@BillRM,
Quote:Ask the Greek who conquest a large part of the world where once more love between men was view as being must purer then men and women love.
Yeah--and they collapsed in igmoniny, faction and disorder and anything they had with value was carted off to Rome for garden ornaments.
Have you no evolutionary perspective? In fact Bill, you justify persecuting male homosexuals with that remark. It's been tried and failed. Selected out Darwin might have said. Our recent toleration, nay--encouragement, is too new to have a judgment passed on it. The only evidence we have, apart from the mythical Amazons, points to failure in the long run and we might thank you for reminding us of it if it wasn't that we already knew.
I never claimed that "men and women" love was pure. It just sets free the female intelligence after it was briefed by DA MAN hisself.
Does the love between men require frilly lingerie and jewels? How many cash tills are jingling up record receipts as a result of the free exercise of the female intelligence. And what does Darwin have to say on that subject?