The Singularity has Arrived but it’s not what everyone thought..

Yeah well ever bright invites me to World Science Festival with VIP status and I have occasionally debated top tier physicists not because I remember X or Y Zed formula but because I frame good questions and counterpoints on foundational topics that make them think...I wonder to what events have you been invited to recently... seriously your initial comments on the state of AI were jaw dropping the level of apathetic perception in you runs deep!

Now if you excuse me I have better things to do then deal with you.
All the best and keep faith in yourself high you are going to need it!

Right. And ChatGPT would solve it for anyone able to say or type the problem, whether they understood what it was or not. And you can bet the answer would be correct. Makes any moron a genius.

An interesting clip on the philosophy of science Albuquerque.

Philosophy dictates to science.Science does not dictate to philosophy.Science just confirms whether a philosophical idea is right or not.

Well as far as the single Big Bang theory is concerned science has certainly confirmed what a load of nonsense that idea was.

The electromagnetic fields that saturate the cosmos precede all BB and BC and science confirms this with the observed multiple BB and BC.

This ties in with psychology.

Science has moved on now to Player science.You will get those who prefer to be left behind with Spectator science.

Brandon cuts and pastes a formula while Albuquerque explains the way it works, what also needs to be taken into account and how the forces interact with each other.

Brandon declares himself the winner.

This is why the phrase "stupid Americans" is so popular.

The question is not hard and overall my answer had no mistakes in principle. Understanding of Newton Physics is for most part natural...everyone know what is a parabola since we started shooting arrows...it just so happen I studied the subject long long ago and although I did knew the principles and parameters I didn't knew how to make the exact calculus. I admit that since I don't check Newtonian calculus for more then 30 years now.

Now what I do and it is written down for future memory and for the ages, (even if the English is not bright and the presentation informal) is pose interesting foundational questions and do proper counters often playing the weaker side to force deeper thinking on topics concepts and ideas people take for granted. And in that department I know I am really good, and that I do it as good and often better then the experts be it in Theology, Philosophy of Science, even Law School...I know it because unlike most people around first I think and then check if the experts came to the same conclusion, which often happens. and often I see further and look at traps that they didn't thought about. Some of the stuff I posted over the last decade in this forgotten forum is really unique and was never said by anyone else and is correct and will be vindicated somewhere in the future, probably retrieved for big data search systems. Now all this shizz is bragging and it is useless me me me when I don't even believe in authorship rights, I am all for open source...I am just saying this because it is the truth and time is on my side on many topics I wrote about.

Brandon it is Brandon... there is no point in debating him as he doesn't really see stuff. Brandon has a very naive close mind set. I don't have any wish of engaging in useless talk with him since he refused to answer any of the questions I made and that those yes indeed were questions worth posing to advance the field.

He doesn't see his own contradictions, he rails against the effect religious fanatics have on science, then proceeds to vote said religious fanatics into office.

According to you, absolute ignorance of a field except for some philosophical musings is superior to actual knowledge of the field achieved by years of study with real college degrees and professional work experience. I've asked you a very simple high school level physics question about a cylinder rolling down an inclined plane that any student now or a century ago could have answered immediately and you can't solve it. I've offered to give you another fundamental high school level physics problem in any physics area of your choosing, but that is also beyond your ability.

Just because I can speculate about the philosophy of medicine doesn't mean that I know more than a doctor.

My partner usually asks me to write responses for her in complicated booking queries, but is over the moon that she can put her problems to AI and get a very well worded response without troubling me at all.

She also pointed out that Elon reckons there's no more homework either.

In my set of questions and observations earlier to you there was inserted a potential solution for Godel's incompleteness...obviously you passed by it at light speed...It is a small hidden gem granted to a stupid man, and I put it there with full intention of being missed...

That explained I have nothing else to say to you, already in my ignore list.
Have the best possible life you can have bye!

Psychology determines Philosophy and Science confirms the Philosophy is correct.

Player Science.

We presently have the tail wagging the dog.

It’s true.

Psychology is coming up with better science than the nonsense that is peddled at the moment.

Yeah man, I was just agree'n wit ya.

It’s gonna be an interesting next few years.

Teacher says 'Sally, this doesn’t sound like your writing.'
Later, Sally says 'ChatGPT, always make my homework sound like me, you moronic robot.'

I like how it is iterative, it remembers our previous conversation.

I wonder how "it" will feel, when it sees that its work has been edited, though. I always proof-read and tweak, mostly to get the spelling in Aussie.

My partner is all for the AI and Musk's starlink. She also thinks digital currency is "inevitable". I don't feel the same way at all.

I was following the emergence of the Greek TEM (the people's reaction to forced austerity measures imposed by the EU) It was such a successful non-currency (people's trade note) that a new edict was enacted, whereby if you didn't pay 70% of your bills digitally, you were fined.

This was over a period of years, following the EU's "sanctions" against the people of Greece, but almost every article mentioning the success of the TEM has been erased from search engines. Likewise with the edict re 70%.

I don't like that AI could be (and clearly has been) tasked with such a power over the information that we can, and should be able to, access freely.

The reality is we have a FAKE science laughably trying to tell psychology, this is how you work.

A science that laughably tries to tell psychology that it has no control whatsoever in its make up.

Things just happen.

A FAKE science doesn’t tell me how I work.I know how I work and FAKE science doesn’t come into it.

It’s all over for atheistic FAKE spectator science.

PLAYER science is far too powerful for it.

There is absolutely no point whatsoever in programming AI with FAKE science.You will just end up with another DEAD fool.

That is how I think it will end up.
'For your own good', of course. The implied message being, 'You are too gullible to be trusted with all the information, too stupid to weed out propaganda from the truth, and you can’t handle the truth, which is that WE have the wisdom to know what is best for YOU.' The hell of it is, they may be half right. But if a society is not 'good' enough to manage themselves, maybe it is best if it does collapse. Maybe the Chinese have it right, Go 'Goblin Mode'.

As far as 'digital money' goes, I take great comfort from my personal hero's words when he said “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's”. These days I’d go mad if I had to do everything with analog money. I do my best to avoid needing to deal with it or need much of it. I wish there was something I actually wanted to spend it on.

But Caesar can go **** himself when it comes to controlling anything else.