8
   

Fitzgerald Investigation of Leak of Identity of CIA Agent

 
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Aug, 2006 12:49 am
I am very sorry, Mr. Imposter, but since you made up your last post out of whole cloth, it is not acceptable.

If you haven't made it up, please provide a link ,lbut be advised, I never read anything written by Michael Moore!!! I only read, when covering the alleged Global Warming, evidence from bona-fide researchers.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Aug, 2006 04:05 am
kuvasz said...

Quote:
ever cheat on your wife? ever been tempted? Would you if you could?


The answer to all of these questions is easy...NO!
I made a promise when I got married,and I keep my promises.
If a man cant or wont keep his word,then he isnt much of a man,IMHO.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Aug, 2006 09:23 am
BernardR wrote:
THE Direct Quote from the Butler Report--

a. It is accepted by all parties that Iraqi officials visited Niger in 1999.

b. The British government had intelligence from several different sources indicating that this visit was for the purpose of acquiring uranium. Since uranium constitutes almost three-quarters of Niger's exports, the intelligence was credible.

c. The evidence was not conclusive that Iraq actually purchased, as opposed to having sought, uranium, and the British government did not claim this.


I know Mr. Parados can't read well and I am starting to worry about Mr. Kuvasz.

I'LL SPELL IT OUT FOR YOU KINDERGARTEN STYLE, MR. PARADOS.

The nice mans in the Butler Place wrote- that the Iraqi bad mans really and truly looked for the icky stuff--Uranium.


D comes after C in the Butler report, Bernard.

A = 1
B = 2
C = 3
D = 4

D is the fourth conclusion. You failed to include it Bernard.
Falsus in omnia
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Aug, 2006 09:27 am
kuvasz wrote:
You know, Jesus had it right about worrying about the beam in your own eye before the mote in another's.



Just wanting to point this out to c.i.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Aug, 2006 09:52 am
For ticomaya's benefit:

A. mote = speck
B. plank = board

Logic: A does not equal B.

Your language skills deserves a Very Happy, and your logic skills an "F".
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Aug, 2006 10:38 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
For ticomaya's benefit:

A. mote = speck
B. plank = board


Good ... I'm glad you figured it out. I assumed I would have to explain it to you.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Aug, 2006 10:48 am
ticomaya, You're the one that doesn't understand the English language. You used "plank" to mean "mote" in a supposedly insult to a previous disucssion. How you managed to pass the bar is a mystery. How you manage to get clients is also a mystery. You're too stupid to be a lowyer.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Aug, 2006 11:08 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
ticomaya, You're the one that doesn't understand the English language. You used "plank" to mean "mote" in a supposedly insult to a previous disucssion.


Laughing No, I used "plank" to mean "plank." (Note: It's "plank" in the NIV, and "beam" in the KJV.)

Back when we had that exchange, mysteryman had commented that you frequently called others "stupid," and thought you ought to remember that you "barely graduated" from high school the next time you "attack someone with a better education then you." You didn't seem to understand his point, so I told you: "I think his point is that perhaps you should remove the plank out of your own eye."

In doing so, I was referring to the plank in your eye (i.e., your own lack of education). I was not referring to the speck/mote, which would be in the other poster's eyes (that which you are complaining about ... i.e., other's stupidity).

Are you following this yet?

----

Here's the exchange:

Ticomaya wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
mm wrote (again another stupid statement):
Yet you denigrate others and call them stupid.
If you were so smart,you would have done better in high school and maybe gone on to college.

I think you need to remember that you "barely graduated" the next time you attack someone with a better education then you.

I did graduate from college with a major in Accounting - in the top 25 percent of my graduating class. I worked in management except for the first 3.5 years I worked as a traveling auditor for Florsheim Shoe Company. They promoted me to Audit Manager, and from then on, I've worked in management for a handful of companies, and also did consulting work.


I think his point is that perhaps you should remove the plank out of your own eye.


Matthew 7:3 (NIV):

Quote:
Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?


Matthew 7:3 (KJV):

Quote:
And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?


----

c.i. wrote:
How you managed to pass the bar is a mystery. How you manage to get clients is also a mystery. You're too stupid to be a lowyer.


Laughing There's that plank again.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Aug, 2006 11:43 am
I'm not a bible reader or a christian, so I interpret them the way I undersatnd them. When I see a contradiction, I point them out. Live with it.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Aug, 2006 01:36 pm
Mystery, so you feel that Clinton's cheating on his wife is worse than Bush lying us into a war? Wow!
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Aug, 2006 09:45 pm
I think it would be difficult to stick a plank in someone's eye without destroying most his face. Consider that a "plank" implies one broad edge, such as the plank used in decks, etc, we're talking about something six inches wide or more.

Stick such a plank into someone's face far enough to achieve substantial eye penetration, and you have also smashed his eye sockets, nose and cheekbones to smithereens. A gruesome scene, any way you look at it.

Now if you want to stick a piece of wood into someone's eye, but leave the rest of the face relatively undisturbed, such a thing would not be rightly called a "plank". "Rod", "stick", or "pole" would be the choice of words here.

The whole "plank in the eye" concept seems fairly unsound and unexecutable without massive facial damage.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Aug, 2006 10:11 pm
ticomaya is a sociopath like Bush. He's a fright; a sick in the head, one.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Aug, 2006 05:33 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
ticomaya is a sociopath like Bush. He's a fright; a sick in the head, one.


Are you armed with anything but ad hominems, c.i.?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Aug, 2006 05:58 pm
Much better than your snides.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Aug, 2006 01:38 am
Ticomaya- If I may be allowed to comment, such ad hominems and obscenities define the poster.

Many on the left are similar( eg- the smutty Frank Apisa).
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Aug, 2006 07:07 am
Advocate wrote:
Mystery, so you feel that Clinton's cheating on his wife is worse than Bush lying us into a war? Wow!


Please show one time where I ever said that,or anything even remotely similiar to that.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Aug, 2006 12:20 pm
BernardR wrote:
... such ad hominems and obscenities define the poster.

Many on the left are similar ...

Idiocy knows no ideology - both the left and the right have their wingnuts.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Aug, 2006 04:32 pm
timberlandko wrote:
BernardR wrote:
... such ad hominems and obscenities define the poster.

Many on the left are similar ...

Idiocy knows no ideology - both the left and the right have their wingnuts.


Did someone call?



(ps...hello from our mutual friend representing guns n ammo contingent)
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Aug, 2006 05:17 pm
blatham wrote:
(ps...hello from our mutual friend representing guns n ammo contingent)

Be sure to tell our mutual G&A freind I said "Hi" and hope all's well - GlamorGams updated me re the new eMail addy a couple days ago, and I've put followup high on my list stuff to get around to.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Aug, 2006 12:14 am
You may be correct, Mr. Timberlandko, that "Both sides have their wingnuts" but I hold, without fear of contradiction, that a prominent feature of "wingnuts" is the number of obscenites and Ad hominems they produce. In that sphere, according to my count, such worthies such as Mr. Imposter and Mr. Apisa have no peers.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 02/24/2025 at 09:09:40