Re: Does It Strike Anyone Else That Other Leaders Rush TO th
squinney wrote:... bombed areas to assess the situation, speak to the public, calm the country, but that Bush flew here to and yonder like a frightened pup?
I don't know that you can equate the two events. The plane hijacking had a lot more uncertaincy to it with planes missing on radar and uncertaincy about if the attack was over, etc. The subway bombings in London and Madrid were very discrete events. By the time Blair was informed, it was over.
In any event, why do politicians have to hand hold people every time there is a disaster? I remember during the aftermath of a hurricane, everyone was talking about the first President Bush and how he didn't immediately fly down to "inspect the damage". I was a lot happier he was in Washington approving financial assistance. Lots of us can pack sandbags and clean up debris. We pay him to cut red tap. I understand that Blair had to go and I applaude his handling of the bombing situation, but how did he "asses the situation" any better than the hordes of experts on subway design, explosives, medical crises, etc.?
I may have lots of issues with Bush, but this isn't one of them.