8
   

This is Biden's America

 
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Mon 14 Mar, 2022 09:01 am
Dolly Parton, about to be inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, took herself out of contention, stating it was undeserved. She said it has motivated her to one day make an R & R album.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Mon 14 Mar, 2022 01:20 pm
In a scathing dissent, Neil Gorsuch accused the government of seeking dismissal of Abu Zubaydah’s petition to avoid “further embarrassment for past misdeeds.”
https://consortiumnews.com/2022/03/10/supreme-court-torture-at-cia-black-site-is-state-secret/?fbclid=IwAR28QBryJYljC9dShJaect2LZOjz00FMjuE3Stp3R_G3Ucc5qbWw4Mows24
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Mon 14 Mar, 2022 05:31 pm
https://scontent.fhou1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/275623091_282220207393875_3916956475651908015_n.jpg?_nc_cat=105&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=2c4854&_nc_ohc=0lWmM-itX2AAX_j2rrd&_nc_ht=scontent.fhou1-2.fna&oh=00_AT9NKsNCJOmvFXWFhN5vF0VL3Z33u49zbz0kdZ2d9fkvuw&oe=6234186A
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Tue 15 Mar, 2022 07:11 am
Sheldon Whitehouse
@SenWhitehouse
·
20h
Koch Industries has decided to continue its business operations in Russia, while the Koch Foundation runs its dark money operation here in the United States. Does that surprise anybody?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  0  
Tue 15 Mar, 2022 07:54 am
@edgarblythe,
Cori Bush seems to have emerged as the one voice I respect. I don’t hear much from Omar anymore. I assume all of the death threats have chilled her voice.
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Tue 15 Mar, 2022 08:48 am
@Lash,
Cori's more outspoken than most progressives lately.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Wed 16 Mar, 2022 01:25 am
In the UK there are 575 chemistry professors, but only one of them is black. Every single one of his applications for research funding has been turned down.

His name is Robert Mokaya.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  4  
Wed 16 Mar, 2022 05:31 am
Koch brothers launch new misinformation campaign against electric cars
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Wed 16 Mar, 2022 05:58 am
@hightor,
I would love if the Kochs and every aspect of being a Koch could somehow be eradicated from having ever existed. Of course that notion's silly because if they didn't do all of this somebody exactly like them would exist.
hightor
 
  2  
Wed 16 Mar, 2022 06:28 am
@edgarblythe,
I've seen lists of all the think tanks, PACs, family foundations, and educational grants they've sponsored or organized. It's stomach-turning. The sheer amount of money, political power, and media influence commanded by the "other side" shows why it is so difficult to loosen its grip on our society. Even large numbers of the working poor have swilled the Kool-Aid.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Wed 16 Mar, 2022 09:47 am
Russia business deals muddy GOP US Senate primary in Ohio

17 hrs ago - By JULIE CARR SMYTH 31 minutes ago COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Several Republicans competing for the party’s nomination to run for U.S. Senate in Ohio are facing scrutiny for their ties to Russia as the country intensifies its war against Ukraine. Much ... (Associated Press)


Read more: https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-2022-midterm-elections-business-europe-rob-portman-903327323c57c2e410c0921ec5f18c01
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Wed 16 Mar, 2022 05:50 pm
Ukraine, Russian Negotiators Say They’re Inching Closer to Peace Deal

https://truthout.org/articles/ukraine-russian-negotiators-say-theyre-inching-closer-to-peace-deal/?fbclid=IwAR19BHiYOTuQjDD3P8TeeUVeftd6mXAWdqC22RqV9jNICHLWyW5zbsqYjUA
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Thu 17 Mar, 2022 06:48 am
By HOLLY OTTERBEIN

03/17/2022 04:31 AM EDT

Top figures from Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign are privately encouraging Ro Khanna to run for president in 2024 if Joe Biden doesn’t seek a second term, giving the California congressman an important stamp of approval from progressives as the party looks to its post-Biden future.

Jeff Weaver, Sanders’ former presidential campaign manager, and Mark Longabaugh, a senior adviser to Sanders during his 2016 bid, have both urged Khanna to consider a campaign in the event Biden declines to run again, according to a person familiar with their discussions.

