JustWonders wrote:No, but then I've not made any claims one way or the other.
It's dlown (and now you) who are saying that "utterly innocent" Muslims were attacked, but so far seem unable to prove it.
OK, so the logic here, as far as I have followed, is:
- A large crowd of white Australians attacked some Lebanese
- There's been no report that anyone can find that the Lebanese were criminals
- There is a report about an SMS that did the rounds that quite clearly describes xenophobic motives ("help support Leb and wog bashing-day")
- There is a report that describes how the mob ended up attacking "anyone who appeared of Mediterranean ethnicity" - "indiscriminately".
From this, in JW's world, it follows that:
- dlowan is wrong to say that "utterly innocent Muslims were attacked", and needs to be countered and called on to provide conclusive evidence
- cjhsa can be quoted deducing that "suddenly you [Australians]'re attacked by a group of Muslim thugs, who don't like you because you are white", without being questioned in any way about how he arrived at that conclusion
Rrriiight.
Somehow, now
I get the feeling that something's missing...
Or is it just that its so much harder for some to imagine
whites engaging in violence against innocents?