12
   

Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

 
 
Mame
 
  2  
Wed 9 Feb, 2022 09:10 am
@snood,
I'd have to agree with you.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  -1  
Wed 9 Feb, 2022 02:55 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

As I think I've noted earlier, what we're seeing with the truck convoy protests has precedents in Canada.
….
And as I've also noted earlier, many of the organizers of the current truck convoy were organizers for the earlier one who have connections with American right wing organizations (details in the wikipedia page on Freedom Convoy 2022). Let's add some more relevant points:

- Alberta holds the vast majority of oil reserves and is by far the greatest levels of oil extraction.

- Alberta oil producers also have significant corporate connections with American oil interests (eg The ultra-right U.S. Koch brothers, little-known to Canadians, are major players in Alberta's oil patch, where they control at least 1.1 million acres.
….
- As we know from reporting and from statements by the Ottawa police chief, the majority of funding for this convoy is originating in the US.

- Alberta has been for some years the Canadian province most likely to elect right wing governments of the "libertarian" sort. With few exceptions, that's who has held power there. If you were to troll the Canadian population looking for Trump fans, Alberta is where your nets would get the richest haul.

- For those following American right wing media and agitprop, you'll have noticed that they have been running hot and heavy with favorable coverage of the convoy in Canada.

- Further, it is not at all difficult to see how the convoy is using American "libertarian" tropes in their stunt - profligate use of flags and, through signage and speech, the attempt to suggest that "freedom" is their domain only. Running concurrent with all this is a promoted notion that these protesters represent the real Canadian citizen consensus.

- Last, let's note the similarities between what we're seeing now and what we saw during the Tea Party.

So let's consider that what might be going on here has less to do with Canada than with the US. Right wing voices down south are pumping up duplicating the Canadian truck protest in America. If that happens, the media will of course cover it just as they've done with the Canadian example AND with the Tea Party. There's conflict and great visuals, so exactly what news media commonly cannot resist.

Early in the Tea Party phenomenon, I heard Dick Armey, then head of the Koch's main propaganda operation, speaking about the Tea Party and he pushed the word "grassroots" into his sentences so often that it was comical. Right wing media is doing exactly that again. But this time, because they are pointing to Canada as role model and exemplar, that makes it even easier to suggest that American oil interests (and the political groups and arrangements which support it) are not in play. It's all just about citizens everywhere increasingly angry at their oppressive governments.


My strong impression is that the Truckdrivers, and the many flag & sign waving spectators, shown on the TV news reports, were, in fact Canadians, acting voluntarily. You appear to be unwilling to accept that evident fact.

You appear to be suggesting these Canadians can't think for themselves (and their self interests), and are acting only at the direction of evil American members of the same old dark conspiracy you cite so endlessly, again and again and again ………

Until about a year ago we held a large stake in a Canadian company, headquartered in Calgary, providing engineering services to (all Canadian) Alberta oil producers. I travelled there (and to their office in Vancouver) regularly to coordinate mutual operations & business development efforts.

They were a pleasant and very capable group, a good deal more conservative in their outlooks than most of us. However in several flights over the extraction areas North of Calgary I was truly astounded by the many abandoned black "lakes" containing sludge & residues from the liquefaction/extraction process for the tar sands . U.S. environmental law would never permit anything like that. The U.S. has enormous reserves of gas and liquid petroleum, and I suspect western Canada does as well, all of which can easily replace the tar sands sources. More up front effort and investment would be required to locate & develop them, compared to the near surface deposits in Alberta, but the long term costs & environmental effects would be far less. Tar sands production continues to be very profitable only because Canadian laws and Canadian governments ignore the relatively far greater environmental consequences, compared with directional drilling for oil & gas. The extraction companies in Alberta are all Canadian owned and operated, though U.S. (and Chinese) investors likely have stakes in them. Most of the petroleum so produced has been consumed in Canada, though the U.S. is currently the chief market for exports. The Canadian producers have long been planning a pipeline to Pacific ports to provide access to Markets in China, though there is political opposition to it in BC. This too is a Canadian affair.

