8
   

This is Biden's America

 
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Thu 31 Mar, 2022 06:05 pm
‘We’ve got to stop fooling ourselves’: Enthusiasm gap keeps getting worse for Dems
The last time the voter enthusiasm deficit was this wide, Democrats lost more than 60 seats in the House.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/03/31/enthusiasm-gap-dems-00021774
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Sun 3 Apr, 2022 08:25 am
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Tue 5 Apr, 2022 09:07 am
Truthout
5t5ia tmorin7c5hdl4s ·
The Biden administration has finally announced that it will repeal one of Trump’s most destructive anti-immigrant policies that immediately deports asylum seekers crossing the U.S.-Mexico border under the pretext of COVID-19.


And I've been told for a year that he lacks this power. - eb
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Tue 5 Apr, 2022 09:13 am
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Wed 6 Apr, 2022 06:15 pm
Texas Governor Greg Abbott announces his plan to use charter buses to send migrants entering his state to Washington, DC

I expect a judge may block this idiocy, but I am almost always disappointed when expecting any form of reason these days.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  3  
Wed 6 Apr, 2022 08:05 pm

"If Assange is extradited, no journalist in the world is safe from life imprisonment in the United States" Daniel Ellsberg, Pentagon Papers
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Thu 7 Apr, 2022 08:18 am
Robert Reich
47 mins ·
Yesterday, CEOs from America’s largest oil companies appeared before a House committee probing why they’re raising prices at the pump while raking in record profits and spending huge sums buying back their shares of stock. (Last year, Chevron, Exxon, BP, and Shell spent more than $44 billion on buybacks and dividends, and plan to spend $74 billion this year — money that should be used instead to lower prices at the pump.) It’s price-gouging and profiteering, and we’re all paying for it.
Republicans, meanwhile, are focusing on sex. I’ll explain why in a moment, but first consider the extent of the Republican sex obsession.
In her recent confirmation hearings, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson was barraged with questions from Republican senators about her alleged lenient treatment of child pornographers. It was a baseless claim, but that didn’t matter to the Republicans who kept hammering her. In four days of hearings, the phrase ‘child porn’ (or ‘pornography’ or ‘pornographer’) was mentioned 165 times, along with 142 mentions of “sex” or related terms like “sexual abuse” or “sex crimes.”
On March 28, Florida’s Republican Governor Ron DeSantis signed a bill banning kindergarten through third-grade public school teachers from talking about sexual orientation or gender identity, calling it an “anti-grooming bill” and accusing opponents of wanting to groom young children for sexual exploitation. (When the Walt Disney Company, Florida’s largest employer, came out against the measure and promised the company would donate $5 million to LBGTQ organizations, DeSantis called Disney’s opposition “radical” and suggested that the Florida legislature cancel Disney’s special status in Florida that essentially makes it a local government.)
In late February, Texas’s Republican Governor Greg Abbott ordered state child welfare officials to launch child abuse investigations into reports of transgender kids receiving gender-affirming care from Last May he signed into law a ban on abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy, and gives private citizens the right to sue anyone who helps someone obtain an abortion.
Just yesterday, Oklahoma’s Republican House voted overwhelmingly to make performing an abortion a felony, punishable by up to 10 years in prison. The measure now heads to Oklahoma’s Republican governor, Kevin Stitt, who has signaled he’ll sign it into law.
The Republican Party, once a proud proponent of limited government, has turned itself into a font of sexual innuendo and legal intrusion into the most intimate aspects of personal life. Protecting children from predators is a worthy aim, to be sure, but the GOP is obsessing about all aspects of sex. Why?
First, it’s part of their culture war, and culture wars sell with voters (and the media) eager for conflict and titillation. A culture war over sex sells even better. It lets Republicans imply that Democrats are somehow on the side of sexual “deviants” who endanger the “natural order.”
Also, by focusing on sex, Republicans can court both the evangelical right and the rightwing extreme QAnon vote (with its the loony “Pizzagate” conspiracy claim that Hillary Clinton was a pedophile).
Most importantly, a culture war over sex allows Republicans to sound faux populist without having to talk about the real sources of populist anger — corporate-induced inflation at a time of record corporate profits, profiteering and price gouging, monopolization, stagnant wages, union busting, soaring CEO pay, billionaires who have amassed $1.7 trillion during the pandemic but who pay a lower tax rate than the working class, and the flow of big money into the political campaigns of lawmakers who oblige by lowering taxes on the wealthy and big corporations and doling out corporate welfare.
Oh, and by focusing on pedophilia, gender identity, gay people, and abortion, Republicans don’t have to talk about Trump and January 6.
Democratic politicians, wake up! You have a critical opportunity between now and the midterm elections to reframe the national conversation as it should be framed -- around abuses of economic power by corporations and the super rich. Those abuses are worsening. They affect the everyday lives of all Americans.
If you fail to do this, Americans will continue to be inundated with Republican “culture war” messages intended to deflect the public’s attention from how badly big corporations and the super wealthy are shafting them. Americans won’t understand how these economic abuses all relate to record amounts of income and wealth at the top, and what must be done to reverse this imbalance (break up monopolies, enact a windfall profits tax, raise taxes on large corporations and the super wealthy, strengthen labor unions, reform campaign finance, stop corporate welfare, and so on). And some of you will lose your jobs in the midterm elections — allowing Republicans to take over the House and Senate.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  3  
Thu 7 Apr, 2022 01:15 pm
Today's vote to confirm K B Jackson to the Supreme Court is the crown of Biden's tenure at this point. Very well done.
Ragman
 
  1  
Thu 7 Apr, 2022 05:18 pm
@edgarblythe,
Now if he could only put Trump behind bars, we could call it a real success.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  3  
Fri 8 Apr, 2022 09:15 am
This from Fortune:
More than 100,000 borrowers have had their student loan debt forgiven — totaling over $6 billion — since the Biden administration announced changes to the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program in October 2021, according to the U.S. Department of Education.

