13
   

Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

 
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Oct, 2022 03:09 pm
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

You are so scared.


Easy to say that from the other side of the ocean.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Oct, 2022 03:13 pm
@blatham,
I know, and using the Ukraine inmsuch a way is pretty sick.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -3  
Reply Thu 6 Oct, 2022 04:20 pm
@Lash,
Lash, this woman sums up what we're saying here, in this echo chamber.

https://www.facebook.com/1454957659/videos/510639713840076
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 6 Oct, 2022 05:21 pm
@izzythepush,
Scared of being honest here.
Lash
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 6 Oct, 2022 05:47 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Yes sir.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 6 Oct, 2022 05:48 pm
@revelette1,
revelette1 wrote:

Lash is just a distraction from this Russia discussion. Personally, I find the whole Russian escalation threat to be scary as heck, and I don't understand at all why in the world anyone would appear to be championing their side. It doesn't make any sense to me.

We must not ignore the non-nuclear options for Russian escalation



I can’t believe stating purported facts is equated to championing.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 6 Oct, 2022 06:27 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

Lash wrote:
The reason ‘every Western intelligence agency’ blames Russia is because Western intelligence agencies did it.
And the US therefore warned our (German) security agencies that they would do it?
But not Denmark, Sweden and Finland? Does the US not want Sweden and Finland in NATO?

The US gets away with a lot of malevolent behavior. I can’t say why—but I have my ideas.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 6 Oct, 2022 11:44 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
Does anyone have any idea what this means?


Comprehension was never your strong suit.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  2  
Reply Thu 6 Oct, 2022 11:58 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

Lash wrote:

You are so scared.

Easy to say that from the other side of the ocean.


The thing that scares me the most is Russia using a tactical nuke. It isn't beyond Putin's mind set. He has already said that if Ukraine attacks any of the land he has already ceded, he would consider it an attack on Russia. He will therefore use nukes to defend the sovereignty.

After all, it's only a little bitty tactical nuke, right? I don't know the strength of the smallest nukes, but I don't believe there is such a thing as a "little bitty" nuke. This kind of action would change the whole complexion of the war and require an American response of some kind!
Builder
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 7 Oct, 2022 12:02 am
@BillW,
Quote:
I don't know the strength of the smallest nukes


They're called depleted uranium rounds, and the US of A has been polluting literally every battleground in every nation they've invaded.
Builder
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 7 Oct, 2022 12:22 am
@BillW,
Don't take my word for it, William; here's some information for you.

https://hir.harvard.edu/depleted-uranium-devastated-health-military-operations-and-environmental-injustice-in-the-middle-east/
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Oct, 2022 12:34 am
@Lash,
Your definition of honesty is to repeat everything Putin says.

You're the most dishonest person, here you constantly misrepresent yourself assomething different.
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Reply Fri 7 Oct, 2022 01:18 am
@Builder,
Builder wrote:

Quote:
I don't know the strength of the smallest nukes


They're called depleted uranium rounds,
According to the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, depleted uranium does not meet the legal definitions of nuclear, radiological, toxin, chemical, poison or incendiary weapons, as far as DU ammunition is not designed nor intended to kill or wound by its chemical or radiological effects. (Source)

What was meant here is called tactical nuclear weapon - Russia has about about 2,000 tactical nuclear weapons, and two systems able to carry these short-range nuclear weapons: Kalibr missile (SS-N-3O) and lskander M missile launcher (ss-z6 'Stone').
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  3  
Reply Fri 7 Oct, 2022 01:25 am
-Wiki