I believe you are trying far too hard to blame all this on Americans, and the "vast, pervasive far right" conspiracies" you assume exist only here. Canadian people, like others everywhere, make their own choices, and it is clear that many of them make choices you don't like. That includes the truckers, their supporters and the many developers & producers of tar sand petroleum in Alberta.
Mame
 
  2  
Wed 9 Feb, 2022 03:50 pm
@georgeob1,
Whoa - wait!

I can't believe you visited my town and didn't call, georgeob1-kanobe. Disappointed! I could have taken you to my club for lunch Smile
georgeob1
 
  -1  
Wed 9 Feb, 2022 05:55 pm
@Mame,
Damn ! I regret the wasted opportunities, Mame. I knew you were from Alberta but failed to make the Calgary connection. Anyway I still have pleasant memories of the lunch in my club.
BillW
 
  1  
Wed 9 Feb, 2022 06:25 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:

............pleasant memories of the lunch in my club.

My pardon for past put downs, didn't realize you are an uppity Bougie (or are you for real?).
georgeob1
 
  -1  
Wed 9 Feb, 2022 06:56 pm
@BillW,
Odd that you didn't fault Mame for the same phrase. It has nothing to do with you so Piss off.
BillW
 
  1  
Wed 9 Feb, 2022 07:09 pm
@BillW,
Didn't mean to piss on you, but you got in the way uppity person....... I would take you to my club but McDonald's probably wouldn't allow you in. ..........and, and, and - see, you made me cry, meanie!
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -2  
Thu 10 Feb, 2022 02:59 am
@georgeob1,
Quote:
Odd that you didn't fault Mame for the same phrase.


These fascists are calling for a ban on the opposing party even getting a leg in the door in the next election, but fail to understand why that's fascism.

I don't give them much credit for intelligence, based on that proviso alone.
hightor
 
  2  
Thu 10 Feb, 2022 04:31 am
@Builder,
Quote:
These fascists are calling for a ban on the opposing party even getting a leg in the door in the next election...

Yes, Republican legislatures have been actively working to suppress voter turnout and assume partisan control of the electoral process.
Quote:
...but fail to understand why that's fascism.

I think you're wrong there; they know it's fascism but don't want it to be identified that way, for public relations reasons.
Quote:
I don't give them much credit for intelligence, based on that proviso alone.

I don't know – actually calling themselves "fascists" would be pretty stupid.
Builder
 
  -2  
Thu 10 Feb, 2022 05:10 am
@hightor,
Quote:
I think you're wrong there; they know it's fascism but don't want it to be identified that way, for public relations reasons.


We're' talking about you and your cronies, hippy.

You know Trump is still a threat to your agenda, and a danger to what amounts to your value system.
hightor
 
  3  
Thu 10 Feb, 2022 05:21 am
@Builder,
a hippy wrote:

We're' talking about you and your cronies, hippy.

No, you completely missed the point. We're talking about you and your cronies, which should have been obvious.
the same hippy wrote:
You know Trump is still a threat to your agenda, and a danger to what amounts to your value system.

Even if someone had an "agenda" there's no way Trump could pose a danger to their "value system". Their "value system" would be remain intact; Trump might be seen as offensive according to someone's value system but he wouldn't "pose a danger" to it. That's ignorant.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  0  
Thu 10 Feb, 2022 12:59 pm
@Builder,
Trump is and remains a danger to democracy, the rule of law, morality, the country and the World. He is not a danger to the universe. Yet. But he still has a few malevolent years left in him.
BillW
 
  1  
Thu 10 Feb, 2022 07:14 pm
@MontereyJack,
Maybe not
https://media.istockphoto.com/vectors/retro-woodcut-black-crossed-fingers-vector-id1151127026?k=20&m=1151127026&s=612x612&w=0&h=OQ5Cr6TCRvyiUGDC6mUI-9OPfbXWzxD2LhV4HgO1g1E=
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  -1  
Thu 10 Feb, 2022 07:17 pm
The unfolding evidence of continuing inflation in our economy is fast becoming a major issue for the coming election. We are emerging from a couple of decades of unusually low inflation rates, as measured by the Consumer Price index. Since 2012 U.S. Inflation rates have varied from a low of 0.7% in 2015 to a high of 2.3% in 2019 . The recently reported value for 2021 was 7.0% and now, a month later, the trailing twelve month rate is 7.5%, based on DLS CPI data - a big increase in just a month.

