19
   

Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

 
 
blatham
 
  3  
Reply Wed 24 Jul, 2024 01:19 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
You are obviously completely ignorant of what the Nazis did with their concentration camps.

One of the most remarkable aspects of her posts here is her posture of being deeply knowledgeable on topic after topic through her brief unlinked statements marked by what she suggests are unchallengeable truths and certainties. And in doing so, she demonstrates (to those of us who actually do study a lot in trying to understand complex matters and who consistently provide source material such that other readers can avail themselves of where our information arises from so they too are better equipped to evaluate facts and opinions) that she commonly does not know what the hell she's talking about. I would truly love to see her non-fiction bookshelves, if they even exist.
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Reply Wed 24 Jul, 2024 01:33 pm
@blatham,
I literally get high blood pressure when she writes about Nazis and especially - like here now - concentration camps, and ‘she commonly does not know what the hell she's talking about’.

I interpret this as revisionism: the reinterpretation and relativisation of the history of National Socialism.
bobsal u1553115
 
  4  
Reply Wed 24 Jul, 2024 02:10 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
And worse: a trivialization of it that manifests itself as pride in having in one sense or another having beaten Nazis in Europe and yet being so ready to embrace Nazis here in the US. They are so causal about what they have no knowledge of.

They have lists of those they want executed and how many prisons and camps will need to be built.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Reply Wed 24 Jul, 2024 02:32 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
I understand your profound displeasure with that species of revisionism. It's dangerous and at this point in time, increasingly so. And I understand too your emotional/physical response to this sort of thing. For me, it is the distaste of disinformation/misinformation flooding so much of right wing and social media along, shoddy/juvenile scholarship and the appetite for simplistic and deluded paranoid conspiracies.

(Pausing now to appreciate a huge downpour with little wind happening here right now. Our wildfire situation has become dire again).
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Reply Wed 24 Jul, 2024 02:55 pm
Quote:
Tommy moderna-vaX-Topher@tommyxtopher
30m
Before @VP@KamalaHarris became the nominee, there were only 3 mentions of "Harris" and "border czar" NOT on Fox or Fox Biz - 2 were quoting Republicans. All noted "root causes."

There were 719 mentions on FNC and FBN.

0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Wed 24 Jul, 2024 02:56 pm
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

I can only speak to my experience on Twitter.

I was suspended multiple times and eventually banned along with thousands of Bernie supporters when Jack let the CIA infiltrate the under the auspices of ‘security’. Criticism of Democrats, Covid policy, Fauci, Wuhan clinic, gain of function experimentation caused many scientists and doctors & regular people like me to be banned and wiped from public discourse.

Elon let us back in.
Democrats shame their followers to stay away so their voice is all you hear.

But, your choice.
I guess.

Quote:
Elon Musk attended Benjamin Netanyahu’s address to Congress on Wednesday as a guest of the embattled Israeli prime minister.

A day earlier, the tech billionaire announced that his Starlink internet service was now active in a Gaza hospital, with the support of Israel’s government.

Netanyahu’s con
gressional visit was met with thousands of protesters gathering near Capitol Hill to demonstrate against Israeli abuses during its war in Gaza. Lawmakers were divided over whether he should have been invited to speak.

Musk has a history of courting rightwing leaders in countries that have overlapping business interests with his various enterprises. He previously hosted Javier Millei, Argentina’s president, at his Tesla factory and has been a cheerleader for his policies, while also cozying up to Narendra Modi, India’s prime minister, and Jair Bolsonaro, the former Brazilian president.


https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/jul/24/elon-musk-netanyahu-speech-congress
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -4  
Reply Wed 24 Jul, 2024 03:18 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Perhaps you are ignorant of what Israel has been doing in Gaza.
0 Replies
 
thack45
 
  4  
Reply Wed 24 Jul, 2024 03:23 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Quote:

...Johnson said Tuesday that it is “inexcusable” that Harris is skipping Netanyahu’s speech and that she should be “held accountable” for it.
More Here

I love this for Johnson, and anyone else in the Republican party that wants some of it.
blatham
 
  3  
Reply Wed 24 Jul, 2024 05:33 pm
@thack45,
It seems to me their position is mandated by a need to find anything to (1) disparage Harris and (2) their dependence on the a large contingent of religious right voters who see Israel as a theological ally (Old Testament) and who desire the coming to pass of their End Times delusion which starts with a conflagration in Israel (even if Jews who don't convert get tossed into eternal hellfire) and (3) because of the right's long standing campaign of vilification of Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims. As with abortion, they are stuck with this history.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Reply Wed 24 Jul, 2024 06:02 pm
The NYT has a very interesting story up right now.
Quote:
Rupert Murdoch is locked in a secret legal battle against three of his children over the future of the family’s media empire, as he moves to preserve it as a conservative political force after his death, according to a sealed court document obtained by The New York Times.