Now he just needs to take the next step and eliminate the rest of it.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Fri 8 Apr, 2022 02:00 pm
@edgarblythe,
Great news.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Sun 10 Apr, 2022 12:15 pm
Biden continuing Trump's privatization efforts.
Real Music
 
  1  
Sun 10 Apr, 2022 01:06 pm
@edgarblythe,
1. Thank you posting this video.

2. I've been wanting to start a thread exclusively about Rep. Katie Porter for quite a while.

3. Rep. Katie Porter, has been and still is, one of my favorite members of Congress.

4. I greatly admire Rep. Katie Porter.

5. So, I decided to use this topic to start a thread exclusively on Rep. Katie Porter.

6. Obviously this won't be the only topic, just the first topic.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Tue 12 Apr, 2022 05:35 am
The Defense Industry’s Ukraine Pundits

Last week, CNN brought on former U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta for his fourth recent appearance to talk, once again, about Russian President Vladimir Putin's deadly invasion of Ukraine.

“I think we need to understand that there is only one thing that Putin understands, and that's force,” said Panetta on Newsroom.

The former CIA director added: “I think the United States has to provide whatever weapons are necessary to the Ukrainians, so that they can hit back, and hit back now.”

At no time did Panetta nor CNN mention that he’s a senior counselor at Beacon Global Strategies, a defense industry consulting firm that has reportedly represented weapons manufacturer Raytheon. The firm doesn’t disclose its clients, but Raytheon and the defense industry generally stand to benefit from the conflict in Ukraine.

The episode is part of a broader pattern and practice: Since Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine, cable news networks have routinely called on defense officials-turned-consultants to offer analysis and help the American public make sense of the crisis. Often, these analysts have used their TV time to call for greater U.S. involvement and bolder moves that could ratchet up tensions between two nuclear-armed superpowers.

The networks have consistently failed to disclose these analysts’ day jobs, describing them instead by only their former high-ranking military or government roles — leaving viewers in the dark about the analysts’ financial ties to defense contractors that stand to profit from increased or prolonged conflict.

During its Ukraine coverage, MSNBC even failed to include disclosures when the network invited on former Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, who serves on the board of directors at Lockheed Martin, the world’s biggest defense contractor.

When asked about this matter, Johnson told The Lever, “I have no comment.”

Corporate media’s lack of transparency about these consultants is deeply troubling, said Craig Holman, government affairs lobbyist for Public Citizen.

“This type of revolving-door behavior should be prohibited for military officials to serve in a private capacity representing military contractors,” Holman told The Lever. “If not prohibited, it should be disclosed to everyone so when they’re going on television trying to affect Biden's policy on whatever war they have in mind, they ought to be straightforward.”

The phenomenon is not new. In an analysis of three weeks of news coverage following last year’s U.S. troop withdrawal from Afghanistan, Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR) found that 20 of the 22 featured guests from the U.S. on the networks’ Sunday shows had ties to the military-industrial-complex. At that point, too, the TV networks regularly neglected to disclose their guests’ ties to the defense industry. But the stakes are now much higher: Military conflict between the U.S. and Russia could make for a world-ending disaster, which is why the Biden administration has been reluctant to take major actions that could be perceived as escalatory.

But the Ukraine crisis and the potential for greater conflict have been a goldmine for defense contractors, sending stocks skyrocketing and prompting sharp increases in defense spending.

“The people who have the most interest in influencing the direction of the coverage are weapons makers,” Jim Naureckas, editor at FAIR, told The Lever. “They have the most direct financial stake in the way we cover issues of war and peace. Unfortunately, they are interested in more war and less peace.”

Since the start of the Ukraine crisis, U.S. defense stocks in leading companies like Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, and Lockheed Martin have surged, and they are expected to continue rising in the coming months. And in the wake of Russia’s invasion, President Biden signed into law a spending package that directs a record-breaking $782 billion towards defense — almost $30 billion above his initial request.

According to The Hill, “The additional Ukraine aid comes on top of more than $1 billion the U.S. has already spent in the past year to arm Ukrainian soldiers with modern weapons, including Javelin anti-tank missiles, manufactured by Lockheed Martin and Raytheon Technologies, and Raytheon’s anti-aircraft Stinger missiles.”

Cashing In On Military Experience
With stories about Russia’s invasion dominating the news, networks have had tons of pundit slots to fill. Those spots have largely gone to high-ranking ex-military officials, who often find lucrative careers in the influence industry working on behalf of defense contractors — and who tend to spout hawkish rhetoric that aligns with how corporate media generally covers conflict. Most of the time, however, the networks have failed to divulge how such martial bombast could aid these former officials’ private-sector employers.

For instance, Jeremy Bash, who served as chief of staff at the Pentagon and the CIA under President Barack Obama, has been a recurring guest on MSNBC and NBC during their coverage of the crisis in Ukraine.

Bash, who was named a national security analyst for NBC and MSNBC in 2017, is also a founder and managing director at Beacon Global Strategies, which describes itself as “a strategic advisory firm specializing in international policy, defense, cyber, intelligence, and homeland security.” While Beacon Global Strategies does not disclose its clients, the firm has worked for defense giant Raytheon, according to the New York Times.

Days after Putin first launched the invasion of Ukraine, Bash went on NBC’s Meet the Press, eager to weigh in on the whole affair — presenting it as “an opportunity for the United States and the west to actually deliver a very fatal blow to Russia's ambitions on the global stage.”

