13
   

Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

 
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2022 01:21 pm
Quote:
Delusional broadcast disorder has claimed its latest victim: John Cleese
Marina Hyde

The great affliction of our age makes men believe they have been cancelled by the BBC while they are literally on the BBC

How very interesting to hear John Cleese explain how he’d be immediately cancelled or censored on the BBC, in comments made freely and at considerable length yesterday in the marquee 8.10am interview slot on the BBC’s flagship Radio 4 news programme. Explaining why he was about to become a presenter on GB News, the 82-year-old declared loftily: “The BBC have not come to me and said: ‘Would you like to have some one-hour shows?’ And if they did, I would say: ‘Not on your nelly!’ Because I wouldn’t get five minutes into the first show before I’d been cancelled or censored.” To which the only possible response is, “Morning, Major!”

These days, Cleese claims to “live in hotel rooms” – a bit on-the-nose, but there you go – and evidently boasts a lively range of views. In the strictest interests of accuracy, we should note that he was recently given a whole two series of a sitcom on the BBC, with the last episode of Hold the Sunset broadcast in 2019, a few months before the pandemic hit. Furthermore, it was barely a month ago that Cleese was tweeting: “GB News is sometimes referred to, rather wittily, as ‘KGB News’. To what extent is GB News influenced by Russian interests?” I don’t know – but perhaps it’s a matter that could be explored on his new GB News show. We’re told anything goes.

For now, what seems clear is that Cleese suffers one of the great afflictions of our age, a kind of delusional broadcast disorder that can make the sufferer believe they have been cancelled by the BBC even while they are literally on the BBC. The worst part of it is that we are not allowed to discuss this social sickness because of political correctness. I tried to tell my husband about it at breakfast yesterday – he works at the BBC – but he told me to be quiet so he could listen to John Cleese on the BBC. Like Cleese, I had been silenced.

In any rational world you’d be able to state the obvious reality – the condition is overwhelmingly suffered by men. But you can’t say it! You can’t say it! You can look at Cleese, or Noel Edmonds, or Nigel Farage, or Laurence Fox, but you’re banned from saying what you see. You have to pretend that women are out there every five minutes wanging on about how they’re not allowed to have a primetime show forever, as well as a bus pass or leadership of a political party, and how their only alternative option is presenting hours of gloriously bitter live telly every week on one of our bazillion-pound news-o-tainment channels.

In a sane world, you’d be allowed to say scientific facts, like the fact that 90% of heroically whingeing BBC cancellees are men, 95% of them are acrimoniously divorced, and 110% of them have “divorced energy”. (Obviously, it’s Not All Previously Primetime Men – Mr Blobby has behaved with perfect dignity.) Yet you can’t say it. You’d get cancelled in seconds. In fact, I don’t even know how I’m writing this next sentence.

Pity me. In my incredibly vulnerable position as a newspaper columnist, I have to think about this stuff constantly. Constantly! I once described a soon-to-launch TV news channel as sure to become “unmoored from facts” – and its CEO voided his pram of all toys. He spent rather a lot of time to-ing and fro-ing with the readers’ editor demanding some mean words be changed, before handing Press Gazette a copy of his very grand letter to the Guardian (which was also subsequently published by the Guardian). In it, he explained: “We are absolutely committed to our mission to report news in the most accurate and balanced way we can. It is unfortunate that your article failed to adhere to this basic principle.” The channel in question? Why, it was GB News.

Don’t get me wrong, I was and am still hugely amused by Angelos Frangopoulos, the adorable little Aussie snowflake who wrote that letter. But imagine how I felt last week when I saw his channel had given a guest spot to Naomi Wolf, who hasn’t been playing with a full deck of data points since the 00s. Wolf’s appearance was essentially a very, very long diatribe against the Covid vaccine. Her assertion that “mass murder has taken place” was bolstered by the GB News presenter Mark Steyn explaining that vaccines “cause every conceivable kind of damage”. Other lowlights of Naomi’s appearance, which was allowed to proceed without a single piece of disinformation being questioned? The claim that Covid vaccinations were “bioweapons” that were “sterilising people” and “poisoning breast milk”. Also, “civil society has been wholly co-opted by bad actors trying to destroy British civil society”. Wolf went on – entirely unchallenged – to compare today’s medical establishment to the eugenicists and exterminators of the Third Reich. Steyn just nodded along, repeatedly going “yeah”, presumably in “the most accurate and balanced way” he could. He booked her again the very next night.

