18
   

Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

 
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Jul, 2024 02:47 pm
@hightor,
Ours is the most diverse parliament in terms of smaller parties and they're still a tiny minority.

Even more so when you take the NI parties out of the equation.

Out of 650 seats, Labour have 412, Conservatives 121 and Liberals 72

I think your projection is based on PR instead of first past the post.

All parliaments are different, the UK and Italian parliaments are poles apart.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Jul, 2024 05:08 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

Ours is the most diverse parliament in terms of smaller parties and they're still a tiny minority.


By that I mean the most current parliament. I'm talking about UK parliaments only.

I'm sure other countries' parliaments are far more diverse.
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Jul, 2024 05:35 pm
@thack45,
thack45 wrote:

Quote:
Trump...reiterated his support for Putin’s call for “peace” in Ukraine. Their plan calls for giving Putin the western regions of Ukraine that were central to his 2016 support for Trump; Trump’s 2016 campaign manager promised Trump would look the other way as Putin absorbed them.

Orbán, who has openly called for Trump’s reelection, posted: “Peace mission 5.0[.] It was an honour to visit President [Trump] at Mar-a-Lago today. We discussed ways to make [peace]. The good news of the day: he’s going to solve it!”


If only the likes of Trump and Orban and Putin had been around to discredit the radical philosophies of men like Franklin and Paine; or to persuade the French that their involvement in this colonial uprising would only prolong the unnecessary instability, personal and familial ruin, violence and death consequent of war; or to convince the colonists that they were outmatched by the British army and their Loyalists, and anyway, fighting for sovereignty was no guarantee that their situations would be improved – they could even lose their British protection altogether. Maybe they could have succeeded where many others failed, and had their "peace", instead of that fool-headed, swashbuckling rebellion.


I am completely smitten with dread that you would write such a thing.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Jul, 2024 06:02 pm
@glitterbag,
You'd be like Australia, you'd have affordable healthcare and kangaroos.
glitterbag
 
  2  
Reply Fri 12 Jul, 2024 07:06 pm
@izzythepush,
I could have kangaroos?
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Jul, 2024 07:36 pm
@glitterbag,
They would be provided. (On the NHS.)
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Jul, 2024 07:39 pm
@glitterbag,
We only let the Australians have kangaroos after the Australian declarition of not rebelling and throwing a shrimp on the barbie.

That famous day.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Sat 13 Jul, 2024 03:12 am
@glitterbag,
glitterbag wrote:

thack45 wrote:

Quote:
Trump...reiterated his support for Putin’s call for “peace” in Ukraine. Their plan calls for giving Putin the western regions of Ukraine that were central to his 2016 support for Trump; Trump’s 2016 campaign manager promised Trump would look the other way as Putin absorbed them.

Orbán, who has openly called for Trump’s reelection, posted: “Peace mission 5.0[.] It was an honour to visit President [Trump] at Mar-a-Lago today. We discussed ways to make [peace]. The good news of the day: he’s going to solve it!”


If only the likes of Trump and Orban and Putin had been around to discredit the radical philosophies of men like Franklin and Paine; or to persuade the French that their involvement in this colonial uprising would only prolong the unnecessary instability, personal and familial ruin, violence and death consequent of war; or to convince the colonists that they were outmatched by the British army and their Loyalists, and anyway, fighting for sovereignty was no guarantee that their situations would be improved – they could even lose their British protection altogether. Maybe they could have succeeded where many others failed, and had their "peace", instead of that fool-headed, swashbuckling rebellion.


I am completely smitten with dread that you would write such a thing.



Were Thack's comments not written in satire?

Or, perhaps, are his in satire...and yours also?

As Barbarino often said, "Ahm so confused."
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Sat 13 Jul, 2024 03:43 am
Quote:
Representative Glenn Grothman (R-WI) said yesterday that if Trump wins reelection, the U.S. should work its way back to 1960, before “the angry feminist movement…took the purpose out of the man’s life.” Grothman said that President Lyndon Baines Johnson’s War on Poverty was actually a “war on marriage,” in a communist attempt to hand control of children over to the government.

Grothman was waxing nostalgic for a fantasy past when laws and society discriminated against women, who could not get credit cards in their own name until 1974—meaning that, among other things, they could not build credit scores to borrow money on their own—and who were forced into dependence on men. The 1960 date Grothman chose was notable in another way, too: it was before the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act with which Congress tried to make the racial equality promised in the 1868 Fourteenth Amendment and the voting rights promised in the 1870 Fifteenth Amendment become real.

