Teacher vs Researcher

Ha Ha the “NO BRAIN, NO PAIN” profoundly sick biological machine has been working over time then to come up with theories based upon information that PRESENCE has provided.As I have always said SELF can input as much information as it wants into the computer but if the computers software has been configured for only 0,1..1,0 logic output possibilities then it will get balanced rubbish out.

Hence why the biological computer has come up with a ridiculous one sided theory to try and explain everything and you have been foolish enough to believe it…..You have inherited the profoundly sick biological computers mind as a result.

I don’t know why I continue trying to explain this stuff to you…I have tried to get your physics thread back on the right track but you are insistent in walking down that dark cul de sac…Your choice my friend..

GLUE…holding matter together…I still can’t stop chuckling about that one

There are +/+ AND -/- forces at play within the cosmos which if you weren't paying attention at school REPEL. These repelling forces are responsible for the localized big bangs that are observed in the cosmos and these forces are created by electromechanical systems...WAKE UP!!!

Insistence on utilizing only 0/1...1/0 (+/-....-/+) logic output possibility software configurations results in theories that try to explain attraction but fail miserably when explaining repulsion hence why it has to resort to GLUE .

I have no doubt that scientists will be able to balance out their one sided/HALF 0/1...1/0 logic equations in some way but you have to remember 0/0...0/1...1/0...1/1 equations balance as well.

The problem with most of the present scientific communities biological computers is that someone has only half installed SOFTWARE logic into them. Some of the same "NO BRAIN, NO PAIN" biological computers have been installed with FULL software logic thank goodness.

The full software needs to be installed because as NO DEFINITIVE PROOF can be provided for all questions asked by SELF the 4 off logic possibility SOFTWARE combinations ARE required.

The FULL software logic provides more realistic theories/ideas.

You can't blame the "NO BRAIN,NO PAIN" computers for the software installed.... they will just work with what that have......They couldn't care less what SOFTWARE is installed....LOL....

As the what coffin box from what CN said in PHF, piggy “stereotyped low-level understanding” of physics.
https://physicshelpforum.com/threads/the-game-of-match-sticks.16181/post-50090
Actually piggy is just a third rated citizen in the local Jiangmen city and waiting to die.
So, recommend this and that endlessly in front of piggy is useless at all, just to waste somebody’s own time. NO BRAIN.
The First Order control large quantity of social resource and can help realize one’s dream.
A brilliant guy should attach to the *ss of the First Order like virus.

Well it does APPEAR extremely bleak regardless of whether HALF or FULL logic possibility SOFTWARE is installed into the “NO PAIN,NO BRAIN” computers we all possess but from my experience utilising FULL logic possibility SOFTWARE produces more realistic results.

My view is that these “NO PAIN,NO BRAIN” computers are clearly phenomenally powerful so they can come up with extremely convincing and complex equations that could deceive SELF so SELF needs to be AWARE of this.

Not quite figured out yet whether SELF is smarter than these “NO BRIAN,NO PAIN” biological computers….time will tell I suppose but it is a big lesson to learn surely …what with AI rapidly gaining pace…..we don’t need AI ….we already have the “who’s smarter problem?” with BI (biological intelligence) for goodness sake.

HA HA.."NO BRIAN" !! I mean't "NO BRAIN"

Modern day science is based upon faulty philosophy.Positive and Negative Nihilism (as I call it) highlights this very point.

Why is there a philosophical output from both the HALF and FULL logic possibility combinations? (0,1…1,0) & (0,0…0,1..1,0..1,1).There should be no output at all.

Claiming that 0 and 1 are the same is an assumption and not proven fact.

This is where science is going wrong.PERIOD.

What it should state is that there is the possibility that 0 and 1 are the same however there is also the possibility that they are not the same and therefore 2 off further logic possibility combinations need to be introduced into science equations .i.e. 0,0..1,1.This is sound science.

Once you start letting your belief system bias your scientific reasoning then your scientific theories/ideas are in trouble.

Truth doesn’t care what your belief systems are.

Virus is "NO BRAIN, NO PAIN".