Anyway, a fun new stablemate for John Cleese. Cleese famously decided that the Brexit debate saw this country sink “to the lowest intellectual level ever”, so I strongly urge him to push that envelope and book Wolf on his first show. In the meantime, those of us saddened by a former idol’s comic decline should comfort ourselves that some of the best recent comedy has happened on GB News. Last year on the free speech channel, presenter Guto Harri took the knee live on air, got suspended for it, quit and was soon made prime minister Boris Johnson’s comms chief. The whole batshit saga was easily funnier than anything Cleese has done since A Fish Called Wanda (1988), and we must look forward to his promising new show in that spirit.


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/oct/11/john-cleese-broadcast-cancelled-bbc
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2022 01:54 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Dear Frank
One of the last people I would have shut up is Cleese.


Figures!
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2022 04:11 pm
@blatham,
He is not the same John Cleese we knew and loved. He's developed a nasty little swing to the right these last few years.
Builder
 
  -4  
Reply Sun 16 Oct, 2022 02:12 am
@snood,
Quote:
Your opinion of Nancy Pelosi differs from mine?


Your opinion of Pelosi isn't your opinion at all.

That's the difference between us.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -3  
Reply Sun 16 Oct, 2022 02:13 am
@hightor,
Quote:
Good night, Builder.


I'm getting creeped out, that you somehow want to be my sugar daddy.
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Sun 16 Oct, 2022 03:10 am
@Builder,
Quote:
I'm getting creeped out, that you somehow want to be my sugar daddy.


Not nearly as creeped out as I am, having to sign off after every exchange so that you know I've left the discussion:

Builder wrote:
You're in constant denial of facts, and when shown evidence, drift away without a word.


Why are you so concerned with my silence? I'd be more than happy if you drifted away without a word.

Good night, Builder. Pleasant dreams. Hope you feel better in the morning.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Sun 16 Oct, 2022 03:21 am
Quote:
At Thursday’s meeting of the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol, as Representative Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) showed that former president Trump both recognized that he had lost the election and intended to leave the White House, he noted that on November 11, just four days after Democrat Joe Biden had been declared the winner of the 2020 election, Trump had abruptly ordered U.S. troops to leave Somalia and Afghanistan by January 15.

Indeed, according to an Axios investigation by Jonathan Swan and Zachary Basu last May, two days before that order, on November 9, 2020, John McEntee, Trump’s hand-picked director of the Presidential Personnel Office, told retired Army Colonel Douglas Macgregor that Trump wanted him to “Get us out of Afghanistan. Get us out of Iraq and Syria. Complete the withdrawal from Germany. Get us out of Africa.” When Macgregor, who was brought on to the administration on November 11, said he didn’t think that was possible, McEntee told him to “do as much as you can.”

Kinzinger’s point was that Trump clearly knew he was leaving office because he was deliberately trying to create chaos for his successor. When he abruptly pulled the U.S. out of northern Syria in October 2019, he abandoned our Kurdish allies, forcing more than 160,000 Syrians from their homes and making them victims of extraordinary violence. The Pentagon considered Trump’s November 11 instructions “a rogue order,” since they had not gone through any of the appropriate channels, and disregarded them.

The release of the Biden administration’s annual National Security Strategy (NSS) on Wednesday, October 12, 2022, highlights just how big a catastrophe we dodged.

Just as Trump’s abrupt withdrawal from Syria left a vacuum for Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Russian president Vladimir Putin, and as Trump’s planned but not executed withdrawal of troops from Germany would have hamstrung the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) so it could not have countered Putin’s Russia, so would the abrupt disengagement of the U.S. around the world have created a giant vacuum for authoritarian countries to fill.

Biden’s National Security Strategy reiterates his belief that we are in a global struggle between democracy and rising autocracy and that the world is at an inflection point that will determine “the security and prosperity of the American people for generations to come.”

The document makes a strong call for American leadership to defend democracy and to reinforce the rules-based international system on which the world has depended since World War II. This system is now under attack as Russia has claimed the right to invade a neighboring country and redraw its boundaries by force, and as authoritarian governments seek to control global trade and power by withholding key resources—like energy—from other nations.

The NSS promises that the U.S. will work to strengthen democracy around the world “because democratic governance consistently outperforms authoritarianism in protecting human dignity, leads to more prosperous and resilient societies, creates stronger and more reliable economic and security partners for the United States, and encourages a peaceful world order.” It also calls for the domestic development of key resources, especially energy, to reduce the ability of other nations to pressure us.

Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken have made rebuilding NATO, reinforcing our traditional partnerships like those with the “Quad”—which, in addition to the U.S., includes Australia, Japan, and India—and advancing our alliances in the Indo-Pacific a top priority. On Thursday, Biden said his staff had calculated that he had spent about 220 hours talking directly with the heads of state at NATO and the European Union, “just holding it together” after Putin counted on NATO splitting up. Biden and Blinken have emphasized security, trade, and technology to knit the world together.

The NSS notes that “we are creating a latticework of strong, resilient, and mutually reinforcing relationships that prove democracies can deliver for their people and the world.” Unified international support for Ukraine illustrates just how successful they have been. The NSS also emphasizes the importance of working with countries in Latin America to improve conditions in the western hemisphere in general and to weaken corruption, improve security, and strengthen democracy there. It calls for closer relations with African nations and African regional institutions, and it calls for a peaceful Arctic.

The NSS notes that Iran interferes in the internal affairs of its neighbors and is advancing a nuclear program and that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK, or North Korea) is also expanding its illicit nuclear weapons. But above all, the NSS calls out Russia and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as key destabilizers of the international order. It notes that they are increasingly aligned with each other but present very different challenges to the U.S.

China is the only power able to reshape the international order, the NSS states, and is using technology to gain sway over international institutions to advance its authoritarian model, which in the past has provided a rising standard of living in exchange for a loss of freedom. The PRC has been able to use that economic power to pressure other countries to become dependent on it.

The NSS calls for strengthening the U.S. at home to compete with the PRC, working with allies and partners, and competing with the PRC in the Indo-Pacific region to strengthen the autonomy of countries there. (The recent U.S. demonstration of support for Taiwan was part of this demonstration, and it had the effect of prompting the PRC to overreact, demonstrating an instability that weakened ties to regional neighbors.)

And yet the NSS emphasizes that while the U.S. has “profound differences” with the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese Government, those differences are not “between our people.” “Ties of family and friendship continue to connect the American and the Chinese people. We deeply respect their achievements, their history, and their culture. Racism and hate have no place in a nation built by generations of immigrants to fulfill the promise of opportunity for all. And we intend to work together to solve issues that matter most to the people of both countries.”

Turning to Russia, the NSS condemns “its longstanding efforts to destabilize its neighbors using intelligence and cyber capabilities, and its blatant attempts to undermine internal democratic processes in countries across Europe, Central Asia, and around the world,” and notes that “Russia has also interfered brazenly in U.S. politics and worked to sow divisions among the American people.” The U.S. will continue to lead “a united, principled, and resolute response to Russia’s invasion” of Ukraine.

But the last several months have indicated that autocracies have their own problems. The PRC has doubled down on a zero-Covid policy that has hurt its economy and sparked internal protest. Tomorrow, the Communist Party will begin its 20th National Congress (congresses are held every five years). It is expected that President Xi Jinping will win a third term to consolidate his grip on power just as the U.S has unveiled strict controls on selling semiconductors and chip-making equipment to China, restrictions that appear to be an attempt to kneecap Chinese advances in artificial intelligence and military capabilities.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has proved disastrous for Putin. As supplies and soldiers have drained into Ukraine, Russia’s control of the lands around it has faltered, while his recent mobilization of the Russian population to fight in Ukraine has created extraordinary unrest at home. Putin is pressing Belarus’s president, Aleksandr Lukashenko, to join the war, but Lukashenko appears hesitant, likely suspecting that joining the disastrous war will mean his own political end.

For its part, Iran is facing internal protests sparked by the murder of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini, known to her family by her Kurdish name Zhina, in the custody of “morality police” for violating the country’s dress code. Saudi Arabia is not necessarily as strong as it has appeared lately, either. When its leaders recently sided with Russia by pushing OPEC+ to cut oil production and thus support gas prices, other OPEC+ countries told the U.S. that the Saudis had pressured them to do so. Saudi Arabia has suddenly offered Ukraine $400 million in humanitarian aid, evidently trying to regain the goodwill of Europe and the U.S., since it imports almost all of its weapons from that bloc.