Democratic officeholders are reluctant to speak publicly about their ambitions in a potential open race in 2024 out of concern that they could undermine the president, who has said he plans to campaign for a second term if he is in good health. There are also sensitivities surrounding Vice President Kamala Harris, who is atop the list of possible candidates but faces skepticism from some party insiders who fear she cannot win a general election.



But a growing list of Democratic governors, senators and House members are turning their attention to the possibility of a primary in two years that doesn’t include Biden, given the president’s advanced age and dismal approval ratings. Roughly half of Americans don’t expect Biden, now 79, will run for a second term, according to a recent Wall Street Journal poll.

The talks between Khanna and current and former Sanders advisers offer a window into the hushed, behind-the-scenes conversations that Democrats are having in the event that Biden doesn’t seek reelection. They also demonstrate that a key part of Sanders’ brain trust is looking to Khanna, a close ally to the Vermont senator, as his heir apparent.

“I think Ro would be a very effective candidate,” said Longabaugh, who stressed that he was only referring to a scenario in which Biden did not run again in 2024. “This guy has a message that’s very powerful. … Ro is basically saying, ‘Is there a way in which we can reconstruct the economy so that all of the wealth is not just being generated on the East Coast, West Coast, or out of my congressional district?’”

In an interview, Khanna made clear that he had no intention of challenging Biden and expressed strong support for his reelection. But he did not close the door to 2028.



“I’m not running in 2024,” Khanna said. “I fully expect the president to run and intend to support him strongly. If for some reason he didn’t, that would be very disappointing, but there are a number of other candidates who I think I could get behind who would make sure that the Democrats beat Donald Trump.”



As for a race beyond that, he said that “after the ’24 cycle will be a time where America will start to look to the future.”

Sen. Bernie Sanders speaks at a news conference accompanied by Reps. Pramila Jayapal, Ro Khanna and Ken Buck, along with Sens. Mike Lee and Chris Murphy
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) speaks at a news conference on the War Powers resolution to end U.S. involvement in the war in Yemen on Jan. 30, 2019, accompanied by Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Ken Buck (R-Colo.), along with Sens. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah). | Andrew Harnik/AP Photo

Khanna has long operated like someone interested in running for president. He’s spent considerable time in the early-voting states campaigning with Sanders as a co-chair of his 2020 presidential bid.

Khanna has also leveraged his connections in Silicon Valley to bring technology jobs to the early presidential states. In 2018, Khanna toured historically Black colleges and universities in South Carolina with Rep. Jim Clyburn and later helped establish a partnership between Zoom and Claflin University. During the 2020 presidential cycle, Khanna used his campaign funding to place more than $100,000 worth of print ads in Iowa, which boosted his efforts to create tech jobs in the state, including in rural areas. Khanna also helped deliver a $1 million grant for Iowa State University, as well as scholarships, digital apprenticeships and other investments to the state.


More recently, Khanna has appeared on “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” and “Real Time with Bill Maher” to publicize his book, “Dignity in the Digital Age: Making Tech Work for All of Us,” as well as at in-person and virtual events in Pennsylvania, New York and California.

“People aren’t going to early states at this point because they’re not interested,” said Democratic consultant Joe Caiazzo, a veteran of campaigns in the first-in-the-nation primary state of New Hampshire. “It’s crystal-clear that Ro Khanna is a part of the next generation of progressive leadership in America.”

The three-term congressman cuts a unique profile: The 45-year-old is a die-hard liberal who happens to also represent the startup paradise of Silicon Valley. He calls himself a “progressive capitalist” and envisions a future in which America’s eroding democracy is strengthened by spreading well-paying technology jobs across the heartland.

Khanna’s supporters believe that he would begin a presidential race with a significant portion of Sanders’ political infrastructure and likely become a top contender for progressive voters.

“I think he would have tremendous appeal among people who supported Bernie. I do, absolutely, 100 percent,” said Weaver. “He has a thoughtful take on the economy, which I think a lot of working-class people that Democrats have had difficulty reaching would hear.”

Like every other Democratic strategist interviewed for this story, Weaver and Caiazzo stipulated that they were talking about Khanna’s future in the context of Biden not seeking a second term.