A tactical nuclear weapon (TNW) or non-strategic nuclear weapon (NSNW) is a nuclear weapon which is designed to be used on a battlefield in military situations, mostly with friendly forces in proximity and perhaps even on contested friendly territory. Generally smaller in explosive power, they are defined in contrast to strategic nuclear weapons, which are designed mostly to be targeted at the enemy interior far away from the war front against military bases, cities, towns, arms industries, and other hardened or larger-area targets to damage the enemy's ability to wage war. No tactical nuclear weapon has ever been used in a combat situation.
,..,...................
The risk that use of tactical nuclear weapons could unexpectedly lead to a rapid escalation of a war to full use of strategic weapons has led to proposals being made within NATO and other organizations to place limitations on—and make more transparent—the stockpiling and use of tactical weapons. As the Cold War came to an end in 1991, the US and USSR withdrew most of their tactical nuclear weapons from deployment and disposed of them. The thousands of tactical warheads wielded by both sides in the late-1980s declined to an estimated 230 American and 1,000 to 2,000 Russian Federation warheads in 2021, although estimates for Russia vary widely.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 7 Oct, 2022 01:30 am
@izzythepush,
I have no idea what Putin says. I haven’t read one article quoting Putin. I look at what’s happening and think.

It’s so odd that the most important thing to you is making up baseless ulterior motives for what I say rather than making a strong argument against my opinions.

It’s childish.
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Fri 7 Oct, 2022 01:50 am
@Lash,
Lash wrote:
I have no idea what Putin says. I haven’t read one article quoting Putin. I look at what’s happening and think.
So you think about what Putin does and orders ("I look at what’s happening") and then come to the result(s) you post here?
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Oct, 2022 02:31 am
@Lash,
Yet somehow you parrot him.

And now we're to believe you're some sort of psychic.
Builder
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 7 Oct, 2022 02:35 am
@Lash,
Quote:
It’s so odd that the most important thing to you is making up baseless ulterior motives for what I say rather than making a strong argument against my opinions.


It's his modus operandi.

Somehow, he thinks I'm a supporter of his home boy Ikke.

I guess desperation leads to grasping at straws.

Which is his strong suit. Poor lad.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Fri 7 Oct, 2022 03:59 am
Quote:
The scandal involving Herschel Walker, the staunchly anti-abortion Georgia candidate for the Senate who appears to have paid for an ex-girlfriend’s abortion in 2009, got worse today. After he claimed he did not know the woman who said he paid for an abortion, the woman said she was the mother of one of his other, newly acknowledged, children, so of course he knows her.

Just five years ago, Representative Tim Murphy (R-PA), who belonged to the Republican Pro-Life Caucus, resigned just hours after the story broke that he pressured a woman with whom he was having an affair to get an abortion. Now, Republicans are rallying around Walker, with former NRA spokesperson and former Breitbart writer Dana Loesch saying: “I don’t care if Herschel Walker paid to abort endangered baby eagles. I want control of the Senate.”

In the Philadelphia Inquirer, columnist Will Bunch pointed out that Republican leaders have not condemned Walker for his hypocrisy on abortion, his lies about it and about the many other things he has lied about during the campaign, or the many allegations of domestic violence women have made about him. Instead, his campaign says it has raised half a million dollars since the news broke, while Walker recorded an ad claiming he has been “saved by grace.”

Bunch noted what many observers have already called out: that the Republicans no longer care about anything but winning. But he went on: they insist on winning so they can put their vision of Christian domination into effect. “[T]he so-called ‘family values’ of American fundamentalists…turn out to be mere window dressing that can be tossed for the movement’s true aim: authoritarianism,” he wrote.

Bunch linked to a piece that scholar of fascism Brynn Tannehill published in today’s New Republic, noting that religion in the U.S. is declining among younger folks and that older evangelicals are increasingly concerned they are losing power, at the same time that their Christianity has become a political identity. Tannehill wrote: “The real danger of this widening schism…lies in this creating the conditions for a future that looks more like present-day Russia or Iran.”

The Republican Party’s shift toward authoritarianism is clear in the refusal of a majority of the party’s nominees for office this fall to agree that President Joe Biden won the 2020 election. Amy Gardner of the Washington Post ran the numbers and found that 299 Republican candidates for the House, Senate, and important state offices are election deniers, and that 174 of them are running in districts that are safely Republican. If Republicans win the House in November, election deniers will form a strong voting bloc that will affect the choice of the next speaker; some are already complaining that House minority leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) is too moderate. Many of those elected in states will oversee state elections.

