Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

@blatham,

blatham wrote:

We see this differently. No problem in that. How about we take it up again in the future when a decision is made on whether to indict.

Okay. When do you reckon that might happen? Next 30-90 days? Early in the new year? After Spring break?

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

Frank Apisa wrote:

But charges must be brought...and a successful prosecution must happen. Or America is no more.

Progressives really are so preposterous sometimes. Laughing

0 Replies

@snood,

snood wrote:

It's a bitterly liberating acceptance of the reality that for whatever perverse reasons, Donald Trump has proven so far to be above the reach of the law, and most likely will continue to prove to be.

Well it's certainly true that, after the way Democrats said that Bill Clinton is above the law, if Mr. Trump ever committed a crime he too would be above the law.

But I think you should try to focus more on the fact that Mr. Trump hasn't actually committed any crimes.

0 Replies

@neptuneblue,

neptuneblue wrote:

However that is nothing compared to the childish name calling and taunts for an American President.

90% of the supposedly outrageous things that Mr. Trump is supposed to have said, he never said. The Democrats were just lying about what he said.

The 10% of the time that he did actually say something outrageous, he was responding in kind after some progressive said something outrageous to him first.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

You're being disingenuous.

2 Replies

@neptuneblue,

Kindly put.

1 Reply

@bobsal u1553115,

Perhaps. But not accurate.

0 Replies

@neptuneblue,

neptuneblue wrote:

You're being disingenuous.

No I'm not. Everything that I said is true.

I assure you that I post the truth with honorable intentions. I don't post the truth with any sort of malign intent.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Oh. But you are intending to deceive.

Which isn't honorable.

1 Reply

@neptuneblue,

I am not intending to deceive. I am posting the truth.

And not any misleading half-truth presented in a misleading context, but the actual complete truth.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

oralloy wrote:

90% of the supposedly outrageous things that Mr. Trump is supposed to have said, he never said. The Democrats were just lying about what he said.

The 10% of the time that he did actually say something outrageous, he was responding in kind after some progressive said something outrageous to him first.

Please just stop, it's becoming quite clear your memory is failing you.

Trump verbally attacked members of his own party, Supreme Court Justices, Five-Star Generals, journalists and member of his own staff.

None of them are "progressives" in any stretch of the term.

So yeah, just stop.

1 Reply

@neptuneblue,

neptuneblue wrote:

Please just stop,

Never.

neptuneblue wrote:

it's becoming quite clear your memory is failing you.

My memory is perfect.

neptuneblue wrote:

Trump verbally attacked members of his own party, Supreme Court Justices, Five-Star Generals, journalists and member of his own staff.

What's wrong with that? Are all these people immune from criticism?

neptuneblue wrote:

None of them are "progressives" in any stretch of the term.

But are they immune to criticism?

neptuneblue wrote:

So yeah, just stop.

Never.

BTW, I think it would be appropriate for Ohio to return Toledo to Michigan ahead of next weekend's football game. This is an excellent time to remedy that past wrong.

Off topic I know. But it's hard not to be thinking about it this time of the year.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Oh. The Gaslighting Game. It seems you've become a master at it.

First you claim Trump never said comments that can be easily proven, then switch tactics over progressives.

While entertaining to see it in action, it still leaves your comments as disingenuous.

And, off topic, Ohio boundary lines were established in 1803, no, you cannot arbitrarily have Toledo.

1 Reply

@snood,

Quote:

Okay. When do you reckon that might happen? Next 30-90 days? Early in the new year? After Spring break?

What do I know? One of the legal people I follow is https://www.emptywheel.net/
You might check in with her now and again.

1 Reply

@neptuneblue,

neptuneblue wrote:

Oh. The Gaslighting Game. It seems you've become a master at it.

Very unlikely. I can't say for sure because I can never remember what gaslighting is supposed to be. But the odds are practically zero that I am doing whatever it is.

neptuneblue wrote:

First you claim Trump never said comments that can be easily proven, then switch tactics over progressives.

I don't recall addressing specific comments of his. I think you are imagining a post that I never made.

neptuneblue wrote:

While entertaining to see it in action, it still leaves your comments as disingenuous.

I am not responsible for imaginary posts that I never made.

Although if you would like to name a specific comment that Mr. Trump made and have me address that specific comment, I would be happy to do that.

neptuneblue wrote:

And, off topic, Ohio boundary lines were established in 1803, no, you cannot arbitrarily have Toledo.

Unless you are losing your memory, you know very well that Ohio stole Toledo. You were certainly aware of the theft in past discussions.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

I've quoted you twice, there will not be a 3rd time. As I tell my children, if you don't know the meaning of a word, look it up and you'll be informed. I suggest you take the same advise.

And I don't really give a flying **** about Toledo, just that you cannot annex it.

2 Replies

@neptuneblue,

He's not worth one time much less three.....

1 Reply

@BillW,

@BillW,
Your use of personal attacks is more evidence that you have nothing useful to contribute to the discussion.

0 Replies

@neptuneblue,

neptuneblue wrote:

I've quoted you twice, there will not be a 3rd time.

You've not quoted me addressing any specific comment by Mr. Trump. I merely addressed his outrageous comments as a whole, pointing out that 90% of them never even happened and the other 10% were fully justified.

neptuneblue wrote:

As I tell my children, if you don't know the meaning of a word, look it up and you'll be informed. I suggest you take the same advise.

I've looked it up a few times. I always forget the definition about 30 seconds after I read it.

I've stopped bothering. It's clearly not an important word to know.

neptuneblue wrote:

And I don't really give a flying **** about Toledo, just that you cannot annex it.

We can if the federal government ever collapses and we go to war and defeat you.

This is yet another reason to equip the MDF with nuclear weapons.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Ok, that's some funny stuff right there. I'm not sure how comedic you actually are.

2 Replies

Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know