Did you know--Conservative men doubt their masculinity?

Dlowan

dlowan wrote:

Lol! Have any of you picked up that the author of BBB's little piece thinks the "research" is a piece of ****, too?

Naw, they're too busy getting the wrinkles out of their knickers.

BB

0 Replies

lol - none so blind....

Whatchew doing publishing a bit of conservative stuff anyway, BBB?

You be gonna ruin yer reputation!

0 Replies

Re: Dlowan

BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:

dlowan wrote:
Lol! Have any of you picked up that the author of BBB's little piece thinks the "research" is a piece of ****, too?

Naw, they're too busy getting the wrinkles out of their knickers.

BB

Yea, but it's damn funny, that counts for somthen' don't it.

0 Replies

oh - funny generally counts, fer sure....

0 Replies

dlowan

dlowan wrote:

lol - none so blind....

Whatchew doing publishing a bit of conservative stuff anyway, BBB?

You be gonna ruin yer reputation!

Alas, I'm afraid my reputation is already ruined by cavorting with Dyslexia, Diane, Osso Buco, Blatham, Lola, Roger, Shewolf, Eva, Fbaezer, and the conservative Asherman.

BBB

0 Replies

jpinMilwaukee wrote:

This whole thread was designed to attack people. Just another "We're better than you" and this is why topic.

Did anyone actually read the article? The writer goes on and on about how he hates the research, doesnt he?

So wait. Someone does a weak-sounding research that purports to show conservatives act out of insecure masculinity. Someone else writes a rant against this research. BBB makes that rant into a new thread. The thread is thus obviously just designed to attack conservatives?

<scratches head> I'm confused.

I swear I think sometimes people only read the name of the author and the title of his/her piece and respond solely on the basis of that, in agreement or disagreement...

0 Replies

jpinMilwaukee wrote:

It's sad to see that political thought has turned into schoolyard insults and attacking peoples self-images.

I'd be laughing if it wasn't so pathetic.

I'm laughing anyway.

Finn d'Abuzz wrote:

What I always find ironic is the readiness of self-professed Lefties to challenge the sexual identity of their opponents.

Browse A2K and you will find enumerable homophobic references made by "Lefties." How can this be? "Lefties" are sexually enlightened and would never succumb to base sexual insults associated with same-sex oral gratification.

Hypocrisy and self-righteousness are the answers.

Exactly.

0 Replies

LOl- another non-reader.

0 Replies

Amigo wrote:

jpinMilwaukee, I have been a political activist for 17 years. I discuss and argue with professors and students (political,military). After 17 years I've become selective. I've read all your post on this thread. I agree with you. Yes, I have an opinion. At the moment, as you can see here, I am not motivated to express it.

So you're capable of more than your "why don't all of your hawks enlist?" arguments and snipes, which is pretty much all I recall seing from you so far at this site? Good. Whenever you're ready ....

0 Replies

OK, Dlowan saw it too, I'm not the only one confused by all the knee/jerking.

0 Replies

dlowan wrote:

LOl- another non-reader.

I read the whole thing, deb. What's yer point?

0 Replies

Ticomaya wrote:

Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
What I always find ironic is the readiness of self-professed Lefties to challenge the sexual identity of their opponents. [..]

Exactly.

As opposed to Righties, who entertain themselves with threads highlighting funny pictures in which Kerry and Edwards seem to be kissing ... haha, the sissies!

(Remember that thread?)

0 Replies

nimh wrote:

Ticomaya wrote:
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
What I always find ironic is the readiness of self-professed Lefties to challenge the sexual identity of their opponents. [..]

Exactly.

As opposed to Righties, who entertain themselves with threads highlighting funny pictures in which Kerry and Edwards seem to be kissing ... haha, the sissies!

(Remember that thread?)

Perhaps. Which do you find more ironic?

0 Replies

I think the most ironic is seeing people huff about "the readiness of self-professed Lefties to challenge the sexual identity of their opponents" when you damn well know their own side is at least as keen on it. Or hypocritical and self-righteous, rather, are the words Finn used I believe.

0 Replies

Ticomaya wrote:

dlowan wrote:
LOl- another non-reader.

I read the whole thing, deb. What's yer point?

So - did you notice the author condemning this sort of "research"?

0 Replies

dlowan

dlowan wrote:

Ticomaya wrote:
dlowan wrote:
LOl- another non-reader.

I read the whole thing, deb. What's yer point?

So - did you notice the author condemning this sort of "research"?

Obviously, many didn't. That why I found the piece so fascinating and decided to post it.

BBB

0 Replies

Yer a bad woman.

You have heads spinning.

0 Replies

dlowan wrote:

Yer a bad woman.

You have heads spinning.

Cain't help it, it's me hormones gone mad!

BBB

0 Replies

I know how to make a hormone ! ! ! !

don't pay her . . .

0 Replies

nimh wrote:

I think the most ironic is seeing people huff about "the readiness of self-professed Lefties to challenge the sexual identity of their opponents" when you damn well know their own side is at least as keen on it. Or hypocritical and self-righteous, rather, are the words Finn used I believe.

You apparently aren't a good judge of irony.

0 Replies

Did you know--Conservative men doubt their masculinity?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know