2
   

Why does the god of the Bible consider handicapped people...

 
 
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 03:15 pm
...to be inferior humans?

Why does the god of the Bible consider people who are physically handicapped, physically impaired...and such...as less worthy than people who do not suffer from those kinds of impairments?

At Leviticus 21:16ff, the god of the Bible "spoke to Moses, saying"...

..."No man of your descendants in succeeding generations, who has any defect, may approach to offer the bread of his God.

For any man who has a defect shall not approach: a man blind or lame, who has a marred face or any limb too long, a man who has a broken foot or broken hand, or is a hunchback or a dwarf, or a man who has a defect in his eye, or eczema or scab, or is a eunuch.

No man of the descendants of Aaron the priest, who has a defect shall come near to offer the offerings made by fire to the Lord. He has a defect; he shall not come near to offer the bread of his God.

He may eat the bread of his God, both the most holy and the holy, only he shall not go near the veil or approach the altar, because he has a defect, lest he profane My sanctuaries, for I the Lord sanctify them."


Why do you suppose the god of the Bible suggest that people with those kinds of defect will "profane" holy places by their mere presence?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 2 • Views: 6,671 • Replies: 131
No top replies

 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 03:26 pm
Well, later on in The New Testament God got over that earlier viewpoint and had his son Jesus pop around town helaing the lame and the deaf and the lepers and many others as well. Maybe it was just that in the early days God hadn't figured out a good health plan for the physically infirmed or maybe God had a different meaning for it than what we currently see .
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 04:08 pm
"Why does the god of the Bible consider handicapped people to be inferior humans?"

Because he/she/it is a scumbag??
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 04:21 pm
Frank wrote:
Why do you suppose the god of the Bible suggest that people with those kinds of defect will "profane" holy places by their mere presence?


Think about it. The laws protecting persons with disabilities were written in our lifetimes. Even modern people have been put off, and prejudiced against, people suffering with illness, infirmity or deformity.

The Bible, IMO, was written by a primitive people, who certainly had less knowledge, understanding and empathy that we have today. What would you expect? It is logical that early peoples would be frightened of someone who has an infirmity or a deformity.

It is not a huge conceptual leap for those folks to believe that disabled people were somehow "cursed" by God, and therefore not fit to enter holy places.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 04:28 pm
Not uncommon, I believe, in ancient religions.

Eg, people with defects were not, I believe, allowed near the ancient olympics.

I suspect fear made people think they were cursed by god or somesuch.

Actually, it is common in animals to shun, or kill, deformed and injured members of their group.


Just an earlier stage of civilisation.


Lol...I know this is not what you want, Frank, but I thought i would give it to you anyway....heehee.....
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 04:47 pm
Frank,

This isn't exactly what I thought you were going to come up with. Not sure how it relates to what we were talking about in the other thread.

Can you explain how you correlate the two so I can get a good understanding, please?
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 04:50 pm
Frank,
You seem to be using your own interpretation for the book of Leviticus. And, in particular the 21st chapter. This chapter deals with purity of the Priests. It was not for the general population, but for the priests. Purity of mind, body and soul was necessary for the Priests and this chapter deals with that. Seems simple enough.

It has already been pointed out that Jesus healed the sick, lepers, lame, blind, deaf etc. This doesn't appear to be that God penalized the handicapped and indeed welcomed them just as He does today.

I am not attempting to change your mind or anything. I just think we should put this into a bit of perspective so that it does not appear that you are just creating another hate the Christian and God thread.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 05:04 pm
Phoenix32890 wrote:
Frank wrote:
Why do you suppose the god of the Bible suggest that people with those kinds of defect will "profane" holy places by their mere presence?


Think about it. The laws protecting persons with disabilities were written in our lifetimes. Even modern people have been put off, and prejudiced against, people suffering with illness, infirmity or deformity.

The Bible, IMO, was written by a primitive people, who certainly had less knowledge, understanding and empathy that we have today. What would you expect? It is logical that early peoples would be frightened of someone who has an infirmity or a deformity.

It is not a huge conceptual leap for those folks to believe that disabled people were somehow "cursed" by God, and therefore not fit to enter holy places.


Precisely.

That is one way of saying what dlown is saying just below you here.

And I agree with both of you.

Do you understand why that is?
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 05:04 pm
dlowan wrote:
Not uncommon, I believe, in ancient religions.

Eg, people with defects were not, I believe, allowed near the ancient olympics.

I suspect fear made people think they were cursed by god or somesuch.

Actually, it is common in animals to shun, or kill, deformed and injured members of their group.


Just an earlier stage of civilisation.


Lol...I know this is not what you want, Frank, but I thought i would give it to you anyway....heehee.....


This is exactly what I wanted, bunny...and exactly what I would have responded if the question has been propose TO me rather than BY me.

Do you understand why that is?
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 05:07 pm
quote="Momma Angel"]Frank,

This isn't exactly what I thought you were going to come up with. Not sure how it relates to what we were talking about in the other thread.

Can you explain how you correlate the two so I can get a good understanding, please?[/quote]

It relates to almost everything I write in the Spirituality and Religion area, MA.

Remember…I am guessing that the Bible does not tell us anything about a God.

It is my guess that the Bible is essentially a history of the early Hebrews…with a mythology masquerading as a theology interspersed.

It is my guess that the "thou shalt" and "thou shalt not" sections of the Bible have absolutely nothing whatever to do with the wishes of a God…but merely reflect the biases and sensibilities of an ancient people.

I do not know if there is a God…or if there are no gods…but I am certainly willing to guess that the Bible would not help me head in either direction…because nearly as I can tell…the Bible does not tell us if there is a God; if there is a God, the Bible does not tell us anything about that God; and if there is a God, the Bible does not tell us anything about what pleases or offends It…or what It expects of humans.

