1
   

Should we handle victory the way the Christian god decrees?

 
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Sep, 2005 07:07 pm
Frank Apisa wrote:
Oops...before you correct me...I see my error, Intrepid.

I apologize...I was wrong.

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y75/Intrepid2/co_fi079.gif

Wow
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Sep, 2005 07:14 pm
Go back and reread my post; I didn't say spelling was your problem.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Sep, 2005 07:17 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Go back and reread my post; I didn't say spelling was your problem.


This is what CI wrote:
Quote:
Intrepid, Your skill is not spelling.


It is silly to spend time on this. However, I must be missing something Shocked Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Sep, 2005 07:17 pm
"Your skill is not spelling" means that your skills lie in another realm - other than spelling. Badly constructed sentence if it's misunderstood. My bad.
.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Sep, 2005 07:19 pm
Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Implicator
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Sep, 2005 07:30 pm
Frank Apisa wrote:
Implicator wrote:


Your question suffers from the fallacy of the complex question (i.e. a "loaded" question), in that it assumes something (that God has commanded us to slaughter every last male in a vanquished country), and then proceeds to ask whether we should obey it or not, without first justifying the assumption itself.


Nice try...but no cigar.

My question does not suffer from the fallacy of the complex question...or loaded question.


Sure it does, and you know that it does. The unsupported assumption is that the commands given in Deut. 20 apply to us in the here and now. You come to this conclusion by doing what you did in previous posts, considering only a small portion of what the Bible has to say.

So, back to the basics. Before you can pose the question with any logical warrant, you either need to show objectively that this command applies to us, or you need to show that Christians (those who you targeted in your initial post) believe that it applies to us. Short of that, you have no foundation from which to even posit this question. That is, you can muse to yourself about this, or to others who agree with you that these commands apply to us, but until you show that they do, you have absolutely nothing to work with.

********

Quote:
The passage is quite clear.

Should we obey it or not.


Simply repeating yourself does not change the fallacious nature of your question. Come on, Frank - get on the court and play ball!

********

Quote:
Quote:
It is much like me asking you whether you still beat your wife.


It is nothing like that. But I appreciate your attempt to avoid answering.


It is everything like that, as I have just demonstrated.

********

Quote:
Quote:
Your question is fallacious, Frank, and therefore does not require an answer until such time as you have justified the unsupported assumption.


The question is not fallacious, Implicator...but I can see you are not up to answering it...so I guess we'll just have to do without your input.


My input has been given, in response to the question you asked. At this point, the only way you can do without my input is to ignore it. You certainly haven't refuted it, no matter what you may claim.

I
0 Replies
 
Implicator
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Sep, 2005 07:36 pm
Frank Apisa wrote:
Implicator wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
Zephaniah 3:17  The LORD thy God in the midst of thee is mighty; he will save, he will rejoice over thee with joy; he will rest in his love, he will joy over thee with singing.


Yeah...I can offer several thousand quotes of people talking about how wonderful and loving the god is. The Bible is full of 'em. Just like the people here are full of 'em.

But I've yet to see any offered where the god of the Bible is actually being kind, compassionate or loving of humanity...and is not threatening, killing, asking others to kill or punishing.

How about furnishing one of them?


Let's start with one example, since you haven't been able to find any yourself. I can give them one after the other, but I will start with this one for now.

Gen. 17:15-16

15 Then God said to Abraham, "As for Sarai your wife, you shall not call her name Sarai, but Sarah shall be her name.

16 "I will bless her, and indeed I will give you a son by her Then I will bless her, and she shall be a mother of nations; kings of peoples will come from her."

Gen. 21:1-2

1 Then the LORD took note of Sarah as He had said, and the LORD did for Sarah as He had promised.

2 So Sarah conceived and bore a son to Abraham in his old age, at the appointed time of which God had spoken to him.


Let me know when you are ready for more examples, the Bible is full of them.

I


Great!

You have furnished the one I have mentioned in many places was in Genesis.

Now...furnish me five more.



We will do them one at a time. Comment on this, and then I will give you the next one.