The Republican narrative that Democrats can win only by cheating began back in 1994, after the Democrats made registering to vote easier with the 1993 so-called Motor Voter Act. In 1994, losing Republican candidates complained their opponents had cheated, and congressional Republicans kept that narrative alive with congressional investigations. Over time, “voter fraud” became the way Republicans explained away the unpopularity of their ideas.

Trump’s continuing insistence that he won the 2020 election, and the Republican Party’s embrace of that lie despite the fact that Biden won by more than 7 million votes in the popular vote and by 306 to 232 in the Electoral College, says that they will never again consider the election of a Democrat legitimate.

In Arizona, where the Republican nominee for governor, Kari Lake, has said that Biden is an illegitimate president and the Republican nominee for secretary of state, Mark Finchem, has said that he would not have certified the true 2020 election results in Arizona, Representative Liz Cheney (R-WY) last night at an event at Arizona State University urged Arizona voters to elect Democrats.

“If you care about democracy and you care about the survival of our republic, then you need to understand—we all have to understand—that we cannot give people power who have told us that they will not honor elections,” Cheney said.

The trial of five Oath Keepers in Washington, D.C., for seditious conspiracy has provided more insight into how far members of the gang were willing to go to keep Trump in office. Today, former Oath Keeper John Zimmerman, who left the gang before January 6, 2021, testified that he heard Oath Keeper leader Stewart Rhodes talking in September 2020 with someone Zimmerman believed was a member of the Secret Service.

Meanwhile, Jeremy Bertino, a leader of the extremist right-wing Proud Boys gang that worked alongside the Oath Keepers on January 6, 2021, today told a federal judge he will plead guilty to seditious conspiracy. Bertino, who was not in Washington on January 6, was a top lieutenant to Proud Boy leader Enrique Tarrio and is now cooperating with the Justice Department. Like others involved in the attack on the U.S. Capitol, Bertino appeared to believe they were “SAVING THE CONSTITUTION,” as he posted to the rioters. He later wrote: “1776 motherf*ck*rs.”

Lawyers for Trump have told New York Times reporters Michael S. Schmidt, Maggie Haberman, and Katie Benner that the Justice Department does not think Trump has returned all the documents he stole from the White House. That information came from Jay I. Bratt, who leads the Justice Department’s counterintelligence operations, and it has split Trump’s lawyers between those who want him to cooperate and those backing Trump’s instinct to fight.

We still don’t know just what is in those documents, and who else has seen them. This is an unfortunate wild card as Biden is trying to rebuild alliances to defend democracy. In the trial of Thomas J. Barrack Jr., an investor and Trump backer being prosecuted for secretly working for the United Arab Emirates during Trump’s term, former secretary of state Rex Tillerson today said he did not know about the contacts between Barrack, Jared Kushner, and representatives for Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates that are coming to light in trial testimony.

In contrast to those backing Trump, Biden today worked toward equal justice before the law when he pardoned all U.S. citizens and permanent residents who have been convicted of possession of marijuana. Many state governments have already made possession legal—a position that Americans overwhelmingly support—and since arrests for possession fall far more heavily on minorities than on white offenders although their rates of marijuana use are similar, advocates for fairness in the criminal justice code have called for this reform. While the pardon will free few if any incarcerated people, it will get rid of criminal records that make it harder to get jobs, housing, and educational opportunities.

Vice President Kamala Harris, who has advocated for a comprehensive marijuana reform bill for years, tweeted: “This is a step forward in correcting the historical injustices of failed drug policies.”

Biden called for governors to pardon possession offenses at the state level and asked officials to look into moving marijuana to a less dangerous category of drug, but he made it clear he wanted to keep “important limitations on trafficking, marketing, and under-age sales.”

hcr
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Fri 7 Oct, 2022 05:05 am
@BillW,
Tactical nukes were a vold war development that put the Soviets on the back foot.

Beforehand nukes were all huge, doomsday devices, the idea of a tactical nuke was that it could be used in a battle situation.

Of course it couldn't, but it did mean the Soviets spent the next few years developing their own instead of using them.

I live in a small country, nowhere is safe here.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.2 seconds on 11/16/2024 at 05:43:32