Mr. Murdoch, 93, set the drama in motion late last year, when he made a surprise move to change the terms of the Murdochs’ irrevocable family trust to ensure that his eldest son and chosen successor, Lachlan, would remain in charge of his vast collection of television networks and newspapers...

I won't paste it all here (it's long) but I wanted to isolate one passage that particularly caught my attention:
Quote:
To bolster his argument that he’s making the change in order to benefit all of his heirs, Mr. Murdoch has moved to replace two of his longtime executives as his personal representatives on the trust with two people with more independence. One is William P. Barr, an attorney general under Presidents George H.W. Bush and Trump, who was also a guest at Mr. Murdoch’s most recent wedding.

The court document shows that Mr. Barr is leading Mr. Murdoch’s effort to rewrite the trust. It quotes Mr. Barr’s statement when he introduced Mr. Murdoch’s move at the special meeting of the trust on Dec. 6. Mr. Murdoch, he said, “knew the companies and the environment better than anyone else and believed that Lachlan was in the best position to carry on that successful strategy.”
Full story HERE

Barr will make a **** ton of money here but I suspect that's just a small part of his motivation. He's a certified true believer that America must be led by an elite cadre of Catholic intellectuals and the very wealthy. And he's well aware that his cause(s) will be endangered if Fox were to change course and tone.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Reply Wed 24 Jul, 2024 06:25 pm
@thack45,
From Trump's rally today (I think but not sure), speaking of Harris
Quote:
She’s running away from Israel.. Kamala Harris is totally against the jewish people.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  5  
Reply Thu 25 Jul, 2024 02:57 am
Quote:
Tonight, President Joe Biden explained to the American people why he decided to refuse the 2024 Democratic presidential nomination and hand the torch to Vice President Kamala Harris.

Speaking from the Oval Office from his seat behind the Resolute Desk, a gift from Queen Victoria to President Rutherford B. Hayes in 1880, Biden recalled the nation’s history. He invoked Thomas Jefferson, who wrote the Declaration of Independence; George Washington, who “showed us presidents are not kings”; Abraham Lincoln, who “implored us to reject malice”; and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who “inspired us to reject fear.”

And then he turned to himself. “I revere this office, but I love my country more,” he said. “It’s been the honor of my life to serve as your president.” But, he said, the defense of democracy is more important than any title, and democracy is “larger than any one of us.” We must unite to protect it.

“In recent weeks, it has become clear to me that I need to unite my party in this critical endeavor,” he said. “I believe my record as president, my leadership in the world, my vision for America’s future, all merited a second term. But nothing, nothing can come in the way of saving our democracy. That includes personal ambition. So I’ve decided the best way forward is to pass the torch to a new generation. It’s the best way to unite our nation.”

There is “a time and a place for long years of experience in public life,” Biden said. “There’s also a time and a place for new voices, fresh voices, yes, younger voices. And that time and place is now.”

Biden reminded listeners that he is not leaving the presidency and will be continuing to use its power for the American people. In outlining what that means, he summed up his presidency.

For the next six months, he said, he will “continue to lower costs for hard-working families [and] grow our economy. I will keep defending our personal freedoms and civil rights, from the right to vote to the right to choose. I will keep calling out hate and extremism, making it clear there is…no place in America for political violence or any violence ever, period. I’m going to keep speaking out to protect our kids from gun violence [and] our planet from [the] climate crisis.”

Biden reiterated his support for his Cancer Moonshot to end cancer—a personal cause for him since the 2015 death of his son Beau from brain cancer—and says he will fight for it, (although House Republicans have recently slashed funding for the program). He said he will call for reforming the Supreme Court “because this is critical to our democracy.”

He promised to continue “working to ensure America remains strong, secure and the leader of the free world,” and pointed out that he is “the first president of this century to report to the American people that the United States is not at war anywhere in the world.” He promised to continue rallying a coalition of nations to stop Putin’s attempt to take over Ukraine, and vowed to continue to build the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). He reminded listeners that when he took office, the conventional wisdom was that China would inevitably surpass the United States, but that is no longer the case, and he said he would continue to strengthen allies and partners in the Pacific.