Genesis 1:18, 21-22:

18 Then the LORD God said, "It is not good for the man to be alone; I will make him a helper suitable for him."

21 So the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and he slept; then He took one of his ribs and closed up the flesh at that place.

22 The LORD God fashioned into a woman the rib which He had taken from the man, and brought her to the man.

I
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Sep, 2005 07:39 pm
Genesis 1:26  And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Genesis 2:18  And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.

Genesis 1:29  And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.

Genesis 9:1  And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.

Genesis 9:17  And God said unto Noah, This is the token of the covenant, which I have established between me and all flesh that is upon the earth.

Genesis 17:9  And God said unto Abraham, Thou shalt keep my covenant therefore, thou, and thy seed after thee in their generations.

Genesis 17:15  And God said unto Abraham, As for Sarai thy wife, thou shalt not call her name Sarai, but Sarah shall her name be.

Genesis 21:12  And God said unto Abraham, Let it not be grievous in thy sight because of the lad, and because of thy bondwoman; in all that Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for in Isaac shall thy seed be called.

Genesis 26:24  And the LORD appeared unto him the same night, and said, I am the God of Abraham thy father: fear not, for I am with thee, and will bless thee, and multiply thy seed for my servant Abraham's sake.

Genesis 35:10  And God said unto him, Thy name is Jacob: thy name shall not be called any more Jacob, but Israel shall be thy name: and he called his name Israel.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Sep, 2005 07:39 pm
Does that mean that man had a penis without a woman?
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Sep, 2005 07:40 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Does that mean that man had a penis without a woman?


Who are you asking? What is your point? Are you debating something?
0 Replies
 
Implicator
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Sep, 2005 07:42 pm
Intrepid wrote:
Genesis 1:26  And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Genesis 2:18  And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.

Genesis 1:29  And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.

Genesis 9:1  And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.

Genesis 9:17  And God said unto Noah, This is the token of the covenant, which I have established between me and all flesh that is upon the earth.

Genesis 17:9  And God said unto Abraham, Thou shalt keep my covenant therefore, thou, and thy seed after thee in their generations.

Genesis 17:15  And God said unto Abraham, As for Sarai thy wife, thou shalt not call her name Sarai, but Sarah shall her name be.

Genesis 21:12  And God said unto Abraham, Let it not be grievous in thy sight because of the lad, and because of thy bondwoman; in all that Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for in Isaac shall thy seed be called.

Genesis 26:24  And the LORD appeared unto him the same night, and said, I am the God of Abraham thy father: fear not, for I am with thee, and will bless thee, and multiply thy seed for my servant Abraham's sake.

Genesis 35:10  And God said unto him, Thy name is Jacob: thy name shall not be called any more Jacob, but Israel shall be thy name: and he called his name Israel.


Hey, come on now ... you have to take things slow with Frank, don't overwhelm him Cool

I
0 Replies
 
Implicator
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Sep, 2005 07:43 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Does that mean that man had a penis without a woman?


I would assume so (although the Bible doesn't say either way) ... for awhile ... what's your point?

I
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Sep, 2005 07:45 pm
Implicator wrote:
Quote:
Hey, come on now ... you have to take things slow with Frank, don't overwhelm him


Well, it started out with Frank demanding one verse. He dismissed any that he was given. You gave him one and he immediately asked for 5 more.
The man is never satisfied. This may be too much for the old guy.... he will, however, recover from his shock long enough to post a damning comment. Laughing
0 Replies
 
Implicator
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Sep, 2005 07:47 pm
Intrepid wrote:
Implicator wrote:
Quote:
Hey, come on now ... you have to take things slow with Frank, don't overwhelm him


Well, it started out with Frank demanding one verse. He dismissed any that he was given. You gave him one and he immediately asked for 5 more.
The man is never satisfied. This may be too much for the old guy.... he will, however, recover from his shock long enough to post a damning comment. Laughing


And to think we are still only in Genesis .... hehe.

