94% OF YOU BELIEVE DIANA WAS MURDERED

Personally I am very fond of the word "Bastard" but why is he calling
them "Nazi"? Just because Prince Phillip has German ties"?

Is England ruled by the Arabs like Fayed? Why doesn't the Queen invite
him for tea and discuss the issue in a true royal manner?

0 Replies

Well our Royal family are German, and King Edward VIII and quite a number among the social elite thought very highly of Hitler. Its true the royal nazi connections have faded somewhat since the war, but thats why Fayed called him a nazi. (He was also probably a bit upset because he thinks Prince Philip ordered the murder of his son Dodi).

The present queen, neice of Edward VIII (who became the Duke of Windsor on his abdication, an packed off to the Bahamas during the war to keep him out the way) is far above politics, certainly National Socialism. Its not that which prevents her having a friendly chat over a pot of tea with Fayed (who certainly does not rule this country, he is an Egyptian shopkeeper).

The problem is that Fayed keeps making accusations that the Queen's husband was in the thick of a conspiracy to murder her estranged daughter in law and her boyfriend. Even the finest Earl Grey is a bit hard to swallow in those circumstances.

0 Replies

Fayed, like anyone who believes those two were murdered, is a nutcase.

0 Replies

Who cares? Certainly not I.

0 Replies

I wonder how far Fayed would get in Saudi Arabia with similar accusations against the royal family resident there?

I think he loves the publicity even more than he loved his son.

0 Replies

Wilso wrote:

Fayed... is a nutcase.

I'm tempted to agree. On the other hand why 10 years and 3 coroners to prove a drunk driver crashed a car?

0 Replies

Steve 41oo wrote:

Wilso wrote:
Fayed... is a nutcase.
I'm tempted to agree. On the other hand why 10 years and 3 coroners to prove a drunk driver crashed a car?

Has anyone in the UK suggested a conspiracy by Fayed? Fayed was the employer of the driver of Diana's car. If the driver's fault is confirmed by a UK coroner, wouldn't Fayed look bad in the UK?

(a Fayed conspiracy would involve hindering the UK investigation by pressure or bribery)

0 Replies

wandeljw wrote:

Steve 41oo wrote:
Wilso wrote:
Fayed... is a nutcase.
I'm tempted to agree. On the other hand why 10 years and 3 coroners to prove a drunk driver crashed a car?

Has anyone in the UK suggested a conspiracy by Fayed? Fayed was the employer of the driver of Diana's car. If the driver's fault is confirmed by a UK coroner, wouldn't Fayed look bad in the UK?

(a Fayed conspiracy would involve hindering the UK investigation by pressure or bribery)

I dont think this is likely. Mohammed Fayed lost his son in the crash. I think he is only wanting the truth about how it happened.

0 Replies

I look at it this way. There are a lot of powerful people in the UK literally desperate to put the lid on this and have a verdict accident.

The Stevens enquiry said it was accident. The French enquiry said it was accident.

So why 10 years and 3 coroners has still not come to the conclusion that a drunk driver crashed the car? What in gods name is so complex about that? Why did Stevens say it was "extraordinarily complex matter" What? A drunk smashes a car what is complex about that?

Clearly every coroner who reads himself/herself into this case drops it like a hot potato because they dont think a jury will give a verdict of accidental death. Why?

0 Replies

and still it goes on

http://www.guardian.co.uk/monarchy/story/0,,2080113,00.html

I ask again. If it was the straightforward accident that everyone says it was, why has there still been no verdict to that effect? What is so difficult about a coroner's court coming to the conclusion that Henri Paul was drunk and crashed the car? Verdict accidental death. Then we could all go home and, if he persisted, legitimately call Fayed a conspiracy nut.

But until there is a coroner's verdict we have to take what Fayed says at face value.

0 Replies

I watched "The Queen" yesterday and wondered what the fuss was all about. I thought it was boring. Perhaps since I remember the real life drama of Diana's life very well, there was not much there to interest me. (just an aside).

0 Replies

well its funny, because my interest in Diana only started with her death. Before that I knew nothing about her.

Interesting too that the poll on this thread overwhelmingly says "accident".

I've not voted...I dont know enough about it...I'm content to let a jury hear all submissions and make their minds up. I'll go along with the verdict. If we ever get one.

0 Replies

Quote:

Channel 4 will broadcast photos of the crash that killed Princess Diana despite a plea from her sons.

Prince William and Prince Harry's private secretary wrote to the channel saying they felt it would be a "gross disrespect" to their mother's memory

0 Replies

I heard a suit from Channel 4 talking about the "legitimate public interest" in showing this film.

I don't agree, it's a re-hash. I sympathise with the family. I think it should be pulled. It's not being shown for journalistic reasons, but as entertainment for the purient admass.

0 Replies

McTag wrote:

I heard a suit from Channel 4 talking about the "legitimate public interest" in showing this film.

I don't agree, it's a re-hash. I sympathise with the family. I think it should be pulled. It's not being shown for journalistic reasons, but as entertainment for the purient admass.

no doubt channel 4 are delighted with the pre-publicity. But I understand the offending photograph only really shows an oxygen mask and a doctor. If the princes private secretary says the whole scene is "redolant" with the death of Diana then heaven knows what he'll make of the inquest. If we ever get one. (How many coroners now 3 or 4).

0 Replies

Steve 41oo, I couldn't watch the new Channel 4 documentry re: Diana.
If you know a place where i could download a proper divX or avi torrents, please post/message me the links. Not the bad quality google/youtube videos. Thanks!

IMO, the British monarchy has the right to assassinate people who may become a future threat to it's national interest/security.

The same can be applied to the Saudi monarchy.

0 Replies

Zippo wrote:

Steve 41oo, I couldn't watch the new Channel 4 documentry re: Diana.
If you know a place where i could download a proper divX or avi torrents, please post/message me the links. Not the bad quality google/youtube videos. Thanks!

IMO, the British monarchy has the right to assassinate people who may become a future threat to it's national interest/security.

The same can be applied to the Saudi monarchy.

Zip, sorry no idea where you find it...sounds like you have more idea re avi torrents or divx than I do.

I didnt watch it myself. I understand the thrust of the programme was to show how the paparazzi did not in fact cause the crash or interfere with the rescue.

There are graphic pictures of the crash scene on the web...if you are interested, I'm not.

What interests me is why it has taken 10 years and still no verdict that a drunk crashed the car.

0 Replies

The newspaper here that seems fixated with Diana is the Daily Express.

Yesterday they ran a headline saying Henri Paul was not drunk at the wheel.

I'm prepared to accept any verdict. I just want one.

It shouldnt take 10 years to come to the simple verdict "accident".

0 Replies

Steve 41oo wrote:

Yesterday they ran a headline saying Henri Paul was not drunk at the wheel.

Yes, that's what unnamed sources told the Express and that's all the French's doctors fault and that Diane was murdered by MI5 and the French intelligence service and that the Express wont help to sweep something under the carpet and ...

0 Replies

I'm not excluding the possibility of accidental death. It looks pretty straighforward. I have an idea...why not hold an inquest and let a coroner's verdict put an end to the speculation? It was a straightforward accident no?

0 Replies

94% OF YOU BELIEVE DIANA WAS MURDERED

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know