Biden promised to continue to work to “end the war in Gaza, bring home all the hostages and bring peace and security to the Middle East and end this war,” as well as “to bring home Americans being unjustly detained all around the world.”

The president reminded people how far the nation has come since he took office on January 20, 2021, a day when, although he didn’t mention it tonight, he went directly to work after taking the oath of office. “On that day,” he recalled, “we…stood in a winter of peril and winter of possibilities.” The United States was “in the grip of the worst pandemic in the century, the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, the worst attack on our democracy since the Civil War.” But, Biden said, “We came together as Americans. We got through it. We emerged stronger, more prosperous and more secure.”

“Today we have the strongest economy in the world, creating nearly 16 million new jobs—a record. Wages are up, inflation continues to come down, the racial wealth gap is the lowest it’s been in 20 years. We are literally rebuilding our entire nation—urban, suburban and rural and tribal communities. Manufacturing has come back to America. We are leading the world again in chips and science and innovation. We finally beat Big Pharma after all these years to lower the cost of prescription drugs for seniors…. More people have health care today in America than ever before.” Biden noted that he signed the PACT Act to help millions of veterans and their families who were exposed to toxic materials, as well as the “most significant climate law…in the history of the world” and “the first major gun safety law in 30 years.”

The “violent crime rate is at a 50-year low,” he said, and “border crossings are lower today than when the previous administration left office. I’ve kept my commitment to appoint the first Black woman to the Supreme Court of the United States of America. I also kept my commitment to have an administration that looks like America and [to] be a president for all Americans.”

Then Biden turned from his own record to the larger meaning of America.

“I ran for president four years ago because I believed…that the soul of America was at stake,” he said. “America is an idea. An idea stronger than any army, bigger than any ocean, more powerful than any dictator or tyrant. It’s the most powerful idea in the history of the world.”

“We hold these truths to be self-evident,” he said. “We are all created equal, endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights: life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness. We’ve never fully lived up to…this sacred idea—but we’ve never walked away from it either. And I do not believe the American people will walk away from it now.

“In just a few months, the American people will choose the course of America’s future. I made my choice…. “[O]ur great vice president, Kamala Harris… is experienced, she is tough, she is capable. She’s been an incredible partner to me and a leader for our country.

“Now the choice is up to you, the American people. When you make that choice, remember the words of Benjamin Franklin hanging on my wall here in the Oval Office, alongside the busts of Dr. [Martin Luther] King and Rosa Parks and Cesar Chavez. When Ben Franklin was asked, as he emerged from the [constitutional] convention…, whether the founders [had] given America a monarchy or a republic, Franklin’s response was: ‘A republic, if you can keep it.’... Whether we keep our republic is now in your hands.”

“My fellow Americans, it’s been the privilege of my life to serve this nation for over 50 years,” President Biden told the American people. “Nowhere else on Earth could a kid with a stutter from modest beginnings in Scranton, Pennsylvania, and in Claymont, Delaware, one day sit behind the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office as the president of the United States, but here I am.

“That’s what’s so special about America. We are a nation of promise and possibilities. Of dreamers and doers. Of ordinary Americans doing extraordinary things. I’ve given my heart and my soul to our nation, like so many others. And I’ve been blessed a million times in return with the love and support of the American people. I hope you have some idea how grateful I am to all of you.

The great thing about America is, here kings and dictators do not rule—the people do. History is in your hands. The power’s in your hands. The idea of America lies in your hands. You just have to keep faith—keep the faith—and remember who we are. We are the United States of America, and there is simply nothing, nothing beyond our capacity when we do it together. So let’s act together, [and] preserve our democracy. God bless you all and may God protect our troops.

“Thank you.”

And with that, President Joe Biden followed the example of the nation’s first president, George Washington, who declined to run for a third term to demonstrate that the United States of America would not have a king, and of its second president, John Adams, who handed the power of the presidency over to his rival Thomas Jefferson and thus established the nation’s tradition of the peaceful transition of power. Like them, Biden gave up the pursuit of power for himself in order to demonstrate the importance of democracy.

After the speech, the White House served ice cream to the Bidens and hundreds of White House staffers in the Rose Garden.

And when the evening was over, First Lady Dr. Jill Biden posted an image of a handwritten note on social media. It read: “To those who never wavered, to those who refused to doubt, to those who always believed, my heart is full of gratitude. Thank you for the trust you put in Joe—now it’s time to put that trust in Kamala.”

hcr
hightor
 
  5  
Reply Thu 25 Jul, 2024 04:17 am
World’s richest 1% gained $40 tn in a decade – Oxfam

Quote:
The world’s richest one percent increased their fortunes by a total of $42 trillion over the past decade, Oxfam said Thursday, ahead of a G20 summit in Brazil where taxing the super-rich tops the agenda.