“I think swallowing Ukraine, a country the size of Texas, with 40 million people, is unprecedented since World War II,” he said. “And if the United States can train and equip the Ukrainians and, I think, engage in a second Charlie Wilson's War, basically the sequel to the movie and the book, which is arming and training a determined force that will shoot Russian aircraft out of the sky, open up those tanks with can-openers, like the Javelins, and kill Russians, which is what our equipment is doing, I think this is a huge opportunity to hit Putin very hard.”

Javelin anti-tank missiles are manufactured jointly by Lockheed Martin and Raytheon. At no point did anyone involved in the broadcast mention that Bash’s consulting firm has worked for Raytheon.

Admiral James Stavridis, an advisory board member at Beacon Global Strategies, has also made frequent recent appearances on MSNBC. Stavridis is also the vice chair of global affairs and managing director at private equity giant Carlyle Group, which has a history of investing in the defense and national security markets.

Stavridis pushed a war-hungry stance on MSNBC’s The Beat with Ari Melber shortly after the Russian invasion began. “In NATO, where I was supreme allied commander, you flood the zone in Eastern Europe,” said Stavridis. “You bring in troops, tanks, missile systems, warships, all the above, in order to send a signal to Vladimir Putin.”

On Meet The Press a couple weeks later, Stavridis recommended that the U.S. send more anti-aircraft missiles to Ukraine to allow the country to create its own no-fly zone: “What we ought to do is give the Ukrainians the ability to create a no-fly zone,” he said. “More Stingers, more missiles that can go higher than Stingers.”

Stinger missiles are manufactured by Raytheon, Beacon Global Strategies’ reported client. Again, MSNBC failed to disclose information about Stavridis’ firm or its work for Raytheon.

Stavridis also called on the United States to approve an arms transfer proposed by Poland, which offered to send Soviet-era MiG-29 fighter jets to Ukraine — via an American air force base in Germany, with the expectation that the U.S. would then supply Poland with replacement planes. “Get those MiG-29s in their hands,” said Stavridis.

The Biden administration shot down that plan on the basis that it could significantly escalate tensions between the U.S. and Russia. A Pentagon spokesperson said that “we do not believe Poland's proposal is a tenable one.”

Beacon Global Strategies did not respond to a request for comment.

“I'd Love To See NATO Move In There”
Bash and Stavridis aren’t the only high-ranking national security officials-turned-pundits working as consultants who have lately been beating the drums of war.

Retired U.S. combat general Barry McCaffrey, for example, has been a mainstay on MSNBC. During an appearance on The Beat with Ari Melber, he lauded NATO and the European Union’s early decision to bring more than 7,000 U.S. troops and armored vehicles from Fort Stewart, Georgia, into Germany.

McCaffrey — who made the controversial Gulf War decision for his infantry division to fire on Iraqi soldiers, civilians, and children after a ceasefire was already underway — runs a consulting firm called BR McCaffrey Associates LLC. According to the business’ website, McCaffrey’s firm promises to help clients “build linkages between government and private sector clients; design public relations, media, advertising and legislative strategies; and provide client specific analysis of U.S. and international political and economic issues.”

In the years following 9/11, McCaffrey pushed for an endless Iraq War, including on NBC, without disclosing his financial interests: McCaffrey’s consulting firm was working behind the scenes to help at least one defense company secure a contract supplying Iraq with armored vehicles.

Former CIA Director and retired army general David Petraeus, meanwhile, has made multiple appearances on CNN recently, during which he talked about the need to get MiGs “into Ukrainian skies.” Petraeus is a partner at private equity giant KKR, a firm with significant defense business. He also serves on the board of directors at Optiv, which provides cybersecurity technology and services across the U.S. government, including the Department of Defense.

Retired army general Wesley Clark has also made a handful of appearances on CNN, voicing his opinion that this “battle is a long way from over, provided we can continue to provide replenishment to the weapons to the Ukrainians.”

Clark has long enjoyed a lucrative career working with defense companies. He runs a strategic consulting firm, Wesley K. Clark & Associates, which says it “uses his expertise, relationships, and extensive international reputation and experience in the fields of energy, alternative energy, corporate and national security, logistics, aerospace and defense, and investment banking.”

Last week on CNN, Clark was asked about the idea of sending a NATO task force to patrol waters off the coast of the Ukrainian city of Odessa.

“I'd love to see NATO move in there with a task force,” he said. “I don't think it's going to happen in the near term because of NATO's reluctance to come into direct conflict with Russian forces… But I do think it's important.”

“You Can't Give Away The Game”
MichèIe Flournoy, a former U.S. Undersecretary of Defense under Obama, has appeared on CNN at least twice in recent weeks to advocate for greater direct military support to Ukraine. Flourney is now co-founder and managing partner at WestExec Advisors, whose clients include aerospace and defense companies like Boeing. She also serves on the board of defense contractor Booz Allen Hamilton.

Flournoy didn’t disclose any of that when she went on State of the Union in early March to push for increasing military aid to Ukraine. “We need to be supplying Ukrainians with as much as we possibly can, munitions like anti-tank Javelin missiles, anti-air Stinger missiles,” she said. “And I think we should also be trying to get them some more of the planes that they know how to fly, MiGs from Eastern Europe, that could enable them to be much more effective in protecting the skies.”

On Amanpour a few days later, Flournoy doubled down on the idea of providing more weapons to Ukraine. “I think we need to bend over backwards to help the Ukrainians as much as possible,” she said. “This is not going to be over anytime soon.”

