0
   

The Democrats Gloat Thread

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 09:31 am
I'll also provide the barf bags. LOL
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 09:39 am
Re: Breaking News Flash
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Lash wrote:
You consider that news? It's a bunch of unsubstantiated opinion and gossip from people who won't even give their names.

Dan Rather might have used it. Of course, he has been banished from news....

The libs have all fallen off the edge of the earth.[/[/b]quote]

BREAKING NEWS FLASH!

Lash has finally admitted that she is among the brilliant few who believe that Planet Earth is flat!

To reward her for that outstanding scientific discovery, we are giving Lash a free pass to the Intelligent Design Convention being held in the free fall zone at the Eastern edge of the Earth.

Free parachutes are provided to all particpants.

BBB


Thanks for the excellent suggestion, c.i. I will add barf bags to my list of free comps to the flat earth crowd.

BBB
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 12:26 pm
Just an observation here - how come it seems the folks who jump right up and complain "They do it too, only worse, and don't admit it":

1) are well (and more or less equally) represented on both sides of the silliness

2) all claim "the moral/ethical highground" on the basis of their own perception of the behavior of those they consider adversaries

3) and finally, don't eschew the practice they bipartisanly condem, but rather persist in continually egging one another on?

Might it not just be that whatever else may be at issue, some folks just plain ain't happy unless they've got somebody to be angry with?
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 12:32 pm
You tell me.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 02:11 pm
I'm used to the rancour. No biggy. If I begin to dislike it much more, I know where the door is.

It just shows an entire lower level to people who beg for certain behavior--get it--and then turn around and deny the same to those they begged for it from.

The hypocracy--really mutilates any claim to integrity.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 02:13 pm
Lash wrote:

The hypocracy--really mutilates any claim to integrity.

You can say this on a politics thread with a straight face?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 02:14 pm
Lash, We all know you are as pure as the ..........
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 02:20 pm
http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/e/c/hillary_vader2.jpg

CI-- I did leave your cry baby thread when I was asked.

We don't even want anyone to leave--but it's stupid for you all to ignore your thread and spam ours.

But, I am having fun finding these pics, so nevermind.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 02:52 pm
http://www.cagle.com/news/HowardDeanDNC/images2/harville.gif
0 Replies
 
Synonymph
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 03:02 pm
Anyone who is obsessed with politics has skewed priorities.

To spend HOURS A DAY posting away about all that crap, arguing every ridiculous little detail... it's laughable and pathetic.

And the loyalty to George Bush, who doesn't give a **** about any of his apologists (and proves it with every misstep he takes), is even more pathetic.

Look at yourselves.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 03:08 pm
You mistake loyalty for a refusal to buy into all the baseless crap crazies spew.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 03:09 pm
I thought George looked a bit sad and tired today, which almost made me feel sorry for him.

Then I remembered all the crap he's committed.
And it's a lot better than the smirk, let's face it.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 03:10 pm
Might be, Timber.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 03:31 pm
Thomas wrote:
dlowan wrote:
I have seen these things written about Bush before lots of times.

Is it really true that they were not written about in "mainstream" media?

I think they were -- as a reader of the (conservative) Wall Street Journal, my impression is that it was at least as critical as the New York Times of Bush's economic decision making, if not more. From what I hear, and what is hard for me to cross-check, this was mainly a TV phenomena. Budget numbers and strategic maps of unknown foreign countries are hard enough to digest in a newspaper, but on TV they're practically impossible to get across. It's much easier to show your TV audience that your president is a hero uniting the nation -- especially when this is what your audience wants to see.



Yeah, I tend to agree. That is why I expressed surprise.

Oy! US TV "news", as far as I was able to gather, is actually worse than ours, in general, except for a few real gems, of course.

But I had thought there was reasonable critiquing in some print media (NO print media could be worse than ours!), especially after they realised how they had been scammed re Iraq.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 03:38 pm
timberlandko wrote:
Just an observation here - how come it seems the folks who jump right up and complain "They do it too, only worse, and don't admit it":

1) are well (and more or less equally) represented on both sides of the silliness

2) all claim "the moral/ethical highground" on the basis of their own perception of the behavior of those they consider adversaries

3) and finally, don't eschew the practice they bipartisanly condem, but rather persist in continually egging one another on?

Might it not just be that whatever else may be at issue, some folks just plain ain't happy unless they've got somebody to be angry with?



Timber, given that you are just as capable as anybody of very extended sniping, in fact more capable than most, and often fully as nasty in your way (eg your gloating performance post election was actually the worst and most childish, in my estimation, possibly because it was of a depth unexpected of you) I always find your attempts to look not only magisterial but majestic and nonpartisan when you come in and deliver these little homilies very odd.

I am also interested in what you actually think the effect is, since you have done it since the inception of the site, with no effect as far as I have ever seen?

Truly, a look in the mirror mught be a reasonable thing to do.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 03:39 pm
nimh wrote:
dlowan wrote:
I am kind of puzzled.

I have seen these things written about Bush before lots of times.

Me too, we all have.

dlowan wrote:
Is it really true that they were not written about in "mainstream" media?

If not, why not?

Havent got a clue. You've got to wonder. US media must be among the more uncritical in the Western world. How ironic that they still rage on about liberal media bias.


Odd indeed. Mind you, we all know bias is in the eye of the beholder, but this one snookers me. (My working definition of reasonable lack of bias being a media that annoys me at least as often as I think it said it really well!)
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 03:40 pm
dlowan, I owe you a drink or two. LOL
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 03:44 pm
All the good reporers in the US are all gone (if not 99.9 percent). Most are afraid of Bushco, and what they have done in the past. If you ask the wrong q's, you'll not be invited to another press release. All the reporters are playing pussy cats.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 04:09 pm
Hmmm I disagree, CI.



I come from a country where there really ARE only a handful of good reporters left.


That is a disturbing development, if true.

Is the Bush White House really cutting out everyone but cronies?


I knew Bush hardly ever communicates, except by speeches, almost never allowing real questions (that is utterly anathema to us, given our leaders are forced to answer questions from the floor of Parliament constantly, it seems so ODD, but that is a culture thing, what you are used to, shrugs).


But is there real evidence for that kind of really blatant press manipulation?


(I know they plant folk to ask Dorothy Dixers)
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 04:24 pm
Timber must have hit that rabbit right in the thicket.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.52 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 07:29:35