Despite this windfall, taxes on the rich had plummeted to “historic lows”, the NGO added, warning of “obscene levels” of inequality with the rest of the world “left to scrap for crumbs”.

Brazil has made international cooperation on taxing the super-rich a priority of its presidency of the G20, a group of countries representing 80 percent of the world’s GDP.

At this week’s summit in Rio de Janeiro, the group’s finance ministers are expected to make progress on ways to raise levies on the ultra-wealthy and prevent billionaires from dodging tax systems.

The initiative involves determining methodologies to tax billionaires and other high-income earners.

The proposal is due to be fiercely debated at the summit on Thursday and Friday, with France, Spain, South Africa, Colombia and the African Union in favour, but the United States firmly against.

Oxfam dubbed it a “real litmus test for G20 governments”, urging them to implement an annual net wealth tax of at least eight percent on the “extreme wealth” of the super-rich.

“Momentum to increase taxes on the super-rich is undeniable,” said Oxfam International’s head of inequality policy, Max Lawson.

“Do they have the political will to strike a global standard that puts the needs of the many before the greed of an elite few?”

Oxfam said that the $42 trillion figure was nearly 36 times more than the wealth accumulated by the poorer half of the world’s population.

Despite this, billionaires “have been paying a tax rate equivalent to less than 0.5 percent of their wealth” across the globe, the NGO said.

Nearly four out of five of the world’s billionaires call a G20 nation home, Oxfam noted.

vanguard
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  3  
Reply Thu 25 Jul, 2024 05:25 am
@hightor,
That means I'll miss him more than I expected.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  5  
Reply Thu 25 Jul, 2024 06:57 am
Actress and producer Roseanne Barr, 71, is an avowed supporter of Donald Trump - unlike the rest of her family.

In an interview with the right-wing conservative broadcaster Newsmax TV, Barr said that she had tried everything to dissuade her family from voting Democrat. As a result, her relatives would no longer speak to her or reply to messages.

But she will never stop trying to ‘wake up the Democrats’. Because that is what God wants her to do.

blatham
 
  5  
Reply Thu 25 Jul, 2024 07:31 am
@Walter Hinteler,
I can't imagine why her family will no longer discuss politics with her.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Thu 25 Jul, 2024 08:11 am
Thunderdomism’s Last Stand

Quote:
According to some of the country’s most prominent news publications, the Democratic establishment moved quickly beginning Sunday afternoon to lock down the Democratic presidential nomination for Kamala Harris. Said Axios this morning: “It’s over. The Democratic establishment pushed out Biden and locked in Kamala Harris with astonishing speed and efficacy.” The Times published a piece entitled “How Democrats Learned to Love the Smoke-Filled Room Again.” But the idea that the ‘establishment’ anointed Kamala Harris and locked the nomination down for her turns the whole matter pretty much on its head. What locked in Harris was the overwhelming resistance of Democratic voters and activists to anyone else. It was national columnists and a significant number of Democratic elites who were pushing for the thunderdome primary.

A good bit of this was support for Harris herself. A lot of it was the fact that with the incumbent president and presumed nominee out and no time to run anything other than a fake primary Harris had democratic legitimacy on her side. Eighty million voters literally chose her in 2020 to be the person who took over for Joe Biden if he couldn’t serve. Democratic primary voters in effect reconfirmed that this Spring since Biden and Harris were against running as a package deal. Few things are more embedded in American political culture than the idea that vice presidents succeed presidents.

Democratic legitimacy in this context isn’t some political science concept. It is what makes her the one person who most or all party stakeholders could rally behind even if she wasn’t necessarily their personal choice. That was never going to be possible with any other potential nominee. If the pick was somehow Gretchen Whitmer, on what basis would Shapiro or Newsom supporters – or Harris supporters, for that matter – ever think that was fair? Most people who actually operate in politics realized this from the first moments people began to suggest Joe Biden should leave the race almost a month ago. It applied even more to the millions of Biden loyalists who had to be dragged kicking and screaming to accept Biden’s withdrawal from the race. For most of them Harris was the only acceptable alternative since she was his loyal deputy.