I
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Sep, 2005 07:48 pm
Well, it seems woman was already on the drawing board if man already the potential to impregnate. So, what's with the companion bit?
0 Replies
 
Implicator
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Sep, 2005 07:55 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Well, it seems woman was already on the drawing board if man already the potential to impregnate. So, what's with the companion bit?


Seems like God is telling us that procreation wasn't the only reason he created woman. Does this not make sense to you?

I
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Sep, 2005 10:53 pm
Whoa, you're gonna have to slow that down, Implicator. When it's perfectly clear and makes simple common sense, it doesn't give them enough of a target for the next salvo of slime. You want to be sportsmanlike about things, after all.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Oct, 2005 04:13 am
Well...so far in the challenge...we have the one instance where the god was on the scene...and the thrust of his being there was not to threaten, punish, kill, or ask others to kill.

He allowed a woman, Sarah, to get pregnant.

Now Implicator and Intrepid have offered the story of the god in Eden...and the story of the God with Noah. And the band of brothers are gloating as though they have met the challenge to show the god as good, kind, and humanity loving...rather than being a barbaric, murderous monster.

(Please excuse any spelling or grammatical errors in this post. It is very, very difficult to be careful when laughing as hard as I am.)

Implicator...Intrepid...

...the thrust of the story about Eden is that the god sets up Adam and Eve in a sting...puts them into a postion where they have absolutely no idea of what is right or wong...good or evil...(and in fact, denies them the information necessary to know those things)...and the god is going to allow these poor naive, innocents to be tempted by the Tempter of all Tempters...and then the god is going to punish all of humanity for all the rest of eternity for the fact that the two...in the sting...disobey one time.

The thrust of the story of Noah is that the god is about to drown every man, woman, child, and animal on the planet (with the exception of Noah, his family, and the animals on his ark) for not living up to its expectations.

And you folks want to offer these stories as instances where the god is good, and kind, and humanity loving????? You want to offer these stories as instances where the god is not excessive, not quick-to-anger slow-to-forgive, not retributive, not vengeful, not petty, not murderous, not barbaric??????????

Gimme a break!

Save your jubilation....it is a laugh here!

So far...you folks have exactly one item...which, I indicated existed.

Your god allowed woman to become pregnant. WOW!

Let's see if you can come up with some others.




Oh, my word. This is absolutely better than I thought it would be.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Oct, 2005 04:25 am
Implicator wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
Implicator wrote:


Your question suffers from the fallacy of the complex question (i.e. a "loaded" question), in that it assumes something (that God has commanded us to slaughter every last male in a vanquished country), and then proceeds to ask whether we should obey it or not, without first justifying the assumption itself.


Nice try...but no cigar.

My question does not suffer from the fallacy of the complex question...or loaded question.


Sure it does, and you know that it does.


No it doesn't...and you know that it doesn't.


Quote:

The unsupported assumption is that the commands given in Deut. 20 apply to us in the here and now. You come to this conclusion by doing what you did in previous posts, considering only a small portion of what the Bible has to say.


Not even necessary to go there. There is abolutely no doubt that the passage IS A COMMAND from the god. It most assuredly did apply to someone. We could leave it at that...my question would still be valid.

Should we do as the god indicates?


Quote:

So, back to the basics. Before you can pose the question with any logical warrant, you either need to show objectively that this command applies to us, or you need to show that Christians (those who you targeted in your initial post) believe that it applies to us. Short of that, you have no foundation from which to even posit this question. That is, you can muse to yourself about this, or to others who agree with you that these commands apply to us, but until you show that they do, you have absolutely nothing to work with.


No, Implicator...I do not have to do any of this. I can pose a question...and expect an answer rather than a lesson in logic from someone who really doesn't show all that much in his/her posts.

If you want to answer the question I posed rather than dodge it...do so. It requires only a YES or a NO.

If want to continue to dodge the question...that is okay also.

But don't pretend you are not dodging it.


Quote:
Quote:
The passage is quite clear.

Should we obey it or not.


Simply repeating yourself does not change the fallacious nature of your question. Come on, Frank - get on the court and play ball!