At stake in Grothman’s erasure of the last sixty years is the equality of women and minorities to the white men who previously exercised virtually complete control of American society. That equality translates into a struggle over the nature of the American government. Since the 1870s, during the reconstruction of the American government after the Civil War, white reactionaries insisted that opening the vote to anyone but white men would result in socialism.

Their argument was that poor voters—by which they meant Black men—would elect leaders who would promise them roads and schools and hospitals, and so on. Those public benefits could be paid for only with tax levies, and since white men held most of the property in the country in those days, they insisted such benefits amounted to a redistribution of wealth from hardworking white men to undeserving Black Americans, even though poor white people would benefit from those public works as much as or more than Black people did.

This argument resurfaced after World War II as an argument against Black and Brown voting and, in the 1970s, against the electoral power of “women’s libbers,” that is, women who called for the federal government to protect the rights of women equally to those of men. Beginning in 1980, when Republican presidential candidate Ronald Reagan called for rolling back the government regulations and social safety net that underpinned society, a gap appeared in voting behavior. Women, especially Black women, tended to back the Democrats, while men moved toward Republican candidates. Increasingly, Republican leaders used racist and sexist tropes to undermine the active government whose business regulations they hated.

For the radical extremists who have taken over the Republican Party, getting rid of the modern government that regulates business, provides a basic social safety net, promotes infrastructure, and protects civil rights is now gospel as they try to replace it with Christian nationalism. But that active government remains popular.

That popularity was reflected today as Republicans continued to take credit for laws passed by Democrats to maintain or expand an active government. In Tennessee, Republican Governor Bill Lee boasted that the state had “secured historic funding to modernize Memphis infrastructure with the single-largest transportation investment in state history.” All the Republicans in the Tennessee delegation opposed the measure, leaving Democratic representative Steve Cohen to provide the state’s only yes vote. Indeed, Tennessee senator Marsha Blackburn posted on social media that “Americans do not want [Biden’s] ‘socialist Build Back Broke’ plan.”

In Alabama, Senator Tommy Tuberville boasted about a bridge project funded by a $550 million Department of Transportation grant, writing: “Since I took office, I have been working to secure funding for the Mobile bridge and get this project underway.” But as Representative Terri Sewell, an Alabama Democrat, pointed out, Tuberville voted against the bill that provided the money.

Like Governor Lee and Senator Blackburn, Tuberville knows such government policies are enormously popular and so takes credit for them, even while voting against them.

Union workers also historically have supported a government that regulates business and provides a social safety net and infrastructure investment, but those workers turned to Reagan in 1980 and have tended to make their home in the Republican Party ever since. Now they appear to be shifting back.

Today the president of the 600,000-member International Association of Machinist and Aerospace Workers urged Biden to stay in the race, writing: “For the first time in decades, we have an Administration that has leveled the playing field for workers trying to organize. The IAM is one of the fastest growing unions in the labor movement because we have a President who goes toe to toe with corporations on behalf of working people.”

Union president Brian Bryant noted that Biden “saved hundreds of thousands of our members’ jobs” and thanked him for “strengthen[ing] the Buy American regulations that have helped to create millions of jobs, including nearly 800,000 in manufacturing.” Bryant also credited Biden with helping to save 83 pension plans that covered more than a million workers and retirees. Bryant noted that “(in) the IAM, we value seniority.”

United Auto Workers president Shawn Fain told Netroots Nation today that “humanity is at stake” in the 2024 election. “This has everything to do with our shot at life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Our wages. Having health care. Our retirement security, and our time…. Those are the four core issues that unite the entire working-class people in a fight against the billionaire class as we saw in our contract campaign last fall when 75% of Americans supported us in that fight, for those reasons.”

"The dream and the scheme of a man like Donald Trump is that the vast majority of working-class people, who literally make our country run, will remain divided. That's how they win. They want us to not unite in a common cause to take on the billionaire class…. They divide us by race. They divide us by gender, by who we love. They divide us by what language we speak or where we were born….”

Today, in Detroit, in a barnburner of a speech, President Joe Biden pitched his plan for the first 100 days of a second term with a Democratic Congress. He promised to restore Roe v. Wade, eliminate medical debt, raise the minimum wage, protect workers’ right to organize, ban assault weapons, and to “keep leading the world” on clean energy and addressing climate change. He also vowed to sign into law the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, which would end voter suppression, and the Freedom to Vote Act, which would protect voter rights and election systems, as well as end partisan gerrymandering.

