12
   

Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

 
 
Lash
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 08:37 am
@Walter Hinteler,
"The very fact that data has already begun to come in, in favour of confirming a subversive act or a terrorist act... once again confirms the information that the Russian side has," Peskov told his daily call with reporters.

"It is very important not to stop, it is very important to find the one behind this explosion."

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/traces-explosives-found-nord-stream-pipelines-sweden-says-2022-11-18/
_________________________

But, the investigators have gone silent. Truth being sold to highest bidder? Who knows, in the post-truth world?
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 08:39 am
@revelette1,
revelette1 wrote:

Very disappointing. I imagine they waited to let this drop til after the midterms. Kind of disillusioning as well. I didn't think I had any political illusions left.

U.S. Backs Immunity for Saudi Leader in Lawsuit Over Khashoggi Murder

Quote:
The State Department said Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the kingdom’s de facto ruler, should have legal immunity as the head of the Saudi government.


I guess oil talks?



Actually, the US is simply acceding to International law. Better to do so than defy it...and later have it bite us on the ass.
revelette1
 
  3  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 09:10 am
@Frank Apisa,
Maybe so. But Biden sure talked like we could force some kind of accountability on him on the campaign trail. We got some low level folks, but that's it.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 09:26 am
@revelette1,
I'm guessing there is no court he has to face he wouldn't voluntarily have to show up for.

He is a head of state. Heads of state have reserved the right to "eliminate" enemies of the state wherever they are found on the planet.

The correct venue is a Turkish or Saudi court.

Very little any other nation could argue jurisdiction about.

Reality always has a dingy backside story.

0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 09:30 am
@revelette1,
revelette1 wrote:

Maybe so. But Biden sure talked like we could force some kind of accountability on him on the campaign trail. We got some low level folks, but that's it.


MBS was only appointed Prime Minister of Saudi Arabia three weeks ago. That is when the International law kicked in. Before that, it made sense to speak of holding him to accountability.

I hate the fact that that asshole is getting away with killing Khashoggi...but for now, at least, he is. The future may hold a different fate for him. Don't lose hope.
revelette1
 
  3  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 09:38 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
MBS was only appointed Prime Minister of Saudi Arabia three weeks ago. That is when the International law kicked in. Before that, it made sense to speak of holding him to accountability.



Oh, well, as bad as that it is, I suppose they had no choice. A lot of different changes and things seem to be happening with those countries over there.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 09:50 am
@Lash,
They have only just found the explosive, it needs to be carefully analysed.

That's you all over, rush to judgement and to hell with the evidence.

Stop the count, Trump has enough votes as it is.
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 09:50 am
@revelette1,
revelette1 wrote:

Quote:
MBS was only appointed Prime Minister of Saudi Arabia three weeks ago. That is when the International law kicked in. Before that, it made sense to speak of holding him to accountability.



Oh, well, as bad as that it is, I suppose they had no choice. A lot of different changes and things seem to be happening with those countries over there.


MBS does not look like the kind of person I would trust very much. But...his concerns are not about what I, or anyone else, thinks of him. I would hope that his concerns are about his nation and the people who live there...and, incidentally, about the rest of the world. He may, like our Trump, be just interested in what "is in it for" himself.

0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 09:53 am
@Frank Apisa,
It would have to be pretty drastic.

He's a member of the Saudi Royal family, a descendent of the prophet Mohammed and guardian of the forbidden city.

He ain't going anywhere.
revelette1
 
  4  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 10:10 am
Quote:
Ron DeSantis boasts that Florida is “where woke goes to die.” (Of course, it’s where everybody goes to die.) He also likes to call it “the free state of Florida.” If you think carefully about these slogans, which DeSantis’s supporters generally don’t, you might detect a wee contradiction. If Florida is “free,” then all ideas, including “woke” ones, ought to thrive there.

The answer to the contradiction is that DeSantis doesn’t care about freedom at all unless it’s the freedom to express ideas he believes in. That contradiction was exposed in especially clear fashion Thursday by a federal judge who struck down DeSantis’s “Stop WOKE Act,” his centerpiece attack on progressive academia, as a prima facie violation of the First Amendment.

The law forbids schools, universities, and even private businesses from espousing a series of concepts, including the idea that any person is oppressed or privileged because of their race or that anybody should “be discriminated against” in order “to achieve diversity, equity or inclusion.” The court struck down the higher-education portion of this law on the obvious grounds that it prohibits a professor from espousing a certain class of ideas.

