Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

He's been peddling this line, because it's true.

You can see him fondling children and teens on CSPAN. At 6:30 especially when he dismisses everyone to hold this preteen girl, and get a shot just with her. It's sick, and frankly monstrous. You may not see anything, but if a guy went to a playground and did the same soet of fondling, they would be arrested for pedophilia.

This is how we know this behavior is not appropriate, that it wouldn't fly on a typical playground.
[youtube]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=V4PLSPvJ9BY[/youtube]

[youtube]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=riBwqfDjFko[/youtube]

This is not some hidden knowledge (though youtube has tried to make it harder to find these videos). You see this creepy uncle doing bad touch on all these kids, and if he does this when the camera is rolling, I wouldn't want to be alone in a room with him. Would you?

It's sick, and frankly monstrous.

These "compilations" are not made by me.

You actively seek it out, collecting all these stupid compilations made by people similarly obsessed...

Let's ignore the Latin for a second...

Let's ignore the Latin for a second,

There once was a tender-hearted woman who rescued a poor, half-frozen snake from near death in the winter cold. “Take me in, oh tender woman,” the snake cries out. “Take me in, for heaven’s sake.”

So the tender-hearted woman takes the snake into her own home, warms it by the fire and feeds it milk and honey: “If I hadn’t brought you in, by now you might have died.” But instead of saying thanks, the snake gave her a vicious bite.

“I saved you,” cried the woman. “And you’ve bitten me, but why? You know your bite is poisonous, and now I’m going to die.” “Oh shut up, silly woman,” said the reptile with a grin. “You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in.”

In current French usage, the phrase may be used ironically to imply the presence of a hidden agenda or a conflict of interest.

Frank Apisa, I know the difference between appropriate and inappropriate touch.

So what's wrong with me?

What's wrong with you, that you think there is nothing wrong with this?!?

What's your point about the gun?

I don't own a gun. I find swords a more elegant weapon. I don't equate weapons with manhood, and whoever made that picture is overcompensating. But you're deflecting. The point is him (Biden) and you. Why is a civilized person who knows Latin defending a senile pedophile and the worst sort of creep?

Pardon me, I just have to rub your belly. Because this is totally appropriate and I know that you'll appreciate it. Also, I'm gonna touch your feet, and sniff your hair. Cuz it's fragrant like lemons.

[youtube]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vQrDEYT9JwY[/youtube]

(For the record that you've been told all your life that the Earth is round has nothing to do with me, I don't have to believe it, and I don't have to accept that it's a crazy idea. That's your hangup. In the meantime, I guess you can explain to me how touching random strangers nearly 1/10 your age nearly anywhere on their body is not groping and is not some form of pedo behavior.)

Of all we have heard at the hearings of the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol, Judge J. Michael Luttig’s testimony on Thursday stands out. Luttig is a leading conservative thinker, a giant in Republican legal circles, who worked in the Reagan administration, was appointed by President George H. W. Bush to a federal judgeship, and was on the short-list for a Supreme Court seat during President George W. Bush’s term. In January 2021, then–vice president Mike Pence’s staff turned to him for support to make sure Pence didn’t agree to count out electors; Luttig opposed the scheme absolutely.

Luttig’s words carry weight among Republican lawmakers.

On Thursday, Judge Luttig examined the ongoing danger to democracy and located it not just on former president Donald Trump and his enablers, but on the entire Republican Party of today, the party that embraces the Big Lie that Trump won the 2020 election, the party that continues to plan to overturn any election in which voters choose a Democrat.

“[T]he former president and his party are today a clear and present danger for American democracy,” Luttig reiterated to NPR’s All Things Considered.

And, as if in confirmation, delegates to a convention of the Texas Republican Party today approved platform planks rejecting “the certified results of the 2020 Presidential election, and [holding] that acting President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. was not legitimately elected by the people of the United States”; requiring students “to learn about the dignity of the preborn human,” including that life begins at fertilization; treating homosexuality as “an abnormal lifestyle choice”; locking the number of Supreme Court justices at 9; getting rid of the constitutional power to levy income taxes; abolishing the Federal Reserve; rejecting the Equal Rights Amendment; returning Christianity to schools and government; ending all gun safety measures; abolishing the Department of Education; arming teachers; requiring colleges to teach “free-market liberty principles”; defending capital punishment; dictating the ways in which the events at the Alamo are remembered; protecting Confederate monuments; ending gay marriage; withdrawing from the United Nations and the World Health Organization; and calling for a vote “for the people of Texas to determine whether or not the State of Texas should reassert its status as an independent nation.”

Luttig said that Republicans must start speaking to Democrats as ”fellow Americans that have a shared destiny and shared hopes and dreams for America.” “We cannot have in America either political party behaving itself like the Republican Party has since the 2020 election.”

I’ve been thinking a lot since Thursday of Luttig’s clear-eyed view of the dangers we face in this country today, and of his willingness to cast aside old political loyalties to call them out in order to protect our democracy. They remind me of nothing so much as Abraham Lincoln’s description of the way northerners reacted to the 1854 passage of a law permitting the spread of enslavement into western lands from which it had previously been excluded. The passage of that law woke up Americans who had not been paying attention, and convinced them to work across old political lines to stop oligarchs from destroying democracy. Northerners were “thunderstruck and stunned; and we reeled and fell in utter confusion. But we rose each fighting, grasping whatever he could first reach—a scythe—a pitchfork—a chopping axe, or a butcher's cleaver” to push back against the oligarchic enslavers, Lincoln later said. Regardless of where they started politically, they stood up for democracy together. And while they came from different parties, he said, they were “still Americans; no less devoted to the continued Union and prosperity of the country than heretofore.”

Over the course of the next decade, that new coalition argued and struggled and took the nation in an entirely new direction. It fought and won a war that involved more than two million men and cost more than $5 billion, established our first national money, welcomed immigrants, created public colleges, invented the income tax, gave farmers land, built transcontinental railroads, and—finally—ended human enslavement in the U.S. except as punishment for a crime for which a person had been duly convicted.

And, of course, it saved the nation from those seeking to destroy it.

“[T]o my knowledge, I’ve never spoken publicly a single word of politics,” Luttig told NPR about his extraordinary statements. In a later note he added: “I wanted to do this for America and I understood I had an obligation to do it for America. It was my ‘moment’ in my life to stand up, step forward, and bear witness to what I believe and what I do not believe.”

SOME Americans think trump should face charges for his 1/6 insurrection attempts at a coup,, by 58 to 40 percents.

A "super majority" would be above 75%, but don't let facts get in the way of your rhetoric.

President Trump played no part in this "insurrection" event.

Apart from these constitutional requirements, a Senate rule (except in cases covered by the nuclear option, or of a rule change) requires an absolute supermajority of three-fifths to move to a vote through a cloture motion, which closes debate on a bill or nomination, thus ending a filibuster by a minority of members. In current practice, the mere threat of a filibuster prevents passing almost any measure that has less than three-fifths agreement in the Senate, 60 of the 100 senators if every seat is filled.

-wiki