94% OF YOU BELIEVE DIANA WAS MURDERED

If they were unlawfully killed, partly (mostly) by the behaviour of a driver employed by the Ritz, maybe we should sue the owner of the Ritz for reimbursement of the trial costs at least.

0 Replies

Isn't there anyone we can just shoot, and be done with it?

0 Replies

McTag wrote:

If they were unlawfully killed, partly (mostly) by the behaviour of a driver employed by the Ritz, maybe we should sue the owner of the Ritz for reimbursement of the trial costs at least.

I could imagine that the Crown might think of - and try to get the money back in a civil case.

But in England and under British law?

So let's try to reopen proceedings in Paris .... or even better: follow Set's advice.

0 Replies

Steve 41oo wrote:

So quite literally the "accident" was not an accident! It would not have happened if other people had not done what they did.

this is why I commented on intent. In our jurisdiction, it is an "accident" by definition, unless intent can be proven.

0 Replies

McTag wrote:

If they were unlawfully killed, partly (mostly) by the behaviour of a driver employed by the Ritz, maybe we should sue the owner of the Ritz for reimbursement of the trial costs at least.

and that would be Mr. al Fayed.

0 Replies

Zackly.

0 Replies

Steve 41oo wrote:

Again, to all the folk who selected accident on the poll for this thread, I say you were wrong.

you can say that, but you'd be wrong (except for any British poll-takers you can out)

0 Replies

Again the interesting thing about this verdict is that it was not an accident. She was unlawfully killed unintentionally or otherwise through the actions of others who are to blame.

Those who said it was a straightforward accident, with no blame attached to any party are wrong. I rest my case m'lud.

But hell, who cares?

0 Replies

Steve 41oo wrote:

Again the interesting thing about this verdict is that it was not an accident. She was unlawfully killed unintentionally or otherwise through the actions of others who are to blame.

Those who said it was a straightforward accident, with no blame attached to any party are wrong. I rest my case m'lud.

But hell, who cares?

Steve,

Your poll asked "Was she murdered?"

Your conclusion is "she was unlawfully killed unintentionally."

What do you consider to be the correct answer to the way your poll was worded?

0 Replies

wandeljw wrote:

Steve 41oo wrote:
Again the interesting thing about this verdict is that it was not an accident. She was unlawfully killed unintentionally or otherwise through the actions of others who are to blame.

Those who said it was a straightforward accident, with no blame attached to any party are wrong. I rest my case m'lud.

But hell, who cares?

Steve,

Your poll asked "Was she murdered?"

Your conclusion is "she was unlawfully killed unintentionally."

What do you consider to be the correct answer to the way your poll was worded?

Well first I could have phrased that better with a comma or two...She was unlawfully killed, (unintentionally or otherwise),

but you ask a reasonable question. I didnt give the coroners verdict options because when I started this thread many years ago...( Smile

) the idea that there might be a coroners verdict was still a long way off.

But to answer directly I think the nearest option in the poll to the jury verdict would be option 2 "Possibly, we will never know the truth".

That certainly sums up my position. The more I think about this, the more I am astounded that the jury did not actually come to the conclusion "accidental death". The pressure on them must have been immense. Yet they went for unlawful killing.

0 Replies

The BBC:

Quote:

The cost of the investigation into the death of Princess Diana has topped £12.5m, new figures show.

£12.5m = $24.6m = 15.5m

0 Replies

Damn and blast. We should be able to charge a lot of that to Mohammed al Pillock.

0 Replies

Quote:

Last week's survey for BBC Two's Newsnight found only 19% of those questioned thought the truth was worth the money it cost to uncover it.

the answer you get depends on the question you ask.

0 Replies

Drink driving, speed and seat belt. That cost 12.5 million pounds. How pathetic. Now bury the bitch and get over it.

0 Replies

she was buried 10+ years ago.

p.s. your sig line is tautological nonsense. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

0 Replies

Steve 41oo wrote:

she was buried 10+ years ago.

You wouldn't know judging by the number of magazine covers she's still on.

0 Replies

Steve 41oo wrote:

p.s. your sig line is tautological nonsense. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

I disagree with your view. I am entitled to.

0 Replies

you are of course entitled to disagree with my opinion Wilso, and I probably would not even have expressed it, had your post about Diana been less offensive.

regarding logic, I'm not so sure it is just a matter of opinion.

0 Replies

Steve 41oo wrote:

and I probably would not even have expressed it, had your post about Diana been less offensive.

That's another thing. It's only offensive to you because of the ridiculous pedestal this woman was placed on by your country. If the stupid cow had put a seat belt on, she'd still be alive today, and the fact she didn't just proves how arrogant, aloof and isolated she was. She's DEAD - GET OVER IT. To me, she meant NOTHING. I see the royal family as a bunch of inbred misfits, and am completely ashamed of my country's connection to them. I see the Union Jack as a butcher's apron and am disgusted by the sight of it in the corner of our flag.

0 Replies

Let's put you down as undecided, then.

It was a matter of concern to some Brits (although not this one) that the mother of the future king (and so Defender of the Faith, patron of the Church of England and so on) was turning into a serial muslim shagger and seemingly unconcerned about adverse opinion.

Certainly, a lot of people thought it might have been a good thing if she were removed, and quickly. Quite a reasonable assumption in some quarters therefore, that her death might be arranged by the state security services.

0 Replies

94% OF YOU BELIEVE DIANA WAS MURDERED

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know