12
   

Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

 
 
Lash
 
  0  
Reply Sun 1 Sep, 2024 11:50 am
@hightor,
Parroting ridiculous out of touch Bidenomics propaganda.

You have no idea what you’re talking about.

Lash
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 1 Sep, 2024 11:53 am
I’ve never seen so many homeless people in my town.

hightor
 
  4  
Reply Sun 1 Sep, 2024 01:46 pm
@Lash,
Quote:
Parroting ridiculous out of touch Bidenomics propaganda.


How do you figure this is parroted propaganda? I simply remarked, "That's what happens when people only listen to right-wing and crackpot media."

You have no idea what you’re talking about.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  5  
Reply Sun 1 Sep, 2024 01:49 pm
@Lash,
Quote:
I’ve never seen so many homeless people in my town.

That's not an economic problem – it's the result of an unregulated housing industry which prefers building high income and vacation homes to affordable housing.
hingehead
 
  6  
Reply Sun 1 Sep, 2024 06:31 pm
@hightor,
Which happens with unregulated capitalism.
https://i.pinimg.com/564x/ef/ea/7e/efea7ed0d8dbb9093b29a0f348d17be3.jpg

https://i.pinimg.com/564x/73/49/d8/7349d8a7a8aa6c935498976d6ced1030.jpg

This is from 2013 - it is worse now
https://i.pinimg.com/564x/82/42/09/8242095bda549446fcb1002f55d23747.jpg
(Radical left wing source of this image: The Christian Post)
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -4  
Reply Sun 1 Sep, 2024 06:41 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
That's not an economic problem – it's the result of an unregulated housing industry which prefers building high income and vacation homes to affordable housing.


You seem to have a very short memory of the reality of the financial sector. It was an unregulated banking/finance/insurance sector that caused the global financial meltdown their controlled media called the GFC, in 2007-8. They also stated that "nobody saw it coming" which was proven to be another massive lie. It was a corporate takeover that led to global ramifications, including China refusing to accept US treasury bonds, but demanding physical assets to help balance the trade accounts.

I know you were here for that period, so you're either being obtuse to attempt to make a point, or, you're being intentionally ignorant.

There's an excellent Sony documentary production called Inside Job, narrated by Matt Damon, to refresh your memory of that time. Evidence included indicates that Obama was complicit in the bail-outs, and failures to prosecute. Marketing men called it the TBTF, indicating that everything would somehow crash irretrievably, if the perpetrators were actually punished, instead of being rewarded.

Here's the doco, to refresh your memory.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2IaJwkqgPk
blatham
 
  4  
Reply Sun 1 Sep, 2024 07:21 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
Quote:
Re: Lash (Post 7377811)
Quote:
I’ve never seen so many homeless people in my town.


That's not an economic problem – it's the result of an unregulated housing industry which prefers building high income and vacation homes to affordable housing.

Obviously, the rise in homelessness is a growing and tragic problem. Lash said earlier that it was a consequence of "Bidenomics" - an entirely predictable anti-Democrat slander from her - but it is a senseless claim as homeless figures in the US were increasing through the Trump presidency (anyone recall Lash blaming Trumponomics?). There's some very good data HERE

Further, this is a growing problem in the EU, Britain, Canada and elsewhere (lots of data available with a google search). Notably, the nations with the lowest homeless figures include those northern European nations with very strong and generous social programs; Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark. See Here
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Sun 1 Sep, 2024 07:45 pm
@Builder,
Different problem, completely. I'm referring to housing policy not real estate shenanigans.
blatham
 
  4  
Reply Sun 1 Sep, 2024 08:45 pm
Quote:
Matthew Dowd@matthewjdowd
2h
In 2012, ABC News had Obama up one over Romney at this same point in election cycle. Today Harris is up six in ABC News poll.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -4  
Reply Sun 1 Sep, 2024 08:50 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
I'm referring to housing policy not real estate shenanigans.


It was the sub-prime mortgages, and low-doc loans, and re-packaging of those high-risk loans as AAA investments, with the intent to steal the funds of retirees. Pretending it's about housing policy, and nothing to do with the criminals in charge of the banking/finance sector, AND that they were bailed out using US taxpayer funds, by president Obama's admin, isn't gonna cut it.

Nice dodge, but reality has a way of dodging BS.

You might like to watch the doco. Very well researched, and as relevant today as it was then, because nothing tangible was done about that industry. In fact, when Obama handed out the bail out money, he didn't give any instructions about what he expected them to do with it, so they handed themselves "performance" bonuses.

