Mesquite Wrote:
Quote:That is the reason I asked if you read the links. It would be easier if you just read the short article. I has pictures that help make the point.
Ok, I understand.
Quote:Do you have a reference for where ten commandments are listed as such? There are at least three main versions for Hebrew, Catholic, and Protestant. Once again I provided a link to illustrate the point. It is much easier to view the graphic there.
Exodus 20:1-17. Don't understand why the Catholics don't have the graven image one.
Quote:"1. Thou shalt have no other gods before me."
Ignoring this, our government has not outlawed Hinduism. That's understandable, since the First Amendment directly contradicts the First Commandment.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Ok, now I don't know if I am just tired or what but God says have no other Gods. So, If I understand this correctly, the law contradicts this because it allows religious freedom? I am not good at politics whatsoever so please bear with me. But, if I am correct then that means that it is legal to have other gods, thereby being in contradiction? But, it still doesn't mean that it is morally right. It just makes it legal.
Quote:"2. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them..."
The first amendment does not allow us to create laws prohibiting the free exercise of religion.
So here again, it contradicts because the law allows it? Again, may be legal but still is not right in God's eyes.
Quote:"3. You shall not take the name of the Lord, your God, in vain."
We have repealed our blasphemy laws, which discriminated against non-Christian religions. Our free-speech laws directly contradict this Commandment. See first amendment.
Still, may be legal but it doesn't make it morally right.
Quote:"4. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:"
Same as above, would be a violation of the first amendment.
True, but are you not implying that man's laws are more important than God's laws? If that is not what you mean, then I apologize and could you explain further.
Quote:If by "that building" you mean the Kentucky court house case that went to the Supreme Court this past March, they had not been hanging all that long. They were put up in 1999 primarily as a provocation and sparked litigation almost immediately.
Frankly, I really do not understand this in your face mentality that the right is displaying about their religion. I feel it is the cause of much of the current divisiveness we are experiencing.
Well, could not we Christians also call your wanting to remove God from schools, courthouses, etc., an in your face mentality? Like I have said before, we differ, we lobby to change the laws. I just believe there is a compromise somewhere. It has to be a compromise that both sides can live with. If you take these things away, then I feel my rights are violated, if you don't take them away, then you feel your rights are violated. So, wouldn't the prudent thing to do be come up with a compromise we can all live with?
Oh, and Momma Angel did not chicken out there Mesquite. Momma Angel just knows better to argue politics. I know less about politics than anything else in this world.
But, I do think it's safe to say that the majority of the world would not think that it was God condoning the actions of 9/11. At least I sure hope so. There has to be some discernment.