6
   

Is "Brexit" something Americans should be concerned about?

 
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Tue 24 Sep, 2019 07:25 am
@Region Philbis,
Our supreme court is professional, appointed by professionals, the politicians keep out of it.

https://www.supremecourt.uk/about/appointments-of-justices.html

Religion isn't an issue over here, there's no way women's reproductive rights are going backwards.

Having said that, bishops sit in the House of Lords, the only other country that gives clerics comparable political power is Iran so make of that what you will.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Tue 24 Sep, 2019 07:33 am
Opinion piece by Lara Kuenssberg BBC political editor.

Quote:
Before everything gets swept up in a force 10 political storm, stop for a moment to think about what has just happened.

The highest court in the land has just ruled that the serving prime minister broke the law. He gave the Queen advice that was unlawful.

Therefore his decision to suspend Parliament was also against the law, so is now null and void.

Short of the inscrutable Lady Hale, with the giant diamond spider on her lapel, declaring Boris Johnson to be Pinocchio, this judgement is just about as bad for the government as it gets.

Mr Johnson is, as is abundantly clear, prepared to run a general election campaign that pits Parliament against the people. And so what, according to that view of the world, if that includes the judges as part of the establishment standing in his way?

But there is a difference between being ruthless and reckless. And the scope and strength of this judgement cannot just be dismissed as some pesky judges sticking their noses in.

Just a few weeks ago, the advice of government lawyers was said to be that it was unlikely the judges would want to step into such explosive territory. They were wrong. For the very many people in the Conservative Party who have doubts about Boris Johnson but wanted to give him the chance, this is a nightmare.

But back to that political storm which is, no surprise, already raging. To shouts of 'Johnson out! Johnson out!' on the Labour conference floor, Jeremy Corbyn said the prime minister should consider his position - in other words he should quit.

The SNP and Liberal Democrats are calling on him to go now too.

The prime minister is in New York at the United Nations, and his team is yet to respond. But the idea that he would walk is far-fetched (for now). What seems certain though is that MPs will be sitting again in Parliament on Wednesday.

The Commons Speaker has already said they should convene urgently. Some MPs have, out of principle, already gone back to sit on the green benches. It is a different question of course to ask, for what purpose, what will they discuss.

There isn't suddenly going to be a majority in Parliament for a way out of this mess. And Boris Johnson will inevitably try to use this to his political advantage.

Do not underestimate how aggressive Number 10 might be willing to be in response to the judgement. It is possible they will fly straight back from New York to face the music, armed with what strategy is harder to read.

But the decision to suspend Parliament may just have blown up in Number 10's face.

In his two months in power, Boris Johnson has lost his first six Commons votes, broken the law by suspending Parliament and misled the monarch.

Even for a politician who seems to enjoy breaking the rules, that is a serious charge that, only two months into office, even the most brazen Johnson backer cannot simply shrug off.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49813639
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 24 Sep, 2019 09:37 am
@Region Philbis,
Quote:
if only our SC had as much integrity as yours.

maybe someday we will get back to the ideals of our forefathers...

Changing the Constitution to fit a leftist view of the US is not "getting back to the ideals of our forefathers". The left ignores the Constitution unless it fits their narritive. Take the Electoral College as a perfect example, the left lost by the rules of the EC, so they seek to get rid of the EC so they can win.

Chris Hayes from MSNBC is a perfect example of this stupidity. Hayes declared, in all seriousness, that the "Electoral College would be unconstitutional if it weren’t specifically in the Constitution."
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Friends don't let friends fat-talk - Discussion by hawkeye10
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
 
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/10/2019 at 09:55:36