@hightor,
hightor wrote:One rule I'd like to see instituted would be a prohibition on consecutive posts. It's not "censorship" but it would prevent the forum flooding we've seen in this thread.
What do you consider to be flooding? The system already makes someone pause when they post more than five or six posts in a row in a thread.
I can try to consolidate multiple replies into a single reply, especially when replying to multiple posts from the same person, or replying to multiple people about the same topic.
I've been meaning to reply to some of those nonsensical transgender posts when I get time. Those replies would probably work well consolidated into a single post.
vikorr wrote:Which post fully illustrates the points I made.
That is incorrect. Your failure to point out the existence of even a single good progressive shows that you were wrong to say that I have no justification for labeling all progressives as being evil.
MontereyJack wrote:Oralloy's scurrilous malign fantasies about progressives got at least 4 threads locked. Nice play, ace. <cynical>.
Everything that I've said about progressives is true.
Threads do not get locked because I post the truth about progressives, they get locked because you post page after page after page of empty claims that I am wrong without ever pointing to a single error on my part.
That's on you, not on me.
MontereyJack wrote:Atrocities are a conservative specialty, progressives don't.
Progressives commit atrocities when they frame innocent people for imaginary crimes.
Progressives commit atrocities when they deliberately violate people's civil liberties for no reason.
That is not an exhaustive list, but having listed two types of atrocities, I think I've established the point.
MontereyJack wrote:2 recent right wing atrocities are the Jan. 6 insurrection and attempted coup
Peaceful protests against leftist tyranny are hardly atrocities.
MontereyJack wrote:and the Trump stackef SCOTUS attack on women's rights repealing abortion.
Meh. I don't do abortion nonsense. Both sides are loopy extremists.
MontereyJack wrote:Clarly the bad people are right wing.
Nope. It's the left that deliberately harms innocent people.
snood wrote:Don’t remind him about shutting down threads. It’s a like a nihilist badge of honor for someone VERY lacking in badges or honor.
I have infinitely more honor than you could ever dream of having.
And it's you people who engage in childish name-calling that get threads shut down, not people like me who deal in relevant facts. (So maybe it would be a badge of honor for
you.)
izzythepush wrote:He's incapable of reason, everytime anyone tries it just results in another outburst of bile against those who think differently.
Not only is that another one of your lies, you are falsely accusing me of being you.
You are the one who always resorts to outbursts of childish name-calling.
izzythepush wrote:That's what got this thread shut down earlier, Vikorr trying to reason with him.
Wrong. What got the thread shut down earlier was a bout of childish name-calling directed at me.
hightor wrote:Hey, it only means that you're a somebody – take it as a compliment. By not using your screen name I'm shielding you from the chorus of opprobrium which usually follows your toxic posts and relieving you of any need to respond. You're welcome!
Like I said, not even close to being persuasive. It's deliberately offensive, and you know it.
There is no toxicity in my posts. The toxicity is entirely on the part of the progressives.
Mame wrote:But you do realize you're spitting upwind when you try to talk to him, don't you? He is relentlessly single-minded in his attacks on and hate for 'evil progressives'. He's not worth your time and efforts because he's blind to any beliefs that aren't his. There are others here more worthy of your intelligence.
I'm blind to any beliefs that are clearly at odds with reality. If someone is delusional, that's not on me.
Although I agree that it is futile for delusional people to try to convince me to join in their delusions. I will stick to reality.