1
   

Should we handle victory the way the Christian god decrees?

 
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 08:48 pm
Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:
Now where in the heck is Momma Angel with her congrats to you for explaining a point so well?


I am right here little one. I have about 12 things going on at the same time and am having a bit of trouble keeping up.

Intrepid,

I do have to admit, what you wrote does make very good sense. But, I believe we should keep God where He has been all this time (i.e., In God We Trust, One Nation Under God, etc.). But, that's my opinion.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 08:56 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:
Now where in the heck is Momma Angel with her congrats to you for explaining a point so well?


I am right here little one. I have about 12 things going on at the same time and am having a bit of trouble keeping up.

Intrepid,

I do have to admit, what you wrote does make very good sense. But, I believe we should keep God where He has been all this time (i.e., In God We Trust, One Nation Under God, etc.). But, that's my opinion.


Momma Angel,
You are an American citizen, I am a Canadian citizen. Your Declaration of Independence covers that and I realize that it is a controversial subject in the U.S. but only the U.S. has this declaration. The rest of the world does not. I believe that I am obliged to obey the worldly authorities provided no godly laws are transgressed.

God has not been in the United States all this time. He has been in Heaven where His Son prepares a place for us.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 09:08 pm
Intrepid,

I do so love your sense of humor! Yes, God has been in heaven all this time! Very Happy

This is just one of those little things we have a different view on. I was brought up with the pledge of allegiance said every morning in homeroom. No harm, no foul!

You are still my mentor!
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 09:12 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
I just wish someone could tell me what is so offensive by the Ten Commandments being in a courthouse? How in the world does it effect your life directly? Have you ever gone to that courthouse?


I did tell you what was offensive about the Ten Commandments being in a court house. Did you not read my post here?

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1522107#1522107

Four of the commandments are in conflict with the laws of the USA. Did you check the links in that post? Why on earth do you feel it so important to put your religious symbol in a court of law? If you want to abide by one version or the other of the commandments you are free to do so.

Momma Angel wrote:
Would you also like to stop people from saying grace before they eat their meal in a restaurant? It doesn't bother me if you don't do it so why should it bother you if I do?


Huge strawman alert! I have never suggested nor heard of anyone else making such a ridiculous suggestion either in a private restaurant or public place including schools.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 09:12 pm
Momma,
I do not critisize you for your believe. That is one of the beautiful things of us living in free countries. We can have and state our opinions openly. I don't think we really differ a lot on this, just a bit. Did you know that Canada is known as God's country? ;-)
0 Replies
 
slkshock7
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 09:15 pm
Once again you've dismissed my response without a lick of substance to support your claim. You say these passages are people thanking God for healing, babies, etc. and that somehow each is not an act of God.

Earth calling Frank...Earth calling Frank...

How do you get that???? The verses are clear..."God healed...", "God sent...", etc.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 09:24 pm
slkshock7,
You will find, as you no doubt already have, that Frank will only accept what Frank wants to accept. He thinks on a different plane than most of us and just as God said "I change not"....so does Frank
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 09:39 pm
Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:
I did tell you what was offensive about the Ten Commandments being in a court house. Did you not read my post here?


Yes, I read your post. I guess I am not really understanding what you mean about symbolism?

I am speaking of the Ten Commandments in the Bible.

Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:
Four of the commandments are in conflict with the laws of the USA. Did you check the links in that post? Why on earth do you feel it so important to put your religious symbol in a court of law? If you want to abide by one version or the other of the commandments you are free to do so.


Could you tell me what four commandments ae in conflict with the laws of the USA? Mesquite, let me try to explain. I believe that if a person is doing God's will then the rightness of that will show through in every aspect of their lives. It's as simple as that. If we have people in political office that are doing God's will and not their own, then I believe we'd be a lot better off.


Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:
Huge strawman alert! I have never suggested nor heard of anyone else making such a ridiculous suggestion either in a private restaurant or public place including schools.


Nor did I mean to suggest that you did. I am just saying, why can you not just ignore that the Ten Commandments are hanging in that building? I don't see what harm they have done all this tiime being there.

Intrepid,

Yes, I know it's called God's country. I visited there once. Most beautiful!

slkshock7 Wrote:

Quote:
Once again you've dismissed my response without a lick of substance to support your claim. You say these passages are people thanking God for healing, babies, etc. and that somehow each is not an act of God.

Earth calling Frank...Earth calling Frank...

How do you get that???? The verses are clear..."God healed...", "God sent...", etc.


slkshock7, have we introduced you properly to Frank? slkshock7, meet Frank. Like I said, God Himself could......
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 09:45 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
Quote:
If we have people in political office that are doing God's will and not their own, then I believe we'd be a lot better off.


