13
   

Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

 
 
BillW
 
  -4  
Reply Fri 22 Jan, 2021 01:04 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:

The vote was 93-2. Overwhelming and bipartisan.

Hawley of Missouri voted no - figures! The other no - Lee of Utah.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
BillW
 
  -4  
Reply Fri 22 Jan, 2021 03:51 pm
@snood,
There's got to be a storyline and I just can''t figure it out..........yet!
BillW
 
  -4  
Reply Fri 22 Jan, 2021 04:11 pm
@BillW,
BillW wrote:

There's got to be a storyline and I just can''t figure it out..........yet!

He has certainly had an exemplary career - to vote "no" on him is to imply only god can be Secretary of Defense!
hightor
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 22 Jan, 2021 04:29 pm
@BillW,
The defense-related nominees usually get a bipartisan nod of approval. Avril Haines was confirmed 84-10 as Director of National Intelligence.
BillW
 
  -4  
Reply Fri 22 Jan, 2021 05:07 pm
@hightor,
hightor, I totally concur with your comment and have known this from my past. I am just totally amazed because of General Austin being black. I was expecting a vote of maybe 60-40 or even 75-25 - which in these times is very, very bipartisan!

Maybe there is hope for the Republicans yet. Realizing Secretary Austin had such a tremendously distinguished career (I was amazed) in the army, I am still dumbfounded with his achievements. Even though he didn't have any real "boots on the ground experience" that I could ascertain, he had lots of combat command experience at every level and the same with his states side command at every level. Still, I am overwhelmed with happiness with the Republican response!

As a "boots on the ground" experience (on my part) for an example, we had a battalion commander who would fly overhead of us during combat action. This was common, of course, for great command positioning; but, he would drop mortar rounds on the enemy.

I remember that he got awarded the Silver Star and Distinguished Flying Cross for action seen in the Republic of Viet Nam............at 5,0000 foot 😂 I had heard that it was common for the Battalion CO and Ass't CO to put each other in for these kinda awards at different periods of time during their tours.

I was in the 1st Air Cavalry Division (Airmobile) - we went to war in helicopters. I had been awarded the Air Medal for participating in a minimum of 25 Combat Assaults via helicopter. Awarded in 7 months of my 12 month tour, so, as you can see - we did a lot of them! I have received over time a lot of comments from Air Force types regarding how a "ground pounder" could get an Air Medal.

......and, that's the rest of the story.....
oralloy
 
  4  
Reply Fri 22 Jan, 2021 06:30 pm
@Rebelofnj,
Rebelofnj wrote:
On a related topic: Rep. Greene also spread lies regarding two school shootings, claiming they were staged.

Cool!

I'd never heard of her before she filed the impeachment charges, but it sounds like she'd make a great president once Mr. Trump completes his second term.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  4  
Reply Fri 22 Jan, 2021 06:32 pm
@revelette3,
revelette3 wrote:
I know why don't he just run as a republican? Why does he remain a democrat? Is is a local thing? Wouldn't that be a thing of the past? I mean he goes farther than just being a conservative democrat. He seems to go out of his way to ruin the democrats whole agenda.

That's like people complaining about me staying a Democrat. Or about Bobsal staying a Republican.

Despite the worst efforts of progressives, America is still a free country. People can be in whatever party they want to be in.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  4  
Reply Fri 22 Jan, 2021 06:33 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:
If he disappeared down an open manhole I wouldn't mourn.

Progressivism and intolerance go hand-in-hand.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  3  
Reply Fri 22 Jan, 2021 07:22 pm
https://grrrgraphics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/china_joe_takes_oath_of_office-1024x799.jpg
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://comicallyincorrect.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/05-biden-unity-dt-1080-1050x750.jpg
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://michaelpramirez.com/uploads/3/4/9/8/34985326/mrz012121-color-1mb_orig.jpg
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
derpydoo
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Jan, 2021 08:48 pm
YouTube Deletes Portion of ‘Dislikes’ From Biden Videos, Says It’s Spam

YouTube deleted what appears to be thousands of “dislikes” from videos on the official channel of President Joe Biden’s White House. The company said it’s a part of its regular efforts to remove engagement it considers inauthentic.


People on the platform noticed that dislikes have been disappearing by the thousands from several White House videos and started posting before-and-after screenshots on social media shortly after the incoming administration took over the channel and published its first videos.
The screenshots indicate a total of at least 16,000 dislikes were removed from at least three videos. Even after the adjustments, the five videos on the channel had about 14,000 likes combined versus nearly 60,000 dislikes as of 3:30 p.m. on Jan. 21.


In response to a screenshot of one of the videos, YouTube told The Epoch Times that it’s monitoring engagement on the site to detect and remove activity it considers spam so that only engagement it considers organic remains. The mechanism worked as intended in the case of the Biden video, the company stated.


“YouTube regularly removes any spam likes or dislikes from your videos,” the company stated in a 2019 tweet. “It may take up to 48 hours for the numbers to be updated.”
It isn’t clear how YouTube discerns between authentic and inauthentic engagement; the company didn’t immediately respond to a request for further details.


YouTube and its owner, Google, have long faced accusations of political bias. The companies have said their products are developed and run as politically neutral, but employee accounts and leaked internal materials indicate the companies are indeed infusing their politics into their products.


Google shifted millions of votes in the Nov. 3, 2020, presidential election by pushing its political agenda onto its users, according to research psychologist Robert Epstein, who assembled a team of more than 700 voters to monitor what results they were receiving from channels such as search results, reminders, search suggestions, and newsfeeds ahead of the election.


In the aftermath of the election, YouTube banned content that said the election was stolen through fraud, an allegation raised by former President Donald Trump and many others. The allegation hasn’t been proven in court, although it is supported by a significant body of evidence, including hundreds of sworn affidavits and analyses of statistical anomalies.


Google and YouTube are the world’s two most popular websites, according to Alexa ranking. Politicians on both sides of the aisle have raised concerns over the massive power held by Google and several other tech giants.

https://archive.fo/9EZXQ#selection-1107.0-1165.218
oralloy
 
  4  
Reply Fri 22 Jan, 2021 08:58 pm
@derpydoo,
The government should break up these tech companies IMO.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
oralloy
 
  5  
Reply Sat 23 Jan, 2021 05:09 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
There have been some shifts in the attitude of conservative white politicians concerning African American citizens. Basically, they don't want to be seen as being 100% racist all the time.

Progressives falsely accuse all non-progressives of racism.

Everyone knows that the accusations are nonsense.
Below viewing threshold (view)
Walter Hinteler
 
  -3  
Reply Sat 23 Jan, 2021 05:58 am
@hightor,
Well, however:
oralloy wrote:
Everyone knows that the accusations are nonsense.

So, basically, they want to be seen as being 100% racist all the time.

oralloy
 
  5  
Reply Sat 23 Jan, 2021 06:01 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
I made no such accusation.

However, you did refer to the fact that non-progressives do face such accusations.


hightor wrote:
Are you insinuating that they do?

No. I am pointing out that no one takes such accusations seriously.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.17 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 06:45:52