Pat Robertson Calls for Assassination of Hugo Chavez!!!

LOFL.

I came in here and discredited old Pat and for that I get shat on by a duck.

You know, CJ, you've spewing your disgust with this site all over the place--you dirtied up the "What Made You Smile Today" thread with your hatefulness. If it bugs you so much, don't let the door hit ya in the ass . . .

People hate it when you call a spade a spade.

Nonsense . . . but they do hate it when some gobshite shows up in a thread about what makes people happy and pukes up his partisan hatred . . .

Find ONE shred of evidence that the DALAI (can't even spell your crap, can you?) Lama has ever called for the death of another human being.

Now.

Go on.


We shall wait for your comment to have any relevance.



I believe - as is not uncommon - we shall wait for ever.

I'm right here D-lo.

Are you folks enjoying your lame attempts to beat me up online?

I never said the Dolly Llama wanted to kill anyone.

Lame is as lame does . . . keep bitchin' about the website CJ, you'll still be tolerated . . . more's the pity . . .

Then what was the relevance of your comment?

It never ceases to amaze me how closed minded so called "liberal" minds really are. If any of you had taken a moment to go back and look at my first two or three contributions to this thread, you might understand what I'm talking about.

But I doubt it.

cjh has always been a pain in the backside. I'm glad others recognize it and tell him so. Our experience on a2k would be much more pleasant without the likes of him.

I'm callin' ya for bitchin' about a website you've spent most of day haunting, and spewing hateful remarks in the "What Made You Smile" thread. Miss Wabbit is callin' ya for a stupid remark about the Dalai Lama, which you haven't supported. Now you just pout some more and make another egregious slur against libruls . . . you ridin' the cotton pony today, CJ?

Well, dearie, I have looked at the first four pages of the thread - and I don't have time to look further.

What I AM seeing is your scattering your usual insulting and grossly prejudiced stuff around - made worse, I assume, by some personal drama - and I can and will call you on nonsensical stuff.

cjh, Your so-called contributions are generally insults. Too bad you can't see that all by yourself.

Yeah c.i., like the time I tried to help with your TV after you asked a question, then knew more about everything than everyone else (in your mind).

And according to D-lo, I'm "grossly predjudiced" because that's what she likes to think. The fact that she's "grossly prejudiced" in favor of what she thinks would never occur to her.

And Set, why on earth would I bother to try and support an OBVIOUSLY FLIPPANT AND MEANINGLESS comment (unless of course, you read it in context with my first post on the subject).

Why do I bother?

cjh, You'll never "get it." It's not about what "we think." Most of your posts are self-evident.

BTW, Do me a favor and don't respond to any of my inquiries on any subject. I'd rather do without yours.

I still love you, cjhsa.

kicky, You'd better watch out; his finger is an erection.

CJ, are you stressing because of your job situation?

Note that it's very important to pull answers out of the ether in order to appease c.i. This is the guy who was watching HD on Comcast before Comcast ever had any HD content. So I'm pretty sure his imagination is pretty active.

May I remind all of you that this was originally an information sharing site. If you ask a question about cooking, or computers, Unix, or HDTV, I'll probably be able to help you. Of course, if you go off and start posting things about me that aren't true, or say things like "never respond to my inquiries", then, I'm going to write you off as a quack.