Should we handle victory the way the Christian god decrees?

Just pointing out that we have one author and two apparent accounts....

0 Replies

Momma Angel wrote:

InfraBlue,

Well, since He is God I would submit He had the authority to make the rules, don't you? He made the rules for a reason. The same reason we have laws. We have laws and we have punishment for breaking the laws. You would call those arbitrary also? I would call them necessary. If we had no laws and no rules, I believe society would have self-destructed long before now.

You are confusing the laws of the land with what god names as sins.

The laws of the land are largely pragmatic to generally benefit the people of that land.

Sin is what god has declared sin to be according to his whim, and more tangibly, sin is what the different religions of god define it to be, which are for the most part strikingly dissimilar.

Some laws of the land are based on those religions' definitions of sin.

0 Replies

Intrepid,
The laws of the land, e.g. "the rules in my country," aren't arbitrary in that they are established for the benefit of the people. People follow them to varying degrees, and police enforce them likewise. I'm familiar with laws against spitting in the street or not cleaning up after one's dog.

0 Replies

InfraBlue wrote:

Intrepid,
The laws of the land, e.g. "the rules in my country," aren't arbitrary in that they are established for the benefit of the people. People follow them to varying degrees, and police enforce them likewise. I'm familiar with laws against spitting in the street or not cleaning up after one's dog.

OK... now explain to me how God did things any differently. His laws were established for the benefit of the people. People followed them to varying degrees, and He enforced them.

0 Replies

God is all powerful. He could have named absolutely anything a sin. That is arbitrary.

You are confusing laws and sin, Intrepid. Some laws are based on things that god says are sins.

Most sins are named by god to benefit himself.

0 Replies

"... He enforced them..." Just how did he enforce "them?"

0 Replies

Actually, all sins are named by god to benefit himself.

0 Replies

Infrablue,

It sounds like you know the mind of God?

0 Replies

c.i.

Mostly, he'd slaughter them.

Sometimes he'd let them put on sackcloth, sacrifice animals to his name, and let them atone for their sins in that way.

0 Replies

How so, MA?

0 Replies

InfraBlue wrote:

God is all powerful. He could have named absolutely anything a sin. That is arbitrary.

You are confusing laws and sin, Intrepid. Some laws are based on things that god says are sins.

Most sins are named by god to benefit himself.

In the Old Testament sin is set forth as an act of disobedience; as an insult to God; as something detested and punished by God; as injurious to the sinner.

In the New Testament it is clearly taught that sin is a transgression of the law; a servitude from which we are liberated by grace; a disobedience punished by God.

I take it that your quarrel is not necessarily with the sin, but with God.

0 Replies

Intrepid wrote:

I take it that your quarrel is not necessarily with the sin, but with God.

My argument isn't heated, I'm merely stating the way I see things. My argument is with the idea of god, and how necessarily arbitrary the concept of sin is.

0 Replies

It is gonna be a wonderful day...and I am going to spend most of the morning on a golf course.

Gonna be loving it.

Life is great.

And every once in a while...I will probably reflect on the stuff our Christians brothers and sisters have offered up in this thread...

...and laugh out loud.

Yeah...life is wonderful.

They don't fear god...but if they do, it doesn't really mean they "fear god." Their god is good, kind, compassionate, and humanity loving. Those of us saying we don't know if there is a god and that the evidence is lacking are close minded...and they are open minded by insisting that there is a God...that the god of the Bible is that God...and that the god really is good, kind, compassionate, and humanity loving...and that they do not really fear the god.

Yup...I'll reflect on that stuff and laugh out loud...and enjoy this wonderful day.

0 Replies

Frank,

Why are you and others ignoring this? I keep trying to point this out to you and yet you insist this is not the fear we are speaking of.

This is taken from the Merriam-Webster's Dictionary:

Main Entry: 1fear

Pronunciation: 'fir

Function: verb

transitive senses

1 archaic : FRIGHTEN

2 archaic : to feel fear in (oneself)

3 : to have a reverential awe of <fear God>

4 : to be afraid of : expect with alarm

But, since you wouldn't give an inch on the definition of KNOW either, I am not surprised.

