The title says it all an early assessment - it claims nothing else.
Your right i haven't read it. And my point which you ignored is that it is rediculously early to be worrying about the history of a president of only 2 and a half years out of office
No, you didn't make this point. You gave a vague, inarticulate What a crock. 2 years after he leaves office. More b s?
. That could have mean:
- there's not enough information
- the article got it all wrong
- Edgar shouldn't be posting so earl, etc
- ie. there were several possible 'points'
But your now claimed meaning...that it is rediculously early to be worrying about the history of a president of only 2 and a half years out of office
Why is it too early to worry
Why call it worry at all, rather than write
It seems very unreasonable for you to be so aggressive.