I am guessing the "theology" of the Bible is phony…and that the god of the Bible is phony also.

And all the postings I make in this section…including this thread…are aimed at showing why I am guessing that way…and trying to convince others to guess that way also.

So that is the tie-in, MA.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 05:07 pm
I'm not so sure that 'they' thought they were cursed by God.

I think it's important to keep in mind that God has no flaws whatsoever. He is pure. So, it would reason that nothing impure can approach God. Just my thought.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 05:09 pm
Frank,

I don't know what Bible you read but mine says there is a God. Tells what He is all about and what He expects of us.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 05:11 pm
Intrepid wrote:
Frank,
You seem to be using your own interpretation for the book of Leviticus. And, in particular the 21st chapter. This chapter deals with purity of the Priests. It was not for the general population, but for the priests. Purity of mind, body and soul was necessary for the Priests and this chapter deals with that. Seems simple enough.


So why does the god of the Bible think that people with disabilities or infirmities should not be priests?

Why does the god of the Bible say that people with disabilities or infirmities would, by their mere presence, profane holy places?


Quote:

It has already been pointed out that Jesus healed the sick, lepers, lame, blind, deaf etc. This doesn't appear to be that God penalized the handicapped and indeed welcomed them just as He does today.


Well...does Jesus say that people with infirmities would not "profane holy places?"


Quote:
I am not attempting to change your mind or anything. I just think we should put this into a bit of perspective so that it does not appear that you are just creating another hate the Christian and God thread.


Not promoting hatred at all, Intrepid. I wouldn't do that.

Look at my post to MA...and that will tell you what I am doing.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 05:15 pm
Momma wrote:
I think it's important to keep in mind that God has no flaws whatsoever. He is pure. So, it would reason that nothing impure can approach God. Just my thought.


Are you saying that a person with a disease, infirmity or disability is impure in the eyes of the God of the Bible? I thought that the God of your Bible loves all his creations equally. Why the double standard?
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 05:16 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
I'm not so sure that 'they' thought they were cursed by God.

I think it's important to keep in mind that God has no flaws whatsoever. He is pure. So, it would reason that nothing impure can approach God. Just my thought.


I'm not sure I understand.

The question is: Why does the god of the Bible say that people with disabilities or infirmities will, by their mere presence, profane holy places?

Why does the god of the Bible think that?



Quote:
Frank,

I don't know what Bible you read but mine says there is a God. Tells what He is all about and what He expects of us.


Yeah...mine all do too.

But re-read what I wrote.

I am not saying the Bibles do not claim to tell us there is a God...or what the God is like...or what pleases or offends the God...or what the God expects of humans...

...I am saying that the Bible is phony.

That is the reason I am raising the questions I am raising. To talk about whether it makes more sense to suppose A GOD said some of these things...or if it makes more sense to suppose ancient humans vented their biases and sensibilities by putting this nonsense in the mouth of a god they invented.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 05:21 pm
In some cultures like in Japan, families hid those with physical and mental defects, because they thought they would bring shame to the family.

Before the Kennedy's got involved with Special Olympics, the developmentally disabled were considered third-class citizens.

We can't expect the writers of the bible to have the sophistication and education of today, since some cultures still hide their disabiled child at home never to be seen by the public.

But this is another point about the bible god we know to be created by men. They were expressing cultural practices that were deemed to be right for their times.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 05:21 pm
Phoenix,

God does love us all equally. When God looks through us now He sees us as without sin as we are washed in the blood of Jesus. This is part of my Christian belief.

God loves everyone. He wants no one to suffer. His gift of salvation is free to everyone that accepts it. He makes no bones about that.

I guess Frank, I just don't see why you would give a flip about what you would probably call a fictional novel? Why this particular one?

What about The DaVinci Code? Lots of books written that are fictional and a lot of people think they are real.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 05:29 pm
Momma Angel wrote:

I guess Frank, I just don't see why you would give a flip about what you would probably call a fictional novel?


Because this particular fictional novel is helping to turn our planet into a cesspool.

That is why I give a flip about it.



Quote:
Why this particular one?


Because this particular fictional novel is helping to turn our planet into a cesspool.


Quote:
What about The DaVinci Code?


How many people have been slaughtered because of the stuff written in the DaVinci Code?


Quote:

Lots of books written that are fictional and a lot of people think they are real.


Okay...not sure of what that has to do with this...but you may be right.

Don't suppose you'd care to name three?
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 05:31 pm
Frank wrote:
...I am saying that the Bible is phony.

That is the reason I am raising the questions I am raising. To talk about whether it makes more sense to suppose A GOD said some of these things...or if it makes more sense to suppose ancient humans vented their biases and sensibilities by putting this nonsense in the mouth of a god they invented.


Frank- Although I do not know whether or not there is a God, I have tremendous respect for the Bible. If one considers the level of knowledge and sophistication of the people who were alive at the time that the Bible was written, to me the creation of that work is a marvel.

I don't think that the Bible is nonsense. It is the foundation of the entire Judeo-Christian tradition. The fact that these people were able to codify their thoughts, to create a history, philosophy and system of ethics, is, to me, nothing short of amazing.

I would never dismiss the work of the very early scientists as "nonsense", even though a lot of their work has been proven incorrect. They did the best that they could, with what they had at hand.

I think that the authors of the Bible deserve the same respect.
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 05:43 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
When God looks through us now He sees us as without sin as we are washed in the blood of Jesus.
Jerry Falwell or Pat Robertson couldn't have expressed it any better...or worse.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Why does the god of the Bible consider handicapped people...
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.85 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 07:22:35