Flournoy’s appearance on Amanpour was one of the rare instances where CNN actually disclosed her work at WestExec Advisors — but the network didn’t mention the firm’s defense-industry clients. Naureckas, of FAIR, doesn’t simply blame pro-war talking heads for failing to disclose their defense-industry ties. He says it’s also up to the journalists running these cable news shows to help the public understand that these “military experts” have a stake in pushing for war.

“Everyone involved is aware of the transaction that is going on,” said Naureckas. “Journalists know this as well, but you can’t admit it because that would spoil the grift if you said, ‘Here’s a person who’s funded by the weapons industry to tell you about this crisis.’ It should be the reporter's instinct to explain the agenda of the people they are quoting, but because this is such an integral part of what is done in the journalism system, you can't give away the game.”

CNN and NBC did not respond to requests for comment.

0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  2  
Tue 12 Apr, 2022 07:47 am
Opinion: Democrats are missing the bigger immigration issue

Quote:
Democrats are terrified that a coming border surge might tank their midterm chances.

But they have largely ignored a much more serious immigration-related political risk. The problem in the months ahead isn’t that the United States will allow in too many immigrants; it’s that we’ll admit too few, particularly the kinds of workers who can fill critical labor-market shortages.

The Biden administration recently announced it would soon end Title 42, a Trump-era border-control policy. Citing the public health emergency when it invoked the policy in March 2020, the Trump team used the pandemic as a pretext to expel all arriving migrants without first allowing them to apply for asylum, as they have a legal right to do. Public health experts and immigration advocates — and many elected Democrats — have long condemned the policy, which has been used to carry out more than 1.7 million migrant expulsions.

President Biden’s own appointees have called the policy illegal and inhumane, with multiple high-level officials blasting it when they resigned. But Biden delayed reversing Title 42, fearing bad optics and attacks from Fox News. (Which arguably was going to attack him as an “open borders” president regardless.)

As expected, right-wingers are now catastrophizing about the looming “Armageddon” that will follow Title 42′s unwinding.

As a result, some worried Democrats are demanding that Biden keep this (likely illegal) policy in place. They have been so fixated on bad-faith right-wing attacks that they have missed the bigger, and much more serious, immigration-related liability: the millions of immigrants whose absence from the U.S. workforce is putting upward pressure on inflation.

Which Democrats are being blamed for, and which voters appear to care much more about.


The more I read from the two of you who appear to post the most, and remembering from two years ago when I was much more involved in participating, there are two kinds of democrats who have a little in common but more not in common in spite of what Hillary Clinton told Bernie Sanders years ago. Those differences have yet to be ironed out. Biden seems to let himself be pulled in all directions from within our party and by republicans. Most moderate democrats have I admit in some instances go farther right than they were maybe thirty or more years ago, but progressives have views which are way outside the mainstream. It seems to me when democrats as a whole focus on bread and butter issues which the average voter cares more about, we do much better. Just saying in my own opinion.

Aside from any moral reasons, we need immigrants for our economy, its that simple.
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Tue 12 Apr, 2022 07:59 am
@revelette1,
We are in agreement on this. I have stated time and again that I don't have an agenda specifically against Democrats. I just want them to do their jobs while they still can. They are the only organization that's big enough to set us on a better course.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Tue 12 Apr, 2022 12:06 pm
Keeping would-be refugees in jails and other forms of lockup costs vast sums of money in addition to fortunes spent on border security. Freeing these folks to work would not just save money it would allow them to buy stuff and pay taxes.
revelette1
 
  2  
Tue 12 Apr, 2022 01:27 pm
@edgarblythe,
You're completely right. Guess we shouldn't hold our breaths, we'll disagree again soon enough. Wink
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Wed 13 Apr, 2022 05:35 am
Amazon’s Union Buster Has Major Labor Clients
BY JULIA ROCK, WALKER BRAGMAN, ANDREW PEREZ – 13 APR 2022 – VIEW

A recent union drive at an Amazon warehouse on Staten Island didn’t just deliver the first labor victory anywhere in the online retailer’s U.S. operations when workers voted to unionize there. The bitter fight over the unionization effort has also provided a rare glimpse into how Democrats' consulting class simultaneously advises — and profits off — purportedly pro-union Democratic politicians, corporate union busters, and the labor movement itself.

The prominent Democratic consulting firm Global Strategy Group (GSG) was recently exposed for helping spearhead Amazon’s attempt to crush the Staten Island union drive. It turns out that the firm — which reaps millions of dollars each election cycle conducting polling, research, and public relations for candidates and liberal organizations — has also long done work for some of the country’s largest unions.

GSG originally sought to defend its work for Amazon, claiming in a since-deleted statement that a report from CNBC “incorrectly attributes anti-union work to GSG that was done by others.” On Monday, the firm issued a half-hearted apology, writing: “While there have been factual inaccuracies in recent reports about our work for Amazon, being involved in any way was a mistake. We are deeply sorry, and we have resigned that work.”

When approached by The Lever, two of the unions that previously contracted with GSG — the American Federation of Teachers and a New York chapter of the Service Employees International Union — said that they will no longer employ the firm.

However, five unions and several big-name Democratic candidates that have employed the firm in recent years did not respond to a request for comment as to whether they would sever ties with the company.

The episode highlights a central conflict at the heart of today’s Democratic Party, one with real implications for organized labor: Democrats present themselves as the party of organized labor, while also relying on campaign contributions from major corporations. Similarly, many of the consultants who work for labor unions or to elect Democrats spend as much or more of their time working on behalf of corporate interests that pay far better, so they have little real loyalty to Democrats’ working-class base.