“NO BRAIN,NO PAIN” can claim whatever it wants with it’s HALF logic software.

Utilising FULL logic software results in programming outputs.Utilising HALF logic software results in different programming outputs.

Both software logics result in a + or - neutral output stance by the “NO BRAIN,NO PAIN” biological computer of which we all have.

The “NO BRAIN,NO PAIN” biological computer will ALWAYS arrive at a + or - neutral conclusion because that is the limit of both it’s FULL or HALF logic software.We can all come to know this eventually if we are AWARE…not so if we are UNAWARE.

Double slits experiment (for electron), touchy and feely

Piggy doesn’t like to disturb fellow guys too much in their thread. So, piggy move the topic here.
Piggy encountered much such issue about this experiment. An outstanding example is as one of our fellow guy’s post in his thread:
“The double-slit experiment proves:

1. That the observer is REAL and has a REAL effect on the world.

2. That the world is in an undetermined state until it is observed.”

Pig’s analysis as below:
The objectivity of nature should not change following man’s subjectivity of observation. If “the world” is “in an undetermined state”, it’s just “in an undetermined state”. It should not turn into “a determined state” following man’s observation. A vivid analogy is that “no matter you observe or not, the clock is ticking (quoted from Woody’s comment in PHF. Piggy forgot where it was.)”

How did such a view as “the world is in an undetermined state until it is observed” appear in the “standard” scientific community?
It originated from such a phenomenon: when a detector is fixed after the slits to find out which slit the electron passed through, the interference pattern disappeared. What appeared on the screen / film was only two straight strips.

Once upon a time piggy argued fiercely about this issue with those “main stream” guys in PHF. Piggy has to prepare the materials. Have a lovely day first, guys.

OP - response. "How can a 'fun' guy'...?
Firstly - Define 'Fun' guy, please? Then I'll continue, should you deem your OP worthy of consumption.
Have a lovely Day

Ah, piggy always doubts whether the pig employed the wrong English word “fun”. Perhaps the word “funny” or “interesting” would be better. Or simply as “a guy”, the best.

Fortunately, piggy is not a teacher. Otherwise, piggy really doesn’t know how to teach such a student as Adesh. According to textbook or the pig’s own new research?
https://physicshelpforum.com/threads/what-is-meant-by-amplitude-in-quantum-mechanics.16022/post-48831

Feel free to discuss the question in the OP.
……………………………………..
Piggy has to go on with the research on the double slits.

Continue the analysis about double slits.

The trouble comes from their pursuit of the “linear superposition” conception. (“trapped in linear physics” as Mark said). The “main stream” consider that the electron passed through two slits in different “undetermined” statesΨ1 + Ψ2 in case of without observation. Piggy always jokes it “one rabbit in two holes”.

In case of observation, piggy’s humble opinion is as below:
If the detector found out the electron passed through slit 1, it just represented the event “the electron passed through slit 1” in experiment; if the detector found out the electron passed through slit 2, it just represented the event “the electron passed through slit 2” in experiment.
How can they “sure enough” that the electron turned from “undetermined” to “determined” and only passed through one slit?
Gangster’s logic.
Moreover, the observation happened AFTER the slits. How can something happened later decided something happened first?
Logic confused?
Experiment eyes model (theory) is one of the cancers in modern day physics research.
Because experimental analysis might be disturbed by theory, piggy suggested them to renew the experimental analysis.

So then, the “NO BRAIN,NO PAIN” biological computers have kicked out 2 off logic possibility outputs to explain how matter is held together…

1.The first output which utilises 0,1…1,0 software possibility logic states that it is glue.

2.The second output which utilises 0,0…0,1…1,0..0,0 software possibility logic states that it is balanced but “toggling” electromechanically produced +/- forces.

PRESENCE in the meantime has now introduced the BUBBLE concept and it would appear that the BUBBLE can have a + or - or N aspect to it.

SELF being separate is quite happy to go with the flow.

Glue? Sorry…to me that is hilarious….

Most modern day scientists need to learn more about the magnetic effects that are happening in the cosmos and at the subatomic level.