12
   

Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

 
 
snood
 
  1  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 11:09 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

Leaving just to make an anniversary date is.

That seemed the overriding concern, get out before September, not withdraw in an orderly manner.

As I have already said, it would have made more sense to wait until the fighting season ended.

The only reason Biden didn’t do that was to make some anniversary.

That is political opportunism.





I think attributing Biden’s decision to political maneuvering is short-sighted. I think looking in hindsight and saying "this is how we should have withdrawn" is a little arrogant, all things considered. It is assuming some things that ain't necessarily so.

This was not an easy decision. Biden set a date and stuck to it – something the previous three presidents had talked about but could not do. It was not arbitrary; it was sticking to the agreement with the Taliban the previous president made.
Saying the withdrawal should have been more "orderly" seems a little naive to me. Everyone knew chaos was going to happen when
the US left.

(For anyone else who was not up on what the Afghani fighting season is…
Afghani fighters have been fairly consistent in sticking to a “fighting season” – especially the Taliban. It’s based on the growing season of the Afghani opium trade and the impossibility of conducting a ground war during an Afghani winter. So, there is usually a marked drop in fighting activity and casualties from October to March.)



The Afghani fighting season is not a cease fire written in stone that we could base our withdrawal on.

For us to base our withdrawal date on the Taliban’s fighting season, it would involve some trust in the Taliban’s integrity. If we waited until October before we pulled out, who’s to say the Taliban wouldn’t then swoop in and take over? It took them less than one month from the time the US left until they took Kandahar.

Again - Biden was sticking to the agreement that Trump made with the Taliban – to leave before the September 11 anniversary. Whose to say that if we’d stuck around past Sept. 11, the Taliban wouldn’t keep their promise to ramp up attacks on US forces?

We trained an army of 300,000 and equipped them with the best weaponry. We could not give them the will to fight.






oralloy
 
  -1  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 11:24 am
@snood,
snood wrote:
We trained an army of 300,000 and equipped them with the best weaponry. We could not give them the will to fight.

They have had the will to fight for years now. They only lost the will to fight when Traitor Joe sold them out to the Taliban.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 11:25 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
Not one of the September 11 hijackers, all members of al-Qaeda, were from Afghanistan.

Progressives will say anything to support terrorism.


hightor wrote:
The USA was justified in pursuing bin Laden and punishing the Taliban which hosted the al-Qaeda training camps, but embarking on a land war and attempting to rebuild Afghanistan and transform it into a democratic state -- a neo-conservative fantasy -- was a mistake, and ill-conceived from the beginning.

What is it about human rights and democracy that you most dislike?


hightor wrote:
Starting an additional war in Iraq a few years later was an act of monumental stupidity.

So should we have just left our troops in Saudi Arabia throughout the war on terror?

Or would you have us just pull out of Saudi Arabia without first toppling Saddam, so he could invade Kuwait again (and then Saudi Arabia) and gain control over the world's oil supply?
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 11:26 am
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:
Joe Biden knew what had to be done...and he did it.

Only progressives think that betraying our allies is necessary.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 11:27 am
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:
Once the **** stirrers quiet down the public will likely accept Joe's action.

Traitor Joe will be condemned for this forever.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  0  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 11:34 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

snood wrote:
We trained an army of 300,000 and equipped them with the best weaponry. We could not give them the will to fight.

They have had the will to fight for years now. They only lost the will to fight when Traitor Joe sold them out to the Taliban.


You mean when he stuck to the agreement that Trump made with the Taliban, to withdraw before Sept 11?
Is that the “sell-out” you’re talking about?
oralloy
 
  -2  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 11:38 am
@snood,
Yes. That is indeed the sell out that I am talking about.
izzythepush
 
  0  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 11:41 am
@snood,
Nothing is guaranteed, but the fact remains, if Biden had waited until the end of the fighting season then the Taliban wouldn’t have had such an easy time of it.

Maybe Trump was the one who set the deadline but Biden did not have to stick with it.

He made himself a hostage to fortune just to hit an anniversary.

He would have been aware of the fighting seasons as well.

They aren’t set in stone but various fighters would have been farming regardless.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 11:42 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:
They only lost the will to fight when Traitor Joe sold them out to the Taliban.
I don't know about your experiences in Afghanistan and relations to this country.
But why do you neglect the time ... well, from the big Kabul Bank financial scandal onward?
Or that on 29 February 2020, the US and the Taliban signed a peace agreement titled the Agreement for Bringing Peace to Afghanistan, including the withdrawal of all regular American and NATO troops from Afghanistan?
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 11:48 am
@snood,
snood wrote:


izzythepush wrote:

Leaving just to make an anniversary date is.

That seemed the overriding concern, get out before September, not withdraw in an orderly manner.

As I have already said, it would have made more sense to wait until the fighting season ended.

The only reason Biden didn’t do that was to make some anniversary.

That is political opportunism.





I think attributing Biden’s decision to political maneuvering is short-sighted. I think looking in hindsight and saying "this is how we should have withdrawn" is a little arrogant, all things considered. It is assuming some things that ain't necessarily so.