Finally, the Democratic Party is defined by the support of women and African-Americans, and especially African-American women. The idea that in an unprecedented electoral emergency situation they were going to skip over the President’s loyal black woman vice president for no clear or tangible reason but the opposition of elite columnists and consultants never made any sense if you’re familiar with the Democrats’ voting coalition. It would be the equivalent of deciding to toss a few sticks of dynamite into the Democratic coalition at a moment of unprecedented crisis.

The thunderdome primary and convention idea was always the fantasy of the DC chattering class. From its very beginnings early this year it was premised on the need to shunt Harris aside. One New York Times columnist referred to it, in a gentle but awkward tone assuming immediate recognition, as “the Kamala Harris problem.” What shut it down was the rush of support for Harris from people across the Democratic Party, high and low, who understand its inner workings and the points made above. You only imagine those are the actions of “the establishment” if what you understand as the Democratic Party is only what you see in Washington, DC. The Thunderdome primary crowd was always either oblivious to or at war with the actual mass of the party itself. They were simply invisible. If you can’t see those people, you’ll think the DC power players are acting on their own. But they weren’t. But they were very clearly reacting to what the mass of the party would allow.

There is one exception that proves the rule: one endorsement that was key to Harris’ rapid ascent to the nomination, that of Joe Biden. From one perspective who is more the establishment, who more wields its powers than an incumbent Democratic president? But that’s the point. What finally made Biden’s departure from the race inevitable is that he had been abandoned by almost every elected official and power broker in the Democratic world, either explicitly or by silence. Biden had been abandoned by every part of what passes for the Democratic establishment and had lost his ability to control it. It was his tweet endorsing Harris that did not cause but triggered the rush toward Harris, resulting in something like a million individuals contributing roughly $100 million in 36 hours.

Harris’ key role in this has hidden in plain sight. A crisis at the pinnacle of leadership is always a most dangerous moment for any heir apparent. She had to prepare herself for the task of taking over for Biden in all its details (not to do so would have been the height of irresponsibility) while simultaneously not allowing even the hint or glimmer that she was taking even the slightest steps to hasten or encourage openness to his fall. For all the stories about Harris’ office drama she appears to have managed this flawlessly, with not so much as a single leak or even speculation about her actions. Once Biden made his announcement she moved rapidly to channel and direct support for herself in a way that all potential challengers threw their support to her within 24 hours. The “establishment” didn’t shut down the Thunderdome contested convention that columnists and reporters were demanding. The convention remains wholly open. Once Biden ended his campaign all the delegates had a total free choice. What killed Thunderdome was the mass of the party making it impossible for anyone to challenge Harris.

tpm
tsarstepan
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Jul, 2024 08:29 am
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Thu 25 Jul, 2024 08:56 am
Why is Donald Trump so obsessed with Hannibal Lecter?
Quote:
The former president continues to bring up the fictional killer at rallies. Anthony Hopkins is ‘appalled’ while everyone else remains confused …

If the rumours are true, and Donald Trump really is becoming increasingly displeased with his choice of running mate, JD Vance, then it can only be a matter of time before he replaces him. And when he does, there is only one figure that he can possibly choose. A figure with a clinical mind. A figure with a sharkish ruthlessness. The figure who haunts Trump’s every waking thought. The overwhelming object of his obsession. That’s right: Trump’s next VP pick has to be the late, great Hannibal Lecter.

[... ... ...]

Trump’s unending Hannibal references are so overwhelmingly confusing that it has sent the internet running to the hills in search of something, anything, that might explain why the next potential president of the world’s biggest superpower keeps repeating the same baffling non-sequitur every time he gets near a microphone. People even approached Anthony Hopkins in an effort to get to the bottom of it. And without luck, because all Hopkins could manage in response was a brief (if understandable) “I’m shocked and appalled”.

So, then. What on earth is going on? Let’s try to get to the bottom of this by going through the prevalent theories.

[... ... ...]

Which leaves just one explanation. “The late great Hannibal Lecter, he’s a lovely man, he’d love to have you for dinner,” is actually a trigger sequence for an army of insurrectionist sleeper agents who have been brainwashed by Russian scientists, and once they’ve heard him say it 35 times they’ll burn Washington to the ground. This is almost certainly the case, and may God have mercy on all our souls.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Jul, 2024 09:08 am
@hightor,
Quote:
It was national columnists and a significant number of Democratic elites who were pushing for the thunderdome primary.

Yes. Josh's use of the "thunderdome" analogy is spot on in it's suggestion of high-drama spectator sport.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 10/17/2024 at 09:53:10