2
   

Antiwar protests.

 
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jun, 2003 10:35 am
well said snood,I couldnt say it better.
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jun, 2003 11:33 am
I wish it were always true, Snood. But I have family members who -- though no permanent damage was done -- testify to the dehumanization of the process and who lost respect it.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jun, 2003 12:17 pm
I felt basic training was very dehumanizing - they took the human out so you could be Army. Of course, I went through basic in early 1969 and I understand there was a major change in the system shortly after I left.

Now don't get me wrong about basic. There were certain things it did that were very important. I was being trained to good out and kill people efficiently and effectively at the same time protecting myself. It was warrior training not baby sitter training.

You have to be dehumanized to accept killing other people. I'm sure the effect last till today. Don't start anything with me because I will finish it and I am not responsible for the way I finish it, if you know what I mean!
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jun, 2003 12:30 pm
We used to joke that there ought to be a re-basic training at the end of your hitch. Something to turn your instincts off and turn your brain back on, or your heart back on or maybe both.

Snood, you're right about the asperion casters, what gets me is the posers. The ones who think because they wear a hat that someone would believe they were GI.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jun, 2003 12:32 pm
I went through basic training in the Air Force during the mid 1950's. My TI was one tough SOB -- and I was only 17 years old at the time. I was scared shitless of him.

I became permanent party at Sampson AFB (the training base) and even after basis training, I had a lot of trouble speaking with him and calling him Smitty -- instead of Sir.

We recently got in touch through the internet. He is now a retired professor -- and I enjoy talking with him via email.

I never felt I was dehumanized -- but then again, this was the Air Force rather than the Army or Marines. But I sure had to grow up in one quick hurry -- and I think that was to my benefit -- big time.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jun, 2003 12:35 pm
I went through Navy boot camp,maybe that is why I didnt feel dehumanized.But,I also had to go through AIT with the Marines,and there I wasnt treated like anything but a recruit.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jun, 2003 01:02 pm
Have been in a Navy boot camp myself: there were some 'rougher' companies, and even in mine was a 'famous' rifling, where seamen finally did all the drill sergeants wanted ... .
I was treated like a 'citizen in uniform', according to our laws.
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jun, 2003 01:23 pm
Citizen in uniform I like.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jun, 2003 01:50 pm
Quote:
Citizens in uniform. The guideline for the future will continue to be the effort to integrate soldiers as citizens into society, to ensure they align themselves to the basic rights and the application of constitutional legal principles, as well as to the notion of humanity and the values enshrined in our Constitution.

Liberty and responsibility have been and remain the political-moral points of reference for the concept of inner leadership adopted and the role model of citizen in uniform. They are the core of our own tradition and the source of the roots the Bundeswehr has in society. At the beginning of the 21st century the soldier continues to require convincing values which give him a sense of place and orientation. He must know what he is being deployed to uphold and defend - human dignity, justice and liberty.

The Bundeswehr is bound to the constitutional rights and laws and serves to protect the rights and liberty of our people and our state. It is an army in a democracy and championing a democracy. The Bundeswehr is subject to the primacy of politics.

An important parliamentary control function is played by the Defence Commissioner of the German Bundestag. His task is to protect the constitutional rights of servicemen. Every member of the armed services has the right to complain to him direct without going through his superiors. The Commissioner may demand information and access to files from military units and visit any Bundeswehr facility unannounced. He submits an annual report to the Bundestag on the complaints he has received.
source: Germany and the world: External Security
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jun, 2003 02:42 pm
Lots of history resonating there, Walter. It's a very civilized document.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jun, 2003 03:09 pm
Tartarin, NOTHING is going to be "always true" when trying to train hundreds of thousands of young people to kill, and keep from getting killed. There are going to be extreme examples of EVERYTHING - cruelty AND consideration - but they will be the exceptions. Sorry about your relatives, but do you have a way to train 18 year olds to be soldiers in eight weeks that you're just not sharing?
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jun, 2003 03:23 pm
It is a little more than that snood, don't forget AIT - but the point is well taken. I found that the atrocities came from the most likely sources, had nothing to do with training.

Also, I remember we had our Geneva convention training right after our stent in the gas chamber - wonder if that was on purpose?
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jun, 2003 03:29 pm
I went through my basic training in 1948 having just turned 19. I never felt dehumanized or in fact found it very difficult. The thing that bothered me was the heat. It was at Camp Hood Texas at the height of a very hot summer. Before I am corrected the name was changed to Fort Hood some time later. After Basic spent a year in a recon battalion as a tank driver. I rather enjoyed that time, after all no one was shooting at us. And I certainly did not have to be deprogrammed after my discharge.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jun, 2003 03:43 pm
au, you get out just before Korea?
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jun, 2003 03:49 pm
Agree -- I should have included the inevitability (as has been pointed out by others) that the training varies from service to service and officer to officer and probably many other factors. However, I am always uneasy about loyalty to an institution. It too often clouds judgment, and in the case of the military and war, that can be a real problem, Snood. I like the notion of debriefing, reverse basic training at the end of service -- was that your idea, Bill?
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jun, 2003 03:53 pm
I think it was snood's idea; but I like it! That was dehumanizing too - "You gotta stand up and take it like a man!"
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jun, 2003 04:07 pm
Bill
Yes and no.
Yes, I got out by going into the reserves however was called back less than 2 months after the Korean police action began. I was lucky however, ending in the headquarters company of the Army outfit involved in building the Thule airbase. People now pay good money for ocean cruises up north I got mine free. Spent another 33 months on active duty.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jun, 2003 04:29 pm
Still got plenty cold, but I guess your in NY - brrrrrrrr, hate the cold!
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2003 08:59 pm
Tartarin wrote:
Agree -- I should have included the inevitability (as has been pointed out by others) that the training varies from service to service and officer to officer and probably many other factors. However, I am always uneasy about loyalty to an institution. It too often clouds judgment, and in the case of the military and war, that can be a real problem, Snood. I like the notion of debriefing, reverse basic training at the end of service -- was that your idea, Bill?


Does this include all of the professional and fraternal institutions in the world? What about loyalty to your alma mater? What about the loyalty members have to the "thin blue line"?
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jun, 2003 06:22 am
Yes, MM. All of the above.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Antiwar protests.
  3. » Page 23
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 12/27/2024 at 12:00:28