“Democratic firms are particularly valuable to corporate America because they understand how institutions and individuals within the Democratic party operate,” Jeff Hauser, executive director of the Revolving Door Project, an organization which scrutinizes the personnel who move between corporations and government, told The Lever. “Amazon benefits from having strong relations with Democrats, especially at a time when they are at odds with the labor movement. So it’s particularly important for leadership in the Democratic Party to demonstrate solidarity with Amazon workers by boycotting firms that fight against workers and in favor of union-busting.”

“Working For Working People Is Good For Business”
GSG, a New York City-based public relations and research firm founded in 1995, advertises its deep ties with the Democratic Party. “GSG led polling for dozens of winning campaigns and political organizations in 2018 and 2020 to secure today’s Democratic majority in the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate,” notes the firm’s website. “In fact, our political team has polled in more races than any other firm.”

In the past two election cycles, GSG clients included the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the party’s official committees to elect senators and representatives, as well as those committees’ allied super PACs, Senate Majority PAC and House Majority PAC. The firm says it served as “a polling partner” in 2020 for Priorities USA, an outside group backing President Joe Biden that was funded in part by large union donations.

The firm has also worked on the campaigns of Cheri Beasley, who is running for Senate in North Carolina; Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.); Rep. Val Demings (D-Fla.), who is challenging Marco Rubio for his Senate seat in Florida; Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.); and Rep. Joe Morelle (D-N.Y.).

None of those committees, lawmakers, or candidates returned requests for comment from The Lever about whether the recent revelations about GSG’s work on the Amazon union campaign would impact their relationship with the firm.

In addition to its Democratic clients, the firm has also worked for a number of labor unions in recent years — including the National Education Association, the International Brotherhood of Carpenters New England Regional Council of Carpenters, the Actors and Artistes of the AFL-CIO, the International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers Local 98 in Philadelphia, the SEIU Local 775 in Washington state, and the ​​American Federation of School Supervisors Local 1 in New York, according to Department of Labor records and federal campaign finance reports.

The Lever contacted all of those unions to ask whether GSG’s work with Amazon would affect their relationship with the firm going forward, and none responded.

Two unions that were listed on GSG’s website as clients last fall, but have not worked with GSG for several years, said they would not work with the firm in the future.

"We are glad that GSG has written an apology, and is taking some accountability in the aftermath of the disclosure that they assisted Amazon,” AFT president Randi Weingarten told The Lever. “There are many consultants who have consistently supported the rights of those who work hard for a living — people like teachers, bus drivers, nurses, and Amazon workers — to have a voice on the job. We will work with those folks who didn’t have to be reminded that working for working people is good for business."

Meanwhile, a spokesperson for the SEIU 1199 in New York told The Lever the union would not work with GSG moving forward. “The union has not used them since 2016 and probably won’t again,” the spokesperson said, adding, “We applaud Amazon workers for their historic victory and call on Amazon to respect their vote and negotiate a fair contract without delay.”

The Nevada Democratic Party, which was taken over by candidates backed by the local Democratic Socialists of America chapter last year, told More Perfect Union it won’t work with GSG again, either.

“We Regret Being Involved”
Soon after GSG’s work for Amazon was first reported, the Amazon Labor Union that had organized the Staten Island workers filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) against the firm for violating federal labor law.

The complaint alleges that the website and other materials that GSG reportedly set up for Amazon contained lies about unions in violation of federal labor law, according to the Amazon Labor Union’s lawyer, Seth Goldstein. (GSG denies that it produced these materials, but CNBC reported that it “has documentation to back up its reporting, including descriptions of the firm’s work with Amazon.)

On Monday, GSG apologized for consulting with Amazon on its union-busting efforts, and suggested that it will not aid the company in future efforts to block its employees from unionizing. “While there were inaccuracies in the description of our work, we regret being involved in any way and have resigned this work with Amazon,” Tanya Meck, a partner and managing director at GSG, told The City.

But GSG has represented many other powerful corporate clients. The firm worked on behalf of both Uber and Lyft in their attempts to block legislation classifying their drivers as employees rather than as independent contractors.

GSG has also worked for Tyson Foods, which came under fire last year for not taking adequate precautions to protect plant workers from COVID-19. Other clients include Apollo Global Management, the hedge fund of billionaire Trump donor Marc Rowan, and Comcast, which faced its own union-busting allegations in 2020.

Tax returns show the firm has additionally worked for the health insurance lobbying group America’s Health Insurance Plans, the Wall Street-backed think tank Third Way, and the Big Pharma front group Center Forward.

The Biden administration has its own close ties to GSG. For example, Jen Psaki, Biden’s press secretary, was a senior vice president and managing director for GSG from 2011 to 2012.

Biden pledged to be the most “pro-union” president in American history and recently spoke out in favor of Amazon workers who want to unionize, but he has declined to take executive actions that would help workers in union elections, as The Lever previously reported.

Meanwhile, top Biden administration officials have rotated through the revolving door between Amazon and its associated firms and government, as New York Magazine recently reported. The company was also one of the top contributors to his candidate committee in 2020.

One corner of the administration, however, has taken an explicitly pro-labor tack. Biden’s NLRB has played an important role in enabling workers to form unions, including at Amazon, by pursuing unfair labor practices complaints and seeking to overturn anti-worker interpretations of labor law. The agency’s general counsel, Jennifer Abruzzo, issued a memo just last week finding that “captive audience meetings” — meetings that companies require workers to attend to hear anti-union talking points — violate federal labor law.

Amazon held such meetings at the recently unionized Staten Island warehouse ahead of the union election. GSG helped produce materials for these meetings, according to reporting by CNBC.