Allies of Khanna, who is the son of Indian immigrants, think he could tap financial support in the Indian American community and appeal to immigrants of all stripes. Indian Americans — one of the fastest-growing immigrant groups in the country — have been working diligently in recent years to increase their political clout, and Khanna has developed close relationships with Indian American leaders.



“Ro has a clear vision of both protecting America’s status as a multiracial democracy and bringing economic opportunity from the coasts to every corner of the country,” said Neil Makhija, executive director of the civic group Indian American Impact. “Since Covid and the changing nature of remote work, an honest, realistic economic message for rural America is possible and the kind of critical message we need from a national leader.”

Khanna’s fans also see another asset — he’s a progressive who does not turn off more establishment and moderate elements of the party. It’s an important quality after 2020, when Democratic officials mobilized to stop Sanders from winning the presidential nomination following his success in early-voting states.

Unlike some other high-profile progressives, Khanna’s style has been less combative and more aimed at building relationships with other parts of the Democratic Party. In perhaps an extreme example, in the 2018 primary, Khanna endorsed both then-Rep. Joe Crowley (D-N.Y.) and the left-wing challenger who defeated him, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

It’s an open question whether Khanna would be able to continue to avoid being a lightning rod under the glare of a presidential campaign.

“His base would be in the progressive wing of the party, but I think his coalition could be bigger than that,” said Longabaugh. “The Democratic Party is a big tent, and I think one of his strengths in a race would be his ability to build that big tent.”

Weaver and Longabaugh would not discuss their conversations with Khanna. Beyond them, a handful of other key figures in Sanders’ orbit hope that, if Biden declines to campaign for a second term, Khanna will run for president in 2024 or in future years.

“I think it would be great to have a President Ro,” said Ben Cohen, the Ben & Jerry’s co-founder who served alongside Khanna as a co-chair for Sanders’ 2020 campaign. “He’s just an honest, sincere guy who really wants what’s best for the majority of Americans.”


Larry Cohen, chair of the Sanders-founded group Our Revolution, and RoseAnn DeMoro, a former national nurses union leader with close ties to Sanders, also spoke highly of Khanna’s qualifications for president.

Ever since Sanders’ second bid for the White House ended in April 2020, the progressive movement has been in search of a future leader. Other potential left-wing candidates in an open 2024 primary could include Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Ocasio-Cortez.

Khanna backs the now-familiar list of progressive goals that Sanders popularized, including Medicare for All, free public college and a $15 minimum wage. Sanders and Khanna have also worked on a number of bills together. In 2019, the two lawmakers spearheaded the passage of a War Powers resolution to end the United States’ involvement in the war in Yemen.

Should the Sanders advisers fail to convince Khanna to look at the White House in 2024, he may seek another job that could elevate his profile in the near term. A person familiar with Khanna’s thinking said he would explore the possibility of a 2024 Senate bid if Dianne Feinstein, California’s 88-year-old incumbent Democratic senator, does not run for reelection.

Khanna’s team went as far as conducting polling in 2021 on a potential Senate primary, including Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) and Reps. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.). The survey found that Khanna would have begun the race as one of the top three candidates, the person said.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/03/17/sanders-khanna-presidential-bid-2024-00018017
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Thu 17 Mar, 2022 12:16 pm