People in political office should be doing the will of the people. As I mentioned before, as long as God's laws are not being transgressed, we must support our governments.

A small aside --- The U.S. has a president who is apparently a devout Christian. Do you think he is doing God's will?
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 09:48 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
I was brought up with the pledge of allegiance said every morning in homeroom.


Well I learned The Pledge of Allegience the original way and then had to relearn it the new way when it was changed to add "under God" in 1954.

It is not something that has always been there as you stated in an earlier post.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 09:51 pm
Intrepid Wrote:

Quote:
A small aside --- The U.S. has a president who is apparently a devout Christian. Do you think he is doing God's will?


Intrepid, I love you to death but not even you can make me get into that one! Oh no, no, no. Laughing Laughing

Not out here in public anyway!
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 09:53 pm
Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:
Well I learned The Pledge of Allegience the original way and then had to relearn it the new way when it was changed to add "under God" in 1954.

It is not something that has always been there as you stated in an earlier post.


Let me rephrase, I was born in 1956 so it has always been there in my lifetime. Better?
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 09:54 pm
Francis Bellamy (1855 - 1931), a Baptist minister, wrote the original Pledge in August 1892.

His original Pledge read as follows: 'I pledge allegiance to my Flag and (to*) the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.' He considered placing the word, 'equality,' in his Pledge, but knew that the state superintendents of education on his committee were against equality for women and African Americans. [ * 'to' added in October, 1892. ]

In 1923 and 1924 the National Flag Conference, under the 'leadership of the American Legion and the Daughters of the American Revolution, changed the Pledge's words, 'my Flag,' to 'the Flag of the United States of America.' Bellamy disliked this change, but his protest was ignored.

In 1954, Congress after a campaign by the Knights of Columbus, added the words, 'under God,' to the Pledge. The Pledge was now both a patriotic oath and a public prayer.

Bellamy's granddaughter said he also would have resented this second change. He had been pressured into leaving his church in 1891 because of his socialist sermons. In his retirement in Florida, he stopped attending church because he disliked the racial bigotry he found there.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 09:57 pm
Intrepid,

Interesting, very interesting. Thanx for the info!
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 09:59 pm
You are welcome.
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 11:05 pm
Duplicate
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 11:15 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
Yes, I read your post. I guess I am not really understanding what you mean about symbolism?


That is the reason I asked if you read the links. It would be easier if you just read the short article. I has pictures that help make the point.

Religious Symbols in the Capital...[/u]

Momma Angel wrote:
I am speaking of the Ten Commandments in the Bible.

Do you have a reference for where ten commandments are listed as such? There are at least three main versions for Hebrew, Catholic, and Protestant. Once again I provided a link to illustrate the point. It is much easier to view the graphic there.

Which Ten Commandments[/u]

Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:
Four of the commandments are in conflict with the laws of the USA. Did you check the links in that post? Why on earth do you feel it so important to put your religious symbol in a court of law? If you want to abide by one version or the other of the commandments you are free to do so.


Momma Angel wrote:
Could you tell me what four commandments ae in conflict with the laws of the USA? Mesquite, let me try to explain. I believe that if a person is doing God's will then the rightness of that will show through in every aspect of their lives. It's as simple as that. If we have people in political office that are doing God's will and not their own, then I believe we'd be a lot better off.

There is a problem with that belief and it is a huge problem. The problem that no two people come up with the same notion of what is God's will. You surely must be aware of the vast differences in biblical interpretation just among Christians. At the extreme end of the spectrum, the perpetrators of 9/11 thought they were doing God's will. Ancient texts are just too ambiguous to be relied on for governance. It is much better kept at a personal level.

OK the commandments in conflict:

"1. Thou shalt have no other gods before me."

Ignoring this, our government has not outlawed Hinduism. That's understandable, since the First Amendment directly contradicts the First Commandment.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

"2. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them..."

The first amendment does not allow us to create laws prohibiting the free exercise of religion.

"3. You shall not take the name of the Lord, your God, in vain."

We have repealed our blasphemy laws, which discriminated against non-Christian religions. Our free-speech laws directly contradict this Commandment. See first amendment.

"4. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:"

Same as above, would be a violation of the first amendment

Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:
Huge strawman alert! I have never suggested nor heard of anyone else making such a ridiculous suggestion either in a private restaurant or public place including schools.


Momma Angel wrote:
Nor did I mean to suggest that you did. I am just saying, why can you not just ignore that the Ten Commandments are hanging in that building? I don't see what harm they have done all this time being there.