0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Wed 13 Apr, 2022 08:20 am
Umair Haque weaves some solid insights in amongst the hyperbole:

Enjoying 2022? This is the World the Far Right Wants

Why the Left Needs to Reinvent Itself if it Wants to Stop the Far Right

Quote:
In one sense, we’re winning this war. Militarily — Ukraine’s astonishing resistence and fierce determination has ground the might of the Russian army to a screeching halt. Goliath, meet David. But in another sense, on another front, we are losing this war very badly indeed.

That front is political — across the West, and the world, the far right, which is made of Putin’s buddies, continues to rise, and rise, and rise. Le Pen. Johnson. Australia’s PM might support Ukraine, but he doesn’t believe in climate change. Modi. Xi. I could go on and on until you and I both want to scream, punch somebody, call an Australian a bogan, or all three.

We are losing this war. It is a hybrid war for Russia, meaning that the political-cultural-social front counts as much as the military one. And while Ukraine’s winning the military front for the rest of us, we are losing the other front for ourselves.

The far right is in such ascendance that Putin’s big bet is that none of this matters. Sooner or later, in the West’s leading nations, a far right demagogue, backed, funded, trained by Putin, a marionette, rises…again…the first one was a certain orange coloured man who likes to be peed on…and then the West is done. It could be a Le Pen, pursuing a Frexit and an end to NATO. It could be a Johnson in extremis, and consider than Johnson rose to power by making Brits hate Europeans. It could be a Josh Hawley, who’s about as subtle in his white supremacy as Jimmy Savile was about his pedophilia. Sooner or later…Putin’s waiting, like a demon spider, for his web to catch a fly.

And that web isn’t being torn down. Why not?

Because the left. I know, I know. Jesus, guys. Grandpa’s going to lecture us about the left again! Run! Hold on while I grab you by the lapels, you snot-nosed litttle…no, really, we need to talk.

The centre left is failing incredibly badly. Joe Biden hasn’t even gotten a war bump for his relatively expert handling of this war. Social democratic parties in Europe are on their way to extinction. Even parts of wise and gentle Canada are governed by demagogues who bear a curious resemblance to burning garbage. And in France, well, there’s the scion of a neo-Nazi dynasty.

Why is the left failing? Imagine that before you was a road to paradise, and a dumpster. The left stepped into the dumpster, and it’s arguing about how to get itself out. It’s like the Oscars in there, except everyone’s Will Smith and Chris Rock, and everything’s made of garbage. What the *** am I talking about?

The left needs to present people with an answer to a failed economic paradigm: globalization. The answer it offers is…wokeness. The result of all this is that people run away screaming from the dumpster fire debating society that the left is now. Average people who the left needs to ever win an election again.

Am I saying that “wokeness killed the left”? No. I’m saying something a little more subtle. The left’s answer to the problems of this age is social justice. Not economic justice. And this position — whatever you or I might think of it — isn’t working.

This isn’t about my opinions or yours. Just facts. The left is not succeeding. My friends, if Baby Hitler is within the margin of error in winning in France, a nation that used to be so far left you couldn’t get a Metro in Paris on the weekends because everyone from doctors to teachers were protesting like it was the goddamned revolution…something is very, very wrong. This is the nation that taught the world what freedom really was. Even if it involved, uh, a guillotine or three. Baby Hitler should not be within a swastika’s distance of winning France.

To understand the failure of the left, we have to understand that our societies such as they are are made of multilayered paradigmatic failures. Imagine a whole goddamned paleontological history of failure. You’re digging in the dirt, and you keep on rummaging through sediment, and uncovering layer after layer of…failure. Here’s the KT boundary — that’s one failure. Ah man, see this band? Jesus, what the hell? Is it made of tears and pain? Black with hate? Don’t touch it, man, put on some gloves! It’s probably still poisonous!!

What do I mean by “our societies are made of a mulitlayered sedimentary history of failure?” Well, the left is correct to focus on the fact that our societies exist in the shadow of a long, long history of colonialism and slavery and supremacy. That’s not untrue. But above that — or maybe beside it — sits a long, long history of misogyny and bigotry, too. And beyond that, in the more modern strata, lies the vicious failure of globalization, which looks like ashes.

We have the complicated task of addressing all these failures. All of them. But leftism such as it’s become — wokeness, to put it too simply — only addresses one layer of these failures, maybe two.

Globalisation has failed everyone. And a modern politics needs to offer a vision and solution for its failures. Its only winners, really, are oligarchs and the warlords who need them. They shop at Harrods and buy trillion dollars penthouses in London and Manhattan — but the average person is struggling. Whether they’re in Calais or California or London’s gritty suburbs. Life has gone downhill for them since globalisation really bit. Their jobs vanished, their communities dried up, their futures became uncertain and unstable. And along came demagogues, and scapegoated immigrants and minorities for it all.

Now let’s think about what the modern left offers as a solution for all this. Social justice. Not economic justice. But how can social justice solve the problems of globaliation? It can’t. So the left tells the average person in the West — who’s life is in decline, looking for a job as prosperous as their grandpa’s, a community, stability, security, a sense of meaning, purpose, identity — that they’re a bad guy. Historically, they’re the inheritors of privilege descended from centuries of violence and slavery and so forth. And the average person, at the losing end of globalization — very much a victim of it — looks at left and says: “What are you smoking? I’m not the bad guy here, I’ve been wronged!”

The average person is correct. It’s true that in the West the average person is the inheritor of privilege, yada yadda, call a woke friend and have them write a grad-school level screed about it — but it’s truer, at least in the immediate sense of their lives, that they’re the losers of globalization. Their lives are more unstable and poorer and the whole nine yards.

Now. You can begin to see why the left is failing so badly. It is offering a badly incomplete solution for a set of failed paradigms. It isn’t really addressing the most immediate failure of all at all — globalization. It keeps insisting that the only paradigmatic failures which matters are those which the average person isn’t affected by.

