dlowan wrote:Ticomaya wrote:dlowan wrote:LOl- another non-reader.
I read the whole thing, deb. What's yer point?
So - did you notice the author condemning this sort of "research"?
Yes. Did you notice Chrissee's posts?
Your posts in this thread are THE ones to read, tico.
No doooooooot abooooooooot it.
Where did I say anything about the article?
I don't think I'm the one who can't read.
jpinMilwaukee wrote:This whole thread was designed to attack people.
Ticomaya wrote:dlowan wrote:Ticomaya wrote:dlowan wrote:LOl- another non-reader.
I read the whole thing, deb. What's yer point?
So - did you notice the author condemning this sort of "research"?
Yes. Did you notice Chrissee's posts?
God knows - prolly skimmed her - I just looked at the general tone.
It was hilarious.
Conservatives have small weenies. Thats a proven FACT! It's a cover-up. Their covering their small weenies.Lying weenie coverers I tell you.
I hate to agree with Amigo, but I'm a conservative and my wang is miniscule. It's as they say in the NRA, 'We only judge a man by the size of his firearm.'
He's obviously a liberal pretending to be a conservative. :wink:
Does that mean his wienie is humungous?
A thread that needs to come with a tape measure...
S**t man, I'm lost! I was arguing with someone while trying to build a swing set and now I can't find them? Has anybody seen mysteryman? That's O.K. I was starting to sound like an as***le anyways. I don't want to be an as***le anymore.Hey while I'm here bust out the tape measure.
dlowan wrote:Does that mean his wienie is humungous?
Damn right it is. It's a proven FACT !! Liberals have larger wienies then conservatives.(but we don't spell as good)
Amigo wrote:dlowan wrote:Does that mean his wienie is humungous?
Damn right it is. It's a proven FACT !! Liberals have larger wienies then conservatives.(but we don't spell as good)
I agree with you: You're lost.
I kinda like the idea of spitting to test for testosterone levels. That shuld replace the blood test for a marriage license. Think I'll start campaigning for it right now.
Ticomaya wrote:nimh wrote:I think the most ironic is seeing people huff about "the readiness of self-professed Lefties to challenge the sexual identity of their opponents" when you damn well know their own side is at least as keen on it. Or hypocritical and self-righteous, rather, are the words Finn used I believe.
You apparently aren't a good judge of irony.
As someone who only deals in a blunt brand of sarcasm, I don't think you're the best placed person to decide who knows of irony... better leave that subtle stuff to us pansy Europeans..
nimh wrote:Ticomaya wrote:nimh wrote:I think the most ironic is seeing people huff about "the readiness of self-professed Lefties to challenge the sexual identity of their opponents" when you damn well know their own side is at least as keen on it. Or hypocritical and self-righteous, rather, are the words Finn used I believe.
You apparently aren't a good judge of irony.
As someone who only deals in a blunt brand of sarcasm, I don't think you're the best placed person to decide who knows of irony... better leave that subtle stuff to us pansy Europeans..
I resent that. I happen to think I deal in a wide variety of sarcasm, blunt and otherwise.
It all looks blunt to those who deal in irony.
Perhaps if you took the cigar out from time to time?
dlowan wrote:It all looks blunt to those who deal in irony.
Perhaps if you took the cigar out from time to time?
Sure. Where would you like me to put it, you naughty bunny?
