13
   

Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

 
 
snood
 
  3  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 08:53 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Quote:
Today, four new Republican representatives from New York called on Representative George Santos (R-NY) to resign.
We'll see what happens with this but it's a good sign.


I think it’s performative- done with the blessings of GOP leadership. This way, a show is made of condemning Santos, while the leaders who could take more definitive actions remain silent, keeping Santos as part of their thin majority.
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 09:04 am
@snood,
I don't think so. I've heard one of these four speaking and he definitely did not sound as if he was reciting someone else's words. And it's notable that each of the four are new arrivals in the House. HERE
Lash
 
  -3  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 09:09 am
Monitoring Biden

https://nypost.com/2023/01/10/biden-may-have-taken-secret-documents-for-his-book-doubling-his-hypocrisy/

Biden may have taken secret documents for his book — doubling his hypocrisy

By Jonathan Turley
January 10, 2023 3:58pm Updated

How that could possibly happen, how anyone could be that irresponsible,” President Biden, struggling to find words to express his revulsion at the very idea of moving classified material to Mar-a-Lago in a “60 Minutes” interview.

“And I thought what data was in there that may compromise sources and methods.”

So how does Biden explain the roughly dozen documents found sitting in a closet at a private office supplied by the Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement? For the moment, he is not saying anything at all. It is easy to understand why.

According to reports, the clearly marked classified documents include those at the highly classified “Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information” (TS/SCI) level. The documents reportedly include material related to Iran, Ukraine and the United Kingdom.

When the documents on such subjects were found at Mar-a-Lago, media experts immediately opined that Donald Trump may have sold material or was endangering national security for a book or vanity.

For two days, Biden has refused to answer questions from reporters as his allies in the media struggle for a spin out of this scandal.

His silence is hardly surprising. Biden has always been better at expressing revulsion than responsibility. Time and again, he has literally rushed before cameras to denounce others, often without basis, for alleged crimes. He has not waited for investigations, let alone trials.

For instance, when mounted agents were falsely accused of whipping migrants in Texas, the president was there. Even though the whipping story was clearly refuted by the available videotape, Biden rode the wave of media outrage, declaring: “It was horrible what — to see, as you saw — to see people treated like they did: horses nearly running them over and people being strapped. It’s outrageous. I promise you, those people will pay.”

This week, the president appeared on the southern border and held a photo op with border agents. Yet he has never had the decency to apologize to the agents who were cleared of all whipping allegations. Instead, his administration is still seeking to punish them on other grounds.

Biden may have to take responsibility for this debacle, but he faces a potential criminal charge. While Attorney General Merrick Garland has again refused to appoint a special counsel, any acknowledgment of Biden’s knowledge or interaction with the documents could have serious legal ramifications. These documents may have been relevant to his last book.

The book, “Promise Me, Dad,” released in November 2017, was marketed as his insider view of America’s relations with countries like Iran and Ukraine: “As vice president, Biden traveled more than a hundred thousand miles that year, across the world, dealing with crises in Ukraine, Central America, and Iraq.”

If he worked off these documents, it is impossible to deny the violation — or his hypocrisy in his comments on Mar-a-Lago.

He is now the subject of the same inquiries he raised with CBS’s Scott Pelley: “I thought what data was in there that may compromise sources and methods. By that, I mean, names of people helped or et cetera.”

The fact is past cases of the removal or mishandling of classified material have not resulted in major prosecutions. Yet many in the Democratic Party and the media have insisted on criminal charges in the Mar-a-Lago case, including barring Trump from office for even a misdemeanor conviction on unlawful possession.

Biden has previously weathered scandals, often by denying culpable intent. When accused of plagiarism, for instance, Biden insisted “if I had intended to cheat, would I have been so stupid?”

Many are likely to be asking the same question in the weeks ahead.

Jonathan Turley is an attorney and professor at George Washington University Law School.
____________________

A thoroughly corrupt guy gaslights his way through life with media running cover for him.


0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 09:11 am
Quote:
Former New York Election Official Admits to Vote Fraud Scheme

Jason Schofield, a Republican, pleaded guilty to using voters’ personal information illegally to obtain absentee ballots as a Rensselaer County election commissioner.
Odd that case after case of convictions for voter fraud involve Republicans doing it
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  2  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 09:12 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

I don't think so. I've heard one of these four speaking and he definitely did not sound as if he was reciting someone else's words. And it's notable that each of the four are new arrivals in the House.