Cash for the Crash. Same crims are still running the show. Obama even handed some of them jobs in govt sectors.
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2024 03:13 am
@Builder,
As I said previously, they're two different problems. The USA's current housing crisis might have been predicted and forestalled if the government had developed a more enlightened policy on housing and the regulatory power existed to promote solutions to our real housing needs. Demographic projections were seemingly ignored.

The sub-prime mortgage disaster was a different issue.

Good night, Builder.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2024 11:03 am
@Builder,
Came across an article excerpted from a new book specifically about the housing crisis in the USA. While I haven't read the entire book, it's interesting that the article doesn't even mention the sub-prime mortgage scandal and the recession it caused. The author, J. Demsas, identifies local zoning laws as big contributors to the housing shortage.

Quote:
(...)

In America, we’ve delegated the power over how our land is used to the local level, and seeded the process with various veto points. We’ve done this under the misguided assumption that decentralization will make the process more democratic. In reality, this system has resulted in stasis and sclerosis, empowering small numbers of unrepresentative people and organizations to determine what our towns and cities look like and preventing our democratically elected representatives from planning for the future.

(...)

The American population is growing, and aging, and in many cases looking for smaller houses. But the types of homes Americans need simply don’t exist. All across the country, local governments ban smaller houses (have you tried looking for a starter home recently?), apartment buildings, and even duplexes—the sorts of places a grandparent, or a young person, or a working family might want to live. The shortage has been estimated at 4 million homes, and that scarcity is fueling our affordability crisis. In the end, whatever does get built reflects the cost of delays, the cost of complying with expensive requirements, the priced-in threat of lawsuits, and, most important, scarcity.

Americans are aware by now that the housing affordability crisis is acute, but many don’t understand what’s causing it. All too often, explanations center on identifying a villain: greedy developers, or private-equity companies, or racist neighbors, or gentrifiers, or corrupt politicians. These stories are not always false, nor are these villains imaginary, but they don’t speak to root causes.

(...)

I believe that opposing housing, renewable-energy development, or even bike lanes for bad reasons is wrong (and my disdain for people who do so is evident in many of these articles). But NIMBYs are a sideshow. A democracy will always have people with different values. The problem is that the game is rigged in their favor. NIMBYs haven’t won because they’ve made better arguments or because they’ve mobilized a mass democratic coalition—I would very much doubt that even 10 percent of Americans have ever seriously engaged in the politics of local development. NIMBYs win because land politics is insulated from democratic accountability. As a result, widespread dissatisfaction with the housing crisis struggles to translate into meaningful change.

When democracies fail to translate voter desires into reality, we should try to identify what’s causing the disconnect. In this case, the trouble is that our collective frustration about our economic outcomes is directed at elected officials who have little or nothing to do with how our land is used. We should change that.

(...)

The Labyrinthine Rules That Created a Housing Crisis
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2024 11:13 am
@Lash,
Quote:
I’m in semi-retirement, and working at a retail store to make ends meet because my retirement income isn’t enough to live in this economy.
Then you're not "semi-retired" – that's like being "semi-pregnant". You didn't put enough away to retire so you're working part-time.
Quote:
I pay three times the amount I used to for food.

I call bullshit. You mean when, twenty years ago? Show us some receipts. You're saying there was 300% inflation on food. I'm paying about 15% more than I paid pre-covid.
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2024 11:35 am
@hightor,
Food Inflation in the United States (1968-2024)

Opinions about rising prices are as old as money itself:
- price rises catch our attention more than stable or declining prices and stay in our memory for longer,
- we pay more attention to the prices we pay for frequent out-of-pocket purchases than to prices of infrequent purchases and to direct debits,
- inflation rates reflect changes in prices compared with their level in the previous year, but our memory goes back further.

I've discussions about this quite frequently with the missus: "When I was young, the price was only ..."
In 1950, an egg cost around 11.2 cents on average - converted from pfennigs - in 2015 it was 10.8 cents, today it is 19 cents.
!950 was the average wage ... ... ...
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2024 11:59 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
Quote:
I’m in semi-retirement, and working at a retail store to make ends meet because my retirement income isn’t enough to live in this economy.
Then you're not "semi-retired" – that's like being "semi-pregnant".
In Germany the semi-retirement scheme ("Altersteilzeit" in Germany, "Teilpension") - simply said - halves the working time remaining until retirement.
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2024 12:21 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
In Germany the semi-retirement scheme ("Altersteilzeit" in Germany, "Teilpension") - simply said - halves the working time remaining until retirement.