This is an issue which will affect everyone, and which I believe will capture growing public concern over the coming months and through the November elections. It's hard to see anything but a major setback for the party in power in this situation, particularly in view of Biden's thoughtless assurances that inflation will be an ephemeral transient phenomenon. (Perhaps up there with his campaign assurances that he will "shut down the virus, but not the country)" .

The Navy is very fond of acronyms, and has one to describe most everything including the frequency with which one is wrong or incorrect in his predictions . It is "WEFT: and Joe Biden is certainly WEFT . As Robert Gates ( CIA Director and SECDEF under Obama) later wrote of then VP Biden. "he was wrong on every major foreign Policy issue that arose during his term.

It can't be easy sustaining that level of stupidity.
Builder
 
  -2  
Thu 10 Feb, 2022 08:45 pm
@georgeob1,
Quote:
It can't be easy sustaining that level of stupidity.


And creepy Joe is like; "Hold my beer....."
hightor
 
  2  
Fri 11 Feb, 2022 05:06 am
@georgeob1,
Quote:
It's hard to see anything but a major setback for the party in power in this situation, particularly in view of Biden's thoughtless assurances that inflation will be an ephemeral transient phenomenon.

When inflation began to pick up lot of people felt that the supply chain disruptions would be fixed as vaccinations increased and the pandemic subsided. It's true, no one can predict the future but the scenario of declining rates of infection and major Asian suppliers returning to full production seemed plausible. I suppose Biden could have simply said that he didn't know what was going to happen but that doesn't really seem like a statement a politician would make. As we now know, the delta and omicron variants, plus the continuing intermittent Chinese lockdowns, have prevented factories from returning to full production. Plus we see intentional acts designed to sabotage the economies of the US and Canada taking place before our eyes.

This inflation cycle has been the result of the global pandemic which has upset modern economies that rely on the rapid delivery of goods and materials. The backlogs at international ports have stalled these deliveries, including all-important electronic chips. These shortages ripple down through the economy at every level. This situation is the result of business practices which have enabled high levels of profits and efficiency but are severely vulnerable to global crises which affect international shipping.

I would ask you, georgeob1, how you think the president of the US is supposed to prevent inflation caused by an unprecedented and now two year old global pandemic which has affected every nation on the planet? Our methods of defeating inflation are limited and will take some time to implement. Or should we hasten a global recession to do the job? I get the feeling that the Republicans don't really have any better plan to deal with rising prices and issues of supply and demand, but simply want to point fingers from the sidelines and generate dissatisfaction which they can use to win at the polls – "politics as usual".



0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  1  
Fri 11 Feb, 2022 05:08 am
@Builder,
'creepy' Builder wrote:
And creepy Joe is like; "Hold my beer....."

Not likely; he doesn't drink alcohol.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  0  
Fri 11 Feb, 2022 05:20 am
HCR wrote:
This morning’s news that former president Trump apparently clogged a White House toilet repeatedly with discarded documents was overtaken this evening by the news that some of the records Trump took from the White House were clearly marked as classified, some of them “top secret.”

The news of the flushed documents came through Axios from New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman, whose book about Trump will be out in October. By law, the records of a presidential administration belong to the American people; there are strict laws about how they should be handled and preserved. That Trump ignored the Presidential Records Act was known because of stories of how he ripped up documents that others tried to tape back together, but the idea that he was flushing so many documents he periodically clogged the toilet seemed a commentary on his regard for the American people who owned those documents.

And yet, by the end of the day, the flushing was not the big story.

In the 15 boxes of material the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) recovered from the former president’s Florida home, Mar-a-Lago, archivists discovered top secret documents. Top secret clearance is applied to documents whose disclosure “could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security” of the United States. They are supposed to be kept secure, and to be seen only by authorized individuals. NARA officials had been trying to retrieve missing documents since last summer (never, never, mess with archivists—they keep meticulous records), and Trump refused to hand them over. When they found the mishandled documents, they called the Justice Department.

