The Singularity has Arrived but it’s not what everyone thought..

@Brandon9000,

All scientists are philosophers first and foremost because they have no definitive proof.They base their science on their philosophy.That is how we have ended up up in the mess we are in with a mythical force and glue that is laughably attempting to explain it all.This poor philosophy science also claimed until recently that it all started with a single Big Bang.It’s a science that can’t even get the basics right about science and magnetic force interactions.

As I keep telling you the 4 off magnetic force interactions NN,NS,SN,SS don’t cancel and only produce attractions and repulsions.You need an N and S force to balance with an N and S force to obtain a balance.

Modern day science can produce as much Al as it likes but it won’t be based upon actual nature science because it doesn’t understand it because it doesn’t understand consciousness.

Dualistic science is nonsense, has always been nonsense and always will be nonsense that will only create Al confusion that explains absolutely nothing at all because it is DEFINITELY not based upon natures philosophy.

1 Reply

@Albuquerque,

Albuquerque wrote:

..oh boy you are a full course meal!
You do really need to get a refresh course on what Philosophers do today everywhere from Neuroscience to High Energy particle Physics...oh and yes AI to......I am sorry for the bluntness Brandon 9K but you are dumb!

You don't know what Science is nor do you have a clear picture on how Philosophy pervades 99% of the time you are awake.

I don't know what science is. That would be news to the people who gave me two physics degrees after years of intensive testing. So, since you DO know what science is does that mean that you're capable of solving a typical high school physics problem? Since I'm the "dumb" one and I have two degrees, I presume that a high school level physics problem such as solved daily by teenagers around the world, should be no problem for you, right?

2 Replies

@Jasper10,

Our previous conversation in which you gave your BS pseudo-equations was shut down so let me finish it now. To summarize, you're not even using the concept of an equation correctly. An equation is, and has always been, a statement that two terms, the meaning and values of which are known, are equal. In your case, the equation S = N would say that two algebraic variables, each of which represents a physical quantity, are equal, but you can't even define what the variables mean or give sample values they might take on.

A real scientist spends years studying what is already believed, even if he disagrees with it. He then formulates his own hypothesis and then tests it to see of it's true. You skip the part about learning existing theory. You also skip the part about testing your hypotheses to see if they're true. You even use equations incorrectly. You don't know what the variables you use mean or what sorts of values they can hold. So, I guess you're also reformulating that atheistic math people all over the world have been working on for a thousand years.

Truly, no one should take your ramblings seriously, and, as far as I can tell from the responses you get and don't get, no one does.

1 Reply

@Brandon9000,

You need to pick your battles more carefully.

You argue grammar with me and physics with Albuquerque.

0 Replies

@Brandon9000,

Most of the post topics that I post on do ultimately get shut down simply because they are predominantly full of one sided atheistic views/opinions which I challenge and we can’t have that now can we.I am not remotely interested in trying to definitively prove or disprove the existence of a God.

The FACT is you cannot cancel out the two natural electromagnetic forces of nature whether you can define them or not.This fact completely destroys all of modern day scientific theories.

PERIOD.

So why does modern day science say that these forces do cancel out?

My science and philosophy are sound my friend.

You may have two two atheistic degrees but you know absolutely nothing about natures true science and philosophy.

The reason I know all this is because I understand consciousness.Something that you and your atheistic science knows absolutely nothing at all about.

1 Reply

@Jasper10,

The two different consciousness states are directly related to the 2 different electromagnetic forces in nature.

There is a push/pull effect associated with both.

Stability you see.

1 Reply

@Jasper10,

Perfect symmetry with division within it.

1 Reply

@Brandon9000,

Did Newtonian Physics with A+ long ago in High School until I followed into literature which was my specialization which I also finished with grade 19 out of 20, which is A+, same with Philosophy and History with 18, did worse on Geography and English witch I finished with 14 which is B, and was on top of national board in Literature in spite of skipping and missing loads of classes left unattended, was tested for IQ which I finished with 133 and later 145, and I can back up what I am saying not sure you can on your end... so what does that have anything to do with the remark that so far you've just made en passent vague comments of authority without saying anything worth a direct counter or rebut? You claim there is no Philosophy in Science which is absolutely ridiculous, only an ignoramus would actually believe that...You barely are aware of the current state of development of AI...when you back up you Colgate pep talk with anything worth debating I will attend your POV's but so far you are out of meat buddy!