The Breakdown with Shaun King
https://smarturl.it/tnsthebreakdown?fbclid=IwAR1Br4sfg5tL0aHqyORh3mBfMP4wDRJ_05QtxDDde4lR8pnFWGahL36VLlM
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Thu 17 Mar, 2022 02:36 pm
Robert Reich
tl46595oso m90rh53rlhms9 ·
Okay, I’m going to go out on a limb today and suggest something that would have seemed utter nonsense as late as a month ago: I’m seeing the stirrings in Washington of a new era of … I’m not sure what to call it. “Unity” is way too strong. “Bipartisanship” doesn’t convey what’s going on. Let me try “de-partisanship.”
Ever since the run-up to Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, I’ve noticed something in Washington that I haven’t seen since in three decades – a quiet understanding that we’re in a new Cold War or potentially even a hot one. Which means we need to join together to survive.
It’s a subtle shift – more of tone than anything else. But you can also discern it in a remarkable series of de-partisan accomplishments lately.
After literally two hundred failed attempts, the Senate just passed an anti-lynching law. The Senate has also given sexual misconduct claims firmer legal footing with a new law prohibiting settlements containing agreements not to disclose such claims.
The Senate also just approved sweeping postal reform. And it has given the green light to long-awaited reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act as part of a massive spending bill.
I’m hearing from Senate staffers that they’re close to bipartisan agreement to strengthen antitrust laws. Also on a measure to expand semiconductor manufacturing, as part of a new China competitiveness bill. And another measure to limit the cost of insulin.
All this on top of $14 billion for Ukraine.
Okay, not as dramatic as voting rights or an increase in the minimum wage. But compared to the last few years, it’s remarkable. You may not have heard much about these initiatives because the media only picks up on bitter conflict and name-calling, but they’re real.
I think something new is happening in Washington, and I think I know why.
I came to Washington in 1974, in the Ford administration, and then worked in the Carter administration. The Cold War was raging during those years, serving as a kind of silent backdrop for everything else. Democrats and Republicans had different positions on a host of issues, but we worked together because it was assumed that we had to. We faced a common threat.
The Cold War produced an array of bipartisan legislation involving huge investments in America — legislation that used the Soviet threat as justification, but helped build the American middle class.
The National Interstate and Defense Highway Act was designed to “permit quick evacuation of target areas” in case of nuclear attack and get munitions rapidly from city to city. Of course, in subsequent years it proved indispensable to America’s economic growth.
America’s huge investment in higher education in the late 1950s was spurred by the Soviets’ Sputnik satellite. The official purpose of the National Defense Education Act, as it was named, was to “insure trained manpower of sufficient quality and quantity to meet the national defense needs of the United States.” But it trained an entire generation in math and science, and expanded access to higher education.
John F. Kennedy launched the race to the moon in 1962 so that space wouldn’t be “governed by a hostile flag of conquest” (i.e., the Soviet Union).
The Defense Department’s Advanced Research Projects Administration served as America’s de facto incubator for new technologies. It was critical to the creation of the Internet as well as new materials technologies.
Then, in November 1989, the Berlin Wall came down. And in December 1991 the Soviet Union collapsed.
Just three years later, Newt Gingrich became Speaker of the House -- and launched the angriest and most divisive chapter in modern American political history. I remember the change in Washington, as if a storm had swept in. Weeks before I had been dealing with Republican members of Congress who occasionally gave me a hard time but were generally open and friendly. Suddenly, the people who came in with Gingrich treated me as if I was the enemy. I wondered at the time whether the threat of Soviet aggression had held America together — given us common purpose and reminded us of our interdependence. With the end of the Cold War, we had nowhere to turn to made enemies of each other.
If the Cold War had not ended, would Gingrich have been able to launch a new internal war in America? Had the Soviet menace remained, would Donald Trump have been able to take up Gingrich’s mantle of hate and conspiracy?
Is Putin now having the same effect as the old Soviet Union did on America’s sense of commonality? The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Frank Apisa
 