The judge noted that if a professor invited Sonia Sotomayor to speak to a law-school class and she shared the following belief (which she wrote in her autobiography):

“I had no need to apologize that the look-wider, search-more affirmative action that Princeton and Yale practiced had opened doors for me. That was its purpose: to create the conditions whereby students from disadvantaged backgrounds could be brought to the starting line of a race many were unaware was even being run.”

… it would be in violation of Florida law.

Indeed, the only way Florida can defend its clumsy prohibition on expressing forbidden beliefs about racism is to assert the state has a blanket right to control ideas expressed in public-university classrooms. The law relies on “the notion that anything professors utter in a state university classroom during ‘in-class instruction’ is government speech, and thus, the government can both determine the content of that speech and prohibit the expression of certain viewpoints,” the court noted, which flies in the face of precedent.

There is a strong liberal argument to be made that essentialist ideas about race help justify illiberal restrictions on speech. The liberal response is to defend free speech. DeSantis’s response, by contrast, is to attempt to ban left-wing ideas about race.

This isn’t some accidental slipup on DeSantis’s part. He genuinely believes he possesses the legal and moral right to censor ideas expressed by academics. And while the Stop WOKE law has been struck down, DeSantis has succeeded in a more limited effort along the same lines: He has stacked the university system with political cronies and intimidated professors from giving testimony to the legislature that contradicts his positions.

At the National Conservatism Conference, representatives of Florida’s government and Hungary’s competitive-authoritarian regime were sharing notes in public. Hungary has cracked down on the higher-education sector, and DeSantis spokesperson Christina Pushaw admiringly cited its slashing attacks on the media. There was little pretense of any attachment to a marketplace of ideas. The model DeSantis wishes to follow is Viktor Orbán, not John Stuart Mill.

Notably, the organization that fought and defeated DeSantis, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, is not a progressive group. FIRE is dedicated to free-speech norms and has fought tirelessly for campus free expression. It has stood up against speech restriction from both the right and the left, but given its longtime focus on academia, much of its work has been undertaken in opposition to illiberalism from the left. That the most effective opponent of left-wing political correctness took down his signature campus law ought to indicate that DeSantis is the furthest thing from a champion of free speech.



Intelligencer
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 11:04 am

Apparently Donald Trump just has the worst luck ever. New York Attorney General Letitia James was successfully able to move a lawsuit that Trump filed against her to federal court, and the judge assigned to the case happens to be someone that recently sanctioned Trump's lawyers for filing frivolous lawsuits in his court. Trump's attorneys have to be furious about this because they are likely to be hit with even MORE sanctions now. Farron Cousins explains what's happening.

=============

*This transcript was auto-generated. Please excuse any typos.

You know, sometimes fate luck, whatever you want to call it just is not on your side. And Donald Trump this week found that out the hard way when a case that he had filed a lawsuit he filed against New York Attorney General Letitia James, was moved at James' request from a Florida State court to a Florida federal court and has now ended up in front of a judge who appears to hate Donald Trump's guts. Here's what happened, as I'm sure everybody is aware, after New York Attorney General Letitia James filed her $250 million lawsuit against the Trump organization, Donald Trump decided to file a lawsuit against her for, as he put it, a campaign of intimidation and harassment that was an attempt to steal, destroy, or control all things. Trump sounds rather frivolous. Yes, because just because you're unhappy that you're being investigated does not mean you have the right to sue because you were investigated and then they, they filed a lawsuit against you.

Um, first and foremost, let's get this outta the way real quick before we get into the judge that is now overseeing this. The case should have been immediately thrown out, right? Letitia James should never have even had to have made a motion to move it from state court to federal court because the original filing should have immediately been tossed into the trash can because there's no merit to this lawsuit whatsoever. You cannot sue just because federal authorities investigated you and they found stuff. So it's not even like it was a frivolous investigation. They found stuff. They've charged your CFO with a crime, with multiple crimes and your organization like that. That's not, you can't just sue for that. The lawsuit should have never stood, and it won't because now it falls in front of Judge, federal Judge Donald Middlebrooks. And if you're not familiar with Donald Middlebrooks, let me refer you to a video from earlier this week where I talked about the fact that Middlebrooks just sanctioned a group of Donald Trump lawyers, including Alina Haba Trump's favorite lawyer for filing a frivolous lawsuit in his court. That lawsuit, of course, was the one that Trump filed against Hillary Clinton and the DNC Lisa Page, Peter str, blah, blah, blah. Middlebrooks not only threw the case out, but he then last week sanctioned Trump's lawyers for even filing the lawsuit. And now this very same judge gets to oversee another frivolous lawsuit filed by Donald Trump and his lawyers, and I'm sure his lawyers probably need a change of pants right now, because that's

