break the people until the people break you.

Truth?

I would buy that for a dollar.
izzythepush
 
  0  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 08:57 am
@DavJohanis,
DavJohanis wrote:
Truth?

I would buy that for a dollar.


Is that when you're not looking for a 1964 Chevrolet Malibu from New Mexico?
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 05:02 pm
@reasoning logic,
If people are going to vote my post down then shouldn't they at least ask "Why I have come to the conclusion that I have?
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 05:05 pm
@reasoning logic,
Welcome to the club mate...Someone is just trolling us all...And why I bring it up from time to time...

They would have no reason to disagree with everyone, unless they are a hateful person/or people...
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 06:28 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
Quote:

They would have no reason to disagree with everyone, unless they are a hateful person/or people...


What if it was God experimenting on us Would he be hateful?
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 06:45 pm
@reasoning logic,
Would God have to exist for this to be true?
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 07:24 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
Quote:
Would God have to exist for this to be true?


Are you saying that because you believe he exist that it could possibly be him doing that or are you saying that a God would never do that?
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 07:32 pm
@reasoning logic,
I am asking you directly if you think a God would have to exist in order to experiment or act evil to people?
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 07:36 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
Quote:
I am asking you directly if you think a God would have to exist in order to experiment or act evil to people?


Being intellectual honest with yourself you do know my answer would be yes, Correct?
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 07:40 pm
@reasoning logic,
Yes...I just wanted to hear you be intellectually honest about it...

So if a God is evil does that still mean he can not be? If not, why can't one exist who is not experimenting with us?
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 08:08 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
Quote:

So if a God is evil does that still mean he can not be?


If Joseph Smith taught that God was one way but you think Joseph Smith was wrong does this mean that God exist or that Joseph Smith does not? You do love this type circular illogical reasoning Correct?

If not, why can't either one exist if they are not experimenting with us?
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 09:05 pm
@reasoning logic,
If God does exist...And Joseph Smith says he is one way....And I say another....Then chances are that neither of us are correct...Because if we knew what God truly was...then we would both be God ourselves....

How is this circular?

If I want to hear you admit that a God has to exist to experiment with us....That is not circular because you are admitting that even if God is a douche, you are saying there is still a chance....You may not have seen it, but everyone else has...

And I do not ever remember you saying this before....

Now whether or not he truly is evil is another discussion for another day...

Because if you are saying there is a chance and he would be evil...Then there is no reason why he could not be....And be Holy.....

If he can't control being evil....Then in theory he could control being Holy...
tenderfoot
 
  1  
Fri 11 Jan, 2013 05:07 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
You talk like a "wana be sect leader"
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Sat 12 Jan, 2013 10:21 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
Quote:
If God does exist...And Joseph Smith says he is one way....And I say another....Then chances are that neither of us are correct...Because if we knew what God truly was...then we would both be God ourselves....


OK you say that chances are that neither of you are correct...Because if you knew what God truly was...then you would both be God yourselves. That seems reasonable but can you understand if you agree to this logic and are going to see it out consistently then you would have to also realize the chances of you being incorrect about the bible being a part of this God so why believe it?
 

Related Topics

Atheism - Discussion by littlek
American Atheists Barred from holding Office - Discussion by edgarblythe
Richard Dawkins doesn't exist! - Question by Jay2know
The New State Religion: Atheism - Question by Expert2
Is Atheism the New Age Religion? - Question by Expert2
Critical thinking on the existence of God - Discussion by Susmariosep
Are evolution and the big bang true? - Discussion by Johnjohnjohn
To the people .. - Question by Johnjohnjohn
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 09:25:28