Reid J. Epstein and Michael S. Schmidt in the New York Times recalled that Trump’s handling of sensitive national security documents was so lackadaisical that when he was White House chief of staff, General John F. Kelly tried to stop Trump from taking classified documents out of the Oval Office out of concern that he would jeopardize national security. Epstein and Schmidt recounted how Trump used to rip pictures out of the President’s Daily Brief, the daily bulletin of national security threats. Now, it appears he took secret material and did not keep it secure.

Certainly, Trump knew he was breaking the law. White House counsel Donald McGahn warned him about the Presidential Records Act. So did two chiefs of staff, Reince Priebus and Kelly. In 2017, internal White House memos warned against destroying presidential records, noting that such destruction is a crime. The editorial board of the Washington Post called Trump’s mutilated records, “a wrenching testimony to his penchant for wanton destruction.”

This story is about the stealing of our records and the endangerment of our national security—and the heroism of archivists—but it is also a story about the media. The defining narrative of the 2016 election was about Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton’s emails, allegedly mishandled. Again and again, the email story was front-page news. A 2017 study in the Columbia Journalism Review by Duncan J. Watts and David M. Rothschild found that the New York Times in six days published as many cover stories about Clinton’s emails as they did about “all the policy issues combined in the 69 days leading up to the election.” The network news gave more time to Clinton’s emails than to all policy issues combined.

Today, Matthew Gertz of Media Matters for America noted that the Trump story should mean that finally “political journalists should stop pretending to believe Republicans when they pretend to be outraged about purportedly illegal or unethical behavior by Democrats.” He compiled a long list of all the Fox News Channel stories about Clinton’s emails and said, “Based on the 2015–16 baseline, Trump flagrantly violating the Presidential Records Act should be a massive story.” Aaron Rupar, author of the newsletter Public Notice, tweeted the obvious: “If two prominent reporters broke news that Joe Biden was flushing documents down White House toilets, [Fox News Channel personality Sean] Hannity would anchor special Fox News coverage that would last through 2024. Trump flushing documents down WH toilets has been mentioned twice on Fox News today, once in passing.”

The House Oversight Committee has announced it will investigate the “potential serious violations” of the Presidential Records Act. Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo was more to the point, saying that Trump’s destruction of evidence amounted to “willful and deliberate destruction of government records for the purpose of concealment.”

That analysis agrees with the discovery by the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol that the White House phone logs for the day of the insurrection have gaps in them: calls they know Trump made to lawmakers are missing. This may be in part because he used his own private cell phone or the phones of aides.

The destruction of documents in the Iran-Contra affair of the 1980s hamstrung the investigation, but it is not clear that, in this era, the concealment will be so effective. Yesterday, lawyers for the Department of Justice provided 19 pages of information to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, outlining how they are getting through the massive amounts of information they have, using cell phone records, internet records, geolocation, data aggregators, and so on. It doesn't seem like much is slipping by.

While the investigation by the January 6 committee and the angry split in the Republican Party after the Republican National Committee excused the insurrection as “legitimate political discourse” have gotten all the headlines, the Biden administration has been working to rebuild and redefine the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) for a new era.

Dr. Mike Martin, a war studies visiting fellow at King’s College London, notes that it is hardly a secret that Russian president Vladimir Putin wants a buffer around Russia of states that are not allied with his enemies. If they cannot be allied with Russia, at least they will be chaotic and neutral, rather than pro-democracy and anti-corruption.

Martin notes it is not a coincidence that Putin decided to test NATO right as German leadership shifts from former German chancellor Angela Merkel to Olaf Scholz, as the U.K. is reeling from scandals surrounding Prime Minister Boris Johnson, and, I would add, as Biden is trying to rebuild the U.S. in the face of open hostility from Republicans after we have suffered far higher Covid death rates than other large, wealthy nations—63% higher since December 1, according to the New York Times.

But the allies surprised Putin by pulling together, in large part because of a sustained and thorough effort by the U.S. State Department, an effort that European diplomats told journalist and political scientist David Rothkopf was “unprecedented.” In a piece for the Daily Beast, Rothkopf notes that the dissolution of the USSR left NATO, along with other international institutions, adrift. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, fed the U.S. sense that it could and should act on its own, getting us into the quagmires of Afghanistan and Iraq, which then shaped President Barack Obama’s caution as he tried simply not to screw up on the international stage. Then Trump actively worked to weaken international alliances.