  3  
Fri 18 Mar, 2022 04:26 am
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:


Robert Reich
tl46595oso m90rh53rlhms9 ·
Okay, I’m going to go out on a limb today and suggest something that would have seemed utter nonsense as late as a month ago: I’m seeing the stirrings in Washington of a new era of … I’m not sure what to call it. “Unity” is way too strong. “Bipartisanship” doesn’t convey what’s going on. Let me try “de-partisanship.”
Ever since the run-up to Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, I’ve noticed something in Washington that I haven’t seen since in three decades – a quiet understanding that we’re in a new Cold War or potentially even a hot one. Which means we need to join together to survive.
It’s a subtle shift – more of tone than anything else. But you can also discern it in a remarkable series of de-partisan accomplishments lately.
After literally two hundred failed attempts, the Senate just passed an anti-lynching law. The Senate has also given sexual misconduct claims firmer legal footing with a new law prohibiting settlements containing agreements not to disclose such claims.
The Senate also just approved sweeping postal reform. And it has given the green light to long-awaited reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act as part of a massive spending bill.
I’m hearing from Senate staffers that they’re close to bipartisan agreement to strengthen antitrust laws. Also on a measure to expand semiconductor manufacturing, as part of a new China competitiveness bill. And another measure to limit the cost of insulin.
All this on top of $14 billion for Ukraine.
Okay, not as dramatic as voting rights or an increase in the minimum wage. But compared to the last few years, it’s remarkable. You may not have heard much about these initiatives because the media only picks up on bitter conflict and name-calling, but they’re real.
I think something new is happening in Washington, and I think I know why.
I came to Washington in 1974, in the Ford administration, and then worked in the Carter administration. The Cold War was raging during those years, serving as a kind of silent backdrop for everything else. Democrats and Republicans had different positions on a host of issues, but we worked together because it was assumed that we had to. We faced a common threat.
The Cold War produced an array of bipartisan legislation involving huge investments in America — legislation that used the Soviet threat as justification, but helped build the American middle class.
The National Interstate and Defense Highway Act was designed to “permit quick evacuation of target areas” in case of nuclear attack and get munitions rapidly from city to city. Of course, in subsequent years it proved indispensable to America’s economic growth.
America’s huge investment in higher education in the late 1950s was spurred by the Soviets’ Sputnik satellite. The official purpose of the National Defense Education Act, as it was named, was to “insure trained manpower of sufficient quality and quantity to meet the national defense needs of the United States.” But it trained an entire generation in math and science, and expanded access to higher education.
John F. Kennedy launched the race to the moon in 1962 so that space wouldn’t be “governed by a hostile flag of conquest” (i.e., the Soviet Union).
The Defense Department’s Advanced Research Projects Administration served as America’s de facto incubator for new technologies. It was critical to the creation of the Internet as well as new materials technologies.
Then, in November 1989, the Berlin Wall came down. And in December 1991 the Soviet Union collapsed.
Just three years later, Newt Gingrich became Speaker of the House -- and launched the angriest and most divisive chapter in modern American political history. I remember the change in Washington, as if a storm had swept in. Weeks before I had been dealing with Republican members of Congress who occasionally gave me a hard time but were generally open and friendly. Suddenly, the people who came in with Gingrich treated me as if I was the enemy. I wondered at the time whether the threat of Soviet aggression had held America together — given us common purpose and reminded us of our interdependence. With the end of the Cold War, we had nowhere to turn to made enemies of each other.
If the Cold War had not ended, would Gingrich have been able to launch a new internal war in America? Had the Soviet menace remained, would Donald Trump have been able to take up Gingrich’s mantle of hate and conspiracy?
Is Putin now having the same effect as the old Soviet Union did on America’s sense of commonality? The enemy of my enemy is my friend.


I appreciate hearing what Reich has to say on this issue, Edgar, and acknowledge his thoughts are heartening. I am especially happy that you are the person sharing it.

Thanks.

edgarblythe
 
  1  
Fri 18 Mar, 2022 05:55 am
@Frank Apisa,
I don't come here with a grudge but a need for the truth.
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Fri 18 Mar, 2022 07:14 am
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:

I don't come here with a grudge but a need for the truth.


Yup..."the truth."

But getting "the truth" and being sure it is "the truth" is often more difficult than nailing Jell-O to the ceiling.

We often settle for opinions of "the truth"...our own or of others, mostly who sorta agree with our own.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Fri 18 Mar, 2022 07:19 am
@Frank Apisa,
I am always wary of those who bang on about truth, like freedom it tends to be usedby those who are 8nterest3d in doing away with it.

Builder uses Truth all the time and he has to be one of the most delusional people here. He thinks the Queen is a lizard.

I also remember the religious right propaganda magazine The Plain Truth which is anything but.

I'm not making snide remarks about Edgar, I think he really is interested in the truth.

Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Fri 18 Mar, 2022 07:26 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

I am always wary of those who bang on about truth, like freedom it tends to be usedby those who are 8nterest3d in doing away with it.

Builder uses Truth all the time and he has to be one of the most delusional people here. He thinks the Queen is a lizard.

I also remember the religious right propaganda magazine The Plain Truth which is anything but.
I'm not making snide remarks about Edgar, I think he really is interested in the truth.




I am damn near positive Edgar is interested in "the truth" and that Builder and the religious right are not.

"The truth" is elusive, Izzy, so much so that I wonder if it actually can be determined in most cases where it is desired.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 2.27 seconds on 01/06/2025 at 06:50:01