nimh wrote:jpinMilwaukee wrote:This whole thread was designed to attack people. Just another "We're better than you" and this is why topic.
Did anyone actually read the article? The writer goes on and on about how he hates the research, doesnt he?
So wait. Someone does a weak-sounding research that purports to show conservatives act out of insecure masculinity. Someone else writes a rant
against this research. BBB makes that rant into a new thread. The thread is thus obviously just designed to attack conservatives?
<scratches head> I'm confused.
I swear I think sometimes people only read the name of the author and the title of his/her piece and respond solely on the basis of that, in agreement or disagreement...
Perhaps an unfortunate result of BBB's penchant for cut and paste.
How many of us (mea culpa) looked to her thread title and merely scanned the cut and pasted article?
In fact, I still have not read the cut and paste in detail.
Relevant to the threads that question whether or not this cut and paste obsessiveness is a problem --- How many people actually read the unending cut and pastes of BBB?
:wink: 