Now, Biden, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan are trying to rebuild NATO and international alliances, focusing on diplomacy. Recognizing that we cannot combat the crises of climate change, pandemics, and emerging technologies without cooperation, they are emphasizing a rules-based international order, and working with others, whose voices matter: “nothing about us without us.”

One diplomat for the European Union told Rothkopf these qualities are “refreshing and, in a way, revolutionary.” A scholar of diplomacy put it like this: “When there are lots of moving pieces in play, when there appears to be the chance for seismic shifts in power, these can call forth a golden age of diplomacy. And the coalition builders, the conceivers of grand alliances, the ones who work well with others, these almost always prevail in the face of a bullying despot.”

Still, no one knows what Russia will do, although as the ground softens, an invasion becomes more difficult. Yesterday, Russia expert and former U.S. ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul added another piece: “Putin knows…NATO won’t accept new members who have Russian soldiers occupying parts of their countries, because NATO members don’t want a war with Russia. That's why Russia invaded Georgia in 2008 & Ukraine 2014.” Russia currently has troops in Belarus that it says are only there temporarily.

substack
Frank Apisa
 
  3  
Fri 11 Feb, 2022 06:59 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:

HCR wrote:
This morning’s news that former president Trump apparently clogged a White House toilet repeatedly with discarded documents was overtaken this evening by the news that some of the records Trump took from the White House were clearly marked as classified, some of them “top secret.”

The news of the flushed documents came through Axios from New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman, whose book about Trump will be out in October. By law, the records of a presidential administration belong to the American people; there are strict laws about how they should be handled and preserved. That Trump ignored the Presidential Records Act was known because of stories of how he ripped up documents that others tried to tape back together, but the idea that he was flushing so many documents he periodically clogged the toilet seemed a commentary on his regard for the American people who owned those documents.

And yet, by the end of the day, the flushing was not the big story.

In the 15 boxes of material the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) recovered from the former president’s Florida home, Mar-a-Lago, archivists discovered top secret documents. Top secret clearance is applied to documents whose disclosure “could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security” of the United States. They are supposed to be kept secure, and to be seen only by authorized individuals. NARA officials had been trying to retrieve missing documents since last summer (never, never, mess with archivists—they keep meticulous records), and Trump refused to hand them over. When they found the mishandled documents, they called the Justice Department.

Reid J. Epstein and Michael S. Schmidt in the New York Times recalled that Trump’s handling of sensitive national security documents was so lackadaisical that when he was White House chief of staff, General John F. Kelly tried to stop Trump from taking classified documents out of the Oval Office out of concern that he would jeopardize national security. Epstein and Schmidt recounted how Trump used to rip pictures out of the President’s Daily Brief, the daily bulletin of national security threats. Now, it appears he took secret material and did not keep it secure.

Certainly, Trump knew he was breaking the law. White House counsel Donald McGahn warned him about the Presidential Records Act. So did two chiefs of staff, Reince Priebus and Kelly. In 2017, internal White House memos warned against destroying presidential records, noting that such destruction is a crime. The editorial board of the Washington Post called Trump’s mutilated records, “a wrenching testimony to his penchant for wanton destruction.”

This story is about the stealing of our records and the endangerment of our national security—and the heroism of archivists—but it is also a story about the media. The defining narrative of the 2016 election was about Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton’s emails, allegedly mishandled. Again and again, the email story was front-page news. A 2017 study in the Columbia Journalism Review by Duncan J. Watts and David M. Rothschild found that the New York Times in six days published as many cover stories about Clinton’s emails as they did about “all the policy issues combined in the 69 days leading up to the election.” The network news gave more time to Clinton’s emails than to all policy issues combined.

Today, Matthew Gertz of Media Matters for America noted that the Trump story should mean that finally “political journalists should stop pretending to believe Republicans when they pretend to be outraged about purportedly illegal or unethical behavior by Democrats.” He compiled a long list of all the Fox News Channel stories about Clinton’s emails and said, “Based on the 2015–16 baseline, Trump flagrantly violating the Presidential Records Act should be a massive story.” Aaron Rupar, author of the newsletter Public Notice, tweeted the obvious: “If two prominent reporters broke news that Joe Biden was flushing documents down White House toilets, [Fox News Channel personality Sean] Hannity would anchor special Fox News coverage that would last through 2024. Trump flushing documents down WH toilets has been mentioned twice on Fox News today, once in passing.”