What is it that bothers you the most? The fact that we believe in something and you don't?

And good golfing!

0 Replies

Momma Angel wrote:

Frank,

Why are you and others ignoring this? I keep trying to point this out to you and yet you insist this is not the fear we are speaking of.

This is taken from the Merriam-Webster's Dictionary:

Main Entry: 1fear

Pronunciation: 'fir

Function: verb

transitive senses

1 archaic : FRIGHTEN

2 archaic : to feel fear in (oneself)

3 : to have a reverential awe of <fear God>

4 : to be afraid of : expect with alarm

But, since you wouldn't give an inch on the definition of KNOW either, I am not surprised.

I am not ignoring it, MA. In fact, I have commented on it several times.

In any case, I understand that you are saying the "fear" you feel is somehow different from the "fear" which we say you appear to feel.

I just happen to think you are rationalizing.

The god we are talking about is, according to the story you accept as true, listening in to everything you say and do...and will reward you greatly if you do and say exactly what it wants you to do and say...

...and will punish you by subjecting you to excruciating, unrelenting torture throughout all the rest of eternity if you screw up.

It just seems more likely to me that you "fear" that god in the sense of "dreading"...than in the sense of "awe."

And frankly, I don't blame you. If I thought for one second that god existed...I'd be needing constant laundry changes I'd be in so much fear.

Quote:

What is it that bothers you the most? The fact that we believe in something and you don't?

What is it that bothers me the most..."The fact that we believe in something and I don't"...

...or what?

Wasn't there supposed to be a second choice?

But if you actually meant those two things to be separated by an "or" rather than an "and"...

...neither.

Really, neither.

I honestly don't care what you "believe" and I certainly am not, in any real sense of the word, "bothered" by it. That is not what any of my convesations are about.

I am concerned about the cumulative negative impact of superstition and religion on humanity.

Quote:

And good golfing!

Thanks. Truly, thank you. And I hope you have a wonderful day yourself, MA.

It is a wonderful life...and we can both appreciate our good fortune to be living and enjoying it.

You can be thankful to your god (no problem with that)...and I can just be thankful.

0 Replies

Frank Apisa wrote in a reply to Momma Angel:

Quote:

You can be thankful to your god (no problem with that)...and I can just be thankful.

Finally, something that we agree upon, Frank ;-)

0 Replies

Frank,

Can you understand why someone would get frustrated discussing this with you? It's not your opinions or your take on things that causes me any frustration, it's your telling me that you think I am rationalizing, etc. Frank, I tell you what I think, what I believe, and what I know and feel.

I am not afraid of God Frank. I love the Lord. I am so looking forward to the day that He comes again! He has given me salvation through His grace. There is nothing for me to be afraid of! I am sorry you do not accept that.

And not everyone believes that religion has a cumulative negative effect on humanity. It's not religion that causes the problems. It's certain interpretations that do.

0 Replies

Momma Angel wrote:

And not everyone believes that religion has a cumulative negative effect on humanity. It's not religion that causes the problems. It's certain interpretations that do.

Hey MA!

Just a quick question on clarification here. You consider religion and it's certain interpretations to be seperate. Can you explain that opinion a bit?

0 Replies

Questioner wrote:

Momma Angel wrote:
And not everyone believes that religion has a cumulative negative effect on humanity. It's not religion that causes the problems. It's certain interpretations that do.

Hey MA!

Just a quick question on clarification here. You consider religion and it's certain interpretations to be seperate. Can you explain that opinion a bit?

Hi Questioner!

How are you doing? I will try to explain what I mean.

To me religion is the delineation of Baptist, Catholic, Muslin, etc. And, because of different interpretations, they keep changing or adding new ones.

Now, that's just my view on things. That doesn't mean it is necessarily anyone elses. I feel there is a difference between religion and spirituality.

Regligion is sticking to the dogma and rules of a particular religion. To me, spirituality is sticking to the rules of God (and of course, that is as I understand them.)

I hope that helped.

0 Replies

Should we handle victory the way the Christian god decrees?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know