OMG! CONDI (and BUSH & Now SCOTT) Still Thinks IRAQ = 9/11

There is no evidence they didn't collude, Setanta. I'm not denying the best evidence presented, as you said.

I accept it. There were meetings and offers of assistance between them. I strongly suspected this to be the case.

The evidence lends itself more toward my assertions than yours.

Lash wrote:

There is no evidence they didn't collude, Setanta. I'm not denying the best evidence presented, as you said.

I accept it. There were meetings and offers of assistance between them. I strongly suspected this to be the case.

The evidence lends itself more toward my assertions than yours.

Lash, the CIA operative under deep cover, that even the CIA doesn't know about.

You see Lash, rational people look for proof, especially before they rush off and kill thousands of people. "I have an inkling that such and such happened" just doesn't cut it.

Concocting evidence is much much worse and I suspect that your school of red herrings is designed to move the discussion away from those very pertinent FACTS!

There is no evidence they didn't collude, Setanta. I'm not denying the best evidence presented, as you said.

I accept it. There were meetings and offers of assistance between them. I strongly suspected this to be the case.

The evidence lends itself more toward my assertions than yours.

JTT wrote:

Lash wrote:

There is no evidence they didn't collude, Setanta. I'm not denying the best evidence presented, as you said.

I accept it. There were meetings and offers of assistance between them. I strongly suspected this to be the case.

The evidence lends itself more toward my assertions than yours.

Lash, the CIA operative under deep cover, that even the CIA doesn't know about.

You see Lash, rational people look for proof, especially before they rush off and kill thousands of people. "I have an inkling that such and such happened" just doesn't cut it.

Concocting evidence is much much worse and I suspect that your school of red herrings is designed to move the discussion away from those very pertinent FACTS!

Do you hold the media to those same standards? First CBS and now Newsweek. Don't forget about the New York Times and their plagiaristic writer who got fired.

JTT-

The facts are messages and offers of assistance were passed between SH and OBL.

Their relationship, real or imagined, was not the sole reason the war occurred.

The fact is that he forced inspectors to wait around in front of facilities while quite large trucks took off behind those facilities.

The fact is an Iraqi scientist was dragged screaming for help from a UN caravan by SH's goons.

The fact is SH had WMDs previously.

The facts do mean something to me. Do they mean anything to you?

No one has said they're conclusive. But, they are not to be ignored, either.

Baldimo wrote:

JTT wrote:

Lash wrote:

There is no evidence they didn't collude, Setanta. I'm not denying the best evidence presented, as you said.

I accept it. There were meetings and offers of assistance between them. I strongly suspected this to be the case.

The evidence lends itself more toward my assertions than yours.

Lash, the CIA operative under deep cover, that even the CIA doesn't know about.

You see Lash, rational people look for proof, especially before they rush off and kill thousands of people. "I have an inkling that such and such happened" just doesn't cut it.

Concocting evidence is much much worse and I suspect that your school of red herrings is designed to move the discussion away from those very pertinent FACTS!

Do you hold the media to those same standards? First CBS and now Newsweek. Don't forget about the New York Times and their plagiaristic writer who got fired.

Of course I hold the media to the same standard. Which one of those media organizations rushed off and killed thousands of people?

All those media organizations you stated retracted their statements when they proved false. It sure would be nice if you held the President to even that most basic standard.

Since when is 12 years rushing?

Lash wrote:

JTT-

The facts are messages and offers of assistance were passed between SH and OBL.

Their relationship, real or imagined, was not the sole reason the war occurred.

The fact is that he forced inspectors to wait around in front of facilities while quite large trucks took off behind those facilities.

The fact is an Iraqi scientist was dragged screaming for help from a UN caravan by SH's goons.

The fact is SH had WMDs previously.

The facts do mean something to me. Do they mean anything to you?

No one has said they're conclusive. But, they are not to be ignored, either.

If the facts mean something perhaps you could provide your evidence of these facts occurring in 2001 or 2002. I think you just like to make up "facts" then whine that we haven't proved them untrue yet.

Concocting evidence is much much worse and I suspect that your school of red herrings is designed to move the discussion away from those very pertinent FACTS!

JTT wrote:

Lash wrote:

There is no evidence they didn't collude, Setanta. I'm not denying the best evidence presented, as you said.

I accept it. There were meetings and offers of assistance between them. I strongly suspected this to be the case.

The evidence lends itself more toward my assertions than yours.

Lash, the CIA operative under deep cover, that even the CIA doesn't know about.

You see Lash, rational people look for proof, especially before they rush off and kill thousands of people. "I have an inkling that such and such happened" just doesn't cut it.

Concocting evidence is much much worse and I suspect that your school of red herrings is designed to move the discussion away from those very pertinent FACTS!

Do you hold the media to those same standards? First CBS and now Newsweek. Don't forget about the New York Times and their plagiaristic writer who got fired.

JTT-

The facts are messages and offers of assistance were passed between SH and OBL.

Their relationship, real or imagined, was not the sole reason the war occurred.

The fact is that he forced inspectors to wait around in front of facilities while quite large trucks took off behind those facilities.

The fact is an Iraqi scientist was dragged screaming for help from a UN caravan by SH's goons.

The fact is SH had WMDs previously.

The facts do mean something to me. Do they mean anything to you?

No one has said they're conclusive. But, they are not to be ignored, either.

JTT wrote:

Quote:

Concocting evidence is much much worse and I suspect that your school of red herrings is designed to move the discussion away from those very pertinent FACTS!

Got a pretty good idea of your line of thinking here. Care to expand on that statement, so I am not accussed later of putting words in you mouth?