“The post-Cold War era is definitively over and a competition is underway between the major powers to shape what comes next,” the NSS says. “No nation is better positioned to succeed in this competition than the United States, as long as we work in common cause with those who share our vision of a world that is free, open, secure, and prosperous. This means that the foundational principles of self-determination, territorial integrity, and political independence must be respected, international institutions must be strengthened, countries must be free to determine their own foreign policy choices, information must be allowed to flow freely, universal human rights must be upheld, and the global economy must operate on a level playing field and provide opportunity for all.”

hcr
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  3  
Reply Sun 16 Oct, 2022 04:12 am
Trump just responded to a Congessional subpoena with a 14 page(!) screed with the first line- in all caps - THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF 2020 WAS RIGGED AND STOLEN!

They prosecuted and convicted Steve Bannon for Contempt of Congress.

He’s awaiting sentencing.

Seems to me just one more in a LONG list of reasons why Merrick Garland has no excuse not to indict and prosecute the orange piece of ****.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  5  
Reply Sun 16 Oct, 2022 05:56 am
https://media.newyorker.com/cartoons/6340bb48eb8804a2771d3c6f/master/w_1600,c_limit/221017_a27035.jpg
“On the lighter side, here’s Muffin with a piece of string.”
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Reply Sun 16 Oct, 2022 06:34 am
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
He is not the same John Cleese we knew and loved. He's developed a nasty little swing to the right these last few years.

That's not something I've observed. Or it's not the way I'd describe him. He is merciless in his criticism of Boris and Trump and the modern GOP. Perhaps you are speaking to his criticisms of "wokeness" in present culture. Here, I'm on his side. And it is notable that the most telling criticisms of this sort (in my opinion, though it is somewhat qualified) commonly come from those whose business is satire and comedy.
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Sun 16 Oct, 2022 06:42 am
@bobsal u1553115,
bobsal u1553115 wrote:

He is not the same John Cleese we knew and loved. He's developed a nasty little swing to the right these last few years.


For some reason, Cleese reminds me of Bill Maher. Both, at one time, were intelligent, reasonable, sane individuals...but both of whom have lost their way. They have managed to pervert individualism into something quite ugly. The main difference between people like them and Trump is...ahhh...well...

...neither of them has managed to be elected president of the United States or Prime Minister of the UK.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Oct, 2022 06:56 am
@blatham,
That's always been the way, Cleese is being shown up for his prejudices the same way Bernard Manning was attacked by the new wave of comics in the 80s.

It just shows how stale and unfunny he's become.

Have you seen Hold the Sunset?

That's his most recent offering.
Region Philbis
 
  3  
Reply Sun 16 Oct, 2022 07:02 am

https://iili.io/tdfrHg.jpg
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Reply Sun 16 Oct, 2022 07:26 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
Cleese is being shown up for his prejudices

Could you identify those prejudices and give examples of them being voiced?
snood
 
  2  
Reply Sun 16 Oct, 2022 07:41 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Quote:
Cleese is being shown up for his prejudices

Could you identify those prejudices and give examples of them being voiced?


I’d be intrigued to read an explanation of your criticisms (some you say you share in common with Cleese) of what you call “wokeness”.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Oct, 2022 08:00 am
Some years ago I opined that London was not really an English city any more

Since then, virtually all my friends from abroad have confirmed my observation

So there must be some truth in it...

I note also that London was the UK city that voted most strongly to remain in the EU


Twitter. Also dog whistle.

LONDON IS AN ENGLISH CITY!

https://twitter.com/JohnCleese/status/1133604249693110272?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1133604249693110272%7Ctwgr%5E8ccf42bc9b50dbf677ba44c6645f32e7d251b227%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fculture%2F2019%2Fmay%2F29%2Fjohn-cleese-criticised-for-saying-london-is-no-longer-an-english-city

0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Sun 16 Oct, 2022 10:04 am
@Frank Apisa,
What the hell happens to Bill Maher, Dennis Miller, John Cleese that they feel their lives have been diminished in any way that they moan on and on about people who for the most part are fairly voiceless, largely victimized, "others" who have already been 'canceled' by life and society themselves.

They have gone from gadflies to bullies.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sun 16 Oct, 2022 01:00 pm
@blatham,
It's in the article I prsviously published, but I'll agree with Frank.

Cleese's criticism of London reeks of prejudice.
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Sun 16 Oct, 2022 01:20 pm
@izzythepush,
Just the fact that Cleese is about to become a presenter on GB News, the Fox News-style television station set up last year which features Nigel Farage as its star host. (He should re-view The Germans, I think.)
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sun 16 Oct, 2022 01:43 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
In ghe Guardizn article he's lying about what is acceptable on the BBC, and trying to cast himself as some sort of victim which he's clearly not.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.22 seconds on 11/16/2024 at 08:30:55