300,000-year-old throwing stick documents the evolution of hunting

Its amazing how new information and evidence can refute earlier assumptions about our ancestors as brutish near -apes. Theres evidence of a lot of working to the wood.

Archaeologists in Germany found a throwing stick that might have been used by a species that preceded Neanderthals.

By Nicholas St. Fleur
April 22, 2020

What’s so special about a 300,000-year-old stick stuck in the muck?

“It’s a stick, sure,” said Jordi Serangeli, an archaeologist from the University of Tübingen in Germany. But to dismiss it as such, he added, would be like calling Neil Armstrong’s first step on the moon “only dirt with a print.”

That’s because the short, pointed piece of wood his team found in Schöningen, Germany, in 2016 may be the newest addition to the hunting arsenal used by extinct human ancestors during the Middle Pleistocene. It was probably a throwing stick that was hurled like a non-returning boomerang, spinning through the air before striking birds, rabbits or other prey.

Along with thrusting spears and javelins, it is the third class of wooden weapon discovered at the waterlogged site, occupied by either Neanderthals or their, and supposedly our, heavy-browed ancestors, Homo heidelbergensis.

When, in 1995, the Schöningen spears were discovered they pierced the debate over whether our early human relatives in Europe were simple scavengers incapable of crafting hunting tools. The throwing stick discovery adds to evidence that early hominins in our lineage were intelligent enough to prepare weapons and communicate together to topple prey. The paper was published Monday in Nature Ecology & Evolution.

“We can show that already 300,000 years ago, not only are these late Homo heidelbergensis or very early Neanderthals at the top of the food chain,” said Nicholas Conard, an archaeologist at the university, “but they also have a whole range of important technological skills they can use to make sure they can feed themselves and lead their lives.”

Schöningen, which was once a lake shore, is known for its pristine preservation of organic material. The muddy sediment has defended wet artifacts from decay. Excavations have uncovered bone tools, slaughtered horses and saber-toothed cat teeth.

Their colleague, Martin Kursch, an excavator at the site, found the stick, which was about half the size of a pool cue and weighed about half a pound. It differed from thrusting spears and javelins because it was much shorter, and slightly curved.

Dr. Conard noticed the wood piece resembled a short stick found in 1994 by Hartmut Thieme, the archaeologist who showcased the Schöningen spears. Dr. Thieme had called his find a “throwing stick” but lacked evidence to support his claim. Other researchers interpreted it as a child’s spear, a root digger or a bark peeler.

“I remember picking it up, and I was afraid it would just fall apart, it was kind of terrifying,” Dr. Conard said. “But in fact it wasn’t like that at all. To the touch it was solid.”

They placed the stick in a cool, dark water bath to keep it moist and protected from microbes. Gerlinde Bigga, an archaeobotanist at the university, analyzed its cell structure and found it was carved from a solid piece of spruce.

“You could harm some animals with that,” Dr. Bigga said.

Next, Veerle Rots, a paleoarchaeologist at the University of Liège in Belgium, examined it to determine its purpose.

“If you look at the piece you could perhaps think it’s a mini spear, but that’s not the case,” said Dr. Rots. “Throwing sticks are pointed at both ends, but that’s actually for the flight trajectory, it’s not for piercing.” Similar features are seen in certain Aboriginal Tasmanian throwing sticks.

Dr. Rots found a large gash near the stick’s center, which suggested it had struck something.

“It was very exciting for me to see there was impact evidence, and I could make a case that it was a throwing stick,” she said.

Annemieke Milks, a paleoarchaeologist from the University College London, who was not involved with the study, said the finding “helps us to build a picture of the diversity of hunting technologies available to Eurasian Middle Pleistocene hominins.”

But Sabine Gaudzinski-Windheuser, a paleoarchaeologist at Germany’s Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum, was not convinced. Had the wooden tool been a throwing stick, she would have expected to see significant scars on its tips rather than near its center.

Dr. Rots disagreed, saying any part of the flying stick could have struck a target. Her team plans to perform ballistic testing with a wooden recreation to demonstrate that the throwing stick was a dangerous weapon for early hominin hunters.

What’s so special about a 300,000-year-old stick stuck in the muck?

“It’s a stick, sure,” said Jordi Serangeli, an archaeologist from the University of Tübingen in Germany. But to dismiss it as such, he added, would be like calling Neil Armstrong’s first step on the moon “only dirt with a print.”

If so, what do you call the worship of ancient relics like the sticks described here?

Quote:

If so, what do you call the worship of ancient relics like the sticks described here?

How do you support your contention that the ancient stick is or was used for "worship"?

Who "worships" the moon landing?

From an anthropological perspective, the shaped throwing stick represents one of the earliest examples of hominid technology, deserving of respect and admiration, but certainly not "worship". Neither the stick nor the moon landings denote anything remotely supernatural.

So when you read this article where the writer is talking about how special it is to find a prehistoric weapon and not just about how the artifact adds to our understanding of prehistorical human life, then you can see there is some kind of worship going on there and not just objective science.

"Respect and admiration," in the context you're using them are forms of worship.

...but in practice it was televised and the flag planted and it became an object of worship and ethnic rivalry.

...then you can see there is some kind of worship going on there and not just objective science.

livinglava wrote:

So when you read this article where the writer is talking about how special it is to find a prehistoric weapon and not just about how the artifact adds to our understanding of prehistorical human life, then you can see there is some kind of worship going on there and not just objective science.

So does your analyse of that sentence in the the NYT (perhaps translated from one of the languages Dr. Jordi Serangeli speaks - "German, Italian [mother tongue], Spanish [second mother tongue], French [very good] and good knowledge of English, Catalan and Latin -) mean that he is doing some kind of worship and not just objective science or is that your general view of the Tübingen University's department of Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology?

Quote:

"Respect and admiration," in the context you're using them are forms of worship.

Not really. These hominids existed 300,000 years ago. We normally think of these early humanoids as primitive or "brutish" but to see a hand-crafted utilitarian item fashioned by them gives us reason to think of those artisans as deserving of respect and we can admire their skill as toolmakers and hunters. But that isn't any indication of a worshipful attitude.

Quote:

...but in practice it was televised and the flag planted and it became an object of worship and ethnic rivalry.

No, the nationalistic flag was never an object of "worship". It was nothing more than a calling card. Humans love to litter and leave graffiti — "Kilroy was here".

Quote:

...then you can see there is some kind of worship going on there and not just objective science.

Putting an archeological discovery in a cultural context is not anything like "worship".

Why does wood-working seem to contradict brutishness in your mind?

Quote:

Why does wood-working seem to contradict brutishness in your mind?

It was a term of art used by archaeologists and paleoanthropologists. I last saw it used as a technical term in a book that was for a number of years a standard text in paleoanthropology. It was by Herbert Wendt a German entitled
Ich Suchte Adam The English Titl was in the infinitive.

Calling anybody from the Mousterian on down "brutish" was common fare .

Tool making especially resources that were hand worked and fashioned toward a purpose requires learned "skills" not mere instinct.

Some animals use tools but none are fashioned in a uniform manner.
Uniformly fashioned tools is therefore "un-animal like"(which was the meaning of brutish)