2 Replies

@Albuquerque,

I still remember when I walked in medieval Portuguese literature class with a Walkman in my head not paying one iota of attention to the boring lot of "cantigas de amigo" and saying I didn't like it, as I was waiting for Fernando Pessoa and other XIX early XX century writers...the teacher counter I did not understood it and that was why I didn't like it until I asked her if I could bring a medieval poetry made by me in medieval Portuguese following all the rules to prove her wrong, which she accepted with a smirk smile thinking I was not up to it, and her face next day when I showed her...the damned poem went viral all over the teachers room in the school and from that day on she never bordered me any more and of course finish top class as usual.
I could bring many other funny stories at University in which teachers feared me debating publicly in oral defence of grades, but hey that is enough bragging for now...I have to wonder the smart lot around what tales do they have, I barely can see any of the lot I met with anything remarkable to say...the stink of bureaucratic yes man is insufferable!

0 Replies

@Jasper10,

I believe in multiple big bangs and big crunches created by the electromagnetic fields that saturate the cosmos at both the macro and micro levels and which precede any BB or BC because that is what is observed.

I don’t believe in a nonsense one sided ill informed atheistic science or philosophy.

1 Reply

@Jasper10,

Jasper10 wrote:

I believe in multiple big bangs and big crunches created by the electromagnetic fields that saturate the cosmos at both the macro and micro levels and which precede any BB or BC because that is what is observed.

I don’t believe in a nonsense one sided ill informed atheistic science or philosophy.

Interesting that you think your blind guesses are so much superior to the guesses of other people.

I wonder if you are correct.

1 Reply

@Brandon9000,

All I can say is that you are not seeing what I am seeing.

Albuquerque is in part right when he says it is the 'language' part of ChatGPT and similar that impresses me. It allows anyone who can speak or type to be a very skilled and fast programmer without the need to learn/know anything. This could be incredibly good or bad, as with most everything, but this truly will be magnitudes greater (of both) than most inventions.

Not to mention the unintended consequences, like when the whaling industry was affected by gas and electricity.

0 Replies

@Albuquerque,

Albuquerque wrote:

Did Newtonian Physics with A+ long ago in High School until I followed into literature which was my specialization which I also finished with grade 19 out of 20, which is A+, same with Philosophy and History with 18, did worse on Geography and English witch I finished with 14 which is B, and was on top of national board in Literature in spite of skipping and missing loads of classes left unattended, was tested for IQ which I finished with 133 and later 145, and I can back up what I am saying not sure you can on your end... so what does that have anything to do with the remark that so far you've just made en passent vague comments of authority without saying anything worth a direct counter or rebut? You claim there is no Philosophy in Science which is absolutely ridiculous, only an ignoramus would actually believe that...You barely are aware of the current state of development of AI...when you back up you Colgate pep talk with anything worth debating I will attend your POV's but so far you are out of meat buddy!

Great then. I was going to offer you a high school level physic problem in any area of physics you chose, but let's take Newtonian physics. Since you know science and I don't and you're smart and I'm dumb, it should be a breeze for you.

Problem: A solid cylinder of mass m and radius R rolls down an inclined plane without slipping. Find the speed of the center of mass at the bottom. I don't give a **** if you use an energy or dynamical approach.

1 Reply

God damn it, another good thread devolved into dick measurements.

2 Replies

@Leadfoot,

Brandon didn't ask you to measure his dick, he asked you to measure the speed it travelled at, rolling down the hill after removal.

0 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

Let’s see Frank.

1 Reply

@Leadfoot,

Oh that made me laugh Leadfoot.Thanks…

0 Replies

@Jasper10,

Jasper10 wrote:

Let’s see Frank.

Your comment is either ignorantly punctuated...or is a sentence in a reading primer.

I wonder which it is?

2 Replies

@Brandon9000,

Hahaha, now you want to lecture me on the Newtons second law, F = ma, or force is equal to mass times acceleration which I studied 30 something years ago. Nice touch with the inclusion of the radius considering a cylinder with X of R to spice up the Maths...the acceleration is constant down the hill which by the way should have a defined length so one can come up with an actual number. You could have had elaborated further considering resistance both from ground and atmospheric pressure and include terminal velocity by the way, this is not the Moon...also how much heat did the cylinder gained and lost in the process eh? Man you are a clown!

...but lets see, let me bring you to my own field, concept analysis, make a philosophical distinction between Energy and Information if there is one to be made. For that matter define what they really are...If you are able to clear cut explain it you might be up for a Nobel...the thing about idiots like you is that you apply formulas without ever getting the substance of the topic at hand understood, and that is exactly why you are lab rats!

2 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

Atheistic science and philosophy is guessing all the time Frank.There is no meaning to it.It’s not balanced at all.It’s big theories are failing by observation and it cannot connect with the other sciences on any meaningful level.I’m surprised that anyone at all keeps putting their faith in it.

I don’t guess Frank.

My science and philosophy is sound.I keep telling you but you won’t believe me.

1 Reply

The Singularity has Arrived but it’s not what everyone thought..

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know