2
   

Antiwar protests.

 
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 06:41 am
Did we all notice Bush's sage advice to Iran's political leaders? Indeed, it is advice which points to the heart of the democratic ideal and process. He advised that the government of Iran and it's supporters will be expected by the world community to treat those inside the country who protest against government policies "with the utmost of respect".

In light of the subject of this thread, and many of its contributions, and the reality of Clear Channel and Bill O'Reilly...does anyone else here just want to vomit all over this White House?
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 06:46 am
Blatham, suggest you chose another orifice from which to express our concerns to this white house.
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 07:04 am
Whichever Blatham chooses, Dys, I'll cover the same territory with the other.

See also Jonathan Schell in the latest Nation.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 09:56 am
Actually, I've come to expect it blatham - and that is sad indeed <sigh>
0 Replies
 
BoGoWo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jun, 2003 08:37 am
Just adding this out of context (as usual), in the hope it has not already been brought up:
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20030505&c=1&s=robbins
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jun, 2003 09:42 am
Excellent speech BGW, I had already contacted the Baseball Hall of Fame and asked them to remove their leadership and that I was very strongly against their political actions. Tim and Susan are true American heros - ones that everyone should look up to!
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jun, 2003 09:48 am
Quote:
Tim and Susan are true American heros - ones that everyone should look up to!


Why? Because they can act? The ability to speak and criticize ones country does not make one a national hero. Otherwise, I would suspect you thought Rush quite the hero during Cinton's term. Right?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jun, 2003 10:16 am
McG

You really ought to try a little harder to stretch from black/white and to see differences.

Rush depends for his living on political commentary, and he's not out in the community doing citizen duty without a hefty speaker's fee. The two actors are putting in such community service for no fee. That's a telling difference, even if we don't take into account that Rush's political discourse would NOT get him a pass in any first year logic of political philosophy course.

Often, speaking against one's country is heroic...and that was quite clearly understood by the men who wrote your constitution - it is a fundamental reason for writing in the ammendment on free speech. For artists...for anyone whose livlihood might be put in some jeopardy through political commentary...to speak out politically is an act of something else than mere self-interest, because their self-interest might be substantially damaged.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jun, 2003 10:23 am
I believe that both work in the entertainment industry. I also do not believe that Roth doesn't get paid for his appearances. I also believe you are stating opinion, not fact.

No, speaking out against ones country is NOT heroic, nor is it villianous. It is an option that our freedom gives us.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jun, 2003 10:29 am
McG

God man...can you read with any carefulness at all? I said 'often'.

As to fact/opinion...I'll wait for you to do some research on what the heck these people do on their off hours and then maybe you can have something meaningful to say on the matter.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jun, 2003 10:31 am
I apologize if that last post sounds harsh, but I am just too pissed off at folks who are too damned lazy to do learning before they open their mouths.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jun, 2003 10:31 am
Ok, I'll look up what Robbins does in his off hours, and you look up what Rush does. Be fair and reasonable in your research and i will do the same.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2003 09:18 am
Quote:
If written today, de Tocqueville's book would certainly be attacked as anti-American, since much of what he said about the U.S.A. was critical. Ever since it was founded, the U.S.A. has been a subject of attraction and fascination for the rest of the world, but also of detraction and disapproval. However, it is only since the start of the cold war that people's attitude to the U.S.A. has been judged essentially in terms of approval or disapproval, and not only by the sort of inhabitants who are also likely to seek out "un-American" behavior in their own fellow citizens, but also internationally. It substituted the question "Are you with the U.S.A.?" for the question "What do you think of the U.S.A.?" What is more, no other country expects or asks such a question about itself. Since America, having won the cold war against the U.S.S.R., implausibly decided on September 11, 2001, that the cause of freedom was again engaged in another life-and-death struggle against another evil, but this time spectacularly ill-defined enemy, any skeptical remarks about the United States and its policy are, once again, likely to meet with outrage.

http://chronicle.com/free/v49/i43/43b00701.htm
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2003 10:08 am
After reading a few quotes, I've been keeping an eye out for it ever since.

Do remember, blatham, there are several posters on a2k from other countries that are quite critical of the US, that don't come across as anti american. Anyway, I guess they are still here.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2003 10:32 am
roger

I'm sorry, I don't understand your first sentence.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2003 11:09 am
Took me a minute to understand it too. Was refering to de Tocqueville's book.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2003 11:20 am
Roger

Yes, I had the book when I was a teenager, but it's long since escaped me. Would love to re read it now that I might actually comprehend it.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2003 11:29 am
Well, blatham, here it is:

Alexis de Tocqueville: Democracy In America
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2003 12:24 pm
Walter

You've brought back my teen years! The pimples, the sock hops, the girls whose breasts I couldn't touch....thank you thank you
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jul, 2003 12:50 pm
If this is such an delight blatham, I'll sing "O Canada .." as well as "O Canada ..." [you certainly will notice that my French isn't that good] for an additional amusement and in honour of today's great parades.
(This only, because I've some difficulties reaching you some breasts.)
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Antiwar protests.
  3. » Page 24
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 11:29:44