They might well be sincere in their desire to separate themselves from Santos in the minds of their constituents who find him embarrassing. But I don’t think they’re speaking out without the aegis of their party bosses. This way, the party appears to disapprove of Santos without having McCarthy or Scalise or anyone whose words would carry weight do anything to jeopardize their majority.

If the GOP was serious about getting rid of the guy, their leadership would publicly demand he steps down.
thack45
 
  3  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 09:12 am
@snood,
McCarthy, for one, has stated his preference that Santos stick around. Not that he wouldn't change his mind if he had to (a benefit of not actually giving a ****). Santos seems to me like he'll only leave if he's forced to do so. Hey, he's getting a regular paycheck plus benefits now!
snood
 
  2  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 09:14 am
@thack45,
thack45 wrote:

McCarthy, for one, has stated his preference that Santos stick around. Not that he wouldn't change his mind if he needs to (a benefit of not actually giving a ****). Santos seems to me like he'll only leave if he's forced to do so. Hey, he's getting a regular paycheck plus benefits now!


And he’s LOVING the attention. Look at his smirk as he’s dodging questions.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 09:30 am
@snood,
snood wrote:


blatham wrote:

I don't think so. I've heard one of these four speaking and he definitely did not sound as if he was reciting someone else's words. And it's notable that each of the four are new arrivals in the House.


They might well be sincere in their desire to separate themselves from Santos in the minds of their constituents who find him embarrassing. But I don’t think they’re speaking out without the aegis of their party bosses. This way, the party appears to disapprove of Santos without having McCarthy or Scalise or anyone whose words would carry weight do anything to jeopardize their majority.

If the GOP was serious about getting rid of the guy, their leadership would publicly demand he steps down.


Yeah, if he gets tossed or forced to resign, a special election must be held to produce his replacement...and that might end up with a Democrat being elected. Very long shot. Santos, a total phony, won by almost 8 points. But until an special election is held, McCarthy's razor thin majority would be down one more vote. It would present an opportunity for some people to do a motion to vacate. Without Santos' vote, it might carry.

https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/2021-01-08_IF11722_dcbc4bdca5fddd5b46b49cc06ba113d2ac8d43f0.pdf
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 11:06 am
@snood,
Quote:
If the GOP was serious about getting rid of the guy, their leadership would publicly demand he steps down.
If the fellow was found to be a child molester they wouldn't want to put that seat at risk. What would turn them around would be a perception that keeping him disadvantages them sufficiently. We all understand that shame and moral considerations are of no concern to leadership. Power is everything. But we can't go further and say such a value set holds true for every House member, particularly those who have just arrived. We also can't say that leadership has no worries about further revelations (with continuing press attention) and/or real legal issues that (which might get him removed automatically). Either of these could move leadership to the conclusion that they must rid themselves of him just as they are trying to do with Trump.

As I said, we'll see how this plays out. But the public position taken by these four - particularly when placed against leadership's behavior - seems a positive to me.
hightor
 
  4  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 11:14 am
@blatham,
Quote:
But the public position taken by these four - particularly when placed against leadership's behavior - seems a positive to me.

I wonder if they – and possibly a few others – might be willing to help avoid a government default when that vote comes up?
Lash
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 11:37 am
McCarthy said in his first press conference today that there is a process for removing elected officials. Santos has been recommended to the Ethics Committee for a review and McC will be satisfied with their recommendations.

McC mentioned that one rule should apply to all.

He did not specifically compare Santos’ lies in volume or depth to those of Joe Biden—whose work in this area—lying about his life, history, and experiences—is unmatched.
engineer
 
  4  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 12:06 pm
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

McCarthy said in his first press conference today that there is a process for removing elected officials. Santos has been recommended to the Ethics Committee for a review and McC will be satisfied with their recommendations.

That's hysterical given that one of McCarthy's first actions was to gut the committee.
Quote:
Republicans are facing criticism after voting for changes to the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) that may significantly weaken its ability to investigate ethical violations by members of Congress.

The House voted to approve a new rules package on Monday, days after electing California Republican Kevin McCarthy as speaker following a protracted series of negotiations with the party's right wing and a nearly unprecedented 15 rounds of voting.

The GOP-led chamber's changes to the OCE, a nonpartisan entity intended to independently review allegations of ethical violations by House members, substantially impacts the office's ability to hire needed staff.

