2
   

Antiwar protests.

 
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2003 12:26 pm
This is an eMail that is going around the other side:

Quote:
Happy Friday! Smile

With all of this talk of war, many of us will encounter "Peace Activists" who will try and convince us that we must refrain from retaliating against the ones who terrorized us all on September 11, 2001, and those who support terror. These activists may be alone or in a gathering . . . . .

most of us don't know how to react to them. When you come upon one of  these people, or one of their rallies, here are the proper rules of  etiquette:

1. Listen politely while this person explains their views.  Strike up a  conversation if necessary and look very interested in their ideas. They will tell you how revenge is immoral, and that by attacking the people who  did this to us, we will only bring on more violence.  They will probably use many arguments, ranging from political to religious to humanitarian.

2. In the middle of their remarks, without any warning, punch them in the nose.

3. When the person gets up off of the ground, they will be very angry and they may try to hit you, so be careful.

4. Very quickly and calmly remind the person that violence only brings about more violence and remind them of their stand on this matter.  Tell them if they are really committed to a non-violent approach to undeserved attacks, they will turn the other cheek and negotiate a solution. Tell them they must lead by example if they really believe what they are saying.

5. Most of them will think for a moment and then agree that you are correct.

6. As soon as they do that, hit them again. Only this time hit them much harder. Square in the nose.

7. Repeat steps 2-5 until the desired results are obtained and the idiot realizes how stupid of an argument he/she is making.

8. There is no difference in an individual attacking an unsuspecting victim or a group of terrorists attacking a nation of people. It is unacceptable and must be dealt with. Perhaps at a high cost.

We owe our military a huge debt for what they are doing for us and our children. 
We must support them and our leaders at times like these. We have no choice.
We either strike back, VERY HARD, or we will keep getting hit in the nose

Can you tell I'm SICK of hearing the people that don't support our President and our troops who are fighting for our freedom.  Oh yes, have a Happy Friday! Smile
0 Replies
 
NeoGuin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2003 01:17 pm
BillW:

I wonder if these people realize that their attitude towards dissenters are similar to those that our enemies have?

But then, they're only going by what they hear on AM Radio and FOX!
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2003 01:56 pm
nimh wrote:
How different is the proportion of these two wars seen in American popular perception? If there is indeed a perception of both being in the same category - of 'moral' wars, somehow, that's very intrigueing - is it because WW1 in the US is associated with Woodrow Wilson's idealism?


nimh, the short version of my take on the American attitude toward WWI is that the introduction of American troops brought about an end to the appalling, pointless slaughter into which Europe had descended left to her own devices. America believes She won that war for you folks before you managed to kill of more of yourselves. I have no quarrel with those who contend had we done a better job, WWII and perhaps evern much of the current mess might have been avoided.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2003 02:15 pm
nimh: regarding the general public= WW II was something about Germans and Jews and Pearl Harbor WW I was something about Europe. Korea was about something or other and Vietnam was something about dominoes.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2003 02:17 pm
Funny, I never saw no dominoes in the jungle. Smile
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2003 02:22 pm
me either Wink
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2003 02:23 pm
I don't recall seeing a pizza of any kind in the bush.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2003 02:26 pm
they didn't deliver incountry but leeches came with every order
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2003 02:35 pm
LOL
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2003 03:04 pm
Remembering the "**** You" lizards. When I first heard one on guard duty, I thought it was someone playing with my mind!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2003 04:12 pm
BillW, Seems they succeeded. Wink c.i.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2003 04:13 pm
Aren't we the one today. Had a good nappy poo - got out of bed kinda mean did we! Shocked
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2003 04:23 pm
dyslexia
If WW2 was only about Germans and Jews it never would be fought.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2003 04:26 pm
au i was only speaking of the common thoughts about history not reality
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2003 05:12 pm
Actually au, that's pretty sad - but true Shocked
0 Replies
 
wolf
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Apr, 2003 12:05 am
On April 12th, get the Selected One out of the White House:

http://www.bigeye.com/stopwar.htm
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Apr, 2003 12:10 am
Thanks wolf, like the name! Cool
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Apr, 2003 06:06 am
timberlandko wrote:
nimh, the short version of my take on the American attitude toward WWI is that the introduction of American troops brought about an end to the appalling, pointless slaughter into which Europe had descended left to her own devices. America believes She won that war for you folks before you managed to kill of more of yourselves.


that would work ;-)
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Apr, 2003 06:13 am
trespassers will wrote:
Quote:
Hmmm...that's NOT a denunciation, tw.

I didn't intend it to be. Why do you think I should denounce something with which I am completely uninvolved?


I've heard enough of those outraged demands to random Muslims and Muslim organisations to "denounce the 11 September attacks!" to agree with Tres here.

There is no reason anyone should be expected to denounce something he had nothing to do with. You hate being expected to denounce Saddam every time you express your disagreement with the war too, I gather, PD. So better come with a quote from Tres suggesting he had condoned or enncouraged this case, or move on ;-).
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Apr, 2003 07:17 am
nimh wrote:
trespassers will wrote:
Quote:
Hmmm...that's NOT a denunciation, tw.

I didn't intend it to be. Why do you think I should denounce something with which I am completely uninvolved?


I've heard enough of those outraged demands to random Muslims and Muslim organisations to "denounce the 11 September attacks!" to agree with Tres here.

There is no reason anyone should be expected to denounce something he had nothing to do with. You hate being expected to denounce Saddam every time you express your disagreement with the war too, I gather, PD. So better come with a quote from Tres suggesting he had condoned or enncouraged this case, or move on ;-).


I'll go along with that - I feel the same way every time someone wants me to "denounce' what some public person who happens to be both an idiot and black says something idiotic.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Antiwar protests.
  3. » Page 12
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/08/2025 at 04:09:25