This was not an easy decision. Biden set a date and stuck to it – something the previous three presidents had talked about but could not do. It was not arbitrary; it was sticking to the agreement with the Taliban the previous president made.
Saying the withdrawal should have been more "orderly" seems a little naive to me. Everyone knew chaos was going to happen when
the US left.

(For anyone else who was not up on what the Afghani fighting season is…
Afghani fighters have been fairly consistent in sticking to a “fighting season” – especially the Taliban. It’s based on the growing season of the Afghani opium trade and the impossibility of conducting a ground war during an Afghani winter. So, there is usually a marked drop in fighting activity and casualties from October to March.)



The Afghani fighting season is not a cease fire written in stone that we could base our withdrawal on.

For us to base our withdrawal date on the Taliban’s fighting season, it would involve some trust in the Taliban’s integrity. If we waited until October before we pulled out, who’s to say the Taliban wouldn’t then swoop in and take over? It took them less than one month from the time the US left until they took Kandahar.

Again - Biden was sticking to the agreement that Trump made with the Taliban – to leave before the September 11 anniversary. Whose to say that if we’d stuck around past Sept. 11, the Taliban wouldn’t keep their promise to ramp up attacks on US forces?

We trained an army of 300,000 and equipped them with the best weaponry. We could not give them the will to fight.


RIGHT ON!

I especially like it coming from someone who spent as much time in the military as you, Snood.

This was not going to be a pretty or a smooth break-away. If it were...W. Bush, Obama, and especially Trump...WOULD HAVE DONE IT.

It was going to be messy...just as messy as Vietnam...and maybe worse.

So far, it seems to be going better than Saigon...and I hope that holds up.

I feel the best political move for the Taliban would be to be as humane as possible during this withdrawal...and attempt to set up an immediate political dialogue with all the parties involved.

Time for them to grow up.

Time for the Trump supporters to do so also.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  0  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 12:03 pm
There’s an old joke about someone asking for directions somewhere only to be told I wouldn’t start from here.

That’s the situation in Afghanistan, and although I have been criticising Biden, the full blame lies 100% with Bush.

He deliberately isolated Iran instead of taking the once in a generation opportunity to bring them into the fold. Iran was vital to controlling Afghanistan, as Shia Muslims they’d had their citizens murdered by the Sunni Taliban.

And they were prepared to help too. Jack Straw put in a lot of work to bring the Iranians in only for Dubya to **** all over it.

And just as importantly instead of reconstructing Afghanistan he went to fight a pointless war in Iraq.
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  0  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 12:15 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:

Bothers me that some time of the ****-stirrers are Democrats.
1) None of them have any useful ideas about how the pullout should have happened.
2) Any ideas they have would be pointless retrospection anyway.
3) Democrats need to be supportive of Biden and not joining the fools tearing him down for what was a very difficult and (as Frank said) politically risky decision.



Yes, what Snood said.
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  1  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 12:17 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:

izzythepush wrote:

He could have done it better.


EVERYTHING EVERY PRESIDENT HAS EVER DONE...COULD HAVE BEEN DONE BETTER.

Everything I've ever done...could have been done better.

My guess is that damn near everything anyone has ever done...could have been done better.

He DID what had to be done.



None of the others did.

So, yes...it could have been done better.


Absolutely Frank.
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  1  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 12:22 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

Yes. That is indeed the sell out that I am talking about.


Well, I suppose no one will ever accuse you of having a grasp on reality. What's it like living in Never-Never Land? Have you met Peter Pan?
BillW
 
  2  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 12:25 pm
Just shy of putting 10-15 thousand troops and an air wing back into Kabul (2-3 carriers off the coast); this is what you get. After all others get pulled out, then you have to withdraw these troops.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 03:24 pm
@BillW,
Keep in mind that those 10-15 thousand troops would not be involved in combat. They would be in charge of training the Afghanis to fight for themselves.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 03:25 pm
@glitterbag,
glitterbag wrote:
Well, I suppose no one will ever accuse you of having a grasp on reality. What's it like living in Never-Never Land? Have you met Peter Pan?

You are the person here who is delusional. I see reality just fine.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 03:28 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
But why do you neglect the time ... well, from the big Kabul Bank financial scandal onward?

Because I perceive no relevance to my point.


Walter Hinteler wrote:
Or that on 29 February 2020, the US and the Taliban signed a peace agreement titled the Agreement for Bringing Peace to Afghanistan, including the withdrawal of all regular American and NATO troops from Afghanistan?

Again, because I perceive no relevance to my point.

I have however addressed this when other people raised it with me.

My response has been that Mr. Biden is not obligated to follow through with Mr. Trump's terrible ideas.
snood
 
  1  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 03:40 pm
@oralloy,
Why did you never call Trump a traitor for wanting to do the same thing Biden did?
oralloy
 
  -1  
Thu 19 Aug, 2021 04:04 pm
@snood,
Probably because I don't use the same words in every post.

I'm pretty sure that I had harsh words for the proposal. I think it's a terrible idea.

Another reason is because Joe Biden is the person who is actually doing it.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 06/14/2025 at 05:36:12