If by "that building" you mean the Kentucky court house case that went to the Supreme Court this past March, they had not been hanging all that long. They were put up in 1999 primarily as a provocation and sparked litigation almost immediately.

Frankly, I really do not understand this in your face mentality that the right is displaying about their religion. I feel it is the cause of much of the current divisiveness we are experiencing.
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 11:25 pm
Intrepid wrote:
Momma Angel wrote:
Quote:
If we have people in political office that are doing God's will and not their own, then I believe we'd be a lot better off.


People in political office should be doing the will of the people. As I mentioned before, as long as God's laws are not being transgressed, we must support our governments.

A small aside --- The U.S. has a president who is apparently a devout Christian. Do you think he is doing God's will?


Wow! Kudos for another good post, even if MA did chicken out. Laughing
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 11:42 pm
Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:
That is the reason I asked if you read the links. It would be easier if you just read the short article. I has pictures that help make the point.


Ok, I understand.

Quote:
Do you have a reference for where ten commandments are listed as such? There are at least three main versions for Hebrew, Catholic, and Protestant. Once again I provided a link to illustrate the point. It is much easier to view the graphic there.


Exodus 20:1-17. Don't understand why the Catholics don't have the graven image one.

Quote:
"1. Thou shalt have no other gods before me."

Ignoring this, our government has not outlawed Hinduism. That's understandable, since the First Amendment directly contradicts the First Commandment.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


Ok, now I don't know if I am just tired or what but God says have no other Gods. So, If I understand this correctly, the law contradicts this because it allows religious freedom? I am not good at politics whatsoever so please bear with me. But, if I am correct then that means that it is legal to have other gods, thereby being in contradiction? But, it still doesn't mean that it is morally right. It just makes it legal.

Quote:
"2. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them..."

The first amendment does not allow us to create laws prohibiting the free exercise of religion.


So here again, it contradicts because the law allows it? Again, may be legal but still is not right in God's eyes.

Quote:
"3. You shall not take the name of the Lord, your God, in vain."

We have repealed our blasphemy laws, which discriminated against non-Christian religions. Our free-speech laws directly contradict this Commandment. See first amendment.


Still, may be legal but it doesn't make it morally right.

Quote:
"4. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:"

Same as above, would be a violation of the first amendment.


True, but are you not implying that man's laws are more important than God's laws? If that is not what you mean, then I apologize and could you explain further.

Quote:
If by "that building" you mean the Kentucky court house case that went to the Supreme Court this past March, they had not been hanging all that long. They were put up in 1999 primarily as a provocation and sparked litigation almost immediately.

Frankly, I really do not understand this in your face mentality that the right is displaying about their religion. I feel it is the cause of much of the current divisiveness we are experiencing.


Well, could not we Christians also call your wanting to remove God from schools, courthouses, etc., an in your face mentality? Like I have said before, we differ, we lobby to change the laws. I just believe there is a compromise somewhere. It has to be a compromise that both sides can live with. If you take these things away, then I feel my rights are violated, if you don't take them away, then you feel your rights are violated. So, wouldn't the prudent thing to do be come up with a compromise we can all live with?

Oh, and Momma Angel did not chicken out there Mesquite. Momma Angel just knows better to argue politics. I know less about politics than anything else in this world.

But, I do think it's safe to say that the majority of the world would not think that it was God condoning the actions of 9/11. At least I sure hope so. There has to be some discernment.
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 11:50 pm
Intrepid wrote:
slkshock7,
You will find, as you no doubt already have, that Frank will only accept what Frank wants to accept. He thinks on a different plane than most of us and just as God said "I change not"....so does Frank


Actually Intrepid, Frank made it quite clear what he was looking for.

When the god of the Bible, the god that Jesus worshipped is on the scene speaking or acting, in other words a first person account such as this, only have him demonstrating loving characteristics.

There is an abundance of these first person accounts, but I have not seen many that are flattering.

Leviticus 26:27-32
Quote:
.27 And if ye will not for all this hearken unto me, but walk contrary unto me;
28 Then I will walk contrary unto you also in fury; and I, even I, will chastise you seven times for your sins.
.29 And ye shall eat the flesh of your sons, and the flesh of your daughters shall ye eat.
30 And I will destroy your high places, and cut down your images, and cast your carcases upon the carcases of your idols, and my soul shall abhor you.
.31 And I will make your cities waste, and bring your sanctuaries unto desolation, and I will not smell the savour of your sweet odours.
32 And I will bring the land into desolation: and your enemies which dwell therein shall be astonished at it.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.15 seconds on 11/16/2024 at 04:28:54