The House Oversight Committee has announced it will investigate the “potential serious violations” of the Presidential Records Act. Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo was more to the point, saying that Trump’s destruction of evidence amounted to “willful and deliberate destruction of government records for the purpose of concealment.”

That analysis agrees with the discovery by the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol that the White House phone logs for the day of the insurrection have gaps in them: calls they know Trump made to lawmakers are missing. This may be in part because he used his own private cell phone or the phones of aides.

The destruction of documents in the Iran-Contra affair of the 1980s hamstrung the investigation, but it is not clear that, in this era, the concealment will be so effective. Yesterday, lawyers for the Department of Justice provided 19 pages of information to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, outlining how they are getting through the massive amounts of information they have, using cell phone records, internet records, geolocation, data aggregators, and so on. It doesn't seem like much is slipping by.

While the investigation by the January 6 committee and the angry split in the Republican Party after the Republican National Committee excused the insurrection as “legitimate political discourse” have gotten all the headlines, the Biden administration has been working to rebuild and redefine the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) for a new era.

Dr. Mike Martin, a war studies visiting fellow at King’s College London, notes that it is hardly a secret that Russian president Vladimir Putin wants a buffer around Russia of states that are not allied with his enemies. If they cannot be allied with Russia, at least they will be chaotic and neutral, rather than pro-democracy and anti-corruption.

Martin notes it is not a coincidence that Putin decided to test NATO right as German leadership shifts from former German chancellor Angela Merkel to Olaf Scholz, as the U.K. is reeling from scandals surrounding Prime Minister Boris Johnson, and, I would add, as Biden is trying to rebuild the U.S. in the face of open hostility from Republicans after we have suffered far higher Covid death rates than other large, wealthy nations—63% higher since December 1, according to the New York Times.

But the allies surprised Putin by pulling together, in large part because of a sustained and thorough effort by the U.S. State Department, an effort that European diplomats told journalist and political scientist David Rothkopf was “unprecedented.” In a piece for the Daily Beast, Rothkopf notes that the dissolution of the USSR left NATO, along with other international institutions, adrift. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, fed the U.S. sense that it could and should act on its own, getting us into the quagmires of Afghanistan and Iraq, which then shaped President Barack Obama’s caution as he tried simply not to screw up on the international stage. Then Trump actively worked to weaken international alliances.

Now, Biden, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan are trying to rebuild NATO and international alliances, focusing on diplomacy. Recognizing that we cannot combat the crises of climate change, pandemics, and emerging technologies without cooperation, they are emphasizing a rules-based international order, and working with others, whose voices matter: “nothing about us without us.”

One diplomat for the European Union told Rothkopf these qualities are “refreshing and, in a way, revolutionary.” A scholar of diplomacy put it like this: “When there are lots of moving pieces in play, when there appears to be the chance for seismic shifts in power, these can call forth a golden age of diplomacy. And the coalition builders, the conceivers of grand alliances, the ones who work well with others, these almost always prevail in the face of a bullying despot.”

Still, no one knows what Russia will do, although as the ground softens, an invasion becomes more difficult. Yesterday, Russia expert and former U.S. ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul added another piece: “Putin knows…NATO won’t accept new members who have Russian soldiers occupying parts of their countries, because NATO members don’t want a war with Russia. That's why Russia invaded Georgia in 2008 & Ukraine 2014.” Russia currently has troops in Belarus that it says are only there temporarily.

substack


If any of this crap were being charged against Hillary Clinton, the same GOP figures now finding this to be a non-issue...would be considering it serious enough to be investigated and investigated and investigated and investigated and investigated and investigated and investigated and investigated and investigated.

And then be investigated some more.
Glennn
 
  0  
Fri 11 Feb, 2022 07:04 am
@Frank Apisa,
Hear, hear!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.19 seconds on 11/28/2024 at 10:55:49