Byron York and I have been emailing back-and-forth about this very point (and I must say that he is a gentleman even in his error:)
Quote:
"I'm not going to tell the jury the information was classified," Fitzgerald answered. "I will tell the jury that there was an investigation into whether the law was violated."
And what law might that be? Sure enough, it's the one barring disclosure of a covert agent's identity.
This is not neccessarily true. There are several different laws which could be violated.
Okie,
Quote:
Yes, it was used to combat, retaliate if you wish to use the term, but to combat mis-information put out by Wilson
It doesn't matter if the information is mis- or not (though it in fact was not). It is still wrong to out someone's wife as retaliation for them disagreeing with you.
Quote:and they doubted her covert status
This is immaterial, even if it is true. In fact, there is little doubt that Cheney and Libby knew she worked for CPD and knew that her identity was confidential even if it didn't rise to the level of 'covert' under the IIPA, which still makes it a crime to talk about publicly.
Quote:and they also figured the reporters already had the info, which many did.
As far as I can tell through research, this is false. Which reporter already had the info? Where did they get it? Why were they looking into it??
I hope you aren't going to respond with a point about Novak, as his stories (which have changed 4 times now) don't hold much water.
Quote:I happen to think Wilson lied about many things and was involved in a vendetta for not only himself, but the CIA.
That's a nice opinion that you have. Now, if you had a single fact to back this conspiracy theory up, I would invite you to present it so we could discuss it.
Cycloptichorn