Terrifying for them. They just got hit with tens of thousands of dollars in fines and they're probably gonna get hit again. Here's what's fun about this. I didn't know this until now, but apparently some members of Donald Trump's legal team had actually held a meeting with the lawyers who ended up filing this, this lawsuit and told them, please don't do this. Like this is frivolous, this is stupid. You are gonna get in trouble if you file this lawsuit. But of course, they didn't listen and they thought, Hey, don't worry, we got a friendly venue down here in Florida State Court. Until, of course, attorney General James stepped in and said, no, we gotta move this to federal court. The court granted her motion, now it's in front of Middlebrooks. And I'm willing to bet that Trump's lawyers are gonna have to go ahead and make a run to the ATM because I have little doubt that this case is going to end any differently than the lawsuit Trump filed against Hillary in the dnc. You're in trouble now, bud. Like the, this is the worst luck you could have possibly had the worst possible judge in Florida for your case to end up against. Especially considering the fact that, as I mentioned, this judge appears to really dislike you and he is gonna make your lawyers pay the price for that.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 11:31 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

It would have to be pretty drastic.

He's a member of the Saudi Royal family, a descendent of the prophet Mohammed and guardian of the forbidden city.

He ain't going anywhere.


Does look that way.

BUT...he still does not look like a guy I'd trust. To me he appears to be a Saudi Ted Cruz.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 11:52 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Just logged into twitter and judging by tweets from a LOT of regular users, it seems that Musk might have killed the site. I've been using twitter for about 15 years and refer to it multiple times each day. For me, it's been incredibly useful as I follow many very bright people (and almost never view comments). What a **** up.


Seems like the left doesn't like it, maybe they can go make their own twitter.
lmur
 
  3  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 01:09 pm
Merrick Garland set to make a MAJOR announcement very shortly.

Live link here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjlY7CsCD74

My guess - he's leaving twitter.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  2  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 01:32 pm
Live Updates: Garland to Name Special Counsel for Trump Inquiries

Updates

Quote:
Garland said he was “confident” that the appointment of the special counsel would not slow down either investigation — and emphasized that he will ultimately make the decision on whether or not to prosecute.


Quote:
The special counsel will take over two major criminal investigations into former President Trump.

WASHINGTON — Attorney General Merrick B. Garland appointed a special counsel on Friday to take over two major criminal investigations involving former President Donald J. Trump, including his role in events leading up to the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and his handling of sensitive government documents.

John L. Smith, the former head of the Justice Department’s public integrity section, will oversee the investigation into Mr. Trump’s retention of sensitive government documents at his home in Florida, and “key” aspects of the separate inquiry into the former president’s actions before the Jan. 6 attack, Mr. Garland said in a news conference.

0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 01:43 pm
I just hope that after the window closes for the time to indict Trump, that Merrick Garland is reminded every day for the rest of his life that the world was counting on him to make Trump account for attempting to overthrow our government, and he quit and walked away.

Because that’s exactly what he’s doing with this “special counsel”.
He found a way to pass the buck and escape the yoke of responsibility. What a ******* pussy.
Ragman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 01:48 pm
@snood,
Couldn’t have said it better. Where is there someone with a spine and a sense of responsibility?
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  2  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 01:51 pm
@snood,
Quote:
Nov. 18, 2022, 2:30 p.m. ET18 minutes ago
18 minutes ago
Glenn Thrush

Garland said he was “confident” that the appointment of the special counsel would not slow down either investigation — and emphasized that he will ultimately make the decision on whether or not to prosecute.


link left previously.
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 02:02 pm
@revelette1,
Garland says don’t worry, everything’s under control.

Okey-dokey
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2022 02:11 pm
@izzythepush,
Baseless Ad hom, per usual.
The US had more to gain by the sabotage than any other player.
I’ll be very happy to have legitimate evidence—if that’s what we get.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.22 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 03:22:39