Correct that post should read:

In Germany and Austria the semi-retirement scheme ("Altersteilzeit" in Germany, "Teilpension" in Austria) - simply said - halves the working time remaining until retirement.

0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  4  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2024 01:53 pm
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

I’m in semi-retirement, and working at a retail store to make ends meet because my retirement income isn’t enough to live in this economy.

Twelve other people with much worse physical ailments than mine at my workplace also have to work later into retirement than me—through pain, cancer, and other disabilities.

People I know at that job are struggling to pay for groceries and selling plasma to make ends meet.

Customers I talk to daily complain about skyrocketing prices for rent and groceries.

I pay three times the amount I used to for food.

I'd say you are suffering from confirmation bias. It sounds like your little slice of the world is not so great and I'm sorry to hear that. It doesn't reflect the entirety of the country, but everyone has to vote their reality. I will say that I seriously doubt you are paying 3x for food. 3x over four years is over 30+% inflation, which is something we are nowhere near.
0 Replies
 
Rebelofnj
 
  5  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2024 04:40 pm
@hightor,
I was able to check my receipts for Walmart, since my credit card is attached to the online account.

A quick glimpse of the last 4 years (from Trump era 2020 to today) showed me that prices are somewhat consistent, at least for milk. No significant price increases as far as I can tell.

Here are the prices for a gallon of 2% milk in New Jersey.

September 2020 - $3.49

September 2021 - $3.30

November 2022 - $3.96

(I didn't gallons of milk in 2023)

September 2024 - $3.73

Of course, this is all anecdotal, based on the shopping habits of one person going to a single store in New Jersey.
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2024 11:59 pm
@Lash,
This is a pretty shitty situation and I'm sorry you're in it. But it seems like this particular employer attracts people in your situation, rather than every employer has significant employees in this situation.

But that's just a critique of selection bias.

The bigger deal is the US's social safety net or lack of it. Scandinavia looks attractive when you're trashed by a system that doesn't give two f*cks about anyone without economic means.

0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Tue 3 Sep, 2024 03:10 am
Quote:
In an interview with right-wing host Mark Levin on the Fox News Channel last night, Trump complained about the new grand jury indictment of him for trying to steal the 2020 presidential election. “Whoever heard you get indicted for interfering with a presidential election where you have every right to do it,” he asked.

In fact, no one has a right to interfere with a presidential election. Several federal laws prohibit such interference. Legal analyst Joyce White Vance added: “This is the banality of evil right here—Trump asserting he can override the will of the voters to claim victory in an election he lost. And, he will do it again. We must vote against him in overwhelming numbers.”

Former president Trump is approaching the election of 2024 the way southern white supremacists approached elections from 1876 to 1964. He has made it very clear he is not trying to win the votes of a majority of Americans. He and his loyalists are trying to intimidate his opponents to keep them from voting while egging on his supporters to commit violence. They are bringing the tactics of the reactionary southern Democrats after the Civil War forward to the present day in an attempt to impose the same sort of minority rule on the nation as a whole.

Trump has made it clear he is not trying to win the popular vote. When his primary challenger Nikki Haley dropped out of the race in March, Trump’s team made no effort to win over her voters; it was President Joe Biden’s reelection team that reached out to them.

A few days later, when Trump’s daughter-in-law Lara Trump and his loyalist Michael Whatley took over the Republican National Committee, they killed the plans of former RNC chair Ronna McDaniel to open 40 satellite campaign offices across ten battleground states. As The Dispatch noted, that meant very little ground game: doors knocked on, phone calls made, or volunteers organized. The new leadership of the RNC also fired 40 out of 60 employees whose job was field organizing.

Trump was clear what he was doing: rather than worrying about attracting voters, he intended to play out the game of the Big Lie that he had won the 2020 presidential election.

Since the 2020 election, at least 28 states have passed laws making it harder to vote in 2024. Whatley was a chief proponent of the Big Lie that justified those laws, and Trump put him in place, saying he wanted the RNC to prioritize “election integrity” efforts. The campaign has focused on lawsuits to make it harder to vote and to put their own loyalists into positions where they might be able to affect the certification of the 2024 vote. As Peter Nicholas reported at NBC News yesterday, Republicans have filed dozens of lawsuits that seemed designed not only to game the system, but also to convince supporters that the election is rigged against Trump.

That lie was the argument Florida governor Ron DeSantis made to justify creating an election police unit in 2022 to stop what he claimed was illegal voting, although election fraud is vanishingly rare. The unit conducted raids—mostly in the early morning—primarily against Black Americans shortly before the 2022 election. Most of the cases were later dropped, or those charged agreed to a plea deal without jail time.

