1
   

Chat With Reyn

 
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 11:24 pm
Nothing as deep as that.

It only means that I'm ready to move on to the next topic and have no wish to continue with the previous one.

Next question.... :wink:
0 Replies
 
LionTamerX
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 11:27 pm
So, how's your game going ?
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 11:27 pm
What are your shallow standing needs?
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 11:32 pm
LionTamerX wrote:
So, how's your game going ?

Check it out for yourself:

knightmonger vs. reyn

Don't want to appear over-confident, but I think it's looking good for me!
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 11:34 pm
Chumly wrote:
What are your shallow standing needs?

Sorry, you'll have to explain that one. I don't understand your question.
0 Replies
 
LionTamerX
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 11:37 pm
I'd say you have him between a rock, and a hard place.
Nice work.
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 11:41 pm
LionTamerX wrote:
I'd say you have him between a rock, and a hard place.
Nice work.

Anothor move and he'll resign, I'm sure.

He's a good player. Fun game.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 11:49 pm
Reyn wrote:
Chumly wrote:
What are your shallow standing needs?

Sorry, you'll have to explain that one. I don't understand your question.
It's Chumly humor rearing it's ugly head again. It's a reverse pun based on "deep seated".

deep - shallow
seated - standing

And it relates to my other massively humor infused post
Chumly wrote:
What is the purpose of your commonly used phrase: "Next question....", does it serve some deeper need?
i.e. "deeper need" which is very similar to "deep seated" which is the opposite of "shallow standing".

Hence I am asking (in a fun-with-words roundabout way) what frivolous needs you have.
0 Replies
 
yitwail
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 11:53 pm
Reyn wrote:
I wish a few of you guys here would play, too. :wink:


ditto, reyn. with a couple more guys, we could have an a2k invitational tournament.

from here, looks like only way you wouldn't win against knightmonger is getting careless & stalemating him. nice going! Cool
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2006 01:30 am
yitwail wrote:
from here, looks like only way you wouldn't win against knightmonger is getting careless & stalemating him. nice going! Cool

I'm trying very hard to avoid that! You should challenge Mike. He's a nice guy.
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2006 01:32 am
Chumly wrote:
Hence I am asking (in a fun-with-words roundabout way) what frivolous needs you have.

Hmmm, frivolous needs, tough question.

It's late here. I'll sleep on it and get back to you.
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2006 10:37 am
Reyn wrote:
Chumly wrote:
Hence I am asking (in a fun-with-words roundabout way) what frivolous needs you have.

Hmmm, frivolous needs, tough question.

It's late here. I'll sleep on it and get back to you.

Well, I thought about it.

I lead a pretty simple and straight-forward life, with none of the usual vices.

Depending on one's view of life, either everything I do is frivolous, or none of it is. For example, my scribblings on A2K could be classified as "frivolous", but I look at it as my contact with the rest of the planet. Or my chess games, or watching TV, etc.

I figure one of my biggest accomplishment in my life was providing for a family of four on a single wage. All-in-all, I think I did a good job.

So, how would you answer your own question?
0 Replies
 
yitwail
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2006 01:15 pm
Reyn wrote:
You should challenge Mike. He's a nice guy.


i've considered it, but the fact that he's playing 89 Exclamation games right now makes me think a game with him could stretch out for weeks, and i prefer a bit faster pace.

Quote:
I figure one of my biggest accomplishment in my life was providing for a family of four on a single wage. All-in-all, I think I did a good job.


even though that wasn't addressed to me, i agree that's a great accomplishment and more than a lot of people can claim.
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2006 01:59 pm
yitwail wrote:
i've considered it, but the fact that he's playing 89 Exclamation games right now makes me think a game with him could stretch out for weeks, and i prefer a bit faster pace.

He moves quite a bit at night time. Last night, we must have exchanged at least 10 moves.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2006 02:55 pm
Reyn wrote:
So, how would you answer your own question?

Frivolous: watching Wheel of Fortune
Important: learning
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2006 03:09 pm
Here's Mr. Doody surfing with a friend:

http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b307/ReynN/David20Surfing20Website.jpg
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Feb, 2006 03:00 pm
notice to meter-reader :
after coming to canada and working as a labourer for a few weeks, i worked for the local 'public utilities commission' for a little over two years.
the PUC had decided to adopt a 'punched card system' for meter-reading and billing. so my first job was to work with two women - we called them girls in those days - to set up-up a meter master file. so i spent about two months as a 'keypunch-operator' . i was really good hitting the keys with two fingers(!!!) and the ladies helped me every day to achieve my goal of tackling a box of those dreaded meter records ... the name 'sangamo' is burnt into my brain - what little is left of it - never to be forgotten ! hbg
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Feb, 2006 03:05 pm
found one of the sangamos :

http://bunnlegacy.com/images/sangamo_meter.jpg
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Feb, 2006 04:17 pm
hamburger wrote:
notice to meter-reader :
after coming to canada and working as a labourer for a few weeks, i worked for the local 'public utilities commission' for a little over two years.
the PUC had decided to adopt a 'punched card system' for meter-reading and billing.

When I first started in 1974, we were required to mark the meter reading in a book of paper cards. The cards were marked with a pencil, much the same way if you were buying a 649 Lottery ticket and chosing your own numbers.

These paper cards would then be put through an optical viewer that would read our pencil marks. If we had rain, it would be terrible for those whose job it was to handle the cards.

Then, later, we were given electronic handheld processors where you would punch in the readings. These processors would be put into a cradle at the end of the day, and the data would be uploaded to the main computer.

They looked a little something like the one below, only more buttons, and a bigger screen, but you get the general idea.

http://www.sontek.com/product/flowtracker/flowtracker-processor.jpg

Quote:
found one of the sangamos :

http://bunnlegacy.com/images/sangamo_meter.jpg

Okay, this is a commercial electric meter that not only measures electric, but also demand readings. We would have to break the seal, and reset the meter every month. The new ones are all digital now.
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Feb, 2006 08:14 pm
reyn : yea, i now see the meter-reader coming with a handheld device to punch in the redings. i understand there are now meters that can be read over the internet without a meterreader even have to enter the premises. - no worry about dogs, rain .. and even 'friendly' ladies (so some meterreaders told me ?).
sangamo, sangama ... i hope i can wipe my memeory clean of that name. hbg
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Chat With Reyn
  3. » Page 59
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/20/2025 at 08:37:10