I'm here asking a question. You are here dodging it.

Let me know when you want to answer the question.


Quote:

Quote:
Quote:
It is much like me asking you whether you still beat your wife.


It is nothing like that. But I appreciate your attempt to avoid answering.


It is everything like that, as I have just demonstrated.


It is nothing like that...but I understand that in order to have it look that you are not dodging the question...you've got to play this little game of yours. Hey, no problem. Play it.

If you ever decide to answer the question, though...I, for one, would be interested in your answer. (Im sure others would also.) All it takes is a YES or a NO.


Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Your question is fallacious, Frank, and therefore does not require an answer until such time as you have justified the unsupported assumption.


The question is not fallacious, Implicator...but I can see you are not up to answering it...so I guess we'll just have to do without your input.


My input has been given, in response to the question you asked. At this point, the only way you can do without my input is to ignore it. You certainly haven't refuted it, no matter what you may claim.


If you want to continue this "No you didn't" "Yes I did" nonsense...continue it. I'll accomodate you. If you want to answer the question...so so. I love to hear your answer. All it takes is a YES or a NO.

I am thoroughly enjoying this discussion with you, Implicator. You are a funny guy or gal!
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Oct, 2005 04:37 am
Intrepid wrote:
Funny that the same people who hate god and Christians are the same people who usually advocate abortion and war.


Rubbish. Why d'you say people hate god - when they're simply saying they don't believe in him? How can anyone hate something that doesn't exist for them?
As for the war part:

"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow my self to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice… And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows . For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people."
-Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942)

"Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord." -Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf)

(Tony) Blair, a committed Christian who keeps the Bible by his bed, knows he is taking a risk by revealing the importance he places on religion in informing his politics. He also knows that many of his key officials feel uncomfortable about the central role that God plays in his life. There were furrowed brows of consternation when Blair, asked who he would answer to for the deaths of British soldiers, replied: 'My Maker'.
Sunday August 3, 2003
The Observer
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/blair/story/0,11964,1011478,00.html

Then there's G.W.Bush and the USA (God Bless America)

Quote:
One only has to check out Bush's record as Governor of Texas to see his own preference for death over life. During his tenure as Governor, Bush presided over a record-setting 152 executions, including the 1998 execution of fellow born-again Christian Karla Faye Tucker, a convicted murderer who later led a prison ministry. Forty of Bush's executions were carried out in 2000, the year the Bush presidential campaign was spotlighting their candidate's strong law enforcement record. The Washington Post's Richard Cohen reported in October 2000 that one of the execution chamber's "tie-down team" members, Fred Allen, had to prepare so many people for lethal injections during 2000, he quit his job in disgust.

Bush mocked Tucker's appeal for clemency. In an interview with Talk magazine, Bush imitated Tucker's appeal for him to spare her life pursing his lips, squinting his eyes, and in a squeaky voice saying, "Please don't kill me." That went too far for former GOP presidential candidate Gary Bauer, himself an evangelical Christian. "I think it is nothing short of unbelievable that the governor of a major state running for president thought it was acceptable to mock a woman he decided to put to death," said Bauer.
http://www.serendipity.li
Not to mention the death Bush has reaped around the world.

Why should anyone, who sincerely wants the world to be a better place, defend religious cults? Why follow bible quoting war mongers?
The bible is about death, revenge, suppression and fear.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naturalists can see religion as wish-fulfillment, a coping strategy for death anxiety (Bertrand Russell), a way to make a powerful being in our own image (Ludwig Feuerbach), a way to retain a father figure when you no longer (or never did) have a strong father figure or when you mature and can't rely on a human parent for everything (Sigmund Freud), or as a way to keep the masses in line (Karl Marx).
http://parablemania.ektopos.com

I have a major question here for Frank:

Frank... Why do you bother? I get the feeling that you really want to free christians - to enlighten them, but you are an intelligent chap, surely you can see that they have been indoctrinated and brainwashed. They are not listening because they don't want to hear... so, why d'you bother?
Personally, I find it too frustrating.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 11/07/2024 at 04:12:30