So while the average person might be kind enough to even agree with the left — yes, I’ve inherited some level of privilege — the moment the left doesn’t also see them as victims of globalization, as its pawns, the people who got ripped off and hurt by it, and insists that they’re only bad guys…it loses them…they roll their eyes, at this childish nonsense, and never return.

Let me give you an example. If I wanted to sum up why the left is failing in two words, those words would be “pregnant people.” I read those two words in newspapers now — they’re becoming de rigueur. This is being forced on people. But should it be? If I actually ask women how they feel about this, every single woman I know — from Britain to France to America to Germany and beyond…rolls their eyes. They go along with it, because well, if they don’t, the same ten thousand people on Twitter will call them Nazis. “Jesus! I’ll say it! Just don’t send me a pic of your…OK? Goddamn!!” Meanwhile, actual Nazis are raping women — women, am I still allowed to say that word — in Ukraine.

And if you dare to point out, hey, uh, anyone asked women what they think of all this, the word “woman” becoming a fraught one…guess what, you get called a Nazi or a bigot or a fascist again, with exactly zero self-awareness that there actual crimes against humanity being committed against the people we’re not allowed to call women.

What planet are we even on? You begin to see what I mean by a “debating society in a dumpster fire.” All of this is bonkers.

Maybe you see my point. Or maybe you want to pillory me. Go right ahead. The ten thousand people on Twitter — maybe it’s a hundred thousand, who knows? — that insist that anyone who disagrees with their semantics, and that their semantics are the most important thing in the world…don’t matter. Really. They don’t. The only purpose they serve right about now is being friends of the far right. By bullying average people, like the women I know, into silence, they only alienate the average person from ever being part of the left. And the average person is quite right not to want to be part of a left that has forgotten about something very crucial: consent.

It’s not my opinion that “pregnant people” is an absurd turn of phrase. That’s not what I’m saying at all, and it’s not about my opinion. I’m saying that every single woman I know thinks so, and probably, that’s a social current that can’t be ignored. And yet nobody has asked them for consent. Instead, these semantics are just forced down their throats. And yet these semantics are about them.

So we have two problems. The left is so wrapped up in these semantics games, one, that it has no concrete vision of an economic or social paradigm to address the catastrophic failure of globalization for the average person. What kind of society does it want? Economy? Beyond telling me it wants semantics, and I’m a Nazi if I don’t agree — while in Ukraine, kids are being raped by actual Nazis — there’s nothing there, and that’s the second problem. Semantics and a lack of substance.

The situation is frankly abysmal and horrific. If I ask the average modern leftist what Marx said about, I don’t know, primitive accumulation, or how that was connected to Aristotle’s notion of the good life, they wouldn’t be able to tell me. If I ask them why gender pronouns matter, I’ll get a long, long lecture — and then I’ll get this weird totalitarian look, searching for any hint of dissent, because, like I said, I’m a bigot if I disagree.

There is real evil in this world. It doesn’t do to call people who merely disagree with you about complex subjects fascists…while actual fascists are busy shredding towns and committing crimes against humanity of the like we haven’t seen for decades….against people that, thanks to you, we’re beginning not to have a word for, which, yes, might be a real problem. What am I supposed to fight the real Nazis with? Grad-school theories? Shall I throw a pronoun at them? Oh, wait, I forgot, I’m as bad as a Ukrainian soldier raping a person who used to be known as a woman for bringing all this up. Yeah, totally. Heil Hitler, guys, you got me. I’m the world’s only brown Nazi.

This kind of debating society in a dumpster fire that the left has turned into is idiotic. It doesn’t do at all to build a politics on bullying and abusiveness — and ignore the matter of consent. The left just doesn’t seem to grasp this. Like some kind of weird rapey guy, it keeps on trying to pull our jaws apart, and force stuff down our gullets, and meanwhile, we keep protesting, “no…no! Stop, man, stop! I don’t want this!”…and it doesn’t care.

Take my example of “pregnant people” again. The average leftist will be in a state of absolute rage at me for contesting this turn of phrase. Like serious rage! As if I came to their home and tortured their pet. Get him! Burn the witch!! But there is real evil in the world. Not calling someone a “pregnant person” surely cannot be on the same level as the war crimes of raping a woman as an act of war or executing a parent in front of their kid. And yet if anyone who disagrees with “pregnant person” is a fascist…what are the soldiers in Ukraine?

So the left barely distinguishes between these obvious levels of things — between evil in bad faith and well-meaning disagreement. It just grabs you by the throat, whether you consent or not, and tries to force-feed you this bizarre diet of semantics. Nobody wants to have their consent ignored. Is it really OK to disappear the word “woman” in these contexts? Shouldn’t we ask… women?

If we don’t…uh…I hate to tell you this…but aren’t we being kind of…welll…rapey? And the left is just ignoring that, too.

In the complex sediments of failure, it’s not just gender diverse people we’ve failed. It’s also women. They are badly, badly wounded too, to this day, systematically discriminated against. You can’t just ignore that, and call them the bad guys, and hope to ever really have women on your side, which is precisely why so many have fled to the far right.

You have to acknowledge the ways in which we’ve all been failed by this complex sediment of failure, in a palaeontology of violence and hate. It can’t just be about one kind of wronged party. Women, by misogyny. Ethnic and racial minorities, by hate. The LGTBQ, by homophobia and transphobia. The average person, by globalization. All of us have been failed, unless our last name are “Bezos” or “Putin” or “the Devil.”