The raids did, though, depress voting. In its 2023 annual report, the Office of Election Crime and Security wrote: “Enforcing Florida election law has the primary effect of punishing violators, but enforcement also and equally as important acts as a deterrent for those who may consider voting illegally or committing other election related crimes.”

Now MAGA Republicans have joined Trump in arguing that Democrats are trying to get noncitizen immigrants to vote for their candidates, although a federal law in place since 1996 makes it clear that it is illegal for noncitizens to vote in elections for president or members of Congress. It does not appear to matter to Republicans that there is no evidence that noncitizens try to vote. As House speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) said in May: “We all know, intuitively, that a lot of illegals are voting in federal elections, but it’s not been something that is easily provable.”

Texas attorney general Ken Paxton also created an “Election Integrity Unit” in the wake of the 2020 election, and on August 21, 2024, after Fox News Channel personality Maria Bartiromo repeated a baseless rumor about noncitizens registering to vote, Paxton launched what he called an undercover investigation that, just days later, launched raids against Latino activists. “It is evident through his pattern of lawsuits, raids, searches, and seizures that he is trying to keep Latinos from voting,” Latino leaders say.

This pattern echoes the Reconstruction Era intimidation of Black voters and their white Republican allies, and it does so with the same justification: the idea that business regulation, social welfare, infrastructure, and civil rights policies are “socialism.” Those policies had nothing to do with the actual principles of socialism, which call for the government to control the means of production. This “socialism” echoed the argument of southern white supremacists who used it to attack Black voting in 1871 after the Fifteenth Amendment, ratified the year before, made it unconstitutional to stop someone from voting on the basis of race.

As newly enfranchised formerly enslaved men who owned little property—because enslavers took what they produced—and white Republicans voted for lawmakers who would rebuild the South, white supremacist Democrats maintained that the roads, schools, and hospitals a healthy society needed could be paid for only with tax dollars. Since white men owned most of the property, such improvements were, they said, a redistribution of wealth.

In the nineteenth century, that argument led first to voter suppression and then to the argument that anyone who did not vote to keep the white supremacists in power was a danger to society. Good Americans must keep such dangerous people out of any proximity to power. In that light, outright violence to maintain the rule of the minority was a demonstration of civic virtue.

True to form, Trump and his supporters have made it clear they consider their ascendancy imperative to recover America from the carnage into which they allege President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have led it. And, if their opponents are truly as dangerous as they insist, those opponents must be capable of any of the actions MAGA Republicans falsely attribute to them.

Trump and his campaign advisor Corey Lewandowski have recently asserted the lie that Democrats kill newborn babies, for example, and Trump told the right-wing Moms for Liberty organization on Friday that schools are operating on children to transition them to a different sex. In a direct link to the ideas of the late nineteenth century that white supremacists used to justify taking power, Trump routinely calls Vice President Harris a communist.

Trump’s lies have become cartoonish as his attachment to reality has slipped, but behind them is a demonizing of his opponents that echoes the past argument that certain people must be kept from power and, possibly, purged from society.

Many of those arrested for attacking the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, told the court they believed they were defending American democracy from those who were destroying the country and had stolen the election. Trump has championed those arrested for trying to install him into the presidency, saying they are “patriots” who have been “treated unfairly” and “have shown incredible courage and sacrifice,” and has promised that if reelected, he will pardon the nearly 1,000 people found guilty of crimes related to that event.

A gala to celebrate and raise money for those attackers—the J6 Awards Gala—was scheduled to be held at Trump’s Bedminster, New Jersey, golf club this Thursday but has just been called off until after the election.

The celebration of violence is now deeply embedded in the MAGA movement with leaders like North Carolina lieutenant governor Mark Robinson, the Republican nominee for governor, who recently attacked an assortment of enemies and assured his audience: “Some folks need killing!” As Josh Kovensky of Talking Points Memo wrote on August 27, this violent tendency has become for MAGA Republicans a fantasy about deploying the military against American citizens.

Yesterday, on the same day that Trump declared he had the right to interfere in a presidential election to put himself in power, the pro-Trump owner of X, Elon Musk, reposted to his nearly 200 million followers a statement suggesting that women and men who can’t physically defend themselves are inferior to “alpha men” and are not good participants in government because they lack the ability to think critically. “This is why a Republic of high status males is best for decision making,” the original post said. “Democratic, but a democracy only for those who are free to think.”

Over the statement, Musk posted: “Interesting observation.”

hcr
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.44 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 07:07:51