dyslexia wrote:Quote:We are talking about the killing of a living being, not the withholding of sperm.
the point is No We ARE NOT, what we are talking about is at what point in time does one become a human being (especially in the eyes of the law) "birth" is the answer. Frank has made abundantly clear his opinion is that the mother has the final authority voer what happens to her body up to the point of a birth of a legal human being.
Actually in the "eyes of the law" you can be charged with murder for killing an unborn child (unless you own an abortuary).
So relying on the law to give you a clear answer on this is futile, Dys, cause the law sees it both ways at present.
"The eyes of the law" also could not see that black folks were persons and declared that they weren't in the Dred Scott decision.
If you are counting on the law to help you find out what is right, you're gonna grow up a scary person.
---------------------
Frank, you have stated previously that if abortion was illegal you would still think that the mother has a "right" to an abortion.
So my question to Frank or any other pro-abortion devotee who thinks he can answer:
If her "right" does not come from the law, then from where or who does it come?