Three of four Democratic-appointed OCE board members will also be removed due to term limits under the changes, leaving Republican-appointed members in nearly full control of the office before Democrats are able to add new members, which may take months.

Last week, a group of 25 advocacy groups condemned the changes in a letter to the House, warning that the OCE would "struggle to perform its core function, dismantling one of the only ways members of Congress are held accountable for ethics violations."

Republican Representative George Santos of New York, who is facing a barrage of backlash and ridicule for lying about his background and qualifications prior to being elected last year, called the changes "fantastic" in an interview with Insider.
engineer
 
  5  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 12:14 pm
@blatham,
The local Republican party in his district has called for him to step down even though he won by a small margin and him stepping down would trigger a special election.
Quote:
Local Republican leaders from Long Island, meanwhile, condemned Santos, R-N.Y., Wednesday as a "pathological liar" and demanded he give up the House seat he won in November.

"He's basically confessed. He needs help," Bruce Blakeman, a Republican who serves as Nassau County's top administrator, said at an emotional news conference. "He's not a normal person. He needs to stop deluding himself that he can continue in Congress."

New York Rep. Anthony D'Esposito, R-N.Y., appeared at the event via video link from Washington, D.C., and also called on Santos to step down.

"George Santos does not have the ability to serve here in the House of Representatives and should resign," D'Esposito said.

Four Republican House members from New York called on Santos to step down, including Rep. Nick Langworthy, who also serves as chair of the state GOP organization.

Local GOP officials said they will refuse to work with Santos's office and will instead route any federal concerns through D'Esposito's office.

The head of the Nassau County Republican committee, Joseph Cairo Jr., acknowledged the GOP's internal vetting process failed to catch Santos's deceptions.

"Shame on me for believing people," Cairo said during the news conference, in response to questions from reporters.

"We trusted him. I take responsibility for that. So we will obviously adapt that [vetting] system."

Cairo said he is convinced Santos "continues to lie" to the public about his behavior.

Cutting ties with Santos would be costly for Republicans.

Santos served as a key ally helping McCarthy win a bitter and protracted leadership fight. Santos's vote could also be crucial for the GOP in the narrowly divided House going forward.

If he were to leave office, it would trigger a special election in a battleground district.

Santos currently faces probes by Nassau County's district attorney and by the U.S. attorney' office. Democratic lawmakers have also urged the House Ethics Committee to begin a separate investigation.
Lash
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 01:29 pm
@engineer,
It would definitely be hysterical if the Ethics Committee is disbanded before completing an inquiry on Santos, but things just don’t happen that fast.

Meanwhile!! https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/01/12/biden-documents-merrick-garland-special-counsel/11031433002/

Attorney General Merrick Garland taps special counsel to probe Biden classified documents
The announcement came hours after the White House revealed a second set of classified documents was found at Biden's home in Wilmington, Delaware.
Kevin Johnson
Bart Jansen
USA TODAY

And, Biden knew, of course, that he’d filched classified documents before the election—and before he sent goons to get Trump’s classified documents.

Whataguy!
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 01:54 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
I wonder if they – and possibly a few others – might be willing to help avoid a government default when that vote comes up?

That vote will be a test of whether it remains possible for Republicans in the House to show any independence and morality at all. But yes, definitely possible.
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 01:57 pm
@engineer,
Quote:
That's hysterical given that one of McCarthy's first actions was to gut the committee.
That bit of news can't possibly have escaped her attention.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 02:00 pm
@engineer,
Quote:
Local Republican leaders from Long Island, meanwhile, condemned Santos, R-N.Y., Wednesday as a "pathological liar" and demanded he give up the House seat he won in November...

Those are not wishy-washy or performative statements.
snood
 
  3  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 02:07 pm
@blatham,
You’re safest with “let’s just see how this goes”.

snood
 
  2  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 02:16 pm
Waitaminute… So there’s NO comment from the Merrick Garland cheerleaders about the speed with which he jumped to the task of getting to the bottom of the sinister Biden document grab?

But everyone was so impressed with Garland’s meticulous attention to building a case, and the way he ignored political pressure to just do his bulldog of justice thing. That’s what everyone kept telling me - a case against a president would of course necessarily take an inordinately long time, and we should LET HIM DO HIS WORK.

But immediately appoints a special counsel to look into the Biden documents.

No comments?

0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  2  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2023 02:36 pm
In regards to Santos, don't forget, this is the party of Matt Gaetz!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.19 seconds on 11/14/2024 at 04:42:34