Biden forcefully contrasted his own record with Trump’s. He reminded the audience that he was the first president to walk a picket line, because “when labor does well, everybody does well.” “When Trump comes here to tell you how great he is for the auto industry, remember this: when Trump was president we lost 86,000 jobs in unions. I created 275,000 auto jobs in America. In fact, what’s been true in the auto industry is true all over America: since I became president, we created nearly 16 million new jobs nationwide, 390,000 of those jobs right here in Michigan. We’ve created 800,000 manufacturing jobs nationwide, including 24,000 in Michigan.”

Biden hammered Trump, saying “no more free passes.” He reminded that audience that Trump is a convicted criminal and that a judge had found him liable for sexual abuse. Biden quoted the judge: “Mr. Trump raped her.” Biden reminded the audience that Trump lost his license to do business in New York state and is still facing criminal charges for retaining classified documents and trying to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, as well as charges in Georgia for election interference. Biden said: “It’s time for us to stop treating politics like entertainment and reality TV.”

Today the European Union charged Trump donor Elon Musk’s social media company X, formerly Twitter, for failing to curb disinformation and illegal hate speech.

Also today, a judge ruled that Trump ally Rudy Giuliani is not entitled to bankruptcy protection. The judge cited Giuliani’s “lack of financial transparency” and noted that Giuliani “has engaged in self-dealing.” This decision means that election workers Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss, as well as other creditors, are free to collect what they can of the $150 million he owes them. A lawyer for the two said: “We’re pleased the Court saw through Mr. Giuliani’s games and put a stop to his abuse of the bankruptcy proceeding. We will move forward as quickly as possible to begin enforcing our judgment against him.”

Meanwhile, Trump appeared to be trying to recapture attention by teasing an unveiling of his vice presidential nominee at next week’s Republican National Convention. He compared the selection process to “a highly sophisticated version of The Apprentice,” the reality TV show in which he appeared before he became president, and which centered around firing people.

hcr
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Sat 13 Jul, 2024 05:52 am
https://cdn.creators.com/198/374663/374663_image.jpg
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Sat 13 Jul, 2024 05:56 am
https://image.cagle.com/286701/980/-abbott-mia-during-texas-hurricane.png
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Sat 13 Jul, 2024 01:34 pm
Senator Sanders hails the "most effective president in modern history" and says Biden is strongest bet to beat "demagogue" Trump.
Sanders used an opinion piece in the New York Times to endorse Biden.

Bernie Sanders: Joe Biden for President
Quote:
I will do all that I can to see that President Biden is re-elected. Why? Despite my disagreements with him on particular issues, he has been the most effective president in the modern history of our country and is the strongest candidate to defeat Donald Trump — a demagogue and pathological liar. It’s time to learn a lesson from the progressive and centrist forces in France who, despite profound political differences, came together this week to soundly defeat right-wing extremism.

I strongly disagree with Mr. Biden on the question of U.S. support for Israel’s horrific war against the Palestinian people. The United States should not provide Benjamin Netanyahu’s right-wing extremist government with another nickel as it continues to create one of the worst humanitarian disasters in modern history.

I strongly disagree with the president’s belief that the Affordable Care Act, as useful as it has been, will ever address America’s health care crisis. Our health care system is broken, dysfunctional and wildly expensive and needs to be replaced with a “Medicare for all” single-payer system. Health care is a human right.

And those are not my only disagreements with Mr. Biden.

But for over two weeks now, the corporate media has obsessively focused on the June presidential debate and the cognitive capabilities of a man who has, perhaps, the most difficult and stressful job in the world. The media has frantically searched for every living human being who no longer supports the president or any neurologist who wants to appear on TV. Unfortunately, too many Democrats have joined that circular firing squad.

Yes. I know: Mr. Biden is old, is prone to gaffes, walks stiffly and had a disastrous debate with Mr. Trump. But this I also know: A presidential election is not an entertainment contest. It does not begin or end with a 90-minute debate.

Enough! Mr. Biden may not be the ideal candidate, but he will be the candidate and should be the candidate. And with an effective campaign that speaks to the needs of working families, he will not only defeat Mr. Trump but beat him badly. It’s time for Democrats to stop the bickering and nit-picking.