But the modern left is increasingly unwilling to even acknowledge this reality. It is increasingly saying that there are a small number of truly oppressed parties, who are the real victims, and everyone else is at fault. That isn’t just a false reality — we’re all victims here, whether of misogyny or globalisation or racism or all three — it’s bad politics, too. Go ahead and tell women they’re the real oppressors. Women — who still make 30% less than men and get the kind of hate for just existing that a dude will never, ever understand. Go ahead and tell women they’re the bad guys here and LOL — good luck ever getting elected.

The left is so focused on a tiny number of “oppressions” that it has forgotten its point is to build a better world for all of us, and that means understanding that we have all been failed by history, power, and money, just different versions of it.

It has become hyper focused with correcting one or two sets of wrongs, to the exclusion of all others — the very ones which affect most people — and that is why it has no broad appeal whatsoever anymore. And it’s also why calling everyone else the bad person, which is most of society, because only a tiny number are the biggest victims, only serves to alienate most people, and hence, the hard right just keeps rising and rising, like Sauron’s goddamned tower. I mean, come on. You’d have to a complete political idiot to think that just repeatedly calling most of society bad and terrible people, for simply existing, in more and more frenzied ways, until you’re literally calling anyone who says “pregnant woman” a bigot…. is ever going to get you elected. And this is what the left actually does now.

The point, again, isn’t that I agree or disagree with wokeness. My personal opinions make no appearance in this essay whatsoever, but as someone who literally grew up at gay clubs, maybe you can imagine what they are. Still, it needs to be pointed out. You cannot offer people who’ve been failed by globalisation… pronouns and semantics…and then force them down their throats… and call that a working politics.

The left has become too intolerant and short-sighted and bullysome — is that a word?— for its own good. I come from a culture where multiple genders have existed for centuries. I’m not saying that’s right or wrong, just that it is. And yet this debate becomes something the left is totally obsessed by. The hill it’s willing to die on.

Have you noticed this? The left doesn’t care about anything the way it cares about gender free bathrooms and pronouns and pregnant people.

Nothing else matters to this left. How should, for example, economies be organized? Should we, say, nationalise a few banks, and turn them into national development banks again? The modern left literally doesn’t care. Should we give people rights to income and property? A deafening silence. How about, at birth, maybe we give every kid a small investment fund, which matures at adulthood partly, and then again at retirement? Nothing. The left has no interest in these complex subjects at all. Ask it if statues should be torn down or if women need to be called something else — and you’ll drown in the painful outrage and abstruse theories of the responses.

It’s crazy, guys. It’s bananas. You can’t tell anyone that if a Ukrainian woman is raped in a war crime, what really matters is calling her a “pregnant person” — and be taken seriously. Anyone vaguely acquainted with reality or adulthood will walk away shaking their head at you. As well they should. Because your priorities are out of touch with reality. There is real evil in the world. The semantics of lesser evils are not what a working politics can be built on in a world pulsating and throbbing now with real, gargantuan scale evil.

Not just because I say so. Because what happens is this. Even if the average person is kind enough to be polite and agree with all this — “pregnant people” and pronouns matter as much as rape and war crimes and serious goddamned evil — because they don’t want to be bullied to high heaven by Twitter’s insane Woke Inquisition…they stop well short of voting for it. When it comes time to vote, the left has a big problem, which is that nobody turns out enough. That people are not turning out the way they used to — especially among the young — tells us something. This is a fad. A fashion. It’s not a functional politics.

If you can barely even get the Woke Police — you know, the people who’ll scream at you and call you a bigot for not saying “pregnant person” while women are raped in war crimes — to turn out, and they’re young, and this all alienates everyone else, then it can never win. It is a losing approach. It’s not a functional politics in that sense — it doesn’t even motivate its hardcore adherent to vote for it, not to mention turns everyone else off, and just aids the hard right in both those ways.

I’m on the side of everyone having equal rights. Everyone. But that does not mean that you can force your interpretation of them down people’s throats, and bully everyone into submission, just because you think you occupy the moral high ground.

There is a reason that people roll their eyes at wokery, and never vote for it. It doesn’t matter to them — and even if they’re polite enough to support it, they don’t turn out, because they are looking for answers to issues which hit them, not just 1% of the population. Those issues aren’t just about social justice and gender — they’re about economic injustice. They’re about the way that globalisation wrecked and shattered the middle and working classes, yet made billionaires into ultra billionaires, corrupted our polities, and left our societies utterly destablized and emptied out.

The left needs to have an answer to those questions. What is a modern economy in the 21st century? What jobs do people do? How do they not live lives of perpetual debt and misery? How do towns and cities left to abandon into rust regenerate? What do we do about climate change? How do we hold crimes against humanity trials? What do we do about the rise of the far right?

The answer to none of these questions is: “I’m going to force semantics down your throat, about an issue that doesn’t really affect you, and if you don’t just open your mouth and say yes please, more, sir, then I’m going to call you a Nazi, and never mind if there are real Nazis committing unspeakable right over there! You’re just as bad as them!”

That is not an answer. All it’s making people do is flee the left the way that a woman on a date would flee a rapey handsy guy. Because that’s what the left is doing. It’s trying to bully people into accepting a kind of totalist vision where semantics solve the world’s problems. If they did, my friends, women wouldn’t be being raped in Ukraine. Calling them “pregnant people” wouldn’t have stopped a single one of those crimes. Does the left get this? Their solutions hold too little resonance in the real world, which is now seeing a resurgence of true evil.

The Devil is looking at the left, and laughing. Evil stalks the globe again. The left, meanwhile, is busy calling everyone who doesn’t say the words “pregnant people” a Nazi, never mind the fact that actual crimes against humanity are a lot different and more than that. You can see why nobody much cares about the left anymore.

medium
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 09:32:47