So there is absolutely no misunderstanding about that last notion, allow me to restate it in different words:
Atheists have less chance of convincing me that it is possible to KNOW gods do not exist...than you theists have of convincing me that it is possible to KNOW a God does.
i agree frank the atheists have a problem with the statement
god does not exist
if taken as a statement then one would have to be omniscient, god like, ie god. only god can say god does not exist
if its a proposition, then we know you cant prove a negative. its for theists to devise the hypothesis and demostrate the proof.
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:i agree frank the atheists have a problem with the statement
god does not exist
if taken as a statement then one would have to be omniscient, god like, ie god. only god can say god does not exist
if its a proposition, then we know you cant prove a negative. its for theists to devise the hypothesis and demostrate the proof.
I don't think gods exists, but then, there's too many places in the universe to hide a small one.
P
well p you might have a point there
but if god is hiding in the undergrowth, whats the point of being god?
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:well p you might have a point there
but if god is hiding in the undergrowth, whats the point of being god?
I dunno. Maybe had something to do with a long weekend in Tijuana, a case of tequilia and a platypus.
P
Frank Apisa wrote:So there is absolutely no misunderstanding about that last notion, allow me to restate it in different words:
Atheists have less chance of convincing me that it is possible to KNOW gods do not exist...than you theists have of convincing me that it is possible to KNOW a God does.
Hi, Frank. Just read your last post. Where should we go from here?