I understand that some Democrats get nervous about having to explain the president’s gaffes and misspeaking names. But unlike the Republicans, they do not have to explain away a candidate who now has 34 felony convictions and faces charges that could lead to dozens of additional convictions, who has been hit with a $5 million judgment after he was found liable in a sexual abuse case, who has been involved in more than 4,000 lawsuits, who has repeatedly gone bankrupt and who has told thousands of documented lies and falsehoods.

Supporters of Mr. Biden can speak proudly about a good and decent Democratic president with a record of real accomplishment. The Biden administration, as a result of the American Rescue Plan, helped rebuild the economy during the pandemic far faster than economists thought possible. At a time when people were terrified about the future, the president and those of us who supported him in Congress put Americans back to work, provided cash benefits to desperate parents and protected small businesses, hospitals, schools and child care centers.

After decades of talk about our crumbling roads, bridges and water systems, we put more money into rebuilding America’s infrastructure than ever before — which is projected to create millions of well-paying jobs. And we did not stop there. We made the largest-ever investment in climate action to save the planet. We canceled student debt for nearly five million financially strapped Americans. We cut prices for insulin and asthma inhalers, capped out-of-pocket costs for prescription drugs and got free vaccines to the American people. We battled to defend women’s rights in the face of moves by Trump-appointed jurists to roll back reproductive freedom and deny women the right to control their own bodies.

So, yes, Mr. Biden has a record to run on. A strong record. But he and his supporters should never suggest that what’s been accomplished is sufficient. To win the election, the president must do more than just defend his excellent record. He needs to propose and fight for a bold agenda that speaks to the needs of the vast majority of our people — the working families of this country, the people who have been left behind for far too long.

At a time when the billionaires have never had it so good and when the United States is experiencing virtually unprecedented income and wealth inequality, over 60 percent of Americans live paycheck to paycheck, real weekly wages for the average worker have not risen in over 50 years, 25 percent of seniors live each year on $15,000 or less, we have a higher rate of childhood poverty than almost any other major country, and housing is becoming more and more unaffordable — among other crises.

This is the wealthiest country in the history of the world. We can do better. We must do better. Joe Biden knows that. Donald Trump does not. Joe Biden wants to tax the rich so that we can fund the needs of working families, the elderly, the children, the sick and the poor. Donald Trump wants to cut taxes for the billionaire class. Joe Biden wants to expand Social Security benefits. Donald Trump and his friends want to weaken Social Security. Joe Biden wants to make it easier for workers to form unions and collectively bargain for better wages and benefits. Donald Trump wants to let multinational corporations get away with exploiting workers and ripping off consumers. Joe Biden respects democracy. Donald Trump attacks it.

This election offers a stark choice on issue after issue. If Mr. Biden and his supporters focus on these issues — and refuse to be divided and distracted — the president will rally working families to his side in the industrial Midwest swing states and elsewhere and win the November election. And let me say this as emphatically as I can: For the sake of our kids and future generations, he must win.


Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Jul, 2024 01:58 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

Senator Sanders hails the "most effective president in modern history" and says Biden is strongest bet to beat "demagogue" Trump.
Sanders used an opinion piece in the New York Times to endorse Biden.


Good for Sanders.

The Democrats have got to pull their act together. Nobody but the MAGA rabble really want another four years of Trump...the worst president during my lifetime.

No reason to waste this opportunity to finally be rid of him...by quarreling unnecessarily.

DEMOCRATS: Get your act together and win this thing...for America, the world...and common sense.

0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sat 13 Jul, 2024 02:24 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Hope you're surviving the heat OK.
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  2  
Reply Sat 13 Jul, 2024 05:02 pm

BREAKING:

Trump injured in incident at Pennsylvania rally
(cnn)
Below viewing threshold (view)
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Jul, 2024 05:22 pm
@Region Philbis,
Tots and pears. Yada-yada-yada. What does he think of gun control now?
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sat 13 Jul, 2024 05:39 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Isn't the 2nd ammendment supposed to prorect from tyranny?

Makes a wecome change from NRA thugs shooting up schools.
0 Replies
 
thack45
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Jul, 2024 05:46 pm
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

He just won the election.

Was my almost first thought
Region Philbis
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Jul, 2024 05:54 pm
@bobsal u1553115,

where was the good guy with a gun to take down the bad guy with a gun?

the crowd was chanting USA USA afterwards... how fitting...
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 09/19/2024 at 09:58:42